I'd be in the "auto-reject" pile as wellzeglo wrote:If I had a 157 and 3.6, there's no chance I'd even get in to those schools, let alone get money.
Who's Outperformed Their Numbers? Forum
- Nachoo2019
- Posts: 798
- Joined: Fri Jan 01, 2016 2:04 pm
Re: Who's Outperformed Their Numbers?
- tuxedocat
- Posts: 863
- Joined: Mon Feb 02, 2015 3:41 pm
Re: Who's Outperformed Their Numbers?
I think I outperformed my numbers at every school I applied to, but most notable were Northwestern and GULC. 2.9/170.
GULC was regular cycle but NU was off the waitlist in the summer, so holding out hope can actually work out, especially as a splitter.
GULC was regular cycle but NU was off the waitlist in the summer, so holding out hope can actually work out, especially as a splitter.
- Lexaholik
- Posts: 233
- Joined: Fri May 31, 2013 10:44 am
Re: Who's Outperformed Their Numbers?
Spot on advice about holding out hope. I had the exact same numbers as you (2.9/170) and got in off the summer WL at NU.tuxedocat wrote:I think I outperformed my numbers at every school I applied to, but most notable were Northwestern and GULC. 2.9/170.
GULC was regular cycle but NU was off the waitlist in the summer, so holding out hope can actually work out, especially as a splitter.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login