shit i mean 1/4 of the shitty school students business and industry are in entertainment/sports management. that sounds pretty fucking cool. i didnt know that existed.chimp wrote:i'm sure the lower-ranked the school the shittier the "business & industry" jobs tend to be. at higher ranked schools, legit in-house gigs are way easier to come by.idontknow1 wrote:This is from a 75-100 school, I was wondering this too and came upon it today: http://i.imgur.com/vP281ax.jpgchimp wrote:I always wonder what the "Business & Industry" jobs consist of. It probably varies considerably based on school tier, but it would be interesting to know.
1/3 of this category is still listed as "other"
Latest employment data Forum
- Johann
- Posts: 19704
- Joined: Wed Mar 12, 2014 4:25 pm
Re: Latest employment data
-
- Posts: 35
- Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2011 5:34 pm
Re: Latest employment data
Yeah, working at Dick's Sporting Goods sounds super cool.JohannDeMann wrote:shit i mean 1/4 of the shitty school students business and industry are in entertainment/sports management. that sounds pretty fucking cool. i didnt know that existed.chimp wrote:i'm sure the lower-ranked the school the shittier the "business & industry" jobs tend to be. at higher ranked schools, legit in-house gigs are way easier to come by.idontknow1 wrote:This is from a 75-100 school, I was wondering this too and came upon it today: http://i.imgur.com/vP281ax.jpgchimp wrote:I always wonder what the "Business & Industry" jobs consist of. It probably varies considerably based on school tier, but it would be interesting to know.
1/3 of this category is still listed as "other"
-
- Posts: 46
- Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2015 11:38 am
Re: Latest employment data
Washington and Lee:
http://law2.wlu.edu/admissions/nalp/ABA ... ry2015.pdf
http://law2.wlu.edu/admissions/nalp/ABA ... ry2015.pdf
-
- Posts: 268
- Joined: Fri Oct 17, 2014 2:06 pm
Re: Latest employment data
I redid this with solos removed from the calculation.
BL+FC: 101+ attorneys + federal clerkships over total graduates
FTLTBR: Full time-long term-bar required positions, excluding solo practice, over total graduates.
FTLTBR (w/o LSF): Full time-long term-bar required positions, excluding solo practice and law school funded, over total graduates.
New this time:
Yale, USC, William & Mary, Georgia, Indiana (Bloomington), UNC, Colorado, Arizona, Washington and Lee, Syracuse, Washburn, Quinnipiac, Albany
1: Yale - BL+FC-60%, FTLTBR-73%, FTLTBR (w/o LSF)-70% <-- Corrected
7: Penn - BL+FC-78%, FTLTBR-94%, FTLTBR (w/o LSF)-91%
8: Duke - BL+FC-70%, FTLTBR-90%, FTLTBR (w/o LSF)-88%
8: UVA - BL+FC-68%, FTLTBR-94%, FTLTBR (w/o LSF)-85%
19: Emory - BL+FC-29%, FTLTBR-82%, FTLTBR (w/o LSF)-63%
20: USC - BL+FC-41%, FTLTBR-79%, FTLTBR (w/o LSF)-65%
22: Notre Dame - BL+FC-37%, FTLTBR-79%, FTLTBR (w/o LSF)-66%
29: William and Mary - BL+FC-21%, FTLTBR-72%, FTLTBR (w/o LSF)-63%
30: Irvine - BL+FC-28%, FTLTBR-73%, FTLTBR (w/o LSF)-62%
31: Davis - BL+FC-18%, FTLTBR-78%, FTLTBR (w/o LSF)-66%
31: Georgia - BL+FC-20%, FTLTBR-71%, FTLTBR (w/o LSF)-71%
34: BYU - BL+FC-19%, FTLTBR-75%, FTLTBR (w/o LSF)-67%
34: Fordham - BL+FC-37%, FTLTBR-68%, FTLTBR (w/o LSF)-68%
