JUST RETAKE BRO Forum
- ronanOgara
- Posts: 1554
- Joined: Mon Jun 03, 2013 10:40 pm
Re: JUST RETAKE BRO
No time to look it up. Still marveling at your top 25% T1 statusGifted Hands wrote:well it wasn't meant to be a brag considering that's like bottom 1/10 on this site. satire-look it upronanOgara wrote:*Said right after bragging about his class and school rank.Gifted Hands wrote:Jesus, you epitomize the elitism here



-
- Posts: 288
- Joined: Mon May 02, 2016 7:44 pm
Re: JUST RETAKE BRO
post stats or gtfronanOgara wrote:No time to look it up. Still marveling at your top 25% T1 statusGifted Hands wrote:well it wasn't meant to be a brag considering that's like bottom 1/10 on this site. satire-look it upronanOgara wrote:*Said right after bragging about his class and school rank.Gifted Hands wrote:Jesus, you epitomize the elitism here![]()
![]()
-
- Posts: 288
- Joined: Mon May 02, 2016 7:44 pm
Re: JUST RETAKE BRO
i think we should include it in our profiles like those guys at bodybuilding.com like max bench squat and deadlift
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- somethingElse
- Posts: 4007
- Joined: Sat Jul 04, 2015 1:09 pm
Re: JUST RETAKE BRO
Already a feature broGifted Hands wrote:i think we should include it in our profiles like those guys at bodybuilding.com like max bench squat and deadlift
-
- Posts: 288
- Joined: Mon May 02, 2016 7:44 pm
Re: JUST RETAKE BRO
yea but on bodybuilding, you know who to take advice from and who not to based on their stats- you don't take advice from the sub-200 pounders. and yea but no actually clicks on ppl's profiles,,,, wait yea, on this site they prob dosomethingElse wrote:Already a feature broGifted Hands wrote:i think we should include it in our profiles like those guys at bodybuilding.com like max bench squat and deadlift
- somethingElse
- Posts: 4007
- Joined: Sat Jul 04, 2015 1:09 pm
Re: JUST RETAKE BRO
broGifted Hands wrote:yea but on bodybuilding, you know who to take advice from and who not to based on their stats- you don't take advice from the sub-200 pounders. and yea but no actually clicks on ppl's profiles,,,, wait yea, on this site they prob dosomethingElse wrote:Already a feature broGifted Hands wrote:i think we should include it in our profiles like those guys at bodybuilding.com like max bench squat and deadlift
-
- Posts: 288
- Joined: Mon May 02, 2016 7:44 pm
Re: JUST RETAKE BRO
let's stay on topic folks
- somethingElse
- Posts: 4007
- Joined: Sat Jul 04, 2015 1:09 pm
Re: JUST RETAKE BRO
What shall we discuss?Gifted Hands wrote:let's stay on topic folks
-
- Posts: 288
- Joined: Mon May 02, 2016 7:44 pm
Re: JUST RETAKE BRO
the goal is to have a healthy, adversarial debate about why ppl should not retakesomethingElse wrote:What shall we discuss?Gifted Hands wrote:let's stay on topic folks
- pancakes3
- Posts: 6619
- Joined: Sun Jul 20, 2014 2:49 pm
Re: JUST RETAKE BRO
how about the difference between sarcasm and satire?
- somethingElse
- Posts: 4007
- Joined: Sat Jul 04, 2015 1:09 pm
Re: JUST RETAKE BRO
That's too broad though bro we need context.Gifted Hands wrote:the goal is to have a healthy, adversarial debate about why ppl should not retakesomethingElse wrote:What shall we discuss?Gifted Hands wrote:let's stay on topic folks
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Mullens
- Posts: 1138
- Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2013 1:34 am
Re: JUST RETAKE BRO
http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 4&t=264398Gifted Hands wrote:let's stay on topic folks
That thread is the best argument for retaking. Instead of risking striking out at a T1, you could've been biglaw safe if you had retaken and gone to a better school. And you'd probably have less debt.
- rpupkin
- Posts: 5653
- Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 10:32 pm
Re: JUST RETAKE BRO
Got it. Here's another argument against retaking: In law school, when you take an exam and get a grade you do not like, do you get to ask the professor to "retake" the exam for a higher grade? Of course not. By retaking the LSAT again and again, you are learning bad habits that will serve you poorly in law school.Gifted Hands wrote:the goal is to have a healthy, adversarial debate about why ppl should not retakesomethingElse wrote:What shall we discuss?Gifted Hands wrote:let's stay on topic folks
- jbagelboy
- Posts: 10361
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 7:57 pm
Re: JUST RETAKE BRO
this is disgusting.
between this and the other threads there's definitely sufficient content for a BoW ban
between this and the other threads there's definitely sufficient content for a BoW ban
-
- Posts: 288
- Joined: Mon May 02, 2016 7:44 pm
Re: JUST RETAKE BRO
this is ridiculous. I bet you support college's like Missouri trying to shut down speech you don't agree with.jbagelboy wrote:this is disgusting.
between this and the other threads there's definitely sufficient content for a BoW ban
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- pancakes3
- Posts: 6619
- Joined: Sun Jul 20, 2014 2:49 pm
Re: JUST RETAKE BRO
it's one thing to censor. it's another to enforce fraud.
