UVAnycparalegal wrote:So who exactly does this extension benefit?
UVA eliminates/extends ED deadline Forum
- Jay-Electronica
- Posts: 235
- Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2009 4:39 pm
Re: UVA eliminates/extends ED deadline
- Space_Cowboy
- Posts: 197
- Joined: Wed Jun 24, 2009 12:52 am
Re: UVA eliminates/extends ED deadline
I see no reason why not. It might not remain a 170 or a 3.85, but it will be something fairly predictable given UVA numbers-driven approach.jawsthegreat wrote:One thing is for sure it is not going to be as easy to predict ED applicants as it was before they extended the deadline.
A 3.85 or a 170 is probably not a guarantee any more.
- CE2JD
- Posts: 914
- Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2008 8:33 pm
Re: UVA eliminates/extends ED deadline
O RLY. I thought I remembered reading somewhere that a 170 was the 97.5 percentile and a 171 was 98.7 or something like that which would make the number of 170s roughly equal to the number of >170s.booboo wrote:Roughly equating, I think there are 1000 170 scorers, and 3000 >170 scorers.
edit: nevermind
From this:

It looks like the number of 170-172s are GREATER than the number of 173-180s.
Last edited by CE2JD on Thu Jan 07, 2010 1:33 am, edited 1 time in total.
- Space_Cowboy
- Posts: 197
- Joined: Wed Jun 24, 2009 12:52 am
Re: UVA eliminates/extends ED deadline
170 - 97.5CE2JD wrote:O RLY. I thought I remembered reading somewhere that a 170 was the 97.5 percentile and a 171 was 98.7 or something like that which would make the number of 170s roughly equal to the number of >170s.booboo wrote:Roughly equating, I think there are 1000 170 scorers, and 3000 >170 scorers.
171 - 98.1
172 - 98.6
-
- Posts: 18203
- Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 10:47 pm
Re: UVA eliminates/extends ED deadline
171 is a 98.1CE2JD wrote:
Uhh... do you know how few people get above a 170? The number of people who get 170s is likely the same as the number of people getting above a 170.
170 is a 97.5
So 1.9% have above a 170, and .6 have a 170. Not quite the same but I understand your point.
It really depends on how close to 171 they usually are.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- booboo
- Posts: 1032
- Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2009 10:39 pm
Re: UVA eliminates/extends ED deadline
I may have done my math wrong... 97.5% is right for 170, for 171, the percentile is 98.1. What I did was multiply the two by a reasonable total unique LSAT taker total of 160,000, subtract the value of the 2.5% percentile from the 1.9% and I got my total 170 scorers.CE2JD wrote:O RLY. I thought I remembered reading somewhere that a 170 was the 97.5 percentile and a 171 was 98.7 or something like that which would make the number of 170s roughly equal to the number of >170s.booboo wrote:Roughly equating, I think there are 1000 170 scorers, and 3000 >170 scorers.
-
- Posts: 18203
- Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 10:47 pm
Re: UVA eliminates/extends ED deadline
I wonder if they'll accept EDing from people on the wait list.
- Space_Cowboy
- Posts: 197
- Joined: Wed Jun 24, 2009 12:52 am
Re: UVA eliminates/extends ED deadline
They do.Desert Fox wrote:I wonder if they'll accept EDing from people on the wait list.
EDIT: Shit, I meant from people with applications in, but no decision yet. No idea what happens if you're WLed.
- jawsthegreat
- Posts: 792
- Joined: Wed Dec 03, 2008 10:51 pm
Re: UVA eliminates/extends ED deadline
Couldn't hurt to try if you think you have been YP'd.Desert Fox wrote:I wonder if they'll accept EDing from people on the wait list.
- CE2JD
- Posts: 914
- Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2008 8:33 pm
Re: UVA eliminates/extends ED deadline
Still, my main point was that, as you go up the score chart, higher scorers get rarer and rarer. This makes it increasingly harder for a law school in the bottom of the T10 to bump up the LSAT median, especially considering the HIGHER YIELDS at HYSCC.
