CHECKMATEmanu6926 wrote:'SLS_AMG wrote: I just don't get why 0Ls get so obsessed over this "sub-tier" BS. There is literally not a single hiring partner in the world who would know what the hell "CCN" or "MVPB" means.
How do you know? All these "employers don't look at rankings" lack credibility. I recall Mike Spivey said that they do occasionally look at rankings. Plus employers obviously know what the top schools are. http://www.wlrk.com/summerassociates/
USNWR Rankings 2016 Predictions Forum
- patogordo

- Posts: 4826
- Joined: Tue Jan 14, 2014 3:33 am
Re: USNWR Rankings 2016 Predictions
- North

- Posts: 4230
- Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2011 7:09 pm
Re: USNWR Rankings 2016 Predictions
What a stupid thread
-
kaiser

- Posts: 3019
- Joined: Mon May 09, 2011 11:34 pm
Re: USNWR Rankings 2016 Predictions
Big big difference between knowing generally how the schools rank, and how these silly sub tiers are grouped. Someone who looks at the list on occasion would simply see a numerical list.manu6926 wrote: How do you know? All these "employers don't look at rankings" lack credibility. I recall Mike Spivey said that they do occasionally look at rankings. Plus employers obviously know what the top schools are. http://www.wlrk.com/summerassociates/
- dwil770

- Posts: 3112
- Joined: Tue Jan 14, 2014 1:28 pm
Re: USNWR Rankings 2016 Predictions
I would bet $20 that you read pgs 1 2 and 3 of this topic as opposed to ignoring half of the topics, and paying loose attention to some amount of ones you don't ignore. People here talk a big game about how they don't care about rankings but obviously we all doNorth wrote:What a stupid thread
Discussion of the worth of usnwr has no place here and please assist me in reporting those who try to derail this thread in that direction. Entirely different topic
-
Mal Reynolds

- Posts: 12612
- Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2011 12:16 am
Re: USNWR Rankings 2016 Predictions
You sound smart.dwil770 wrote:I would bet $20 that you read pgs 1 2 and 3 of this topic as opposed to ignoring half of the topics, and paying loose attention to some amount of ones you don't ignore. People here talk a big game about how they don't care about rankings but obviously we all doNorth wrote:What a stupid thread
Discussion of the worth of usnwr has no place here and please assist me in reporting those who try to derail this thread in that direction. Entirely different topic
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- dwil770

- Posts: 3112
- Joined: Tue Jan 14, 2014 1:28 pm
Re: USNWR Rankings 2016 Predictions
sublime wrote:It's not that we don't care about rankings (although many legitimately don't), it is that this is comically early for a thread on this. Particularly considering that the 2015 thread was only started like a month ago, by the poster that you hilariously scolded for no reason.dwil770 wrote:I would bet $20 that you read pgs 1 2 and 3 of this topic as opposed to ignoring half of the topics, and paying loose attention to some amount of ones you don't ignore. People here talk a big game about how they don't care about rankings but obviously we all doNorth wrote:What a stupid thread
Discussion of the worth of usnwr has no place here and please assist me in reporting those who try to derail this thread in that direction. Entirely different topic
1. He called my thread stupid and I took it personally. Not the most scholarly of threads, yeah, but I think people will have opinions about it and generally enjoy it.
2. I'm particularly interested on predictions in light of the new rankings.
Edit: but yeah maybe you guys really don't want to talk about it so sorry
Last edited by dwil770 on Sun Mar 16, 2014 2:04 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
Mal Reynolds

- Posts: 12612
- Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2011 12:16 am
Re: USNWR Rankings 2016 Predictions
I can tell you I was a little upset my school didn't get a bump in the rankings but other than that I don't care.
- dwil770

- Posts: 3112
- Joined: Tue Jan 14, 2014 1:28 pm
Re: USNWR Rankings 2016 Predictions
Haha sometimes I guess i try too hard because a lot of posters on tls make good contributions. Sorry if it's off puttingMal Reynolds wrote:You sound smart.dwil770 wrote:I would bet $20 that you read pgs 1 2 and 3 of this topic as opposed to ignoring half of the topics, and paying loose attention to some amount of ones you don't ignore. People here talk a big game about how they don't care about rankings but obviously we all doNorth wrote:What a stupid thread
Discussion of the worth of usnwr has no place here and please assist me in reporting those who try to derail this thread in that direction. Entirely different topic
- Hipster but Athletic

- Posts: 1993
- Joined: Mon Sep 23, 2013 2:15 pm
Re: USNWR Rankings 2016 Predictions
It wasn't you coming off as a try-hard. It was that your post just wasn't very good.
- dwil770

- Posts: 3112
- Joined: Tue Jan 14, 2014 1:28 pm
Re: USNWR Rankings 2016 Predictions
I was trying to say that he probably paid more attention to this thread than others but of course that doesn't mean that it can't be stupid. I guess I still disagree with the need to call it out just leave it in peaceHipster but Athletic wrote:It wasn't you coming off as a try-hard. It was that your post just wasn't very good.
Edit: In the same token I shouldn't have gone off on him so I guess it evens out haha
- BanjoCalhoun

