Ok, I KINDA side with the OP on this. In a thread supposedly about sexism in LSAT education and making jokes about domestic violence, commenting on someone's appearance is not quiteeee appropswarandpeace wrote:I thought so, as wellA → B ⊨ ¬B → ¬A wrote:I thought it was a nice thing to say.cbarlow1016 wrote:k guess no one wants to have a serious conversation on here and who would care about women's rights/domestic abuse so nbd.warandpeace wrote:OP, you're cute
offensive post Forum
- ManOfTheMinute
- Posts: 1557
- Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2012 12:54 am
Re: .
-
- Posts: 592
- Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2012 5:32 pm
Re: .
This is what I thought the thread was about: .ManOfTheMinute wrote:Ok, I KINDA side with the OP on this. In a thread supposedly about sexism in LSAT education and making jokes about domestic violence, commenting on someone's appearance is not quiteeee approps
- ManOfTheMinute
- Posts: 1557
- Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2012 12:54 am
Re: .
Bahahahahhahahahah. Fair.A → B ⊨ ¬B → ¬A wrote:This is what I thought the thread was about: .ManOfTheMinute wrote:Ok, I KINDA side with the OP on this. In a thread supposedly about sexism in LSAT education and making jokes about domestic violence, commenting on someone's appearance is not quiteeee approps
- simplycatalina
- Posts: 935
- Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2012 7:41 pm
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- simplycatalina
- Posts: 935
- Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2012 7:41 pm
Re: .
A → B ⊨ ¬B → ¬A wrote:This is what I thought the thread was about: .ManOfTheMinute wrote:Ok, I KINDA side with the OP on this. In a thread supposedly about sexism in LSAT education and making jokes about domestic violence, commenting on someone's appearance is not quiteeee approps
Last edited by simplycatalina on Wed Jan 30, 2013 10:12 am, edited 1 time in total.
- ManOfTheMinute
- Posts: 1557
- Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2012 12:54 am
Re: .
Well for starters, you said that I attacked you and have since been unwilling to substantiate that claim in any way. Not indicative of a rationale person out for a serious conversation.cbarlow1016 wrote:I don't know what I did to piss people off but I was attempting to have a serious conversation and not trying to upset anyone.
- warandpeace
- Posts: 301
- Joined: Sat Mar 12, 2011 1:43 pm
Re: .
am surprised he's okay with it, but it's his facebook page. did you want tls to do something? i'm sure most of us agree with you but, yeahcbarlow1016 wrote:I initially created this thread because I was pissed about an uber-sexist blueprint post, but I guess this is not the place to take my concerns. As someone who has lobbied for women's rights for a while, this thread is kinda sad and disheartening to me.A → B ⊨ ¬B → ¬A wrote:This is what I thought the thread was about: .ManOfTheMinute wrote:Ok, I KINDA side with the OP on this. In a thread supposedly about sexism in LSAT education and making jokes about domestic violence, commenting on someone's appearance is not quiteeee approps
- simplycatalina
- Posts: 935
- Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2012 7:41 pm
Re: .
.ManOfTheMinute wrote:Well for starters, you said that I attacked you and have since been unwilling to substantiate that claim in any way. Not indicative of a rationale person out for a serious conversation.cbarlow1016 wrote:I don't know what I did to piss people off but I was attempting to have a serious conversation and not trying to upset anyone.
Last edited by simplycatalina on Fri Jun 21, 2013 2:48 am, edited 1 time in total.
- simplycatalina
- Posts: 935
- Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2012 7:41 pm
Re: .
warandpeace wrote:am surprised he's okay with it, but it's his facebook page. did you want tls to do something? i'm sure most of us agree with you but, yeahcbarlow1016 wrote:I initially created this thread because I was pissed about an uber-sexist blueprint post, but I guess this is not the place to take my concerns. As someone who has lobbied for women's rights for a while, this thread is kinda sad and disheartening to me.A → B ⊨ ¬B → ¬A wrote:This is what I thought the thread was about: .ManOfTheMinute wrote:Ok, I KINDA side with the OP on this. In a thread supposedly about sexism in LSAT education and making jokes about domestic violence, commenting on someone's appearance is not quiteeee approps
Last edited by simplycatalina on Wed Jan 30, 2013 10:21 am, edited 1 time in total.
- warandpeace
- Posts: 301
- Joined: Sat Mar 12, 2011 1:43 pm
Re: .
oh. don't have a fb, otherwise would have done so.cbarlow1016 wrote:
it's blueprint's facebook page. i just thought i'd post it because i thought other people would also have a problem with it. i'm not trying to get anyone to do anything for me, i'd just like anyone who feels strongly to comment on the blueprint page.
-
- Posts: 235
- Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2011 8:48 pm
Re: .
What's wrong with the picture? It's more insulting to Chris Brown than anything. I guess it sort of makes light of a serious issue, but it's not like it's an endorsement of domestic violence. You realize comedians make jokes about very serious/unfunny things all the time, right? The seriousness of the issue provides the contrast for the humor. Hell, there is a whole genre of dead baby jokes out there. I'd post one, but I get the sense that's not your thing. I guess my point is, you're overreacting here, which is amusing to most casual observers, and does little to further your cause.
EDIT: FWIW, in addition to thinking the picutre wasn't offensive, I also did not think it was funny. So, maybe it wasn't worth posting... but yeah...
EDIT: FWIW, in addition to thinking the picutre wasn't offensive, I also did not think it was funny. So, maybe it wasn't worth posting... but yeah...