Last edited by CE2JD on Thu Jan 07, 2010 1:37 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 1853
- Joined: Wed Dec 03, 2008 1:46 am
Re: UVA eliminates/extends ED deadline
prelim ABA applicants for Fall 2009 is currently 86,100 http://members.lsac.org/Public/MainPage ... Page2.aspxbooboo wrote:I may have done my math wrong... 97.5% is right for 170, for 171, the percentile is 98.1. What I did was multiply the two by a reasonable total unique LSAT taker total of 160,000, subtract the value of the 2.5% percentile from the 1.9% and I got my total 170 scorers.CE2JD wrote:O RLY. I thought I remembered reading somewhere that a 170 was the 97.5 percentile and a 171 was 98.7 or something like that which would make the number of 170s roughly equal to the number of >170s.booboo wrote:Roughly equating, I think there are 1000 170 scorers, and 3000 >170 scorers.
- booboo
- Posts: 1032
- Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2009 10:39 pm
Re: UVA eliminates/extends ED deadline
Definitely a valid point. Unless they are feeling generous with money, hehe.CE2JD wrote:Still, my main point was that, as you go up the score chart, higher scorers get rarer and rarer. This makes it increasingly harder for a law school in the bottom of the T10 to bump up the LSAT median, especially considering the HIGHER YIELDS at HYSCC.
- GeePee
- Posts: 1273
- Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2009 7:35 pm
Re: UVA eliminates/extends ED deadline
There are a lot better anti-YP methods than giving up your chance of choice or money...jawsthegreat wrote:Couldn't hurt to try if you think you have been YP'd.Desert Fox wrote:I wonder if they'll accept EDing from people on the wait list.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Space_Cowboy
- Posts: 197
- Joined: Wed Jun 24, 2009 12:52 am
Re: UVA eliminates/extends ED deadline
Any as effective? But yeah, your point is a good one.GeePee wrote:There are a lot better anti-YP methods than giving up your chance of choice or money...jawsthegreat wrote:Couldn't hurt to try if you think you have been YP'd.Desert Fox wrote:I wonder if they'll accept EDing from people on the wait list.
- CE2JD
- Posts: 914
- Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2008 8:33 pm
Re: UVA eliminates/extends ED deadline
You mean like keeping people on the waitlist until 5 days before matriculation and then admitting them if you're low on numbers?GeePee wrote:There are a lot better anti-YP methods than giving up your chance of choice or money...jawsthegreat wrote:Couldn't hurt to try if you think you have been YP'd.Desert Fox wrote:I wonder if they'll accept EDing from people on the wait list.
- Space_Cowboy
- Posts: 197
- Joined: Wed Jun 24, 2009 12:52 am
Re: UVA eliminates/extends ED deadline
I think he meant Why? essays or LOCI or interviews.CE2JD wrote:You mean like keeping people on the waitlist until 5 days before matriculation and then admitting them?GeePee wrote:There are a lot better anti-YP methods than giving up your chance of choice or money...jawsthegreat wrote:Couldn't hurt to try if you think you have been YP'd.Desert Fox wrote:I wonder if they'll accept EDing from people on the wait list.
- Space_Cowboy
- Posts: 197
- Joined: Wed Jun 24, 2009 12:52 am
Re: UVA eliminates/extends ED deadline
If Dean Trujillo would extend the ED deadline till after the release of 2011 USNWR rankings, that would b truly awesome. With UVA's impressive jump in GPA least year (high 3.7s to 3.85), that should put them over Michigan (all else being equal, of course (not a terrible assumption)). When the inevitable "Michigan in decline" freakout occurs they could pick up a couple more candidates.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 18203
- Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 10:47 pm
Re: UVA eliminates/extends ED deadline
UVA and Mich will tied at 9Space_Cowboy wrote:If Dean Trujillo would extend the ED deadline till after the release of 2011 USNWR rankings, that would b truly awesome. With UVA's impressive jump in GPA least year (high 3.7s to 3.85), that should put them over Michigan (all else being equal, of course (not a terrible assumption)). When the inevitable "Michigan in decline" freakout occurs they could pick up a couple more candidates.
NU and Duke will tie for 11.
And UT and GT will tie for 14.
You heard it here first!
- wadeny
- Posts: 137
- Joined: Tue Apr 21, 2009 11:52 pm
Re: UVA eliminates/extends ED deadline
I still don't get why UVA decided to alter their ED process like this, especially in the middle of the cycle. I mean, it's not really an "early" decision any longer, so why would they even continue to call it that? It seems like it has something to do with their yield, but whatever the reason, it sounds pretty shady to me.