- Posts: 63
- Joined: Fri Feb 14, 2014 3:41 pm
Re: USNWR Rankings 2016 Predictions
As comically premature as it is I've enjoyed the thread for what it's worth. People need to relax, everyone that's here could have ignored the link. For most of us USNWR is a guilty pleasure and far from a significant determinant of school choice.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Hipster but Athletic

- Posts: 1993
- Joined: Mon Sep 23, 2013 2:15 pm
Re: USNWR Rankings 2016 Predictions
it's "by" the same token, and I have no idea what you're talking about. You made a terrible post, got called out about it, defended it by saying you tried too hard, got told "no you're just dumb" --and are now just speaking gibberish. "[You] were trying to say" that he probably paid more attention to this thread? Ya...we all got that. And that's why you got called fucking dumb.
- North

- Posts: 4230
- Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2011 7:09 pm
Re: USNWR Rankings 2016 Predictions
Patogordo'sTar.gifdwil770 wrote:I would bet $20 that you read pgs 1 2 and 3 of this topic as opposed to ignoring half of the topics, and paying loose attention to some amount of ones you don't ignore. People here talk a big game about how they don't care about rankings but obviously we all doNorth wrote:What a stupid thread
A CALL TO ARMSdwil770 wrote:Discussion of the worth of usnwr has no place here and please assist me in reporting those who try to derail this thread in that direction. Entirely different topic
- dwil770

- Posts: 3112
- Joined: Tue Jan 14, 2014 1:28 pm
Re: USNWR Rankings 2016 Predictions
Look you should have chuckled at the premise of this light hearted thread and moved on like normal people in this thread are doing.Hipster but Athletic wrote:it's "by" the same token, and I have no idea what you're talking about. You made a terrible post, got called out about it, defended it by saying you tried too hard, got told "no you're just dumb" --and are now just speaking gibberish. "[You] were trying to say" that he probably paid more attention to this thread? Ya...we all got that. And that's why you got called fucking dumb.
At any rate, sorry for all of the complaints you have about me. Hopefully that placates you.
Last edited by dwil770 on Sun Mar 16, 2014 1:24 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Mauve.Dino

- Posts: 171
- Joined: Thu Nov 21, 2013 11:55 am
Re: USNWR Rankings 2016 Predictions
Sandusky's taint changes EVERYTHING.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- Winston1984

- Posts: 1789
- Joined: Sun Mar 17, 2013 12:02 pm
Re: USNWR Rankings 2016 Predictions
I'm still outraged it hasn't been stickied yet.sublime wrote:dwil770 wrote:I was trying to say that he probably paid more attention to this thread than others but of course that doesn't mean that it can't be stupid. I guess I still disagree with the need to call it out just leave it in peaceHipster but Athletic wrote:It wasn't you coming off as a try-hard. It was that your post just wasn't very good.
Edit: In the same token I shouldn't have gone off on him so I guess it evens out haha
Fwiw, I legitimately lol'd at the sticky request, which is more than I get from most threads.
-
Mal Reynolds

- Posts: 12612
- Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2011 12:16 am
Re: USNWR Rankings 2016 Predictions
I enjoyed this joke. I hope it sticks around.Mauve.Dino wrote:Sandusky's taint changes EVERYTHING.
- rpupkin

- Posts: 5653
- Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 10:32 pm
Re: USNWR Rankings 2016 Predictions
Done. I've reported three posters. And since no one else has done so, I want to say thanks. Whether the mindless sheep of TLS want to acknowledge it or not, prestige matters in our chosen profession. And the USNWR rankings are the engine of prestige. If you're one of those saying that you don't care about the 2016 USNWR rankings, then you're essentially saying that you don't care about your own future. Good luck with that.dwil770 wrote:I would bet $20 that you read pgs 1 2 and 3 of this topic as opposed to ignoring half of the topics, and paying loose attention to some amount of ones you don't ignore. People here talk a big game about how they don't care about rankings but obviously we all doNorth wrote:What a stupid thread
Discussion of the worth of usnwr has no place here and please assist me in reporting those who try to derail this thread in that direction. Entirely different topic
Now back to the good part: I think this is a dangerous time for SLS. We watched it drop from #2 to #3. Meanwhile, CLS and Chi are in a dogfight for #4, and I can tell that the competition is lifting both schools to greater heights. The era of "HYS" is about to come to a dramatic end.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
rad lulz

- Posts: 9807
- Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2012 10:53 pm
Re: USNWR Rankings 2016 Predictions
lolrpupkin wrote:Done. I've reported three posters. And since no one else has done so, I want to say thanks. Whether the mindless sheep of TLS want to acknowledge it or not, prestige matters in our chosen profession. And the USNWR rankings are the engine of prestige. If you're one of those saying that you don't care about the 2016 USNWR rankings, then you're essentially saying that you don't care about your own future. Good luck with that.
Now back to the good part: I think this is a dangerous time for SLS. We watched it drop from #2 to #3. Meanwhile, CLS and Chi are in a dogfight for #4, and I can tell that the competition is lifting both schools to greater heights. The era of "HYS" is about to come to a dramatic end.
-
03152016

- Posts: 9180
- Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2011 3:14 am
Re: USNWR Rankings 2016 Predictions
ITT: trolls trolling trolls
- A. Nony Mouse

- Posts: 29293
- Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2012 11:51 am
Re: USNWR Rankings 2016 Predictions
This thread is going absolutely nowhere. OP, you can start this up again next year when the rankings are imminent.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login