oh...guess i need to go look back on it.Bumi wrote:This list is radically different from last year's top 10. I, for one, am floored.warandpeace wrote:wait why is everyone so surprised? hasn't the list stayed relatively the same?
2012 US News Top 10 posted online Forum
- warandpeace

- Posts: 301
- Joined: Sat Mar 12, 2011 1:43 pm
Re: 2012 US News Top 10 posted online
-
emmbar53

- Posts: 112
- Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2010 2:17 pm
Re: 2012 US News Top 10 posted online
+1099.9luft wrote:low lsat median, for one.icpb wrote:Just curious, why don't people think Berkeley belongs in the top 10 (other than the fact that it has weird admissions)?
TBF, it could drop a couple of spots within the top10, so not sure what's with the hatin.
-1
ETA: Score: +9
- kwais

- Posts: 1675
- Joined: Tue May 11, 2010 12:28 pm
Re: 2012 US News Top 10 posted online
I believe that it was sarcasmwarandpeace wrote:oh...guess i need to go look back on it.Bumi wrote:This list is radically different from last year's top 10. I, for one, am floored.warandpeace wrote:wait why is everyone so surprised? hasn't the list stayed relatively the same?
- warandpeace

- Posts: 301
- Joined: Sat Mar 12, 2011 1:43 pm
Re: 2012 US News Top 10 posted online
hold up. i just looked at the old list; there's no difference?!
the list posted for 2012 is alphabetical. again, someone correct me if i'm wrong...
http://grad-schools.usnews.rankingsandr ... w-rankings
the list posted for 2012 is alphabetical. again, someone correct me if i'm wrong...
http://grad-schools.usnews.rankingsandr ... w-rankings
- warandpeace

- Posts: 301
- Joined: Sat Mar 12, 2011 1:43 pm
Re: 2012 US News Top 10 posted online
oh god of course it waskwais wrote:I believe that it was sarcasmwarandpeace wrote:oh...guess i need to go look back on it.Bumi wrote:This list is radically different from last year's top 10. I, for one, am floored.warandpeace wrote:wait why is everyone so surprised? hasn't the list stayed relatively the same?
-
FiveSermon

- Posts: 1505
- Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2010 6:56 pm
Re: 2012 US News Top 10 posted online
Not surprised.
- DoubleChecks

- Posts: 2328
- Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 4:35 pm
Re: 2012 US News Top 10 posted online
only thing that is not surprising is that it's now +11FiveSermon wrote:Not surprised.
- hipstermafia

- Posts: 1053
- Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2010 12:45 pm
Re: 2012 US News Top 10 posted online
you realize he is kidding, right?ziggie wrote:Wait, you realize the list was in alphabetical order, right?Bumi wrote:This list is radically different from last year's top 10. I, for one, am floored.warandpeace wrote:wait why is everyone so surprised? hasn't the list stayed relatively the same?
- nshapkar

- Posts: 2443
- Joined: Sat Dec 25, 2010 5:56 pm
Re: 2012 US News Top 10 posted online
DoubleChecks wrote:only thing that is not surprising is that it's now +11FiveSermon wrote:Not surprised.
+12 for the sake of "+#"
-
ATR

- Posts: 1118
- Joined: Sun Oct 03, 2010 9:18 pm
Re: 2012 US News Top 10 posted online
Take solace you're not this guy.Upton Sinclair wrote:Being the +10 in this thread is the best thing to happen to me all day. I wish I was kidding.
- Upton Sinclair

- Posts: 233
- Joined: Mon Mar 15, 2010 3:10 pm
Re: 2012 US News Top 10 posted online
Quality.ATR wrote:Take solace you're not this guy.Upton Sinclair wrote:Being the +10 in this thread is the best thing to happen to me all day. I wish I was kidding.
- amers73

- Posts: 216
- Joined: Sun Dec 12, 2010 4:30 pm
Re: 2012 US News Top 10 posted online
Ouch.ATR wrote:Take solace you're not this guy.Upton Sinclair wrote:Being the +10 in this thread is the best thing to happen to me all day. I wish I was kidding.
-
Arbiter213

- Posts: 2248
- Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2010 10:16 pm
Re: 2012 US News Top 10 posted online
+14, but now this must stop, as everyone knows on TLS numbering goes 1-14 and then "TTT"Malcolm8X wrote:+13
- LLB2JD

