Your performance in Math 1050 has nothing to do with future performance in law school. However, I assume you want to include your A+ in Basket-weaving 101 you took as a Freshman at your UG, right? You can't just pick and choose the applicable classes from a UG curriculum (because most students would be left with zero classes to measure a GPA from).coldshoulder wrote: Where I'm from, CC class was taken at high school. The classes were no more difficult than AP (actually easier) but I had no interest in mathematics and did not pay attention or even go to most of the classes. Yes, for my 16 year-old self, that was immature. But hell, how does my performance in Math 1050/1060 affect my future performance in law school? A large part of college should be the ability to start over and have your now adult life be the focus of future applications.
Moral of the story: You're older and still stupid. LSAC is very much to blame for this. I'm attempting to move on and kill the LSAT, but I should not have to be at this disadvantage.
If you're going to blame the LSAC for your own immaturities (yes, even when you're 16), then maybe you should go work for a few years, mature, and then apply to law school when you're ready to be an adult.
I'm sick of this entitlement bullshit. Take responsibility for your own fuck-ups. My grades at my UG were certainly not all they could be, but I don't go blaming anyone but myself. I even had some grade disputes, but I blame myself for not following through on them. I screwed up, not my profs that assigned me a B when it should have been an A. I didn't get it corrected, so I should be the one to suffer because of it.
