Advice on an additional LoR... Forum

(Applications Advice, Letters of Recommendation . . . )
Post Reply
LSHPFL10

New
Posts: 72
Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 10:12 am

Advice on an additional LoR...

Post by LSHPFL10 » Thu Feb 11, 2010 1:50 pm

To cut to the chase, I have been waitlisted at a couple of schools that I wish to send an additional letter of recommendation to. The letter itself outlines some work experience that I have that may help to differentiate me somewhat as a candidate - thus, I think it could be helpful.

However, my only reservation is this: the letter is written by an individual who has retired from my former place of employment fairly recently (though he held a very high poisition there), and, although it outlines some unique job duties I had, it isn't (as I have been told) necessarily written with the eloquence or skill that a professor-written letter normally is written with.

I am sort of on the fence about how to go about this. Please provide me with any advice you think would be helpful.

Thanks in advance.

User avatar
sapp

Bronze
Posts: 151
Joined: Fri Dec 11, 2009 12:33 pm

Re: Advice on an additional LoR...

Post by sapp » Thu Feb 11, 2010 1:54 pm

If your options are that letter or nothing, send it.

If your options are that letter or a different one, pick which ever one is best.

Tuski

New
Posts: 92
Joined: Mon Dec 21, 2009 3:07 pm

Re: Advice on an additional LoR...

Post by Tuski » Thu Feb 11, 2010 2:06 pm

One of my professional LOR's wasn't written particularly eloquently from what I saw (I only saw a draft though, but I doubt the final draft was much improved based on other things I've seen this person write). At first I had reservations about sending it, but I did and it doesn't seem to have hurt me. My thought is a professional LOR is mostly going to comment on work ethic, character, professional success, and this doesn't have to be done with extremely high-caliber or eloquent writing (it wouldn't necessarily even be expected as much from a professional source as an academic one). Having said that, as the previous poster said, I'd go with a better-written one over a badly-written one, but if it's the badly-written one or nothing, then I think use it.

LSHPFL10

New
Posts: 72
Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 10:12 am

Re: Advice on an additional LoR...

Post by LSHPFL10 » Thu Feb 11, 2010 4:14 pm

Thanks a lot for the replies, guys.

Anyone else care to comment on their advice??

LSHPFL10

New
Posts: 72
Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 10:12 am

Re: Advice on an additional LoR...

Post by LSHPFL10 » Thu Feb 11, 2010 9:55 pm

LSHPFL10 wrote:Thanks a lot for the replies, guys.

Anyone else care to comment on their advice??
Bump.

Norwood

Bronze
Posts: 344
Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 10:13 pm

Re: Advice on an additional LoR...

Post by Norwood » Fri Feb 12, 2010 1:35 am

sapp wrote:If your options are that letter or nothing, send it.

If your options are that letter or a different one, pick which ever one is best.
I agree with the previous two posters. Adcomms aren't evaluating your recommender's writing skills, they're looking at what YOU have accomplished and what potential YOU have to be a law student. View your recommender's letter for its content.

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


Post Reply

Return to “Law School Admissions Forum”