Serious question to all the chicks applying to H and/or Y. Forum

[KibblesAndVick]

You don't go to Yale or Harvard to meet good looking girls in class. You go to Yale and Harvard so you can meet randos and tell them you're a law student at Yale/Harvard. And that's to speak nothing of the highschool gossipy nature of law school social life that would discourage you from walking down that route even if the girls were up to your standards.

[newyorker88]

Oh well.

We know H had at least one hot chick...

Dude you must be old if you are calling faculty "chicks".

The person in his avatar is old as hell. Not sure if that's his dad or him. or maybe some man that he likes.

[dutchstriker]

Oh well.

We know H had at least one hot chick...

Dude you must be old if you are calling faculty "chicks".

The person in his avatar is old as hell. Not sure if that's his dad or him. or maybe some man that he likes.

May also be Peter North.

[Lmao Zedong]

princeton might be in the top 15 for school with the hottest girls, believe it or not. however, i concede that i have very specific preferences with respect to girls that others might not share.

hook noses? bad teeth? spare tires?

[APimpNamedSlickback]

[APimpNamedSlickback]

princeton might be in the top 15 for school with the hottest girls, believe it or not. however, i concede that i have very specific preferences with respect to girls that others might not share.

hook noses? bad teeth? spare tires?

many of the most attractive girls from my secondary school went to princeton, and i've been to parties at the eating clubs on a few occasions.

there are beat girls at every school, but dude i'd be curious to find out what you're basing your post on.

edit: but again, i'll grant that i dont find the kind of hot girl that you'd find at, say, florida state attractive at all. stuff like uggs, bleached hair and implants are pretty much dealbreakers as far as i'm concerned so yeah.

[newyorker88]

Oh well.

We know H had at least one hot chick...

Dude you must be old if you are calling faculty "chicks".

The person in his avatar is old as hell. Not sure if that's his dad or him. or maybe some man that he likes.

May also be Peter North.

oh shit I just googled that name. wow smh

[fenderjsm88]

Even if there are any hot girls at those schools, they'll probably be married or something.

[pugalicious]

Even if there are any hot girls at those schools, they'll probably be married or something.

Nice avatar. You, sir, are a mouthful.

: )

[Lmao Zedong]

princeton might be in the top 15 for school with the hottest girls, believe it or not. however, i concede that i have very specific preferences with respect to girls that others might not share.

hook noses? bad teeth? spare tires?

many of the most attractive girls from my secondary school went to princeton, and i've been to parties at the eating clubs on a few occasions.

there are beat girls at every school, but dude i'd be curious to find out what you're basing your post on.

edit: but again, i'll grant that i dont find the kind of hot girl that you'd find at, say, florida state attractive at all. stuff like uggs, bleached hair and implants are pretty much dealbreakers as far as i'm concerned so yeah.

actually, my post was completely unfounded

just felt like poking some fun. though in all seriousness, if i had to take a wild stab in the dark at it, i wouldn't be guess princeton merits anywhere near top-15 status. TTT fo sho

[crackberry]

So I can't see any of Peter's posts but I definitely didn't "foe" him or whatever. If he "foe'd" me, would I not be able to see his posts? Or did he just disappear into thin air?

According to my screen, this thread was started by kittenmittons.

[r2b2ct]

He vanished off the face of TLS!

[entrechatsix]

So I can't see any of Peter's posts but I definitely didn't "foe" him or whatever. If he "foe'd" me, would I not be able to see his posts? Or did he just disappear into thin air?

According to my screen, this thread was started by kittenmittons.

+1. it took a while to even realize wth was going on.

oh wait, no... wth is going on?

[Unitas]

So I can't see any of Peter's posts but I definitely didn't "foe" him or whatever. If he "foe'd" me, would I not be able to see his posts? Or did he just disappear into thin air?

According to my screen, this thread was started by kittenmittons.

What happened?

His pms to me became Anonymous and underneath it says he is no longer a registered user... This is very strange, as I didn't think TLS deleted people’s accounts under any circumstances.

[r6_philly]

it's time for someone else to start some conspiracy theory or let's have a "Who was really Peter North thread". I don't want to start one but I really would love to read one.

[Rawlsian]

it's time for someone else to start some conspiracy theory or let's have a "Who was really Peter North thread". I don't want to start one but I really would love to read one.

