I consider >1 year being at least some WEdrawstring wrote:Also, I've asked this question a few times and gotten different responses. If someone graduates in May, starts full time work immediately, then applies in September, is that a KJD or someone who has about a year and a half of WE (because that's what it will be upon matriculation).
KJD and/or Weak Softs Thread Forum
- Attax
- Posts: 3589
- Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2013 10:59 am
Re: KJD and/or Weak Softs Thread
- mazer
- Posts: 49
- Joined: Tue Dec 24, 2013 10:42 pm
Re: KJD and/or Weak Softs Thread
KJD here as well. It's been an interesting, and pleasantly surprising, cycle since I'm a February retake. I'm a "reverse splitter" too so it's been all kind of anxiety.
That would be how I would characterize it, too.Attax wrote:I consider >1 year being at least some WEdrawstring wrote:Also, I've asked this question a few times and gotten different responses. If someone graduates in May, starts full time work immediately, then applies in September, is that a KJD or someone who has about a year and a half of WE (because that's what it will be upon matriculation).
- Quest4Knowledge
- Posts: 293
- Joined: Thu Jul 04, 2013 2:36 pm
Re: KJD and/or Weak Softs Thread
I agree, but from an admissions perspective - when draw applies, the office will only see that they've been working since May. So May-Fall is all the office has to go on, even if by the time we start school it'll be >1 year.Attax wrote:I consider >1 year being at least some WEdrawstring wrote:Also, I've asked this question a few times and gotten different responses. If someone graduates in May, starts full time work immediately, then applies in September, is that a KJD or someone who has about a year and a half of WE (because that's what it will be upon matriculation).
- dnptan
- Posts: 355
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2013 5:33 pm
Re: KJD and/or Weak Softs Thread
Hey guys, I've met a few K-JDs applying for law school, some even getting into Yale. Both on and off the TLS forum, here's a list of softs I've seen from K-JDs, and how I would rank them. I also included K-MA/PhD-JDs (never left academia), those softs with an asterisk (*). If there is no asterisk, that means I've known people with those softs in undergrad. Please feel free to add/comment on the list.
IMO for KJDs applying for the T14:
Insignificant Softs
- Club Membership
- Minor
- Part-time Work
- Campus Work
- Low-level Honor Societies (NSCS et. al)
Below-Average Softs
- Study abroad
- Ivy league degree (or Stanford, MIT etc.)
- STEM
- Low leadership position (Secretary, auditor)
- Teaching Assistant
- Graduating Early
- Multiple Minors
- Senior Thesis (As required by program)
- Mock Trial
- Internships
Average Softs
- Honors Thesis [Added by manillabay]
- Prestigious internships (Capitol Hill, etc)
- Bi or Tri-lingual
- Double Major
- College Athlete
- High leadership position (VP, P)
- Conference Publication
- Mid-level honor societies (Tau Beta Pi, Phi Kappa Phi)
Above-Average Softs
- International Competitor (Debate, Maths etc.)
- High-profile internships (Obama, Trayvon Martin case)
- Master's Degree*
- Published Author
- Quad or Polylingual
- Triple Major ++
- Phi Beta Kappa
- Starting a company
- College-level lecturer
- Journal Publication
Unique Softs
- PhD*
- Best-selling or renowned author*
- Starting a SUCCESSFUL company (Selling it for ~100,000+)
- Establishing an organization on or off-campus
- Establishing a new LASTING major
- Olympic athlete
- High-level Journal Publication (Nature, Harvard Law Review)
---
Note that a lot of people "bump up", that is consider their AVERAGE softs as ABOVE AVERAGE, because in the real world, they are above average. However, applying to the T14 means that you already ARE above average, so the curve shifts. This explains why 70% of applicants consider themselves "above average"
IMO for KJDs applying for the T14:
Insignificant Softs
- Club Membership
- Minor
- Part-time Work
- Campus Work
- Low-level Honor Societies (NSCS et. al)
Below-Average Softs
- Study abroad
- Ivy league degree (or Stanford, MIT etc.)
- STEM
- Low leadership position (Secretary, auditor)
- Teaching Assistant
- Graduating Early
- Multiple Minors
- Senior Thesis (As required by program)
- Mock Trial
- Internships
Average Softs
- Honors Thesis [Added by manillabay]
- Prestigious internships (Capitol Hill, etc)
- Bi or Tri-lingual
- Double Major
- College Athlete
- High leadership position (VP, P)
- Conference Publication
- Mid-level honor societies (Tau Beta Pi, Phi Kappa Phi)
Above-Average Softs
- International Competitor (Debate, Maths etc.)
