Latest employment data Forum

071816 · Post by **071816** » Mon Apr 13, 2015 4:31 pm

ED PONTIFICAL CATHOLIC

AT9 · Post by **AT9** » Mon Apr 13, 2015 4:32 pm

MT Cicero wrote:
AT9 wrote:
JFO1833 wrote:Many new ones today:

47: Wake Forest - BL+FC-18%, FTLTBR-68%, FTLTBR (w/o LSF)-67%
http://career.law.wfu.edu/files/2015/04 ... BA2015.pdf
Maybe I'm missing something, but I think FTLTBR - long-term school funded (none) should be 71% (133/187). Without solos, it's 69% (128/187).

Regardless, glad to see that our stats have improved from last year's abysmal rates (with a much larger class size, too).
It is without solos. And 128/187 = 68.4% = 68% rounded. Also, there are 3 LSF, not none. 125/187 = 66.8% = 67% rounded.

I think that's the math anyway.

I see the discrepancy. The ABA PDF shows 3 LTSF, but the website shows them as short term: http://career.law.wfu.edu/stats/

Saddle Up wrote:
JFO1833 wrote:[145: South Dakota - BL+FC-2%, FTLTBR-67%, FTLTBR (w/o LSF)-67%
Impressed. That outcome certainly rocks...

Way to go USD.

UVAIce · Post by **UVAIce** » Mon Apr 13, 2015 4:33 pm

I'm just going to assume the 1% is a rounding error of some sort.

BrazilBandit · Post by **BrazilBandit** » Mon Apr 13, 2015 4:33 pm

Can someone at least get them a decent scanner?

rpupkin · Post by **rpupkin** » Mon Apr 13, 2015 4:34 pm

Tiago Splitter wrote:Pontifical Catholic really hitting it out of the park.

Business jobs.

MT Cicero · Post by **MT Cicero** » Mon Apr 13, 2015 4:35 pm

rpupkin wrote:
Tiago Splitter wrote:Pontifical Catholic really hitting it out of the park.
Business jobs.

Tiago Splitter · Post by **Tiago Splitter** » Mon Apr 13, 2015 4:35 pm

~~The Northwestern of Puerto Rico~~
The Pontifical Catholic of Illinois

BigZuck · Post by **BigZuck** » Mon Apr 13, 2015 4:38 pm

They have a Sports and Entertainment Law Society according to Wikipedia

Desert Fox · Post by **Desert Fox** » Mon Apr 13, 2015 4:39 pm

They have the "I defrauded MLB regarding my age" law LOCKED DOWN.

LET'S GET IT · Post by **LET'S GET IT** » Mon Apr 13, 2015 4:42 pm

BigZuck wrote:They have a Sports and Entertainment Law Society according to Wikipedia

So if I transfer there I have a decent shot of being Lebron and Denzel's agent you think?

KMart · Post by **KMart** » Mon Apr 13, 2015 4:44 pm

LET'S GET IT wrote:
BigZuck wrote:They have a Sports and Entertainment Law Society according to Wikipedia
So if I transfer there I have a decent shot of being Lebron and Denzel's agent you think?

At a minimum you're looking at NBA role players and a slew of B-list actors.

LET'S GET IT · Post by **LET'S GET IT** » Mon Apr 13, 2015 4:59 pm

KMart wrote:
LET'S GET IT wrote:
BigZuck wrote:They have a Sports and Entertainment Law Society according to Wikipedia
So if I transfer there I have a decent shot of being Lebron and Denzel's agent you think?
At a minimum you're looking at NBA role players and a slew of B-list actors.

So, like, Kevin Love and Don Cheadle? I'll have to think about this.

JFO1833 · Post by **JFO1833** » Mon Apr 13, 2015 5:00 pm

I had guessed there would be far more discussion of NYU than Pontifical Catholic.

sesto elemento · Post by **sesto elemento** » Mon Apr 13, 2015 5:05 pm

JFO1833 wrote:I had guessed there would be far more discussion of NYU than Pontifical Catholic.

Nah, NYU has a bigger PI crew than Penn so the Biglaw + Clerkship numbers reflect that.

Moneytrees · Post by **Moneytrees** » Mon Apr 13, 2015 5:19 pm

Little surprised that Minnesota still is ranked so highly. Seems to me that the employment outcomes don't justify the cost. It has pretty good placement, but when you consider that cost of attendance is 60k for residents and 66k for non-residents, it just sort of looks out of place in the top 20.

