i'm curious what people's thoughts are regarding which of the two above mentioned scenarios is more competitive.
From personal experience, i went to a decent (top 50) private undergrad and majored in business. upon entering the job market i had a lot of opportunities to work at big companies but the positions were always in more of an operational capacity. Despite the fact that i graduated with a 3.9 gpa, getting a front-office analyst position at a big bank seemed nearly impossible while friends of mine at ivy league schools seemed to have no problem whatsoever getting a job at any back of their choice without gpa's even close to mine. based on my undergrad experience i would say going to the right school really made a difference, do you think this is more or less the case in law school?
Job Competition: Undergrad to I-banking vs. LS to Big Law Forum
-
- Posts: 38
- Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 4:49 pm
-
- Posts: 867
- Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2009 1:33 am
-
- Posts: 24
- Joined: Tue May 20, 2008 12:58 am
Re: Job Competition: Undergrad to I-banking vs. LS to Big Law
Here is the principal difference: Ibanking is concentrated in certain cities - NY, LA, Chicago, Atlanta. There are fewer positions for ibanking analysts than there are decent jobs for lawyers. You can graduate with a 4.0 in undergrad but if your school is not highly regarded by an ibanking regional office, you won't get an offer. On the flip side, if you finish with a 3.9 at Univ. Minnesota Law you better believe you will land a sweet job in Minneapolis. Or if you graduate at the top at IUB you can land a great job in Indianapolis. I think for ibanking it matters much more where you went to school, and how well that school is regarded in America's largest markets.
- weaselology
- Posts: 85
- Joined: Sat Nov 21, 2009 5:28 pm
Re: Job Competition: Undergrad to I-banking vs. LS to Big Law
I believe this is true. I worked as an analyst at a bulge bracket right out of undergrad. I was involved in recruiting and we only allowed applicants from approximately 10 schools and basically threw out a resume if the GPA was below a 3.5. This was in M&A, however. For trading roles, it is a bit different.talibkweli wrote:purely as a matter of applicants vs spots, getting an analyst gig at a bulge bracket is more difficult than getting into big law via a t14 law school. by several orders of magnitude, in fact.ixpresxi wrote:i'm curious what people's thoughts are regarding which of the two above mentioned scenarios is more competitive.
From personal experience, i went to a decent (top 50) private undergrad and majored in business. upon entering the job market i had a lot of opportunities to work at big companies but the positions were always in more of an operational capacity. Despite the fact that i graduated with a 3.9 gpa, getting a front-office analyst position at a big bank seemed nearly impossible while friends of mine at ivy league schools seemed to have no problem whatsoever getting a job at any back of their choice without gpa's even close to mine. based on my undergrad experience i would say going to the right school really made a difference, do you think this is more or less the case in law school?
however, for individuals, it depends on the specific circumstances. an all-around impressive girl with a 3.2 at princeton has a much better chance at goldman than cravath. on the other hand, a 4.0 kid from a little known state school has better odds at big law than ibanking.
- englawyer
- Posts: 1271
- Joined: Wed Feb 14, 2007 10:57 pm
Re: Job Competition: Undergrad to I-banking vs. LS to Big Law
school prestige matters in law, but its easier than breaking into banking. if you graduate at the top of a non-elite law school you can still get looked at. it IS however much easier to get biglaw from an elite institution.ixpresxi wrote:i'm curious what people's thoughts are regarding which of the two above mentioned scenarios is more competitive.
From personal experience, i went to a decent (top 50) private undergrad and majored in business. upon entering the job market i had a lot of opportunities to work at big companies but the positions were always in more of an operational capacity. Despite the fact that i graduated with a 3.9 gpa, getting a front-office analyst position at a big bank seemed nearly impossible while friends of mine at ivy league schools seemed to have no problem whatsoever getting a job at any back of their choice without gpa's even close to mine. based on my undergrad experience i would say going to the right school really made a difference, do you think this is more or less the case in law school?
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login