- High-profile internships (Obama, Trayvon Martin case)
- Master's Degree*
- Published Author
- Quad or Polylingual
- Triple Major ++
- Phi Beta Kappa
- Starting a company
- College-level lecturer
- Journal Publication
Unique Softs
- PhD*
- Best-selling or renowned author*
- Starting a SUCCESSFUL company (Selling it for ~100,000+)
- Establishing an organization on or off-campus
- Establishing a new LASTING major
- Olympic athlete
- High-level Journal Publication (Nature, Harvard Law Review)
---
Note that a lot of people "bump up", that is consider their AVERAGE softs as ABOVE AVERAGE, because in the real world, they are above average. However, applying to the T14 means that you already ARE above average, so the curve shifts. This explains why 70% of applicants consider themselves "above average"
Last edited by dnptan on Wed Apr 02, 2014 10:41 am, edited 2 times in total.
- manillabay
- Posts: 233
- Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2014 9:50 pm
Re: KJD and/or Weak Softs Thread
How is a thesis a below average soft? I think writing a thesis is 10x more substantial than making it in phi kappa phi....And what kjd do you know that is an Olympic athlete?dnptan wrote:Hey guys, I've met a few K-JDs applying for law school, some even getting into Yale. Both on and off the TLS forum, here's a list of softs I've seen from K-JDs, and how I would rank them. I also included K-MA/PhD-JDs (never left academia), those softs with an asterisk (*). If there is no asterisk, that means I've known people with those softs in undergrad. Please feel free to add/comment on the list.
IMO for KJDs applying for the T14:
Insignificant Softs
- Club Membership
- Minor
- Part-time Work
- Campus Work
- Low-level Honor Societies (NSCS et. al)
Below-Average Softs
- Study abroad
- Ivy league degree (or Stanford, MIT etc.)
- STEM
- Low leadership position (Secretary, auditor)
- Teaching Assistant
- Graduating Early
- Multiple Minors
- Senior Thesis
- Mock Trial
- Internships
Average Softs
- Prestigious internships (Capitol Hill, etc)
- Bi or Tri-lingual
- Double Major
- College Athlete
- High leadership position (VP, P)
- Conference Publication
- Mid-level honor societies (Tau Beta Pi, Phi Kappa Phi)
Above-Average Softs
- International Competitor (Debate, Maths etc.)
- High-profile internships (Obama, Trayvon Martin case)
- Master's Degree*
- Published Author
- Quad or Polylingual
- Triple Major ++
- Phi Beta Kappa
- Starting a company
- College-level lecturer
- Journal Publication
Unique Softs
- PhD*
- Best-selling or renowned author*
- Starting a SUCCESSFUL company (Selling it for ~100,000+)
- Establishing an organization on or off-campus
- Establishing a new LASTING major
- Olympic athlete
- High-level Journal Publication (Nature, Harvard Law Review)
---
Note that a lot of people "bump up", that is consider their AVERAGE softs as ABOVE AVERAGE, because in the real world, they are above average. However, applying to the T14 means that you already ARE above average, so the curve shifts. This explains why 70% of applicants consider themselves "above average"
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- dnptan
- Posts: 355
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2013 5:33 pm
Re: KJD and/or Weak Softs Thread
Sorry, I meant undergrad thesis as required by the program. An honors thesis is in the average category - let me fix that. I know one who won a medal in Sochi.manillabay wrote:How is a thesis a below average soft? I think writing a thesis is 10x more substantial than making it in phi kappa phi....And what kjd do you know that is an Olympic athlete?dnptan wrote:Hey guys, ... "above average"
Last edited by dnptan on Fri Apr 04, 2014 6:22 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- drawstring
- Posts: 1933
- Joined: Tue Apr 09, 2013 4:52 pm
Re: KJD and/or Weak Softs Thread
Ya, that's the issue. I've had a few people, including Spivey, say that I'll be looked at as someone with a year or more of WE, which makes sense as that's what I'd have at matriculation and a K-JD wouldn't. Others have said that they'll look at it as if I've had just a few months though, because that's what it will be when I apply. It makes a big difference, especially for someone whose biggest weakness is probably their WE; it would suck reapplying with no real boost to my application.Quest4Knowledge wrote:I agree, but from an admissions perspective - when draw applies, the office will only see that they've been working since May. So May-Fall is all the office has to go on, even if by the time we start school it'll be >1 year.Attax wrote:I consider >1 year being at least some WEdrawstring wrote:Also, I've asked this question a few times and gotten different responses. If someone graduates in May, starts full time work immediately, then applies in September, is that a KJD or someone who has about a year and a half of WE (because that's what it will be upon matriculation).
