How do you think law schools should be ranked? Forum

(Applications Advice, Letters of Recommendation . . . )
elegally

New
Posts: 36
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2010 11:43 am

Re: How do you think law schools should be ranked?

Post by elegally » Tue Nov 23, 2010 4:20 pm

tk4386 wrote:Sluttiness of the locals.
Lol this is my favorite so far.

Bumi

Silver
Posts: 947
Joined: Sun Jul 25, 2010 4:57 pm

Re: How do you think law schools should be ranked?

Post by Bumi » Tue Nov 23, 2010 4:30 pm

canuck wrote:
2807 wrote: Well, maybe. That is why I would like a blind test. It will tell the truth. It would make the teachers teach, and the students learn. Pedigree would mean nothing. If it so happened that pedigree and work-product equated to the same rankings I would be surprised, but at least it would really validate that ranking--and for the right reason.
This is so flawed in so many ways.
I agree. For instance, imagine if the law schools themselves used some sort of blind test to select students based on their aptitude instead of just undergrad GPA and undergrad prestige. Anarchy!

ohlawl

New
Posts: 59
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2010 4:39 pm

Re: How do you think law schools should be ranked?

Post by ohlawl » Tue Nov 23, 2010 4:40 pm

National names on one list with the rest having regional rankings per market.

User avatar
OGR3

Silver
Posts: 881
Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2009 6:56 pm

Re: How do you think law schools should be ranked?

Post by OGR3 » Tue Nov 23, 2010 4:50 pm

AP ranking of the school's basketball program.

User avatar
prezidentv8

Gold
Posts: 2823
Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2008 5:33 am

Re: How do you think law schools should be ranked?

Post by prezidentv8 » Tue Nov 23, 2010 4:51 pm

OGR3 wrote:AP ranking of the school's basketball program.
I agree.

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


User avatar
omninode

Bronze
Posts: 405
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2010 2:09 pm

Re: How do you think law schools should be ranked?

Post by omninode » Tue Nov 23, 2010 4:56 pm

Bumi wrote:
canuck wrote:
2807 wrote: Well, maybe. That is why I would like a blind test. It will tell the truth. It would make the teachers teach, and the students learn. Pedigree would mean nothing. If it so happened that pedigree and work-product equated to the same rankings I would be surprised, but at least it would really validate that ranking--and for the right reason.
This is so flawed in so many ways.
I agree. For instance, imagine if the law schools themselves used some sort of blind test to select students based on their aptitude instead of just undergrad GPA and undergrad prestige. Anarchy!
If rankings came down to tests, I think you would see law schools teaching for the test rather than the best interests of the students, which is exactly what happens when K-12 schools are held to standardized tests. Believe me, it is not a good thing.

pereira6

Silver
Posts: 616
Joined: Tue Jul 20, 2010 6:10 pm

Re: How do you think law schools should be ranked?

Post by pereira6 » Tue Nov 23, 2010 4:56 pm

prezidentv8 wrote:
OGR3 wrote:AP ranking of the school's basketball program.
I agree.
Says the Dukie.

r6_philly

Diamond
Posts: 10752
Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2009 4:32 pm

Re: How do you think law schools should be ranked?

Post by r6_philly » Tue Nov 23, 2010 4:58 pm

Have the US News site reshuffle the list randomly each time someone goes to the site.

User avatar
northwood

Platinum
Posts: 5036
Joined: Fri May 14, 2010 7:29 pm

Re: How do you think law schools should be ranked?

Post by northwood » Tue Nov 23, 2010 5:00 pm

total number of applicants with fee waivers

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


User avatar
AreJay711

Gold
Posts: 3406
Joined: Tue Jul 20, 2010 8:51 pm

Re: How do you think law schools should be ranked?

Post by AreJay711 » Tue Nov 23, 2010 5:01 pm

Ill make an attempt. The ranking formula should be Raw Score = Biglaw placement + 1.5 (Article III clerkship placement) + 2 (Academia placement)

User avatar
kwais

Gold
Posts: 1675
Joined: Tue May 11, 2010 12:28 pm

Re: How do you think law schools should be ranked?

Post by kwais » Tue Nov 23, 2010 5:03 pm

r6_philly wrote:Have the US News site reshuffle the list randomly each time someone goes to the site.
this is the fairest

User avatar
AnthonyNicator

New
Posts: 21
Joined: Fri May 21, 2010 6:46 pm

Re: How do you think law schools should be ranked?

Post by AnthonyNicator » Tue Nov 23, 2010 5:06 pm

student body. cooley FTW!

User avatar
JazzOne

Gold
Posts: 2979
Joined: Tue Sep 09, 2008 11:04 am

Re: How do you think law schools should be ranked?

