C/O 2017 Median LSAT/GPA/Class Size Forum

[ms9]

Colorado is a 161 LSAT median
3.62 GPA median
168 students

[should-i-do-it]

Colorado is a 161 LSAT median
3.62 GPA median
168 students

Thanks Bro!

[ChiLaw]

Duke is out

http://law.duke.edu/admis/classprofile/

[SplitMyPants]

Duke is out

http://law.duke.edu/admis/classprofile/

Maintained medians and raised both 25ths while increasing class size. Not bad.

[ms9]

Duke is out

http://law.duke.edu/admis/classprofile/

Maintained medians and raised both 25ths while increasing class size. Not bad.

I think the higher up you go, the better the results you will see (with some outliers for sure) and visa versa the lower down you go. I doubt this is a startling prognostication to most.

[Moneytrees]

I agree with Spivey. However, you have to imagine that some T14 schools will take a hit. I'm not sure which ones, but I have a hard time believing that all the T14 schools could maintain their medians given that apps were down close to 10% last year. I don't think we will see anything utterly shocking, but schools with big class sizes will be hard pressed to maintain their medians.

[should-i-do-it]

moaaaar medians

[Colonel_funkadunk]

moaaaar medians

[logicspeaks]

At USC orientation today they said the class size was 205 with 3.76/166 medians.

[Mack.Hambleton]

At USC orientation today they said the class size was 205 with 3.76/166 medians.

C/O 2016 numbers for reference: 166/3.7 (175 students)

[whitespider]

All these school with bigger classes and holding their medians.

With apps down, something's gotta give. Which schools really dropped the ball?

[Mack.Hambleton]

Also OP or whoever can edit the spreadsheet, Berkeley's 25th LSAT should be -2 (not +1, went from 166 to 164)

[MikeJD]

At USC orientation today they said the class size was 205 with 3.76/166 medians.

That's got to be a mistake. I was told by a friend who is attending they were aiming for a 167 with a class of 150-160.. So much for that.

[ms9]

At USC orientation today they said the class size was 205 with 3.76/166 medians.

That's got to be a mistake. I was told by a friend who is attending they were aiming for a 167 with a class of 150-160.. So much for that.

They both could be true. USC was way up at applications this year -- I spoke to their dean of admissions a few months ago and their dean a few weeks ago. They admitted something like 220 off the waitlist last year and less than 10 this year. So perhaps they targeted 167 and a class of 150-160 but got a larger class due to the increase in interest.

[ms9]

Someone please correct me if this is false, but didn't multiple people have access to updating the spreadsheet last year? Not that it really matters but I feel like it was updated almost spontaneously last year...or maybe I am just less patient this year.

[rebexness]

Someone please correct me if this is false, but didn't multiple people have access to updating the spreadsheet last year? Not that it really matters but I feel like it was updated almost spontaneously last year...or maybe I am just less patient this year.

I think that ended up with a lot of the data being messed up by trolly types and also people who aren't good at spreadsheets.

[ms9]

Someone please correct me if this is false, but didn't multiple people have access to updating the spreadsheet last year? Not that it really matters but I feel like it was updated almost spontaneously last year...or maybe I am just less patient this year.

I think that ended up with a lot of the data being messed up by trolly types and also people who aren't good at spreadsheets.

That may or may not have been me.

[jk148706]

Duke/Vandy/USC all hold medians? I'm finished in the contest.

Also -- though I understand the need for limited access to the spreadsheet, whoever has those privileges should add one or two people who can be trusted to edit and can do it quickly (not me).

[MikeJD]

Duke/Vandy/USC all hold medians? I'm finished in the contest.

Also -- though I understand the need for limited access to the spreadsheet, whoever has those privileges should add one or two people who can be trusted to edit and can do it quickly (not me).

Vandy and USC still not up on their website like Duke so it might change?

[ms9]

Duke/Vandy/USC all hold medians? I'm finished in the contest.

Also -- though I understand the need for limited access to the spreadsheet, whoever has those privileges should add one or two people who can be trusted to edit and can do it quickly (not me).

Vandy and USC still not up on their website like Duke so it might change?

It all might change, because the submission date to ABA will be in Oct, but for the record I just got confirmation on USC

[blueberrycrumble]

Also OP or whoever can edit the spreadsheet, Berkeley's 25th LSAT should be -2 (not +1, went from 166 to 164)

Someone else ITT mentioned that the ABA report was 163 so I changed it to that...
I changed it back to 166 as you said though

Can you someone confirm which one is right?

[blueberrycrumble]

Duke/Vandy/USC all hold medians? I'm finished in the contest.

Also -- though I understand the need for limited access to the spreadsheet, whoever has those privileges should add one or two people who can be trusted to edit and can do it quickly (not me).

Sorry for the delay guys, I've been really busy the past few days. Spreadsheet is all up to date though.

Also, taking volunteers (maybe 2 or 3?) to help out with updating the spreadsheet as they start flooding in; pm me your gmail email address if you're interested. - Will not be making it an open spreadsheet though as that's just asking for trouble

[Huskies13!]

TTT time:
http://www.mcgeorge.edu/News/Pacific_Mc ... d_2018.htm
156 students
151 LSAT (down from 154!!)
3.14 (down from 3.24)

Looks like the pain is trickling down...

[Tiago Splitter]

TTT time:
http://www.mcgeorge.edu/News/Pacific_Mc ... d_2018.htm
156 students
151 LSAT (down from 154!!)
3.14 (down from 3.24)

Looks like the pain is trickling down...

Ok now we're having some fun.

[Winston1984]

TTT time:
http://www.mcgeorge.edu/News/Pacific_Mc ... d_2018.htm
156 students
151 LSAT (down from 154!!)
3.14 (down from 3.24)

Looks like the pain is trickling down...

Ok now we're having some fun.