34: Indiana (Bloomington) - BL+FC-19%, FTLTBR-64%, FTLTBR (w/o LSF)-64%
34: Ohio State - BL+FC-20%, FTLTBR-73%, FTLTBR (w/o LSF)-72%
34: UNC - BL+FC-26%, FTLTBR-69%, FTLTBR (w/o LSF)-68%
40: Colorado - BL+FC-15%, FTLTBR-70%, FTLTBR (w/o LSF)-67%
41: Illinois - BL+FC-29%, FTLTBR-72%, FTLTBR (w/o LSF)-64%
42: Arizona - BL+FC-8%, FTLTBR-72%, FTLTBR (w/o LSF)-65%
42: Washington and Lee - BL+FC-20%, FTLTBR-65%, FTLTBR (w/o LSF)-64%
47: Florida - BL+FC-17%, FTLTBR-68%, FTLTBR (w/o LSF)-68%
50: Tulane - BL+FC-18%, FTLTBR-61%, FTLTBR (w/o LSF)-61%
52: Pepperdine - BL+FC-9%, FTLTBR-46%, FTLTBR (w/o LSF)-46%
52: Richmond - BL+FC-13%, FTLTBR-56%, FTLTBR (w/o LSF)-56%
56: Nebraska - BL+FC-8%, FTLTBR-67%, FTLTBR (w/o LSF)-67%
63: Miami - BL+FC-10%, FTLTBR-67%, FTLTBR (w/o LSF)-67%
67: UNLV - BL+FC-6%, FTLTBR-65%, FTLTBR (w/o LSF)-64%
71: American - BL+FC-12%, FTLTBR-55%, FTLTBR (w/o LSF)-45%
71: Penn State - BL+FC-11%, FTLTBR-65%, FTLTBR (w/o LSF)-65%
75: Arkansas-Fayetteville - BL+FC-9%, FTLTBR-53%, FTLTBR (w/o LSF)-53%
78: Illinois-Tech (Kent) - BL+FC-8%, FTLTBR-50%, FTLTBR (w/o LSF)-50%
78: Loyola Chicago - BL+FC-11%, FTLTBR-55%, FTLTBR (w/o LSF)-55%
82: St. John's - BL+FC-10%, FTLTBR-61%, FTLTBR (w/o LSF)-61%
87: SUNY-Buffalo - BL+FC-8%, FTLTBR-59%, FTLTBR (w/o LSF)-59%
87: Syracuse - BL+FC-11%, FTLTBR-57%, FTLTBR (w/o LSF)-57%
87: Vilanova - BL+FC-16%, FTLTBR-65%, FTLTBR (w/o LSF)-65%
94: Lewis & Clark - BL+FC-6%, FTLTBR-52%, FTLTBR (w/o LSF)-52%
108: Catholic (Columbus) - BL+FC-6%, FTLTBR-46%, FTLTBR (w/o LSF)-46%
108: Wyoming - BL+FC-1%, FTLTBR-49%, FTLTBR (w/o LSF)-49%
110: Maine - BL+FC-4%, FTLTBR-46%, FTLTBR (w/o LSF)-46%
113: Seattle - BL+FC-4%, FTLTBR-45%, FTLTBR (w/o LSF)-45%
118: Mercer - BL+FC-7%, FTLTBR-68%, FTLTBR (w/o LSF)-68%
122: Hofstra - BL+FC-5%, FTLTBR-57%, FTLTBR (w/o LSF)-56%
122: Washburn - BL+FC-3%, FTLTBR-63%, FTLTBR (w/o LSF)-63%
127: Drexel - BL+FC-8%, FTLTBR-60%, FTLTBR (w/o LSF)-60%
127: Quinnipiac - BL+FC-2%, FTLTBR-42%, FTLTBR (w/o LSF)-42%
135: Loyola New Orleans - BL+FC-5%, FTLTBR-49%, FTLTBR (w/o LSF)-48%
138: Albany - BL+FC-3%, FTLTBR-62%, FTLTBR (w/o LSF)-62%
138: Pace - BL+FC-4%, FTLTBR-56%, FTLTBR (w/o LSF)-54%
RNP: Appalachian - BL+FC-3%, FTLTBR-33%, FTLTBR (w/o LSF)-33%
RNP: Arizona Summit - BL+FC-1%, FTLTBR-39%, FTLTBR (w/o LSF)-37%
RNP: Ave Maria - BL+FC-0%, FTLTBR-35%, FTLTBR (w/o LSF)-35%
RNP: Capital - BL+FC-2%, FTLTBR-34%, FTLTBR (w/o LSF)-34%
RNP: Charlotte - BL+FC-0%, FTLTBR-29%, FTLTBR (w/o LSF)-29%
RNP: Florida Costal - BL+FC-1%, FTLTBR-33%, FTLTBR (w/o LSF)-33%
RNP: Liberty - BL+FC-1%, FTLTBR-42%, FTLTBR (w/o LSF)-41%
RNP: McGeroge - BL+FC-4%, FTLTBR-43%, FTLTBR (w/o LSF)-42%
RNP: Northern Kentucky - BL+FC-6%, FTLTBR-42%, FTLTBR (w/o LSF)-42%
RNP: Puerto Rico - BL+FC-2%, FTLTBR-15%, FTLTBR (w/o LSF)-15%
RNP: Widener-DE - BL+FC-2%, FTLTBR-44%, FTLTBR (w/o LSF)-44%
RNP: Widener-Harrisburg - BL+FC-2%, FTLTBR-52%, FTLTBR (w/o LSF)-52%
RNP: WMU-Cooley - BL+FC-1%, FTLTBR-26%, FTLTBR (w/o LSF)-26%
UNR: LaVerne - BL+FC-0%, FTLTBR-39%, FTLTBR (w/o LSF)-39%
UNR: UMass-Dartmouth - BL+FC-2%, FTLTBR-22%, FTLTBR (w/o LSF)-22%
BL+FC: 101+ attorneys + federal clerkships over total graduates
FTLTBR: Full time-long term-bar required positions, excluding solo practice, over total graduates.
