Oh, excellent point! I'll keep that in mind when I draft my LOCI'sHannibal wrote:Barbie here got into UIUC with a decent scholly, below both medians and I think below one 25th. She has two huge softs though.
*waits for joke*

Oh, excellent point! I'll keep that in mind when I draft my LOCI'sHannibal wrote:Barbie here got into UIUC with a decent scholly, below both medians and I think below one 25th. She has two huge softs though.
*waits for joke*
I think the people in this category are still waiting for answers. Their apps are most likely sitting in maybe piles right now.JLR wrote:Folks - trying to keep this on point. I am focusing on exceptions to auto rejects (below both medians, non URM), not anything else. Not splitters, reverse splitters or softs. ANYONE below both medians and a non URM who has an acceptance?
Like Hanni said, TLS user Barbie. Below both medians at UIUC, non-URM, got in. She did have exceptional softs though. PM her for more info.JLR wrote:Folks - trying to keep this on point. I am focusing on exceptions to auto rejects (below both medians, non URM), not anything else. Not splitters, reverse splitters or softs. ANYONE below both medians and a non URM who has an acceptance?
OK, JLR, the only reason I wrote in this thread was because it's a generally accepted notion that the LSAT is worth a lot more weight than a GPA. If you have a GPA AND an LSAT below both medians, you probably wouldn't be a very good fit at that school anywaybk187 wrote:What are you on about?JLR wrote:Folks - trying to keep this on point. I am focusing on exceptions to auto rejects (below both medians, non URM), not anything else. Not splitters, reverse splitters or softs. ANYONE below both medians and a non URM who has an acceptance?
Are you seriously asking for someone below both medians who has no softs that got in? Someone who has literally nothing going for them?
Want to continue reading?
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
Your hard work in college is reflected in your GPA, which they like. You're acting like the average 4.0/167 has a hard time snagging lower T14's, which is not true.paulinaporizkova wrote:So no, I don't have MS's and PhD's and my LSAT (95th percentile when I took it) was on the low end of most schools I applied to, but I think the fact that I worked so damn hard in college really reflects my ability to succeed in graduate school, which is why I think I was accepted to these schools with a "subpar" LSAT.
I wasn't joking about Barbie.JLR wrote:bk187 - no. I am simply suggesting that no matter how good one's softs are, they cannot overcome being below both medians.
This...Hannibal wrote:I wasn't joking about Barbie.JLR wrote:bk187 - no. I am simply suggesting that no matter how good one's softs are, they cannot overcome being below both medians.
Even ED doesn't save you from the kiss of death (below both medians).paulinaporizkova wrote:JLR, I agree. I think it would be a rare case if this were to happen. Or the person ED'd.
I'm sorry. Did everyone completely disregard my comment?JLR wrote:bk187 - no. I am simply suggesting that no matter how good one's softs are, they cannot overcome being below both medians.
Register now!
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
Did you guys actually read it?Desert Fox wrote:Barbie should have been autodinged for her TTT book. Truly atrocious.
Extremely rare is an understatement.Shooter wrote: Harvard accepts white males below both medians. Done, end of discussion. Softs (provided they are exceptional) can make a difference. It is just extremely rare.
I was read excerpts. It was clear it wasn't even edited.Hannibal wrote:Did you guys actually read it?Desert Fox wrote:Barbie should have been autodinged for her TTT book. Truly atrocious.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
I doubt it.paulinaporizkova wrote:Maybe this is a topic for another thread, but in a battle between a white male and a white female, all other things constant in their application, does the female really get the advantage?
Whether or not her book was horrible, it's still true that she got into UIUC while being below both medians, and non-URM.Desert Fox wrote:I was read excerpts. It was clear it wasn't even edited.Hannibal wrote:Did you guys actually read it?Desert Fox wrote:Barbie should have been autodinged for her TTT book. Truly atrocious.
Would you like to make other true but nonresponsive relies to my post?kazu wrote:Whether or not her book was horrible, it's still true that she got into UIUC while being below both medians, and non-URM.Desert Fox wrote:I was read excerpts. It was clear it wasn't even edited.Hannibal wrote:Did you guys actually read it?Desert Fox wrote:Barbie should have been autodinged for her TTT book. Truly atrocious.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Already a member? Login
Eh, that wasn't directed at you, I was just annoyed that OP kept ignoring a valid answer to his question.Desert Fox wrote:Would you like to make other true but nonresponsive relies to my post?
That's a pretty huge win. Which school. It could people applying.bookofcarpetsamples wrote:i was admitted to a school with a one point below median lsat (but still above 25th), and a well below 25th gpa. it happens, but i think everyone on here knows it's very, very rare.
Gotcha. It's exactly what he was looking for but doesn't want to hear it for some odd reason.kazu wrote:Eh, that wasn't directed at you, I was just annoyed that OP kept ignoring a valid answer to his question.Desert Fox wrote:Would you like to make other true but nonresponsive relies to my post?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login