Except that MIT/Caltech > all otherscrackberry wrote:I am very proud of the sea change I seem to have initiated on TLS (using solely this thread as my evidence) that the upper tier of UGs should be HYPS and not just HYP. I feel this is an appropriate legacy.
True or False: a 3.5 from HYPS > 3.8 from a T15-20 undergrad Forum
-
- Posts: 1500
- Joined: Fri Nov 06, 2009 11:39 pm
Re: True or False: a 3.5 from HYPS > 3.8 from a T15-20 undergrad
-
- Posts: 142
- Joined: Sat Apr 03, 2010 2:18 am
Re: True or False: a 3.5 from HYPS > 3.8 from a T15-20 undergrad
Hahaha in some ways. I know a lot of Caltech kids that can't have a simple conversation. But then again, I'm sure they'll laugh at my inability to comprehend quantum physicsflcath wrote: Except that MIT/Caltech > all others
- somewhatwayward
- Posts: 1442
- Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2009 5:10 pm
Re: True or False: a 3.5 from HYPS > 3.8 from a T15-20 undergrad
heh, well, i added that partially bc i was responding to you, but i do consider them on the same level....my sis goes there.....and i might've gone, if i had gotten incrackberry wrote:I am very proud of the sea change I seem to have initiated on TLS (using solely this thread as my evidence) that the upper tier of UGs should be HYPS and not just HYP. I feel this is an appropriate legacy.

- Na_Swatch
- Posts: 467
- Joined: Sun Sep 20, 2009 4:40 pm
Re: True or False: a 3.5 from HYPS > 3.8 from a T15-20 undergrad
Actually it appears, for the top law schools (especially HYSCC), that coming from any of the T20 Undergrad will provide a boost during your admissions. It really seems like a strong GPA from any of these UGs will provide a slight moderating effect on your LSAT if its low/median...
Of course HYP will still get the biggest boost, but just from cycle information (and looking at the lists of attendees for the ASW at one of the HYS), there definitely is some kind of advantage conferred by top undergrads that extends beyond just top 5. Self-selection is still a factor, of course, but for HYS it seems like the 3.8~3.9s from a good UG are in a different tier than the 3.8s~3.9s of lower schools.
Of course HYP will still get the biggest boost, but just from cycle information (and looking at the lists of attendees for the ASW at one of the HYS), there definitely is some kind of advantage conferred by top undergrads that extends beyond just top 5. Self-selection is still a factor, of course, but for HYS it seems like the 3.8~3.9s from a good UG are in a different tier than the 3.8s~3.9s of lower schools.
-
- Posts: 248
- Joined: Sat Oct 17, 2009 4:18 pm
Re: True or False: a 3.5 from HYPS > 3.8 from a T15-20 undergrad
for some reason, whenever i see your name, i think of "<adjective> anti-Stanford trolling"crackberry wrote:I am very proud of the sea change I seem to have initiated on TLS (using solely this thread as my evidence) that the upper tier of UGs should be HYPS and not just HYP. I feel this is an appropriate legacy.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 156
- Joined: Fri Dec 25, 2009 4:41 pm
Re: True or False: a 3.5 from HYPS > 3.8 from a T15-20 undergrad
As far as I have heard, HYPS and Penn have ridiculous grade inflation, making it nearly impossible not to get an A in a course. Schools like Chi, NU, and Cornel (undergrad) are notorious for being much harder, so I am pretty sure that they are weighed just as heavily.
- crackberry
- Posts: 3252
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm
Re: True or False: a 3.5 from HYPS > 3.8 from a T15-20 undergrad
Totally depends on your major, at least at Stanford. Also, Princeton most certainly does not have rampant grade inflation.pelmen74 wrote:As far as I have heard, HYPS and Penn have ridiculous grade inflation, making it nearly impossible not to get an A in a course. Schools like Chi, NU, and Cornel (undergrad) are notorious for being much harder, so I am pretty sure that they are weighed just as heavily.