Inequality in LS Admissions Process. Forum

(Applications Advice, Letters of Recommendation . . . )
emalf

New
Posts: 7
Joined: Thu Feb 04, 2010 12:45 pm

Inequality in LS Admissions Process.

Post by emalf » Thu Feb 04, 2010 12:52 pm

Why are law schools so unfair?

This law school process sucks because you see people with lower grades, lesser credentials, and URMS admitted almost at face value. while people like me get dinged because all of our spots are taken by special interest applicants (URMs w/ lower #s), etc.

It's like schools, in general, are trying to make up for the fact that blacks, latinos, etc. were discriminated against by taking it out on people so far removed from the situation (ie, me with my numbers).

Isn't it a given that URM's also, in general, do the worst in law school and tend to be at the bottom of the class, anyways?

Why are whites so disadvantaged in LS admissions??!
Last edited by emalf on Thu Feb 04, 2010 1:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
kittenmittons

Silver
Posts: 1453
Joined: Sun Nov 15, 2009 1:24 pm

Re: Inequality in LS Admissions Process.

Post by kittenmittons » Thu Feb 04, 2010 12:53 pm

IBTL

narkizopoint

Bronze
Posts: 200
Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2009 5:33 pm

Re: Inequality in LS Admissions Process.

Post by narkizopoint » Thu Feb 04, 2010 12:53 pm

The process in inequal because the applicants are inequal...

User avatar
booboo

Silver
Posts: 1032
Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2009 10:39 pm

Re: Inequality in LS Admissions Process.

Post by booboo » Thu Feb 04, 2010 12:53 pm

emalf wrote:Why are law schools so unfair?

I have already been dinged at 4 schools (Stanford, G'Town, BU and GW). That wouldn't be too big of deal other than the fact that I have a 3.9/168 (non-URM) and was Vice President of my UG student government body. I also have no criminal offenses and partake in community service.

This law school process sucks because you see people with lower grades, lesser credentials, and URMS admitted almost at face value. while people like me get dinged because all of our spots are taken by special interest applicants (URMs w/ lower #s), etc.

It's like schools, in general, are trying to make up for the fact that blacks, latinos, etc. were discriminated against by taking it out on people so far removed from the situation (ie, me with my numbers).

Isn't it a given that URM's also, in general, do the worst in law school and tend to be at the bottom of the class, anyways?

Why are whites so disadvantaged in LS admissions??!
Seriously?

kentee15

New
Posts: 21
Joined: Mon Feb 01, 2010 4:18 pm

Re: Inequality in LS Admissions Process.

Post by kentee15 » Thu Feb 04, 2010 12:53 pm

bullshit u got rejected from GW with those numbers unless whoever wrote your apps wrote horrible things about you

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


CyLaw

Gold
Posts: 1551
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2008 1:59 pm

Re: Inequality in LS Admissions Process.

Post by CyLaw » Thu Feb 04, 2010 12:54 pm

kentee15 wrote:bullshit u got rejected from GW with those numbers unless whoever wrote your apps wrote horrible things about you
I think this post was OP's PS, so that could explain the GW ding.

User avatar
scribelaw

Silver
Posts: 760
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2009 3:27 pm

Re: Inequality in LS Admissions Process.

Post by scribelaw » Thu Feb 04, 2010 12:54 pm

You got dinged at GW and BU with a 169/3.8?

I call bullshit. Either that or the entitled douchebaggery evident in your OP came through in your application.

oneforship

Silver
Posts: 1004
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2008 5:17 pm

Re: Inequality in LS Admissions Process.

Post by oneforship » Thu Feb 04, 2010 12:54 pm

kittenmittons wrote:IBTL

User avatar
s0ph1e2007

Silver
Posts: 1043
Joined: Sat Oct 10, 2009 10:37 pm

Re: Inequality in LS Admissions Process.

Post by s0ph1e2007 » Thu Feb 04, 2010 12:55 pm

Flame flame flame flame flame

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


emalf

New
Posts: 7
Joined: Thu Feb 04, 2010 12:45 pm

Re: Inequality in LS Admissions Process.

Post by emalf » Thu Feb 04, 2010 12:55 pm

booboo wrote:
emalf wrote:Why are law schools so unfair?

