JohnWild wrote:What are you looking at / end up choosing? These are almost my exact same qualifications for a potential laptop.zeth006 wrote:My bottom line criteria for a notebook for law school
1. Good keyboard. Not just ok. I should be able to type on it with minimum errors and close to 60WPM or better.
2. Light weight. I'm planning to brown bag most of my lunches and dinners and maybe eat out 1-2 meals a week as I did in univ. Under 5 pounds was my requirement
3. Thin. 1 inch or less. Related to #2. I should be able to carry it around without developing back problems. I'm hoping if i don't carry around too many books it can go inside alongside my other books.
4. Access to repair/warranty service with a better chance of not getting shafted like with Geek Squad
5. Strong, rigid build construction. Flex was a no-no and automatic groups for disqualification from my list.
5. Battery life. Not crucial, but important if I ever have to study where there are no plugs. Doubt I'll be in that situation as I don't plan to go to school in the boonies.
JohnWild wrote:What are you looking at / end up choosing? These are almost my exact same qualifications for a potential laptop.zeth006 wrote:My bottom line criteria for a notebook for law school
1. Good keyboard. Not just ok. I should be able to type on it with minimum errors and close to 60WPM or better.
2. Light weight. I'm planning to brown bag most of my lunches and dinners and maybe eat out 1-2 meals a week as I did in univ. Under 5 pounds was my requirement
3. Thin. 1 inch or less. Related to #2. I should be able to carry it around without developing back problems. I'm hoping if i don't carry around too many books it can go inside alongside my other books.
4. Access to repair/warranty service with a better chance of not getting shafted like with Geek Squad
5. Strong, rigid build construction. Flex was a no-no and automatic grounds for disqualification from my list.
6. Battery life. Not crucial, but important if I ever have to study where there are no plugs. Doubt I'll be in that situation as I don't plan to go to school in the boonies.
Before I tell you which one I chose, I will show you the lineup. The lineup was created based on the following requirements listed above. Any notebook in the past few months that fell far too short in one or more fields was immediately eliminated. The notebook had to be a 13.3” and with a price hovering at most around the $1,000 range. The lineup goes as follows:
1. Sony Vaio Y - $800 before taxes/student fees
2. Lenovo Edge 13 - $800 for the Intel version
3. Asus UL30JT - Price not listed though available in Europe. It's predecessor, the UL30VT, hasn't changed in pricing. Unless Asus decides to keep the UL30VT line selling at Amazon.com/JR, I can see it being priced at $850 and beyond in the US.
4. Asus UL30VT - $700-$750 on Amazon.com/J&R
5. Macbook Pro 13 - $1,049 after rebate (Now it's $1,099 after $100 rebate)
*Note that these are all 13.3" notebooks. I left out the Lenovo T410 series since its dimensions and weight automatically disqualified it as an ultraportable/ultraportable competitor. If you don't mind extra weight, check it out by all means!
1. Sony Vaio Y - This was the closest runner-up to the winner. It had a nice balance of a decent touchpad, good keyboard, solid build construction, so-so battery life, and sub-4lb weight. I was initially a bit put off by the slower ULV SU7300 processor, but was initially willing to forgive that as it had strengths in most other areas. I was willing to jump on it if Sony were to release their $100 off discount as they have twice in the past 6 months. I waited and waited...but it never came around. $700.00 for this baby would've been a steal. But at the $800.00 mark, I was willing to push the wallet higher if I could get better!
I've never touched this laptop in person. There aren't any Sonystyle stores in my neighborhood. I've just seen a lot of youtube reviews (a valuable source BTW) and read a lot of reviews on the web (e.g. Notebookreview.com, LaptopMag, CNET, etc).
2. Lenovo Edge 13 - I was a little turned off for a few reasons with one of them being that the Edge is in short a cheap imitation of the legendary Thinkpad line. I understand Lenovo's need to reach into the notebook-but-not-quite-a-netbook segment for under $1,000. I guess you could say they did well in putting some thought into aesthetics (for the first time in world history) via a shiny, red or black glossy lid. But when it came down to keyboard and build construction, it's as Thinkpadish as Domino's pizza is Italian. It's a bastard child. I might've been spoiled by the by IBM’s and now Lenovo’s renowned build construction and keyboard quality as shown in the T410.
But sadly, this notebook felt too foreign to me at BestBuy. Maybe the little red pointing stick didn't enchant me as it normally does many others. Maybe I'm used to having at least alright-looking notebooks and not just plain janes. I dunno. But typing on that Edge 13 at BestBuy felt to me like I was typing on one of those typewriter toys I used to play with when I was 4. The keys were really huge, almost oversized, and the typing action didn't strike a tone with me at all. I guess from a more objective PoV, it's a matter of feel. If you can type easily on it, you may not have the same experience I had.