- Nachoo2019
- Posts: 798
- Joined: Fri Jan 01, 2016 2:04 pm
Re: JUST RETAKE BRO
No you should be banned so that an 0L scrolling through this site don't see your advice/comments/thoughts and take them seriously.Gifted Hands wrote:this is ridiculous. I bet you support college's like Missouri trying to shut down speech you don't agree with.jbagelboy wrote:this is disgusting.
between this and the other threads there's definitely sufficient content for a BoW ban
Everything you have said on TLS has either been one big troll or you just truly have no clue what you're talking about.
- MKC
- Posts: 16246
- Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2012 10:18 am
Re: JUST RETAKE BRO
TLS is not in any way a public institution. It exists to give good advice to prospective and current law students. Your advice is objectively terrible. A BOW ban for giving said advice seems appropriate, if a little premature. I would settle for a month to see if you calm down when you come back.Gifted Hands wrote:this is ridiculous. I bet you support college's like Missouri trying to shut down speech you don't agree with.jbagelboy wrote:this is disgusting.
between this and the other threads there's definitely sufficient content for a BoW ban
Last edited by MKC on Sat Jan 27, 2018 5:39 pm, edited 2 times in total.
- jbagelboy
- Posts: 10361
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 7:57 pm
Re: JUST RETAKE BRO
I'm actually a huge proponent of free campus speech and permitting diversity of intellectual voices at universities, and I have substantial concerns regarding the recent movement toward the political censorship resulting from angsty misinterpretations of progressive thought. But that's neither here nor there.Gifted Hands wrote:this is ridiculous. I bet you support college's like Missouri trying to shut down speech you don't agree with.jbagelboy wrote:this is disgusting.
between this and the other threads there's definitely sufficient content for a BoW ban
The rhetorical excrement you've dribbled across multiple pages in this forum do not rise to the level of "difference" or even any manner of discourse at all. It's just inartful trolling at best. We shall not become the enablers of cowardice and stupidity in gratifying your bizarre irredeemable pursuit of spreading financial ruin and career suicide.
ETA: also everything the terrific posters just said above me.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- somethingElse
- Posts: 4007
- Joined: Sat Jul 04, 2015 1:09 pm
Re: JUST RETAKE BRO
Vegas odds updated to 2-1.
- EnderWiggin
- Posts: 1217
- Joined: Wed Nov 12, 2014 9:55 pm
Re: JUST RETAKE BRO
jbagelboy wrote:
The rhetorical excrement you've dribbled across multiple pages in this forum
- gsy987
- Posts: 182
- Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2015 8:38 pm
Re: JUST RETAKE BRO
I enjoy how we've stumbled from a very uninteresting debate (whether OP's "advice" is wrong... which it clearly is) to a much more interesting debate (whether he should be banned.)jbagelboy wrote:I'm actually a huge proponent of free campus speech and permitting diversity of intellectual voices at universities, and I have substantial concerns regarding the recent movement toward the political censorship resulting from angsty misinterpretations of progressive thought. But that's neither here nor there.Gifted Hands wrote:this is ridiculous. I bet you support college's like Missouri trying to shut down speech you don't agree with.jbagelboy wrote:this is disgusting.
between this and the other threads there's definitely sufficient content for a BoW ban
The rhetorical excrement you've dribbled across multiple pages in this forum do not rise to the level of "difference" or even any manner of discourse at all. It's just inartful trolling at best. We shall not become the enablers of cowardice and stupidity in gratifying your bizarre irredeemable pursuit of spreading financial ruin and career suicide.
ETA: also everything the terrific posters just said above me.
Put me on the side of not banning OP. I think that each time they've posted, they've been significantly refuted by huge portions of TLS'ers... So I don't see the huge risk towards people actually following their advice.
-
- Posts: 288
- Joined: Mon May 02, 2016 7:44 pm
Re: JUST RETAKE BRO
the guy above me gets it
this is no different than college campuses, and my advice does have merit and does encourage a healthy debate for readers to see and make their own decisions. im not a clueless 0L
Jbagelboy: in your artful, long-winded, fart-huffing response, you basically proved my point
this is no different than college campuses, and my advice does have merit and does encourage a healthy debate for readers to see and make their own decisions. im not a clueless 0L
Jbagelboy: in your artful, long-winded, fart-huffing response, you basically proved my point
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login