I have already been dinged at 4 schools (Stanford, G'Town, BU and GW). That wouldn't be too big of deal other than the fact that I have a 3.9/168 (non-URM) and was Vice President of my UG student government body. I also have no criminal offenses and partake in community service.

This law school process sucks because you see people with lower grades, lesser credentials, and URMS admitted almost at face value. while people like me get dinged because all of our spots are taken by special interest applicants (URMs w/ lower #s), etc.

It's like schools, in general, are trying to make up for the fact that blacks, latinos, etc. were discriminated against by taking it out on people so far removed from the situation (ie, me with my numbers).

Isn't it a given that URM's also, in general, do the worst in law school and tend to be at the bottom of the class, anyways?

Why are whites so disadvantaged in LS admissions??!
Seriously?
I'm so serious. I was getting pissed writing this. I have 4 more schools to hear from. But this process is bullshit. especially when people with lower numbers are taken into those same schools.

User avatar
UFMatt

Bronze
Posts: 404
Joined: Sun Jul 26, 2009 2:59 pm

Re: Inequality in LS Admissions Process.

Post by UFMatt » Thu Feb 04, 2010 12:55 pm

White splitters are "special interest" applicants? :)

My advice to you, assuming this isn't a flame, is not to post when you're upset. It makes you look foolish. Stanford and Georgetown are by no means locks with your stats. Not getting into BU or GW is unfortunate, but that's why it's wise to apply to 12+ schools.

User avatar
sandiecohen47

Bronze
Posts: 178
Joined: Tue Nov 24, 2009 9:37 pm

Re: Inequality in LS Admissions Process.

Post by sandiecohen47 » Thu Feb 04, 2010 12:55 pm

I really hope this is a flame.

User avatar
booboo

Silver
Posts: 1032
Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2009 10:39 pm

Re: Inequality in LS Admissions Process.

Post by booboo » Thu Feb 04, 2010 12:55 pm

kentee15 wrote:bullshit u got rejected from GW with those numbers unless whoever wrote your apps wrote horrible things about you
Pretty sure you'd have to write a scathing PS about how URM's are undeserving to go to law school without the requisite numbers, and then spitting on the PS would keep you out. (I am guessing that is what happened here.)

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


meowmeow

Bronze
Posts: 165
Joined: Thu Nov 19, 2009 5:45 pm

Re: Inequality in LS Admissions Process.

Post by meowmeow » Thu Feb 04, 2010 12:55 pm

Maybe you are just boring

APimpNamedSlickback

Silver
Posts: 867
Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2009 1:33 am

Re: Inequality in LS Admissions Process.

Post by APimpNamedSlickback » Thu Feb 04, 2010 12:55 pm

i think it doesnt help anyone to have a silent majority of pissed off people thinking they are being screwed by affirmative action and stuff.

op, i sympathize with your frustration, but remember a couple things:

1. no one is entitled to a spot because of their numbers. ultimately its for the admissions people to select kids on teh basis of a whole host of considerations. you are betraying an insane degree of conceit in acting like you know more than they do.

2. the "special" admits you refer to are few in number. you would have likely been pwned by another white guy had AA never existed.

hth

User avatar
Mr. Matlock

Silver
Posts: 1356
Joined: Thu Nov 27, 2008 6:36 pm

Re: Inequality in LS Admissions Process.

Post by Mr. Matlock » Thu Feb 04, 2010 12:56 pm

emalf wrote:Why are law schools so unfair?

I have already been dinged at 4 schools (Stanford, G'Town, BU and GW). That wouldn't be too big of deal other than the fact that I have a 3.9/168 (non-URM) and was Vice President of my UG student government body. I also have no criminal offenses and partake in community service.

This law school process sucks because you see people with lower grades, lesser credentials, and URMS admitted almost at face value. while people like me get dinged because all of our spots are taken by special interest applicants (URMs w/ lower #s), etc.

It's like schools, in general, are trying to make up for the fact that blacks, latinos, etc. were discriminated against by taking it out on people so far removed from the situation (ie, me with my numbers).

Isn't it a given that URM's also, in general, do the worst in law school and tend to be at the bottom of the class, anyways?