Specs are comparable to the Sony Vaio Y before options added. As with all ultraportables, if you have the money to spend, I highly recommend buying a SSD to make things snappy.
Bottom line: They got the aesthetics portion down. But the keyboard and touchpad didn't click with me. Feel and typing experience are obviously subjective, which is why I encourage you to avoid taking my brief review of the Thinkpad Edge 13 at face value as there are plenty of people on notebookreview who reportedly like this notebook. But my brief 5 minute experience at Best Buy just didn't work out for me. It definitely gets at least passing marks in the areas that matter the most. It's thin, it's light, it's got great battery life and build construction. But the typing experience is where I got blown off and pushed away. I guess this is where a car analogy works best for explanation: As with a visit to the car lot, a notebook will either click with you or it won't.
Other reviews of this notebook:
Got a 4/5 stars on Laptop Mag
http://www.laptopmag.com/review/laptops ... ge-13.aspx
Review on notebookreview.com
http://www.notebookreview.com/default.asp?newsID=5450
#3 and #4. Asus UL30VT and UL30JT
I'm merging these two because they're basically iterations of one another.
UL30VT – The UL30VT comes with a SU7300 and Nvidia 210M switchable graphics. You can find plenty of reviews of this laptop on Amazon.com both good and bad. It manages to pull off a respectable 4.5/5 star-rating. But as anyone who's read Consumer Reports car knows, you can't just let a magazine or website's top 10 listings determine whether a car is right for you. You have to not only look at a car's historical reliability ratings, but also take it for a test drive in person. I wasn’t impressed by the personal accounts people gave of flex in the keyboard and screen area. Most who reportedly noticed the flex said it wasn't serious enough to worry about. But at a visit to Best Buy, I came across the UL30VT's 14.1" brother, the UL50VT. The only difference aside from screen real estate is the presence of an optical drive, adding to the weight. The level of flex between the screen and keyboard in my opinion was a bit too much. I could twist the screen and keyboard just a tiny bit and notice bending. And I was no football star in high school.
Asus UL30JT - From what few accounts I've read, this notebook, recently released in Europe and Asia, is more or less a descendent of the UL30VT with a processor upgrade and minor changes in graphic technology. The graphics performance is identical which might be important to know if you plan to play SC2. Thus like with the UL30VT, you will probably be able to play SC2 on max settings. The only difference is that the UL30JT has Nvidia’s “Optimus” technology, meaning that unlike with the UL30VT, you don’t need to use a switch to change between using the integrated GPU and the dedicated 210M. Nvidia Optimus does it automatically based on a list of applications.
But the main selling point for high performance road warriors is the all-new i5-520UM processor which scores decently compared to the SU7300. Note though that this is the 520UM version, NOT the 520M which is commonly found on many gaming notebooks today. The former is built for lower power consumption (TDP: 18w) compared to its high performance brother (TDP: 35w). In most games today, your bottleneck is your GPU rather than your CPU, so this notebook with its almost imminent premium over the UL30VT(Google previous i5 ultraportable CPU shipment delay by Intel) will be a matter of whether you absolutely need that new processor. Remember, raw processing power isn't noticeable when doing regular tasks like schoolwork, listening to music, or increasingly even watching a 1080p movie. Since many video players are utilizing GPU acceleration, the need for a faster processor just to play 1080p videos is all but gone.
Battery life for the UL30JT is actually demonstrated to be worse than the UL30VT despite the i5-520UM’s lower power draw. This is most likely due to the way Nvidia Optimus operates. While the integrated Intel GPU is in operation, the dedicated Nvidia 310M GPU powers down. But we don’t see such a dynamic vice versa. While the 310M GPU is active, the Intel integrated GPU still continues to draw power. This means gaming on the road will probably drain battery life quicker than it should.
So in sum: I'd skip the UL30JT unless they offer a generous introductory discount on it and go for the UL30VT if you're interested in it. They've brought the price to $700 give or take $20-30 bucks in the past 2 months alone--probably to get rid of them and introduce the UL30JT. If you do decide to get the VT, choose the UL30VT-A5. Less of a finger-print magnet, same specs as the -X5 except bigger battery.
Call me anal--I agree that I am when it comes to details. I'm an ISTJ personality type after all, which makes me an arse when it comes to concentrating on the trees in the forest. But when you combine keyboard and screen flex, a not-so-coherent touchpad, and an ok screen quality, I just felt I could get more for my money's worth. The weight, thinness, and battery life are where it needs to be. But the 3 shortcomings didn't sit too well with me.