Also, if anyone is willing to rate my softs via PM please let me know

- Mack.Hambleton
- Posts: 5414
- Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2014 2:09 am
Re: KJD and/or Weak Softs Thread
.
Last edited by Mack.Hambleton on Sat Jul 25, 2015 8:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Iroh
- Posts: 129
- Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2012 10:20 pm
Re: KJD and/or Weak Softs Thread
Is a double major really an "average" soft? Maybe I just suffer from low self-esteem, but I don't think my double major is really as impressive as someone who is bi or tri-lingual.
Also, I think "consistent volunteer work" should be listed as a separate soft. Not sure where to put it though, maybe as "average".
Also, I think "consistent volunteer work" should be listed as a separate soft. Not sure where to put it though, maybe as "average".
-
- Posts: 297
- Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2013 7:58 pm
Re: KJD and/or Weak Softs Thread
same here.james.bungles wrote:checking in here as a super K-JD (graduating in three years)
I wonder if it was actually a bad thing to graduate early, I feel like ad comms will assume that we're young and immature. Oh well....I saved myself a whole year's worth of tuition and living expenses so there's that.
-
- Posts: 12
- Joined: Sun Jun 03, 2012 11:08 pm
Re: KJD and/or Weak Softs Thread
I'm a KJD that was accepted to Yale! Maybe slightly above average softs, slightly above average numbers for Yale. Can answer any other questions, if anyone is interested!
- manillabay
- Posts: 233
- Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2014 9:50 pm
Re: KJD and/or Weak Softs Thread
hibye wrote:I'm a KJD that was accepted to Yale! Maybe slightly above average softs, slightly above average numbers for Yale. Can answer any other questions, if anyone is interested!
What type of UG university
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 551
- Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 3:10 am
Re: KJD and/or Weak Softs Thread
I just pray my lack of tremendous work experience doesn't railroad me when it comes time for OCI.
I graduated a half a semester early, and have a relatively sophisticated job considering I have a BS degree, but I'm sure my WE still won't be enough seeing as I can't get a job as a CPA or engineer without a relevant degree, so I mean, what can I do.
Have to get top grades and put lipstick on a pig to make it sound better than what it is.
I graduated a half a semester early, and have a relatively sophisticated job considering I have a BS degree, but I'm sure my WE still won't be enough seeing as I can't get a job as a CPA or engineer without a relevant degree, so I mean, what can I do.
Have to get top grades and put lipstick on a pig to make it sound better than what it is.
- PotenC
- Posts: 244
- Joined: Wed Jul 18, 2012 11:13 pm
Re: KJD and/or Weak Softs Thread
I think the value of softs are better quantified when placed in context of the specific applicant. For example, an entry-level job might be construed to be completely unremarkable on the resume of a student who's from a prestigious undergrad, who's had inexhaustible opportunities day in and day out. This same entry-level position might just reflect extremely well on the resume of an applicant who hails from a typical state university with a nigh nonexistent career services department. Just my two cents.


-
- Posts: 551
- Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 3:10 am
Re: KJD and/or Weak Softs Thread
HmmmmmmmmPotenC wrote:I think the value of softs are better quantified when placed in context of the specific applicant. For example, an entry-level job might be construed to be completely unremarkable on the resume of a student who's from a prestigious undergrad, who's had inexhaustible opportunities day in and day out. This same entry-level position might just reflect extremely well on the resume of an applicant who hails from a typical state university with a nigh nonexistent career services department. Just my two cents.
This is true... I mean, even if people don't necessarily see it this way, this is probably a great way to spin things if and when the topic of work experience comes up in an interview.
-
- Posts: 266
- Joined: Mon Jan 06, 2014 11:51 pm
Re: KJD and/or Weak Softs Thread
I had a hunch earlier in the cycle that Duke was bucking the "anti K-JD" trend, and the poll results might bear that out. Interesting to see the responses there.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 12
- Joined: Sun Jun 03, 2012 11:08 pm
Re: KJD and/or Weak Softs Thread
top 3 universitymanillabay wrote:hibye wrote:I'm a KJD that was accepted to Yale! Maybe slightly above average softs, slightly above average numbers for Yale. Can answer any other questions, if anyone is interested!
