(Applications Advice, Letters of Recommendation . . . )
-
Miracle

- Posts: 929
- Joined: Fri Dec 19, 2008 9:25 pm
Post
by Miracle » Thu Aug 23, 2012 9:16 pm
North wrote:WannabeBlueDevil wrote:yay cyber sarcasm.
Haha, yup. Cyber sarcasm.
But, seriously:
- "School name" does not matter when transferring, your performance during 1L almost exclusively does.
- Never go to a law school with the sole intent of transferring elsewhere because there is about a 90% chance you won't be able to.
- LST doesn't rank "highest paying careers."
- If it did, it would be entirely irrelevant to OP.
- This is what's relevant: BC (68.4% full time legal employment rate for graduates) and BU (50.9% full time legal employment rate for graduates)
Read more before giving advice to people who might take it. OP is in a great place to capitalize on his distance from his UGPA by working for a 170+ LSAT. Then he can go to a T14 outright.
ETA: Just saw your link. Lol, that information has about ZERO relevance to the people currently graduating. Get out of here dude.
what does LST mean?
Im guessing Law School ....
-
alwayssunnyinfl

- Posts: 4100
- Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2012 9:34 pm
Post
by alwayssunnyinfl » Thu Aug 23, 2012 9:16 pm
Miracle wrote:North wrote:WannabeBlueDevil wrote:yay cyber sarcasm.
Haha, yup. Cyber sarcasm.
But, seriously:
- "School name" does not matter when transferring, your performance during 1L almost exclusively does.
- Never go to a law school with the sole intent of transferring elsewhere because there is about a 90% chance you won't be able to.
- LST doesn't rank "highest paying careers."
- If it did, it would be entirely irrelevant to OP.
- This is what's relevant: BC (68.4% full time legal employment rate for graduates) and BU (50.9% full time legal employment rate for graduates)
Read more before giving advice to people who might take it. OP is in a great place to capitalize on his distance from his UGPA by working for a 170+ LSAT. Then he can go to a T14 outright.
ETA: Just saw your link. Lol, that information has about ZERO relevance to the people currently graduating. Get out of here dude.
what does LST mean?
Im guessing Law School ....
A website you need to become very familiar with
-
Miracle

- Posts: 929
- Joined: Fri Dec 19, 2008 9:25 pm
Post
by Miracle » Thu Aug 23, 2012 9:18 pm
alwayssunnyinfl wrote:Miracle wrote:North wrote:WannabeBlueDevil wrote:yay cyber sarcasm.
Haha, yup. Cyber sarcasm.
But, seriously:
- "School name" does not matter when transferring, your performance during 1L almost exclusively does.
- Never go to a law school with the sole intent of transferring elsewhere because there is about a 90% chance you won't be able to.
- LST doesn't rank "highest paying careers."
- If it did, it would be entirely irrelevant to OP.
- This is what's relevant: BC (68.4% full time legal employment rate for graduates) and BU (50.9% full time legal employment rate for graduates)
Read more before giving advice to people who might take it. OP is in a great place to capitalize on his distance from his UGPA by working for a 170+ LSAT. Then he can go to a T14 outright.
ETA: Just saw your link. Lol, that information has about ZERO relevance to the people currently graduating. Get out of here dude.
what does LST mean?
Im guessing Law School ....
A website you need to become very familiar with
Law School Transparency! Got it! I know what the website means, i just didn't know what the abbreviation means
How does this sentence make sense: LTS does't rank highest paying careers. LOL i don't get it
-
alwayssunnyinfl

- Posts: 4100
- Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2012 9:34 pm
Post
by alwayssunnyinfl » Thu Aug 23, 2012 9:22 pm
Miracle wrote:
How does this sentence make sense: LTS does't rank highest paying careers. LOL i don't get it
He meant that no one gives a crap if people who graduated from a particular law school in the past make a lot of money. The relevant info is what are
current graduates up against.
-
Miracle

- Posts: 929
- Joined: Fri Dec 19, 2008 9:25 pm
Post
by Miracle » Thu Aug 23, 2012 9:24 pm
alwayssunnyinfl wrote:Miracle wrote:
How does this sentence make sense: LTS does't rank highest paying careers. LOL i don't get it
He meant that no one gives a crap if people who graduated from a particular law school in the past make a lot of money. The relevant info is what are
current graduates up against.
Ok Ok i got it!
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
top30man

- Posts: 1224
- Joined: Wed Sep 14, 2011 9:11 pm
Post
by top30man » Thu Aug 23, 2012 9:28 pm
Any data that talks about how grads are doing far after graduation is likely to be very flawed. Would you really look at this list and say "Im going to turn down Yale for BU."
Also, worth noting that all these graduates were pre-ITE, which makes it even less relevant.
-
alwayssunnyinfl

- Posts: 4100
- Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2012 9:34 pm
Post
by alwayssunnyinfl » Thu Aug 23, 2012 9:31 pm
top30man wrote:Any data that talks about how grads are doing far after graduation is likely to be very flawed. Would you really look at this list and say "Im going to turn down Yale for BU."
Also, worth noting that all these graduates were pre-ITE, which makes it even less relevant.
[Just in case, pre-ITE means pre-"In this economy"]
-
Miracle

- Posts: 929
- Joined: Fri Dec 19, 2008 9:25 pm
Post
by Miracle » Thu Aug 23, 2012 9:35 pm
alwayssunnyinfl wrote:top30man wrote:Any data that talks about how grads are doing far after graduation is likely to be very flawed. Would you really look at this list and say "Im going to turn down Yale for BU."
Also, worth noting that all these graduates were pre-ITE, which makes it even less relevant.
[Just in case, pre-ITE means pre-"In this economy"]
LOL thank you on the explanation. I didn't know what that meant either.
Want to continue reading?
Register for access!
Did I mention it was FREE ?
Already a member? Login