5. Macbook Pro 13
We now come across the final contestant. As you may have well guessed, the MBP is the winner in my contest. My assessment so far has been lengthy, but I assure you this is the last review.

Apple is perhaps one of the most liked and hated brands. Many swoon merely over the aesthetics its Macbooks. Others deride them for being too pricey for the CPU/RAM/other specs offered. Granted, specs are one consideration in choosing a notebook. But for law school, whether or not a CPU/GPU combo gets you 1,000 FPS in Crysis becomes irrelevant when your main tasks will include schoolwork and maybe the occasional round of facebook-stalking and watching youtube clips of "I'm a Marvel and I'm a DC" on break time. Your main concerns will differ immensely from that of a gamer’s.
Keyboard – I got used to the keyboard fairly quickly. Some people complain that the keys are spaced too far apart, but that’s understandable as your typical $600 el cheapo notebook that many such as yours truly have at home use the standard keyboard layout that’s been used for decades. The chiclet keyboard found on the Macbook Pro and increasingly on other notebooks seems better suited for typing. Spaced apart keys mean fewer rates of typos. Most of us don’t need to type while looking at the keyboard, which means most of our errors will arise from hitting the key located next the one we intended to hit. I didn’t notice any mushy flex while typing. The keys are rock solid and don’t feel like they’ll pop out after a few months.
Weight – Admittedly, at 4.5 pounds, the Macbook Pro loses to the rest of the competition. That’s understandable as the Macbook Pro wasn’t designed to be solely an ultraportable. It was designed to deliver ok performance for the weight. As strange as it may sound, I tossed in the Macbook Pro as a competitor during my 2-3 months of reading reviews just for the hell of it. But at the end of my search, I felt that 4.5 pounds vs. the Sony Y’s 3.7 pounds wasn’t enough for me to eliminate the Macbook Pro. I chose to excuse this one “shortcoming” as it wasn’t my only index for judging a notebook.
Thinness – My criteria was 1 inch or less. All the notebooks above came out at or below this requirement. The Asus UL30JT did manage to come out at .58” at the thinness part but like all the others, came out to right within 1 inch of thickness. This more or less meant that the Macbook Pro would not fit any better or worse than its seemingly skinner competitor.
Specs - I addressed this in another discussion earlier. The P8600 processor inside is plenty good enough for law school applications and web-surfing. The i3 processor is actually inferior to it for it falls short in single-core benchmarks. If you're planning to edit videos and photos, your best bet is to look into higher performance alternatives, particularly notebooks whose processors score well on multicore benchmarks. That's where the HP Envy 14 at $999 (release date not given) or even the extremely pricey Sony Vaio Z come into play if you've got money.
Otherwise, the SU7300 processor included with the Sony, the Asuses, and the Lenovo actually lose to the P8600 in both battery life and real-life performance.
Build construction – If your notebook is going to just sit on your bedroom desk as a desktop replacement, then this criteria is meaningless—as is choosing a notebook over a desktop for your bedroom computer unless your desk is really that tiny. Now please note: How much importance we can attach to build construction is debatable. But in my opinion, it’s important especially if you’re taking your notebook somewhere every day. Your notebook is going to move around in your backpack or bag and smack against books. Even the tiniest allowance for flex won’t do your interior parts any good. Apple uses the hardware sensor inside its Macbooks to detect whether your notebook has undergone a lot of punishment before giving you warranty coverage. This should probably tell you something.
The Macbook Pro passed this test with flying colors. As mentioned already, the keyboard wasn’t mushy. A brief twist of the keyboard/screen produced zero flex. The aluminum unibody design is simply rock solid. The thinness isn’t a tradeoff for flex unlike what I heard with the UL30VT/JT. No allowance given whatsoever!
Battery life –The Macbook Pro simply topped this index with the advertised 10 hour battery life. With the Wi-Fi turned on and my brightness turned down a bit, my battery life measured 8. But as I stated earlier, I didn’t deem this benchmark to be crucial to my decision as any means; it was more so a welcome strength.
Display quality – A brief overview: All laptop screens use TN panels. LG has not been able to find a way to shrink down the light bulbs used in IPS panels which BTW are often used by photographers for accurate images. This leaves notebook manufacturers to choose among TN panels of varying image quality, which is evaluated in terms of color reproduction, brightness, and viewing angles.