What type of UG university
- FanOfPosner
- Posts: 51
- Joined: Sun Jan 12, 2014 9:00 pm
Re: KJD and/or Weak Softs Thread
I'm one of those 1 year of work experience people. (To be fair, it'll be more like 13 months.) I'm not sure that it helped me in admissions, since I'm in consulting which is completely standard. I'm sure the adcomms see a ton of my exact work experience. But I do think it'll help in OCI.
-
- Posts: 3971
- Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2012 7:01 pm
Re: KJD and/or Weak Softs Thread
Duke probably has more responses because this thread is somewhat old, and when I put up the survey a lot of people had heard from Duke because of the PT app.
- dnptan
- Posts: 355
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2013 5:33 pm
Re: KJD and/or Weak Softs Thread
It's average insofar as it takes effort to achieve and not everyone can achieve it. However, the quality of that double major is very variable. For instance, a double major in English and Philosophy is very common, and many universities offer it as a staple. A Double major in Physics and Philosophy, while also offered as a staple, is much less common and thus more impressive. A double major in Physics and Business Administration is fairly unique and shows a lot about the candidate's background, interest, and drive.Iroh wrote:Is a double major really an "average" soft? Maybe I just suffer from low self-esteem, but I don't think my double major is really as impressive as someone who is bi or tri-lingual.
Also, I think "consistent volunteer work" should be listed as a separate soft. Not sure where to put it though, maybe as "average".
Likewise, some languages are more similar than others. Someone can be born to a bi-lingual+ family, which isn't that impressive (I'm one of those). Then there are those who learn a second language, but it's not that far-removed from English (E.g. most languages which use a latin script). Finally, there are those remarkable individuals who have mastered English and some other language which has a completely different structure (Chinese, Arabic, Russian).
This is what makes softs hard to classify. Softs rarely have pure merit - they are taken as part of the whole, just like the rest of your application. The way I classified things is less in the difficulty of achieving the soft, but moreso the rarity of the soft.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- shifty_eyed
- Posts: 1925
- Joined: Fri Oct 02, 2009 8:09 pm
Re: KJD and/or Weak Softs Thread
If you really think being KJD is holding you back, it's the easiest thing in your whole application to fix.
- LSATneurotic
- Posts: 982
- Joined: Fri Feb 28, 2014 7:27 pm
Re: KJD and/or Weak Softs Thread
Checking in! Super weak softs, tentative fit for your definition of KJD.
-
- Posts: 22
- Joined: Wed Jul 22, 2015 9:14 am
Re: KJD and/or Weak Softs Thread
I know this is an old thread but I thought it would be worth it to bump. It seems like there's little to no support for KJDs. I've never really doubted myself until looking at this forum, and even then the only people saying to take a few years off are the ones who have done it. The couple of KJDs I've talked to say that they wish they took a year off, but none of them say that they would strongly encourage it or that they absolutely regret their decision not to. Is anyone else starting to doubt themselves? 

-
- Posts: 437
- Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2012 11:23 pm
Re: KJD and/or Weak Softs Thread
I got into all but one school I applied to, with serious money at the ones that offered it. Have no regrets about going straight through.nopenottoday wrote:I know this is an old thread but I thought it would be worth it to bump. It seems like there's little to no support for KJDs. I've never really doubted myself until looking at this forum, and even then the only people saying to take a few years off are the ones who have done it. The couple of KJDs I've talked to say that they wish they took a year off, but none of them say that they would strongly encourage it or that they absolutely regret their decision not to. Is anyone else starting to doubt themselves?
I also think people overestimate the importance softs, although it's possible I underestimate my own (those who know me would say that's unlikely, as I certainly do not lack for confidence). I don't think most of my "softs" count as anything special. I say that because lots of other people at the UG I went to also had them, which means people at all the UGs nationwide probably have them, and many of those UGs have significantly stronger academic reputations.
I did, however, have a 3.98/179 GPA/LSAT profile. If you're a KJD, just kill it on the tests and you'll be fine.
ETA: And when you actually start, the complaining all the WE people do about having to re-learn how to study and such puts you at an advantage early on. It doesn't really do much grades-wise, but it does help with just being happier and your days being not as tough while going through 1L.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login