1) Peter North is not who you think he is. His IP addresses are not even close, nor are they spoofed or are they a proxy. We can shut down the conspiracy theory now.
2) With that, this alt is now banned and user can resume posting under his/her normal username.
Thread is locked.

Unitas, we need more detective work.

[r6_philly]

so I was right about the alt...

lets start guessing! I think it's a very regular poster. Not I by the way.

[APimpNamedSlickback]

it wasn't me, but all i want to say is lol at the new, unwitting op of this thread.

[r6_philly]

it wasn't me, but all i want to say is lol at the new, unwitting op of this thread.

Is it really now???

[Unitas]

so I was right about the alt...

lets start guessing! I think it's a very regular poster. Not I by the way.

That quote doesn't say North is an alt.

That quote from BetaSteve was talking about the alt who posted in the thread I created defending my theory. In no way did it indicate North was an alt. In fact if North was an alt BetaSteve would have banned him then. Therefore, it is likely North is/was not an alt of a regular poster.

Anyone think North requested his entire history to be deleted? I have never heard of it otherwise, even for alts, trolls, and flames...

1) Peter North is not who you think he is. His IP addresses are not even close, nor are they spoofed or are they a proxy. We can shut down the conspiracy theory now.
2) With that, this alt is now banned and user can resume posting under his/her normal username.
Thread is locked.

Unitas, we need more detective work.

Ok here is what I have so far. Never have I seen TLS delete an entire person (I am new this year so forgive me if it happens a lot). Some examples: ones that out other posters i.e. crazy testmasters lady (they just ban them and delete/edit the offending posts), flames are usually ok and banned for time periods when a timeout is needed i.e. too many to list, and I don't really know of any alts except the one in the thread I created and his posts still exist - the account was just banned. So what could North have done to deserve the deletion of his entire persona? Other weird things it creates is new authors to really weird threads.. Weird one sided conversations with quotes attributed to someone who no longer exists.. and distances the real person behind North from his posts..

Only thing I can really think is that it was a request of Norths. Any thoughts?


*waits for Betasteve to come and give the right answer.*

[r6_philly]

I don't know the philosophy here, but I would not have deleted an user account and history on request most of the time. I can only think of certain situations where risk to injury is involved... But I am not running this site. In the past I have dealt with this 100's of times elsewhere and I always leave them be.

[Unitas]

I don't know the philosophy here, but I would not have deleted an user account and history on request most of the time. I can only think of certain situations where risk to injury is involved... But I am not running this site. In the past I have dealt with this 100's of times elsewhere and I always leave them be.

I have only done it and seen it done with advertisers that spam all forums at once and it is just easier to delete them altogether.

TLS isn't set up to do it either in this kind of case, as usually there would be placeholders for the deleted person so threads wouldn't be attributed to new people. It is very interesting and leads me to believe that someone truly outed North, which could have hurt him professionally.

[r6_philly]

I don't know the philosophy here, but I would not have deleted an user account and history on request most of the time. I can only think of certain situations where risk to injury is involved... But I am not running this site. In the past I have dealt with this 100's of times elsewhere and I always leave them be.

I have only done it and seen it done with advertisers that spam all forums at once and it is just easier to delete them altogether.

TLS isn't set up to do it either in this kind of case, as usually there would be placeholders for the deleted person so threads wouldn't be attributed to new people. It is very interesting and leads me to believe that someone truly outed North, which could have hurt him professionally.

If you delete the thread starter the next guy/post inherents it. You can't have an empty pointer. I don't know if it was about that, because I asked before and they didn't care.

[Rawlsian]

Does anyone have more of North's threads bookmarked? Have his previous threads now been inherited by the first to reply?

[Unitas]

I have only done it and seen it done with advertisers that spam all forums at once and it is just easier to delete them altogether.

TLS isn't set up to do it either in this kind of case, as usually there would be placeholders for the deleted person so threads wouldn't be attributed to new people. It is very interesting and leads me to believe that someone truly outed North, which could have hurt him professionally.

If you delete the thread starter the next guy/post inherents it. You can't have an empty pointer. I don't know if it was about that, because I asked before and they didn't care.

I have seen on other forums when someone is deleted due to a legit request the name changes to anonymous and all the posts just become blank and last edited by anonymous.

Does anyone have more of North's threads bookmarked? Have his previous threads now been inherited by the first to reply?

Yep, all of them.