Why are whites so disadvantaged in LS admissions??!
Dude, if your PS/Resume was anything like this post... IT SCREAMS WHINEY LITTLE DOUCHE!!!! I'd check on that and possibly re-submit if you get a chance.

Also, IBTL.

User avatar
NayBoer

Silver
Posts: 1013
Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 3:24 pm

Re: Inequality in LS Admissions Process.

Post by NayBoer » Thu Feb 04, 2010 12:57 pm

Wait, URMs might be getting a special boost? Clearly we need our top investigative reporters to get to the bottom of this. Thanks for your sharp eye, OP. Without you, we'd have never noticed.

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


User avatar
s0ph1e2007

Silver
Posts: 1043
Joined: Sat Oct 10, 2009 10:37 pm

Re: Inequality in LS Admissions Process.

Post by s0ph1e2007 » Thu Feb 04, 2010 12:57 pm

Seriously
Huge FLAME

someone should lock this

Mosca

Bronze
Posts: 251
Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2008 7:10 am

Re: Inequality in LS Admissions Process.

Post by Mosca » Thu Feb 04, 2010 12:57 pm

emalf wrote:
Isn't it a given that URM's also, in general, do the worst in law school and tend to be at the bottom of the class, anyways?
Your personal statement sucks.

User avatar
Sauer Grapes

Silver
Posts: 1222
Joined: Wed Dec 16, 2009 11:02 am

Re: Inequality in LS Admissions Process.

Post by Sauer Grapes » Thu Feb 04, 2010 12:57 pm

emalf wrote:Why are law schools so unfair?

I have already been dinged at 4 schools (Stanford, G'Town, BU and GW). That wouldn't be too big of deal other than the fact that I have a 3.9/168 (non-URM) and was Vice President of my UG student government body. I also have no criminal offenses and partake in community service.
scribelaw wrote:You got dinged at GW and BU with a 169/3.8?

I call bullshit. Either that or the entitled douchebaggery evident in your OP came through in your application.
Hi, I'm Dyslexia, have we met?
Last edited by Sauer Grapes on Thu Feb 04, 2010 12:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.

emalf

New
Posts: 7
Joined: Thu Feb 04, 2010 12:45 pm

Re: Inequality in LS Admissions Process.

Post by emalf » Thu Feb 04, 2010 12:58 pm

talibkweli wrote:i think it doesnt help anyone to have a silent majority of pissed off people thinking they are being screwed by affirmative action and stuff.

op, i sympathize with your frustration, but remember a couple things:

1. no one is entitled to a spot because of their numbers. ultimately its for the admissions people to select kids on teh basis of a whole host of considerations. you are betraying an insane degree of conceit in acting like you know more than they do.

2. the "special" admits you refer to are few in number. you would have likely been pwned by another white guy had AA never existed.

hth

how many more people are there with #s higher than 3.9/168? you probably got in somewhere better with lower numbers because of affirmative action.

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!


User avatar
Sauer Grapes

Silver
Posts: 1222
Joined: Wed Dec 16, 2009 11:02 am

Re: Inequality in LS Admissions Process.

Post by Sauer Grapes » Thu Feb 04, 2010 12:58 pm

deleted, quoting and editing fail on my part.
Last edited by Sauer Grapes on Thu Feb 04, 2010 12:59 pm, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
puppleberry finn

Silver
Posts: 1035
Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 7:03 pm

Re: Inequality in LS Admissions Process.

Post by puppleberry finn » Thu Feb 04, 2010 12:59 pm

emalf wrote: how many more people are there with #s higher than 3.9/168? you probably got in somewhere better with lower numbers because of affirmative action.
talib's #'s pwn you


hth

CyLaw

Gold
Posts: 1551
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2008 1:59 pm

Re: Inequality in LS Admissions Process.

Post by CyLaw » Thu Feb 04, 2010 12:59 pm

Mods really should start enforcing the no alts rule.

D. H2Oman

Platinum
Posts: 7445
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2009 5:47 am

Re: Inequality in LS Admissions Process.

Post by D. H2Oman » Thu Feb 04, 2010 1:00 pm

El tago

Seriously? What are you waiting for?

Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!


Locked

Return to “Law School Admissions Forum”