Post by JazzOne » Tue Nov 23, 2010 5:07 pm

Highest to lowest tuition

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


User avatar
prezidentv8

Gold
Posts: 2823
Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2008 5:33 am

Re: How do you think law schools should be ranked?

Post by prezidentv8 » Tue Nov 23, 2010 5:08 pm

pereira6 wrote:
prezidentv8 wrote:
OGR3 wrote:AP ranking of the school's basketball program.
I agree.
Says the Dukie.
You see what I did there.

User avatar
kwais

Gold
Posts: 1675
Joined: Tue May 11, 2010 12:28 pm

Re: How do you think law schools should be ranked?

Post by kwais » Tue Nov 23, 2010 5:08 pm

sassiest faculty

User avatar
AreJay711

Gold
Posts: 3406
Joined: Tue Jul 20, 2010 8:51 pm

Re: How do you think law schools should be ranked?

Post by AreJay711 » Tue Nov 23, 2010 5:12 pm

JazzOne wrote:Highest to lowest tuition
This is a really good idea assuming that people aren't idiots and wont overpay for law school. Unfortunately, that assumption is probably false lol.

User avatar
Bildungsroman

Platinum
Posts: 5529
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2010 2:42 pm

Re: How do you think law schools should be ranked?

Post by Bildungsroman » Tue Nov 23, 2010 5:15 pm

How about a website that works almost exactly like HotOrNot?

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


canuck

Bronze
Posts: 222
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2010 7:26 pm

Re: How do you think law schools should be ranked?

Post by canuck » Tue Nov 23, 2010 5:25 pm

Bildungsroman wrote:How about a website that works almost exactly like HotOrNot?
Easy there Zuckerberg.
But ya this is an awesome idea.

User avatar
Adjudicator

Silver
Posts: 1108
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2010 4:18 am

Re: How do you think law schools should be ranked?

Post by Adjudicator » Tue Nov 23, 2010 5:26 pm

Call it "hoTTTornot.com"

User avatar
omninode

Bronze
Posts: 405
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2010 2:09 pm

Re: How do you think law schools should be ranked?

Post by omninode » Tue Nov 23, 2010 5:31 pm

canuck wrote:
Bildungsroman wrote:How about a website that works almost exactly like HotOrNot?
Easy there Zuckerberg.
But ya this is an awesome idea.
Argh! You beat me to the Zuckerberg joke!

Then you took the idea, which I maintain I came up with first, and turned it into a popular website while my identical twin brother and I were rowing in England (How f'ing weird was that movie?).

User avatar
catsparka

Bronze
Posts: 267
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2010 4:50 pm

Re: How do you think law schools should be ranked?

Post by catsparka » Tue Nov 23, 2010 6:07 pm

Adjudicator wrote:Call it "hoTTTornot.com"
:lol:

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!


Bumi

Silver
Posts: 947
Joined: Sun Jul 25, 2010 4:57 pm

Re: How do you think law schools should be ranked?

Post by Bumi » Tue Nov 23, 2010 6:20 pm

omninode wrote:
Bumi wrote:
canuck wrote:
2807 wrote: Well, maybe. That is why I would like a blind test. It will tell the truth. It would make the teachers teach, and the students learn. Pedigree would mean nothing. If it so happened that pedigree and work-product equated to the same rankings I would be surprised, but at least it would really validate that ranking--and for the right reason.
This is so flawed in so many ways.
I agree. For instance, imagine if the law schools themselves used some sort of blind test to select students based on their aptitude instead of just undergrad GPA and undergrad prestige. Anarchy!
If rankings came down to tests, I think you would see law schools teaching for the test rather than the best interests of the students, which is exactly what happens when K-12 schools are held to standardized tests. Believe me, it is not a good thing.
That was a joke about the LSAT.

edit: It occurred to me just now that USNWR rankings actually are based in small part on bar passage rates. So, ratings already do come down to tests. I have never actually been to law school, but I am pretty sure few would construe what they do there as teaching specifically for the bar exam.
Last edited by Bumi on Tue Nov 23, 2010 6:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
prezidentv8

Gold
Posts: 2823
Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2008 5:33 am

Re: How do you think law schools should be ranked?

Post by prezidentv8 » Tue Nov 23, 2010 6:24 pm

Bumi wrote:That was a joke about the LSAT.

Image

User avatar
quakeroats

Silver
Posts: 1397
Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2009 8:34 am

Re: How do you think law schools should be ranked?

Post by quakeroats » Tue Nov 23, 2010 6:27 pm

Proximity to Durham, NC.

elegally

New
Posts: 36
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2010 11:43 am

Re: How do you think law schools should be ranked?

Post by elegally » Tue Nov 23, 2010 10:39 pm

bump.

good answers so far. but how could you develop a system that would actually track real employment statistics? It seems like it would be pretty difficult.

Seriously? What are you waiting for?

Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!


Post Reply

Return to “Law School Admissions Forum”