Unsolicited Fee Waivers 2017 Forum
- lawschool2016nyc
- Posts: 107
- Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2016 2:49 pm
Re: Unsolicited Fee Waivers 2017
.
Last edited by lawschool2016nyc on Tue Jan 10, 2017 2:24 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- btruj777
- Posts: 332
- Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2016 9:31 am
Re: Unsolicited Fee Waivers 2017
lawschool2016nyc wrote:Can people who got Columbia/NYU fee waivers post their stats? I'm just kind of baffled I haven't gotten one.
167/3.95 URM, non-AA
-
- Posts: 91
- Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2016 9:43 am
Re: Unsolicited Fee Waivers 2017
I got Columbia not NYU, but 4.02 and 169 (Non URM)lawschool2016nyc wrote:Can people who got Columbia/NYU fee waivers post their stats? I'm just kind of baffled I haven't gotten one.
-
- Posts: 338
- Joined: Thu Jun 19, 2014 7:41 pm
Re: Unsolicited Fee Waivers 2017
Out of T14 now just missing HYS, Chi and B
3.6x
175lawschool2016nyc wrote:Can people who got Columbia/NYU fee waivers post their stats? I'm just kind of baffled I haven't gotten one.
3.6x
-
- Posts: 89
- Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2012 4:27 pm
Re: Unsolicited Fee Waivers 2017
I have AmeriCorps, and I'm URM. I don't think LSAC knows I'm Americorps, but they do know I'm URM.ReadyToStart wrote:Huh. That's disappointing since I'm at their LSAT median, and above the 75th for GPA. Do you think I should try and solicit one from them? They're the only T14 that I'm waiting on.ood wrote:ReadyToStart wrote:Did you take the September LSAT?ood wrote:167 3.8
unsolicited fee waiver from every t14 but HYS and BOALT
Has anyone received a waiver from Berkeley yet?
When did you receive one from NYU?
September LSAT and Oct. 21
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 111
- Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2016 8:13 am
Re: Unsolicited Fee Waivers 2017
Just got Texas
-
- Posts: 17
- Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2016 8:57 pm
Re: Unsolicited Fee Waivers 2017
Since yesterday, I've received Texas, WashU, Maryland, and Florida unsolicited. Filled out the form for Northwestern after reading a few threads mentioning that option and I received that waiver. Cheers!URM_lawnerd wrote:Just warning you guys in advance, please don't hate me! Also, this is my first post on TLS!!
URM Latino dude, 3.4 GPA (3.39 per LSAC wtfff) (change of majors lol), September 2016 LSAT score of 160. Since receiving my score last week, I've received a ton of unsolicited waivers, including:
Penn, Michigan, UVA (my top choice), Duke, Vanderbilt, Emory, Boston U, Georgia, U of Washington (actually that was sent after I attended the DC Law school fair on 9/23/16), William and Mary, and other lower-ranked schools obviously.
I've solicited from several other schools, like UNC, and received all EXCEPT Alabama, which rejected my proverbial advances yesterday lol
Let me know if any of this is normal since I definitely didn't expect a shower of waivers - and I plan to ask for more in the coming days and I suppose also after I take the December LSAT.
-
- Posts: 79
- Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2016 6:49 am
Re: Unsolicited Fee Waivers 2017
I'm also confused about Columbia... LSAT at 50th and GPA above 75th. Maybe they're targeting splitters?lawschool2016nyc wrote:Can people who got Columbia/NYU fee waivers post their stats? I'm just kind of baffled I haven't gotten one.
-
- Posts: 42
- Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2016 12:59 pm
Re: Unsolicited Fee Waivers 2017
I have a 171 and a 3.55 and have gotten NYU down EXCEPT Cornell. Kinda bugging me, I really don’t want to fork out that 80 bucks.
- ws120
- Posts: 26
- Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2016 9:21 am
Re: Unsolicited Fee Waivers 2017
Columbia down (except UC, Berkeley, NW) 177 and 3.66.
- taxman14
- Posts: 504
- Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2015 8:04 pm
Re: Unsolicited Fee Waivers 2017
Odd that I didn't get a waiver for Columbia. I wonder if this is something that comes in waves or if I'll actually have to fork over that $85...
-
- Posts: 17
- Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2016 8:57 pm
Re: Unsolicited Fee Waivers 2017
I'm surprised that the topic of the CAS Report Fees doesn't come up often. Is it just me or are those fees a real racket? I know there's really no way to get out of them besides getting an LSAC Waiver - which still only entitles you to 4 free reports - but there's gotta be a movement somewhere to get those fees down or eliminate them. I imagine the "Reports" are all handled automatically by a computer and sent to schools electronically, why is there a fee for every school?
It's ridiculous to me.
It's ridiculous to me.