- Posts: 660
- Joined: Tue Sep 29, 2009 5:32 pm
Re: 2012 US News Top 10 posted online
-1. So that takes it back to 13.Arbiter213 wrote:+14, but now this must stop, as everyone knows on TLS numbering goes 1-14 and then "TTT"Malcolm8X wrote:+13
-
ATR

- Posts: 1118
- Joined: Sun Oct 03, 2010 9:18 pm
Re: 2012 US News Top 10 posted online
Egregious GULC trolling.Arbiter213 wrote:+14, but now this must stop, as everyone knows on TLS numbering goes 1-14 and then "TTT"
- ScrabbleChamp

- Posts: 963
- Joined: Wed Jun 23, 2010 8:09 am
Re: 2012 US News Top 10 posted online
+TTTArbiter213 wrote:+14, but now this must stop, as everyone knows on TLS numbering goes 1-14 and then "TTT"Malcolm8X wrote:+13
-
Wactawshus

- Posts: 69
- Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 4:59 pm
Re: 2012 US News Top 10 posted online
RetakeScrabbleChamp wrote:+TTTArbiter213 wrote:+14, but now this must stop, as everyone knows on TLS numbering goes 1-14 and then "TTT"Malcolm8X wrote:+13
- nygrrrl

- Posts: 4434
- Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2009 1:01 am
Re: 2012 US News Top 10 posted online
Hey there, "Retake" guy... I thought that was pretty darned funny, but just for future reference...
FYI:
FYI:
Nightrunner wrote:LEGIT ANNOUNCEMENT:
"Retake" isn't funny anymore. Moreover, if you drop it in the Lounge (or in an applicable LSAT thread), then so be it...but stop posting it in response to legit questions in on-topic forums, e.g., choosing between two law schools. You're not funny; you're being an asshole.
Please consider this an open warning - vacations are my first reaction to future instances.
- robotclubmember

- Posts: 743
- Joined: Wed Sep 15, 2010 7:53 am
Re: 2012 US News Top 10 posted online
Indeed, deserving of censure and perhaps even ridicule.ATR wrote:Egregious GULC trolling.Arbiter213 wrote:+14, but now this must stop, as everyone knows on TLS numbering goes 1-14 and then "TTT"
-
haus

- Posts: 3896
- Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2010 11:07 am
Re: 2012 US News Top 10 posted online
I do not think that the internet has been approved for the use of sarcasm yet.kwais wrote: I believe that it was sarcasm
- nygrrrl

- Posts: 4434
- Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2009 1:01 am
Re: 2012 US News Top 10 posted online
Personally, I am still waiting for the sarcasm font.haus wrote:I do not think that the internet has been approved for the use of sarcasm yet.kwais wrote: I believe that it was sarcasm
-
Wactawshus

- Posts: 69
- Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 4:59 pm
Re: 2012 US News Top 10 posted online
I wonder if this counts when the term is used to be an asshole only for the sake of mocking larger assholes?nygrrrl wrote:Hey there, "Retake" guy... I thought that was pretty darned funny, but just for future reference...
FYI:Nightrunner wrote:LEGIT ANNOUNCEMENT:
"Retake" isn't funny anymore. Moreover, if you drop it in the Lounge (or in an applicable LSAT thread), then so be it...but stop posting it in response to legit questions in on-topic forums, e.g., choosing between two law schools. You're not funny; you're being an asshole.
Please consider this an open warning - vacations are my first reaction to future instances.
Is there no merit to this?
- Aberzombie1892

- Posts: 1908
- Joined: Sun Mar 29, 2009 10:56 am
Re: 2012 US News Top 10 posted online
That's only because US News hasn't found a way to rank it yet.haus wrote:I do not think that the internet has been approved for the use of sarcasm yet.kwais wrote: I believe that it was sarcasm
- nygrrrl

- Posts: 4434
- Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2009 1:01 am
Re: 2012 US News Top 10 posted online
My advice on that would be... proceed at your own risk.Wactawshus wrote:I wonder if this counts when the term is used to be an asshole only for the sake of mocking larger assholes?nygrrrl wrote:Hey there, "Retake" guy... I thought that was pretty darned funny, but just for future reference...
FYI:Nightrunner wrote:LEGIT ANNOUNCEMENT:
"Retake" isn't funny anymore. Moreover, if you drop it in the Lounge (or in an applicable LSAT thread), then so be it...but stop posting it in response to legit questions in on-topic forums, e.g., choosing between two law schools. You're not funny; you're being an asshole.
Please consider this an open warning - vacations are my first reaction to future instances.
Is there no merit to this?