2016 USNWR T25 Prediction Contest (Winners Announced) Forum

eed333 · Post by **eed333** » Mon Mar 09, 2015 1:59 pm

Y
.
.
HS
.
.
CC (tied)
.
NP
.
VBD (all tied)
.
MNCG

This?

jever020 · Post by **jever020** » Mon Mar 09, 2015 2:00 pm

MikeSpivey wrote:
jever020 wrote:
rpupkin wrote:
jever020 wrote:spivey, spivey, spivey, spivey (spivey, spivey, spivey, spivey, etc)

give us the rest pleeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeease
Spivey is busy responding to USNWR's cease-and-desist letter.
The people must know! The people must be given the juice!
The second I get new info I'll stop what I am doing and post I promise.

Double pinky promise?!

ms9 · Post by **ms9** » Mon Mar 09, 2015 2:08 pm

jever020 wrote:
MikeSpivey wrote:
jever020 wrote:

The second I get new info I'll stop what I am doing and post I promise.

Double pinky promise?!

No.

jever020 · Post by **jever020** » Mon Mar 09, 2015 2:10 pm

MikeSpivey wrote:
jever020 wrote:
MikeSpivey wrote:
jever020 wrote:

The second I get new info I'll stop what I am doing and post I promise.

Double pinky promise?!
No.

Fair enough lol.

HalfStudent · Post by **HalfStudent** » Mon Mar 09, 2015 2:15 pm

Saddle Up wrote:Really thought Emory would go up from #19. At least the USNWR standings are a lot more influential than those from that POS ATL.

Emory hired 20% of their class, it really helps them stay ahead of about 2 schools I think.

Moneytrees · Post by **Moneytrees** » Mon Mar 09, 2015 2:18 pm

Emory was one of the few top tier schools that did not see an uptick in employment placement last year. It's still a great school, but I question its top 20 ranking. The numbers just don't seem to back it up.

chuckbass · Post by **chuckbass** » Mon Mar 09, 2015 2:32 pm

Wonderful. You have all figured out why the TLS mantra is that the rankings don't actually matter. Thank you for all of the wonderful insight.

runinthefront · Post by **runinthefront** » Mon Mar 09, 2015 2:34 pm

scottidsntknow wrote:Wonderful. You have all figured out why the TLS mantra is that the rankings don't actually matter. Thank you for all of the wonderful insight.

this was an absolutely useless post and you should feel bad for making it

LawsRUs · Post by **LawsRUs** » Mon Mar 09, 2015 2:39 pm

hey take that back, scotti is my friend

Lemurian · Post by **Lemurian** » Mon Mar 09, 2015 2:39 pm

Illinois at 41? How?

The numbers just don't back that up at all.

lawplaya · Post by **lawplaya** » Mon Mar 09, 2015 2:45 pm

Looks Like Campos was right on Irvine not Chemerinsky. Campos said Irvine was basically Davis,hastings while Dean Chem was aiming top 20(UCLA/USC). Good for Campos.

rpupkin · Post by **rpupkin** » Mon Mar 09, 2015 2:47 pm

lawplaya wrote:Looks Like Campos was right on Irvine not Chemerinsky. Campos said Irvine was basically Davis,hastings while Dean Chem was aiming top 20(UCLA/USC). Good for Campos.

Basically everyone except Chemerinsky said that.

table3 · Post by **table3** » Mon Mar 09, 2015 2:48 pm

Lot of confusing cross-talk in the library lobby right now about NCAAM rankings.

DK21 · Post by **DK21** » Mon Mar 09, 2015 2:48 pm

rpupkin wrote:
lawplaya wrote:Looks Like Campos was right on Irvine not Chemerinsky. Campos said Irvine was basically Davis,hastings while Dean Chem was aiming top 20(UCLA/USC). Good for Campos.
Basically everyone except Chemerinsky said that.

not credible.

Dafaq · Post by **Dafaq** » Mon Mar 09, 2015 2:49 pm

Damn, I nailed UT at #15. (Safe bet since UT is always @15)

jever020 · Post by **jever020** » Mon Mar 09, 2015 2:50 pm

Dafaq wrote:Damn, I nailed UT at #15. (Safe bet since UT is always @15)

santoki · Post by **santoki** » Mon Mar 09, 2015 2:57 pm

Post removed.

hdunlop · Post by **hdunlop** » Mon Mar 09, 2015 3:14 pm

Saddle Up wrote:I think an above poster’s BVD acronym works!

Not as catchy as MVP but BVD is a recognizable brand name (catchy enough), plus there is no way to include M within a top ten reference.