- John_rizzy_rawls
- Posts: 3468
- Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2012 2:44 pm
Re: .
"Mockery is a time-honored way of pointing out poor behavior. Just ask Jonathan Swift."
- Blueprint LSAT Preparation
Pretty sure their direct response was more than adequate here.
Also, you know Chris Brown has also punched Frank Ocean and Drake right? Should LGBT Advocacy Groups and Organizations for the Lyrically Challenged, respectively, be up in arms?
Relax. No one is condoning this behavior, quite the opposite. Please tell me everyone in Berkeley isn't like this.
- Blueprint LSAT Preparation
Pretty sure their direct response was more than adequate here.
Also, you know Chris Brown has also punched Frank Ocean and Drake right? Should LGBT Advocacy Groups and Organizations for the Lyrically Challenged, respectively, be up in arms?
Relax. No one is condoning this behavior, quite the opposite. Please tell me everyone in Berkeley isn't like this.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- warandpeace
- Posts: 301
- Joined: Sat Mar 12, 2011 1:43 pm
Re: .
180John_rizzy_rawls wrote: [...] Organizations for the Lyrically Challenged, respectively, be up in arms?
-
- Posts: 592
- Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2012 5:32 pm
Re: .
lolJohn_rizzy_rawls wrote:Please tell me everyone in Berkeley isn't like this.
-
- Posts: 18585
- Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2012 1:52 am
Re: .
LOL fuck off. As someone who is all for women's rights, it's beyond disingenuous to imply that anyone who doesn't agree with you ITT is somehow against women's rights in general. JFC.cbarlow1016 wrote:I initially created this thread because I was pissed about an uber-sexist blueprint post, but I guess this is not the place to take my concerns. As someone who has lobbied for women's rights for a while, this thread is kinda sad and disheartening to me.A → B ⊨ ¬B → ¬A wrote:This is what I thought the thread was about: .ManOfTheMinute wrote:Ok, I KINDA side with the OP on this. In a thread supposedly about sexism in LSAT education and making jokes about domestic violence, commenting on someone's appearance is not quiteeee approps
Also, your original post was ironically rather sexist. Men can be against domestic violence to women, and women exist who would disagree with your point, so stop drawing tribal-group lines in the sand.
Last edited by suralin on Wed Jan 30, 2013 4:55 am, edited 2 times in total.
- Richie Tenenbaum
- Posts: 2118
- Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 6:17 am
Re: .
Did not find the picture offensive or sexist. And not sure how it can be viewed as advocating domestic abuse. Would a Ray Lewis Deer Antler meme be promoting the use of illegal substances in sports? What about a meme making fun of Lance Armstrong? Seems like the Blueprint guy's answer to your comment was perfectly valid.
ETA:
OP, I'm curious why you didn't also comment on this other BP photo: https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid ... permPage=1
Clearly someone from blueprint is making light of lying and promoting the idea that people should make up and then kill off their fake girlfriends. Disgusting.
ETA:
OP, I'm curious why you didn't also comment on this other BP photo: https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid ... permPage=1
Clearly someone from blueprint is making light of lying and promoting the idea that people should make up and then kill off their fake girlfriends. Disgusting.
Last edited by Richie Tenenbaum on Wed Jan 30, 2013 5:04 am, edited 1 time in total.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- simplycatalina
- Posts: 935
- Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2012 7:41 pm
- simplycatalina
- Posts: 935
- Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2012 7:41 pm
-
- Posts: 271
- Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2012 3:07 am
Re: .
+1cbarlow1016 wrote:K here goes. I actually really appreciate this response, so thank you.vman21 wrote:cbarlow, looks like people on here are giving you the space to make an argument. I thought that is what you wanted:
:cbarlow1016 wrote: I don't know what I did to piss people off but I was attempting to have a serious conversation and not trying to upset anyone.
This person is engaging with you on the issues, for instance:Instead of lamenting the hate, why don't you write a convincing rebuttal? I, for one, am actually curious/interested in what you have to say. I am not sure if I agree with you or not, and you wanted to have a serious conversation so...persuade me (and others) that you are right. And ignore the hate, or at least play along with it (nobody is trying to be hateful, really, I think they are just poking fun at you).Betharl wrote:What's wrong with the picture? It's more insulting to Chris Brown than anything. I guess it sort of makes light of a serious issue, but it's not like it's an endorsement of domestic violence.
If this were the real world, would you roll your eyes, or would you roll up your sleeves and write an interesting argument?
I am (sincerely) looking forward to your remarks.
I thought that this post was offensive because, while I understand that Chris Brown beat people other than Rihanna, he is primarily known for this assault. I think that it is incredibly inappropriate to make any jokes related to domestic violence because of the gravity of the situation, and the fact that so many women and families face a similar situation on a daily basis. As someone who has worked with survivors of domestic violence, I have seen how it can tear people apart, both physically and psychologically, but yet it's something that 1 in 3 women in the United States faces. In my opinion, making any jokes related to this phenomenon minimizes the tangible and harmful effects it has on a daily basis. It's not that they were trying to be offensive, so I understand the point that some of you guys have made, but I don't think this is the proper place for humor. Domestic violence is never funny, and it is not something to be joked about. Making light of it sends the message to real people who have experienced it that their experiences don't matter, that what happened to them was not serious or harmful, and that other people don't take them seriously. And it send the message to abusers that the abuse is no big deal. Feel free to disagree with me, but like I said, I'm not seeing the humor here.
Can't believe this is somehow a big argument? Were there edits or something that I missed here? What did the LSAT distribution curve have to do with this..?
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login