-
- Posts: 147
- Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2016 6:40 pm
Re: Unsolicited Fee Waivers 2017
I agree. But I imagine they'll keep increasing the prices of them to, imo, weed those out who are just applying to law school because they "don't have other options." Nobody is gonna pay these fees in future years who doesn't actually WANT to be in this profession.URM_lawnerd wrote:I'm surprised that the topic of the CAS Report Fees doesn't come up often. Is it just me or are those fees a real racket? I know there's really no way to get out of them besides getting an LSAC Waiver - which still only entitles you to 4 free reports - but there's gotta be a movement somewhere to get those fees down or eliminate them. I imagine the "Reports" are all handled automatically by a computer and sent to schools electronically, why is there a fee for every school?
It's ridiculous to me.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 171
- Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2016 3:19 am
Re: Unsolicited Fee Waivers 2017
Amen. They have a monopoly and they exploit the hell out of it.URM_lawnerd wrote:I'm surprised that the topic of the CAS Report Fees doesn't come up often. Is it just me or are those fees a real racket? I know there's really no way to get out of them besides getting an LSAC Waiver - which still only entitles you to 4 free reports - but there's gotta be a movement somewhere to get those fees down or eliminate them. I imagine the "Reports" are all handled automatically by a computer and sent to schools electronically, why is there a fee for every school?
It's ridiculous to me.
-
- Posts: 91
- Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2016 9:43 am
Re: Unsolicited Fee Waivers 2017
Update: They politely rejected my solicitation.neubyneu wrote:If you do, let us know how that goes. I'm above their 75ths and never got a fee waiver. Took LSAT in June. They're the only one I'm missing too.ReadyToStart wrote:Huh. That's disappointing since I'm at their LSAT median, and above the 75th for GPA. Do you think I should try and solicit one from them? They're the only T14 that I'm waiting on.ood wrote:ReadyToStart wrote:Did you take the September LSAT?ood wrote:167 3.8
unsolicited fee waiver from every t14 but HYS and BOALT
Has anyone received a waiver from Berkeley yet?
When did you receive one from NYU?
September LSAT and Oct. 21
-
- Posts: 24
- Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2016 10:34 pm
Re: Unsolicited Fee Waivers 2017
I got Columbia yesterday. Not sure if it shall be deemed unsolicited...coz I requested one earlier but got turned down...then I received one from CRS via email... btw I'm an international applicant and dont' have LSAC GPA...
- neubyneu
- Posts: 12
- Joined: Tue Sep 20, 2016 10:35 pm
Re: Unsolicited Fee Waivers 2017
Thanks for the update. Does anyone have any theories about why this might be happening to ReadyToStart and me? It's not like the school knows anything about us besides our numbers at this point. I'm really more curious than anything now.ReadyToStart wrote:Update: They politely rejected my solicitation.neubyneu wrote:If you do, let us know how that goes. I'm above their 75ths and never got a fee waiver. Took LSAT in June. They're the only one I'm missing too.ReadyToStart wrote:Huh. That's disappointing since I'm at their LSAT median, and above the 75th for GPA. Do you think I should try and solicit one from them? They're the only T14 that I'm waiting on.ood wrote:ReadyToStart wrote:Did you take the September LSAT?ood wrote:167 3.8
unsolicited fee waiver from every t14 but HYS and BOALT
Has anyone received a waiver from Berkeley yet?
When did you receive one from NYU?
September LSAT and Oct. 21
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- btruj777
- Posts: 332
- Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2016 9:31 am
Re: Unsolicited Fee Waivers 2017
neubyneu wrote:Thanks for the update. Does anyone have any theories about why this might be happening to ReadyToStart and me? It's not like the school knows anything about us besides our numbers at this point. I'm really more curious than anything now.ReadyToStart wrote:Update: They politely rejected my solicitation.neubyneu wrote:If you do, let us know how that goes. I'm above their 75ths and never got a fee waiver. Took LSAT in June. They're the only one I'm missing too.ReadyToStart wrote:Huh. That's disappointing since I'm at their LSAT median, and above the 75th for GPA. Do you think I should try and solicit one from them? They're the only T14 that I'm waiting on.ood wrote:ReadyToStart wrote:Did you take the September LSAT?ood wrote:167 3.8
unsolicited fee waiver from every t14 but HYS and BOALT
Has anyone received a waiver from Berkeley yet?
When did you receive one from NYU?
September LSAT and Oct. 21
I have a theory and 100% possible fiction. But this could be a secondary type of YP.
If you guys have the numbers where you may be able to go way above this school and they do not think you will go to Columbia then making you pay the $80 would be an expression of desire to attend their school?
AS opposed to having you WL or you reject them, this could be a way to weed out people who are just applying for fun or only when they have less barriers to entry (the $80).