Tyty

chuckbass · Post by **chuckbass** » Mon Mar 09, 2015 3:18 pm

Fwiw the basis of the acronyms is selectivity more or less

ms9 · Post by **ms9** » Mon Mar 09, 2015 3:18 pm

table3 wrote:Lot of confusing cross-talk in the library lobby right now about NCAAM rankings.

Ha! Columbia is a #1 seed in their bracket! And Yale. And Harvard. Chicago slips to 2 seed because they don't have a team.

RustyRyan · Post by **RustyRyan** » Mon Mar 09, 2015 3:19 pm

Why does the TLS wisdom seem to be that Michigan was due for a drop and that it's been hurting since 08? I've seen it ITT and a few other places.

Not that it matters in the scheme of things, but I'm curious as to what signs people were seeing.

Mack.Hambleton · Post by **Mack.Hambleton** » Mon Mar 09, 2015 3:20 pm

RustyRyan wrote:Why does the TLS wisdom seem to be that Michigan was due for a drop and that it's been hurting since 08? I've seen it ITT and a few other places.

Not that it matters in the scheme of things, but I'm curious as to what signs people were seeing.

57% BL+FC

12th in the T14

bl1nds1ght · Post by **bl1nds1ght** » Mon Mar 09, 2015 3:21 pm

RustyRyan wrote:Why does the TLS wisdom seem to be that Michigan was due for a drop and that it's been hurting since 08? I've seen it ITT and a few other places.

Not that it matters in the scheme of things, but I'm curious as to what signs people were seeing.

Higher unemployment relative to the rest of the T14.

Unrelated, I don't understand the Davis jump. It just seems like a weaker program based on employment.

KMart · Post by **KMart** » Mon Mar 09, 2015 3:26 pm

runinthefront wrote:
scottidsntknow wrote:Wonderful. You have all figured out why the TLS mantra is that the rankings don't actually matter. Thank you for all of the wonderful insight.
this was an absolutely useless post and you should feel bad for making it

This can be said about a lot of posts from a lot of people.

Lemurian · Post by **Lemurian** » Mon Mar 09, 2015 3:26 pm

bl1nds1ght wrote:
RustyRyan wrote:Why does the TLS wisdom seem to be that Michigan was due for a drop and that it's been hurting since 08? I've seen it ITT and a few other places.

Not that it matters in the scheme of things, but I'm curious as to what signs people were seeing.
Higher unemployment relative to the rest of the T14.

Unrelated, I don't understand the Davis jump. It just seems like a weaker program based on employment.

Come on mate, it wouldn't be the USNWR if it were based on things like numbers and employment

2016 USNWR T25 Prediction Contest (Winners Announced) Forum

Re: 2016 USNWR T25 Pred. Cont. (CLOSED.)

Re: 2016 USNWR T25 Pred. Cont. (CLOSED.)

Re: 2016 USNWR T25 Pred. Cont. (CLOSED.)

Re: 2016 USNWR T25 Pred. Cont. (CLOSED.)

Re: 2016 USNWR T25 Pred. Cont. (CLOSED.)

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Re: 2016 USNWR T25 Pred. Cont. (CLOSED.)

Re: 2016 USNWR T25 Pred. Cont. (CLOSED.)

Re: 2016 USNWR T25 Pred. Cont. (CLOSED.)

Re: 2016 USNWR T25 Pred. Cont. (CLOSED.)

Register for access!

Re: 2016 USNWR T25 Pred. Cont. (CLOSED.)

Re: 2016 USNWR T25 Pred. Cont. (CLOSED.)

Re: 2016 USNWR T25 Pred. Cont. (CLOSED.)

Re: 2016 USNWR T25 Pred. Cont. (CLOSED.)

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

Re: 2016 USNWR T25 Pred. Cont. (CLOSED.)

Re: 2016 USNWR T25 Pred. Cont. (CLOSED.)

Re: 2016 USNWR T25 Pred. Cont. (CLOSED.)

Post removed.

Register now!

Re: 2016 USNWR T25 Pred. Cont. (CLOSED.)

Re: 2016 USNWR T25 Pred. Cont. (CLOSED.)

Re: 2016 USNWR T25 Pred. Cont. (CLOSED.)

Re: 2016 USNWR T25 Pred. Cont. (CLOSED.)

Register now, it's still FREE!

Re: 2016 USNWR T25 Pred. Cont. (CLOSED.)

Re: 2016 USNWR T25 Pred. Cont. (CLOSED.)

Re: 2016 USNWR T25 Pred. Cont. (CLOSED.)

Re: 2016 USNWR T25 Pred. Cont. (CLOSED.)

Seriously? What are you waiting for?