Now if you scroll back up, you’ll notice I left this out of the official law school criteria. Well in my case, I included it in my own personal checklist. My reasoning is that I am counting on having to stare at the screen a lot almost daily. In the least, I'd have images that are nicer to look at.
In terms of color reproduction, viewing angles, and brightness, the Macbook Pro’s screen is simply irresistible! It excels in all 3 areas. For an idea of how screen quality works, check out a White Macbook vs. Macbook Pro screen standoff:
--ImageRemoved--
As you can see, the MBP at the left is more apt at reproducing blacks and whites where they belong.
Note here: This is more a luxury. Feel free to leave out screen quality as it's not conducive to productivity.
So as you can see, not all screens are made the same. Some are just your regular run-of-the-mill screens that'll get the job done. Others like the Macbook Pro's TN panel, are of professional photographer quality and are as close as you can get to an IPS panel.
Aesthetics – I didn’t count this into my official criteria. But you’ve gotta admit…it just looks darn purty!

Touchpad - Probably one of the biggest selling points for me. The MBP has the best touchpad I've ever used. The sensitivity is almost perfect! I never have to use the mouse when I'm doing stuff on it while at the coffeeshop. I love two-finger scrolling up and down, going back/forward with a three-finger lateral swipes, using four finger lateral swipes to bring up active programs, and four-finger vertical swipes to use Expose. Right-click is done with two finger click and tap to click is enabled in settings. I've heard some complain that the touchpad's too sensitive. I thought so too at the beginning and have almost completely gotten used to using it regularly. I still occasionally fumble with right-click but end up getting it down on the second try.
For web-surfing and reading long documents, using Apple's iPadlike inertial scrolling and swiping is actually really enjoyable. I've had people sitting next to me at the coffeeshop wondering how the hell my notebook achieves this effect but theirs doesn't.
Service/Support Available - This was the deal-sealer for me. Without it, I would've been on the fence between this and the Sony Vaio Y. Having an Apple store within 20 minutes is a huge plus. I've heard of people buying Squaretrade Warranties and having good experiences, but waiting up to 5 days for repair service just didn't sound too hot. At the ripe old age of 24, I still prefer being able to meet a real person who can spend upwards of 15 minutes diagnosing my problem while having English proficiency. For law school, I'm willing to pay the price for convenience and peace of mind. 3-year Applecare Protection for a little more money was all in all what helped me make my decision. The nice part I've heard is if your Macbook gets 3 or more serviceable hardware flaws, you get a new one free. I personally don't follow the belief among many Apple fanboys that Macs last longer. Their failure rates are comparable to the rest of the industry average which calls for having a B&M computer repair center close by in case stuff goes south.
Some cons
Please remember that the Macbook Pro is NOT for everyone. You'll like it or you'll think it's overpriced. To be fair and balanced, I've decided to include the shortfalls as a prospective law school student.
1. OSX - There's a learning curve to conquer. It doesn't take a while IMO but some really just don't like the way it's limited compared to Windows
2. No OneNote for Mac - Microsoft, being the dicks they are, have consistently excluded OneNote from previous and pending versions of Office for Mac. Office 2011 does not ship with OneNote. I know this because I made sure of it last night while tinkering with the RTM version today. If you like OneNote for note-taking, you'll be using it a lot.
If you're not cool with Boot Camping Windows, running VMWare, or using Crossover to run OneNote, this will be an inexcusable negative. Office tends to run a bit slower in VMware and temperatures tend to get hotter while running Windows in Boot Camp as Macs aren't optimized for Windows 7. The VMware lag can be alleviated with a rather pricey SSD upgrade. In my personal experiences, Crossover seems to be able to run Office 2007 just fine.
Even after all this, if you STILL loathe running OneNote non-natively, there ARE alternatives to OneNote that run natively in OS X. But the general consensus in the Mac community is that there is no perfect replacement for OneNote.
Thus my advice is stick with Crossover.

3. Weight - Some find 4.5 pounds to be too heavy. These people are the ones who'll wound up spending $1,400 for a Mac Air or a lot less for a netbook. All power to them.
Once you get past the cons, you'll notice 2 things:
1. The Macbook Pro doesn't always come out on top of all indexes. It loses to one or more competitors. So you might wonder, why, zeth? Why choose a notebook if it loses or comes out just equal in one more more respects?
The answer?
2. The Macbook Pro manages to score points in ALL of these indexes. It doesn't have a serious short-coming in any area unless you count OneNote not being run natively as one. The perceived price premium goes into ensuring that there are few compromises, if any.
EDIT: I'm not normally one to incite flame wars. Hopefully I didn't step on any toes with this review...