It would be a fantastic school if it cut tuition for residents by like half, but as it stands it just seems grossly overrated.

runinthefront · Post by **runinthefront** » Mon Apr 13, 2015 5:25 pm

I mean, Emory is employing 1/5 of its students for like ~12k more per year and it's only doing like 9% better in terms of BL+FC. You're right though, both are pretty overrated for T-20 schools

071816 · Post by **071816** » Mon Apr 13, 2015 5:27 pm

runinthefront wrote:I mean, Emory is employing 1/5 of it's students for like ~12k more per year and it's only doing like 9% better in terms of BL+FC. You're right though, both are pretty overrated for T-20 schools

Neither school can hold a candle to PONTIFICAL CATHOLIC.

chuckbass · Post by **chuckbass** » Mon Apr 13, 2015 5:27 pm

It must be shocking that TLS parrots "rankings don't matter"

Moneytrees · Post by **Moneytrees** » Mon Apr 13, 2015 5:28 pm

runinthefront wrote:I mean, Emory is employing 1/5 of its students for like ~12k more per year and it's only doing like 9% better in terms of BL+FC. You're right though, both are pretty overrated for T-20 schools

Yeah, Emory is definitely not a top 20 school in terms of placement by any relevant measure.

runinthefront · Post by **runinthefront** » Mon Apr 13, 2015 5:30 pm

scottidsntknow wrote:It must be shocking that TLS parrots "rankings don't matter"

not shocking, but I think, as one poster noted earlier...it's simply crazy how precipitous the drop is in terms of outcomes as you go from like...Penn to WUSTL or GULC to Emory (whether you're ranking solely on BL+FC or US News/ATL). It's crazy because there's really only like 6-10 better schools in between.

chuckbass · Post by **chuckbass** » Mon Apr 13, 2015 5:31 pm

runinthefront wrote:
scottidsntknow wrote:It must be shocking that TLS parrots "rankings don't matter"
not shocking, but I think, as one poster noted earlier...it's simply crazy how precipitous the drop is in terms of outcomes as you go from like...Penn to WUSTL or GULC to Emory (whether you're ranking solely on BL+FC or US News/ATL). It's crazy because there's really only like 6-10 better schools in between.

Whoosh

runinthefront · Post by **runinthefront** » Mon Apr 13, 2015 5:34 pm

scottidsntknow wrote:
runinthefront wrote:
scottidsntknow wrote:It must be shocking that TLS parrots "rankings don't matter"
not shocking, but I think, as one poster noted earlier...it's simply crazy how precipitous the drop is in terms of outcomes as you go from like...Penn to WUSTL or GULC to Emory (whether you're ranking solely on BL+FC or US News/ATL). It's crazy because there's really only like 6-10 better schools in between.
Whoosh

Oh, no, your sarcasm didn't go over my head. I got it...just ignored it.

storpappa · Post by **storpappa** » Mon Apr 13, 2015 5:37 pm

runinthefront wrote:
scottidsntknow wrote:
runinthefront wrote:
scottidsntknow wrote:It must be shocking that TLS parrots "rankings don't matter"
not shocking, but I think, as one poster noted earlier...it's simply crazy how precipitous the drop is in terms of outcomes as you go from like...Penn to WUSTL or GULC to Emory (whether you're ranking solely on BL+FC or US News/ATL). It's crazy because there's really only like 6-10 better schools in between.
Whoosh
Oh, no, your sarcasm didn't go over my head. I got it...just ignored it.

+1

Manteca · Post by **Manteca** » Mon Apr 13, 2015 5:39 pm

less posting more data

Moneytrees · Post by **Moneytrees** » Mon Apr 13, 2015 5:44 pm

Manteca wrote:less posting more data

Gratuitous post about posting.

Latest employment data Forum

Re: Latest employment data

Re: Latest employment data

Re: Latest employment data

Re: Latest employment data

Re: Latest employment data

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Re: Latest employment data

Re: Latest employment data

Re: Latest employment data

Re: Latest employment data

Register for access!

Re: Latest employment data

Re: Latest employment data

Re: Latest employment data

Re: Latest employment data

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

Re: Latest employment data

Re: Latest employment data

Re: Latest employment data

Re: Latest employment data

Register now!

Re: Latest employment data

Re: Latest employment data

Re: Latest employment data

Re: Latest employment data

Register now, it's still FREE!

Re: Latest employment data

Re: Latest employment data

Re: Latest employment data

Re: Latest employment data

Seriously? What are you waiting for?