M_n_M wrote:Seriously? I had no idea. I just remember seeing some philosophy grad students chilling at the local bar each week playing trivia and drinking brews. I had 1 of them lecturing to me as a teaching assistant and one of them as a recently elevated professor. Both were awkward as hell in class, but they seemed pretty happy around each other at the bar. Maybe all my experiences are just the exception to the norm.
I mean, you're pointing to 2 people out of all the people who ever taught you in college. All the others were once grad students and have PhDs, too.
And no, to get a PhD you do not chill with your friends for a couple of years until you get a professor job. Not even remotely close. Of course people look happy at a bar drinking and playing trivia. But that's not how they spend the vast majority of their time.
To go back to the OP, my point is mostly that entering a PhD program because you have a humanities BA and crappy job and don't know what else to do is an even worse idea than going to law school for those reasons. (I know PhD programs pay your tuition/give a stipend. It's still a worse idea.)
Desert Fox - I'll grant that the pool entering PhD programs is a little different, and the model for sociability is a little different, but you need to be good at pretty much everything to actually get a job these days, and that includes being able to stand up in front of people and talk. Maybe less on the day-to-day chitchat, but the people who succeed are always the people who know people and talk to people and are liked by people. "Fit" is absolutely a HUGE criterion for hiring and getting tenure.