If the school was the one you would go to, then $80 should not deter you (I think they think this).
But this position leaves out a very import fact of life.
Many of us applicants have a certain preference to a a school but would only commit to it if it really made financial sense in the long run. For example, UChi is my dream school, but would I go to Penn or UVA or NU given a Full ride? Perhaps.
If what I say is true then Columbia ignores this fact by trying to uncover committed applicants by having them pay.
Last edited by btruj777 on Thu Oct 27, 2016 10:25 am, edited 2 times in total.
- SixSigma
- Posts: 18
- Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2016 5:05 am
Re: Unsolicited Fee Waivers 2017
WUSTL
American University
San Diego
Pitt
Roger Williams
Thomas Jefferson
Golden Gate
Creighton
Baltimore
Cardozo
Michigan State
North Kentucky
Penn State
CWRU
Iowa
George Mason
Washburn
Concordia
Catholic
Western State
Charlotte
Tulsa
Southwestern
Delaware
Valparaiso
Indiana
Hastings
American University
San Diego
Pitt
Roger Williams
Thomas Jefferson
Golden Gate
Creighton
Baltimore
Cardozo
Michigan State
North Kentucky
Penn State
CWRU
Iowa
George Mason
Washburn
Concordia
Catholic
Western State
Charlotte
Tulsa
Southwestern
Delaware
Valparaiso
Indiana
Hastings
- Purple Post It Note
- Posts: 73
- Joined: Wed Sep 14, 2016 2:34 pm
Re: Unsolicited Fee Waivers 2017
.
Last edited by Purple Post It Note on Wed Dec 21, 2016 10:35 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 6478
- Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2016 4:46 am
Re: Unsolicited Fee Waivers 2017
Anecdotal, but self-reported GPA of "3.75+" and 177+ LSAT (September) and out of the t14 literally only gotten Penn. I was thinking this was because my graduating year is listed as 2018 and no transcript uploaded, or int'l UG, in case they have some filter, but now I'm not sure.btruj777 wrote:neubyneu wrote:Thanks for the update. Does anyone have any theories about why this might be happening to ReadyToStart and me? It's not like the school knows anything about us besides our numbers at this point. I'm really more curious than anything now.ReadyToStart wrote:Update: They politely rejected my solicitation.neubyneu wrote:If you do, let us know how that goes. I'm above their 75ths and never got a fee waiver. Took LSAT in June. They're the only one I'm missing too.ReadyToStart wrote:Huh. That's disappointing since I'm at their LSAT median, and above the 75th for GPA. Do you think I should try and solicit one from them? They're the only T14 that I'm waiting on.ood wrote:ReadyToStart wrote: Did you take the September LSAT?
When did you receive one from NYU?
September LSAT and Oct. 21
I have a theory and 100% possible fiction. But this could be a secondary type of YP.
If you guys have the numbers where you may be able to go way above this school and they do not think you will go to Columbia then making you pay the $80 would be an expression of desire to attend their school?
AS opposed to having you WL or you reject them, this could be a way to weed out people who are just applying for fun or only when they have less barriers to entry (the $80).
If the school was the one you would go to, then $80 should not deter you (I think they think this).
But this position leaves out a very import fact of life.
Many of us applicants have a certain preference to a a school but would only commit to it if it really made financial sense in the long run. For example, UChi is my dream school, but would I go to Penn or UVA or NU given a Full ride? Perhaps.
If what I say is true then Columbia ignores this fact by trying to uncover committed applicants by having them pay.
You would think they'd *want* you to apply, so they can say they had a bigger applicant pool. But your reasoning here makes sense. Ugh. I really don't want to have to dish out thousands on the application process. Seems a cruel reward for high numbers.

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- btruj777
- Posts: 332
- Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2016 9:31 am
Re: Unsolicited Fee Waivers 2017
I know, (assuming this theory to be true) you are being rewarded by having to pay money for an app (BS), and if you blanket t14 thats a hefty price. It seems like its easier (for schools) to cast a wide net to people to with lower numbers (to increase applicant pool) and reject them quickly (decrease acceptance rate) but this may not work with higher numbers because they want to accept you, but they do not know if you want to accept them, so they have option (A) YP or option (B) have you guys (my brosephs with da high numbers) express actual interest by paying money. In a sick sick way, (which makes me hope I am wrong) in this fashion they offset the costs of being able to decrease acceptance rate by rejecting low numbers by having YOU guys pay money. SO for them its WIN WIN They see it like this maybe:Alexandros wrote:
You would think they'd *want* you to apply, so they can say they had a bigger applicant pool. But your reasoning here makes sense. Ugh. I really don't want to have to dish out thousands on the application process. Seems a cruel reward for high numbers.
