I'm confused about URM on UC Law Campuses Forum

[ag912]

If the only argument is that California is in the United States. Why hasnt the federal law banning the sale and use of marijuana not had the same effect on California legislation?

[BlueDiamond]

I hate to have to do it, but it has gone too far... RETAKE

[crossingforHYS]

the bakke case was in the 1970s, that section of the California Constitution was inserted in the late 90s. If there was a conflict wouldn't that decision have nullified the ability of the proposition to be brought to election/passed/used to amend the constitution.

this made me laugh....

there are a billion and five conflicts in the california constitution look at the biggest one:

prop 8 said only men and women are allowed to marry...yet there is an ep clause in the california constitution....
we do brainsurgery on our constitution....nothing is consistent

[ag912]

I've gotten in to the law school I wanted to already, I just happened to come across that Proposition lol.

[crossingforHYS]

I hate to have to do it, but it has gone too far... RETAKE

[flcath]

If the only argument is that California is in the United States. Why hasnt the federal law banning the sale and use of marijuana not had the same effect on California legislation?

You aren't in law school, are you?

[crossingforHYS]

If the only argument is that California is in the United States. Why hasnt the federal law banning the sale and use of marijuana not had the same effect on California legislation?

You aren't in law school, are you?

neither am I...but even I know that the answer to the above is b/c the DOJ wont go after it

k I am out....I have kept this going waaaayyy to long

[ag912]

I will be in august =/

[Ty Webb]

The OP is going to get a C in Con Law.

HTH.