-
- Posts: 6244
- Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2009 6:09 pm
Re: UVA eliminates/extends ED deadline
yeah whatever, I bet they just want a bunch of apps just so they can reject them
Last edited by Borhas on Sun Jan 28, 2018 3:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- ruleser
- Posts: 870
- Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2008 2:41 am
Re: UVA eliminates/extends ED deadline
Or it could be they realize a drop in ranking is coming and want to lock people in before they find out about it.Space_Cowboy wrote:If Dean Trujillo would extend the ED deadline till after the release of 2011 USNWR rankings, that would b truly awesome. With UVA's impressive jump in GPA least year (high 3.7s to 3.85), that should put them over Michigan (all else being equal, of course (not a terrible assumption)). When the inevitable "Michigan in decline" freakout occurs they could pick up a couple more candidates.
Honestly, why wouldn't schools do this. ED is just a dream for them, they can pick whoever they want and have a guarantee that that person attends and they don't have to give $$, never mind bargain later. It's nothing but win for them. Could simply be they saw people sending in the ED ap the longer they had to wait, and someone there said, it's working well, why not run up matric %/$$ by just doing it all year? Why wouldn't all schools do it all year, there's no downside for them?
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- AngryAvocado
- Posts: 774
- Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2009 11:22 pm
Re: UVA eliminates/extends ED deadline
This would mean that Cooley couldn't be ranked 12th...BLASPHEMY!Desert Fox wrote:UVA and Mich will tied at 9Space_Cowboy wrote:If Dean Trujillo would extend the ED deadline till after the release of 2011 USNWR rankings, that would b truly awesome. With UVA's impressive jump in GPA least year (high 3.7s to 3.85), that should put them over Michigan (all else being equal, of course (not a terrible assumption)). When the inevitable "Michigan in decline" freakout occurs they could pick up a couple more candidates.
NU and Duke will tie for 11.
And UT and GT will tie for 14.
You heard it here first!
-
- Posts: 18203
- Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 10:47 pm
Re: UVA eliminates/extends ED deadline
With the new campus and thus a new library they are shooting up the rankings. T6 babyAngryAvocado wrote:This would mean that Cooley couldn't be ranked 12th...BLASPHEMY!Desert Fox wrote:UVA and Mich will tied at 9Space_Cowboy wrote:If Dean Trujillo would extend the ED deadline till after the release of 2011 USNWR rankings, that would b truly awesome. With UVA's impressive jump in GPA least year (high 3.7s to 3.85), that should put them over Michigan (all else being equal, of course (not a terrible assumption)). When the inevitable "Michigan in decline" freakout occurs they could pick up a couple more candidates.
NU and Duke will tie for 11.
And UT and GT will tie for 14.
You heard it here first!
- Dignan
- Posts: 1110
- Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2009 5:52 pm
Re: UVA eliminates/extends ED deadline
I think it's more than that. I think they're trying to lock in higher quality admits. Early January is a time during which people start to freak out. You've got 172/3.7 types who ED'd to Colubmia/NYU and who then got rejected/deferred. We've even seen a few people with those numbers who were deferred by Cornell. Furthermore, you've got the inevitable batch of high-quality applicants who were sure that they were getting into Berkeley in December but who are now puzzled that they have yet to hear anything. And, finally, you've got several schools (Chicago, NU, Columbia) who tend to take their sweet time getting back to RD applicants.Borhas wrote:yeah whatever, I bet they just want a bunch of apps just so they can reject them
Basically, you've got hundreds of nervous applicants, some of whom with Columbia/Chicago/Berkeley numbers, who are worried that they will get shut out of the T14. Virginia is throwing them a late life line, and I bet at least a couple dozen will grab it. It's a brilliant move.
- Helmholtz
- Posts: 4128
- Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 1:48 pm
Re: UVA eliminates/extends ED deadline
When have numbers ever stopped Cooley?!? If they can invent a badass ranking system taking into consideration factors such as restroom square footage and total weightage of library staff, they can sure as hell invent a workaround to this measly problem.AngryAvocado wrote:This would mean that Cooley couldn't be ranked 12th...BLASPHEMY!Desert Fox wrote:UVA and Mich will tied at 9Space_Cowboy wrote:If Dean Trujillo would extend the ED deadline till after the release of 2011 USNWR rankings, that would b truly awesome. With UVA's impressive jump in GPA least year (high 3.7s to 3.85), that should put them over Michigan (all else being equal, of course (not a terrible assumption)). When the inevitable "Michigan in decline" freakout occurs they could pick up a couple more candidates.
NU and Duke will tie for 11.
And UT and GT will tie for 14.
You heard it here first!
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login