1. Only the people with high numbers that would consider going to the school would pay the $85
2. They increase applicant pool with lower apps from lower numbers with fee waivers
3. They decrease acceptance rates
4. They offset the cost of 2 and 3 with the money from 1
But why not simply YP the higher numbers? Well they cant do number 4 and I imagine it is (1) less trouble and (2) they stand to be less offensive to the people they actually want (because having to pay $80 hurts less than having been WL + the deterrent effect of having to write a letter to express interest after being YP).
TOTAL SPECULATION AND HIGHLY UNLIKELY BUT FUN TO THINK ABOUT
-
- Posts: 6478
- Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2016 4:46 am
Re: Unsolicited Fee Waivers 2017
Ugh, I also hope you're wrong, but that really does make sense. Especially as NYU and CLS don't really do much actual YP-ing at the level of acceptance, so encouraging people with high numbers to apply isn't going to do much for their acceptance rate.btruj777 wrote:
I know, (assuming this theory to be true) you are being rewarded by having to pay money for an app (BS), and if you blanket t14 thats a hefty price. It seems like its easier (for schools) to cast a wide net to people to with lower numbers (to increase applicant pool) and reject them quickly (decrease acceptance rate) but this may not work with higher numbers because they want to accept you, but they do not know if you want to accept them, so they have option (A) YP or option (B) have you guys (my brosephs with da high numbers) express actual interest by paying money. In a sick sick way, (which makes me hope I am wrong) in this fashion they offset the costs of being able to decrease acceptance rate by rejecting low numbers by having YOU guys pay money. SO for them its WIN WIN They see it like this maybe:
1. Only the people with high numbers that would consider going to the school would pay the $85
2. They increase applicant pool with lower apps from lower numbers with fee waivers
3. They decrease acceptance rates
4. They offset the cost of 2 and 3 with the money from 1
But why not simply YP the higher numbers? Well they cant do number 4 and I imagine it is (1) less trouble and (2) they stand to be less offensive to the people they actually want (because having to pay $80 hurts less than having been WL + the deterrent effect of having to write a letter to express interest after being YP).
TOTAL SPECULATION AND HIGHLY UNLIKELY BUT FUN TO THINK ABOUT
-
- Posts: 631
- Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2016 11:47 pm
Re: Unsolicited Fee Waivers 2017
.
Last edited by goldenbear2020 on Thu Oct 27, 2016 6:48 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- btruj777
- Posts: 332
- Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2016 9:31 am
Re: Unsolicited Fee Waivers 2017
Well so lets turn it into a positive.Alexandros wrote:Ugh, I also hope you're wrong, but that really does make sense. Especially as NYU and CLS don't really do much actual YP-ing at the level of acceptance, so encouraging people with high numbers to apply isn't going to do much for their acceptance rate.btruj777 wrote:
I know, (assuming this theory to be true) you are being rewarded by having to pay money for an app (BS), and if you blanket t14 thats a hefty price. It seems like its easier (for schools) to cast a wide net to people to with lower numbers (to increase applicant pool) and reject them quickly (decrease acceptance rate) but this may not work with higher numbers because they want to accept you, but they do not know if you want to accept them, so they have option (A) YP or option (B) have you guys (my brosephs with da high numbers) express actual interest by paying money. In a sick sick way, (which makes me hope I am wrong) in this fashion they offset the costs of being able to decrease acceptance rate by rejecting low numbers by having YOU guys pay money. SO for them its WIN WIN They see it like this maybe:
1. Only the people with high numbers that would consider going to the school would pay the $85
2. They increase applicant pool with lower apps from lower numbers with fee waivers
3. They decrease acceptance rates
4. They offset the cost of 2 and 3 with the money from 1
But why not simply YP the higher numbers? Well they cant do number 4 and I imagine it is (1) less trouble and (2) they stand to be less offensive to the people they actually want (because having to pay $80 hurts less than having been WL + the deterrent effect of having to write a letter to express interest after being YP).
TOTAL SPECULATION AND HIGHLY UNLIKELY BUT FUN TO THINK ABOUT
If I am correct, then you know that Columbia will be honored when you apply, a great PLUS PLUS if you ACTUALLY want to go, or at least would go given the $$.
If I am wrong, then there has to be an alt. cause as to why YOU didnt get a fee waiver. (perhaps someone dropped the ball somewhere or they didnt even know you existed for some reason). IF this is so, then by applying you put them on notice of who you are - a very strong candidate.
In either case you look favorable to Columbia by fokring out the 85, if you have zero interest in the school then you just saved at least $30!!!!!
It could be worse,
I got a fee waiver....and if I am right...I just paid for a $30 rejection letter with a nice header. (3.95/167/URM hispanic)
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login