FTLTBR (w/o LSF): Full time-long term-bar required positions, excluding solo practice and law school funded, over total graduates.
New this time:
Yale, USC, William & Mary, Georgia, Indiana (Bloomington), UNC, Colorado, Arizona, Washington and Lee, Syracuse, Washburn, Quinnipiac, Albany
1: Yale - BL+FC-60%, FTLTBR-73%, FTLTBR (w/o LSF)-70% <-- Corrected
7: Penn - BL+FC-78%, FTLTBR-94%, FTLTBR (w/o LSF)-91%
8: Duke - BL+FC-70%, FTLTBR-90%, FTLTBR (w/o LSF)-88%
8: UVA - BL+FC-68%, FTLTBR-94%, FTLTBR (w/o LSF)-85%
19: Emory - BL+FC-29%, FTLTBR-82%, FTLTBR (w/o LSF)-63%
20: USC - BL+FC-41%, FTLTBR-79%, FTLTBR (w/o LSF)-65%
22: Notre Dame - BL+FC-37%, FTLTBR-79%, FTLTBR (w/o LSF)-66%
29: William and Mary - BL+FC-21%, FTLTBR-72%, FTLTBR (w/o LSF)-63%
30: Irvine - BL+FC-28%, FTLTBR-73%, FTLTBR (w/o LSF)-62%
31: Davis - BL+FC-18%, FTLTBR-78%, FTLTBR (w/o LSF)-66%
31: Georgia - BL+FC-20%, FTLTBR-71%, FTLTBR (w/o LSF)-71%
34: BYU - BL+FC-19%, FTLTBR-75%, FTLTBR (w/o LSF)-67%
34: Fordham - BL+FC-37%, FTLTBR-68%, FTLTBR (w/o LSF)-68%
34: Indiana (Bloomington) - BL+FC-19%, FTLTBR-64%, FTLTBR (w/o LSF)-64%
34: Ohio State - BL+FC-20%, FTLTBR-73%, FTLTBR (w/o LSF)-72%
34: UNC - BL+FC-26%, FTLTBR-69%, FTLTBR (w/o LSF)-68%
40: Colorado - BL+FC-15%, FTLTBR-70%, FTLTBR (w/o LSF)-67%
41: Illinois - BL+FC-29%, FTLTBR-72%, FTLTBR (w/o LSF)-64%
42: Arizona - BL+FC-8%, FTLTBR-72%, FTLTBR (w/o LSF)-65%
42: Washington and Lee - BL+FC-20%, FTLTBR-65%, FTLTBR (w/o LSF)-64%
47: Florida - BL+FC-17%, FTLTBR-68%, FTLTBR (w/o LSF)-68%
50: Tulane - BL+FC-18%, FTLTBR-61%, FTLTBR (w/o LSF)-61%
52: Pepperdine - BL+FC-9%, FTLTBR-46%, FTLTBR (w/o LSF)-46%
52: Richmond - BL+FC-13%, FTLTBR-56%, FTLTBR (w/o LSF)-56%
56: Nebraska - BL+FC-8%, FTLTBR-67%, FTLTBR (w/o LSF)-67%
63: Miami - BL+FC-10%, FTLTBR-67%, FTLTBR (w/o LSF)-67%
67: UNLV - BL+FC-6%, FTLTBR-65%, FTLTBR (w/o LSF)-64%
71: American - BL+FC-12%, FTLTBR-55%, FTLTBR (w/o LSF)-45%
71: Penn State - BL+FC-11%, FTLTBR-65%, FTLTBR (w/o LSF)-65%
75: Arkansas-Fayetteville - BL+FC-9%, FTLTBR-53%, FTLTBR (w/o LSF)-53%
78: Illinois-Tech (Kent) - BL+FC-8%, FTLTBR-50%, FTLTBR (w/o LSF)-50%
78: Loyola Chicago - BL+FC-11%, FTLTBR-55%, FTLTBR (w/o LSF)-55%
82: St. John's - BL+FC-10%, FTLTBR-61%, FTLTBR (w/o LSF)-61%
87: SUNY-Buffalo - BL+FC-8%, FTLTBR-59%, FTLTBR (w/o LSF)-59%
87: Syracuse - BL+FC-11%, FTLTBR-57%, FTLTBR (w/o LSF)-57%
87: Vilanova - BL+FC-16%, FTLTBR-65%, FTLTBR (w/o LSF)-65%
94: Lewis & Clark - BL+FC-6%, FTLTBR-52%, FTLTBR (w/o LSF)-52%
108: Catholic (Columbus) - BL+FC-6%, FTLTBR-46%, FTLTBR (w/o LSF)-46%
108: Wyoming - BL+FC-1%, FTLTBR-49%, FTLTBR (w/o LSF)-49%
110: Maine - BL+FC-4%, FTLTBR-46%, FTLTBR (w/o LSF)-46%
113: Seattle - BL+FC-4%, FTLTBR-45%, FTLTBR (w/o LSF)-45%
118: Mercer - BL+FC-7%, FTLTBR-68%, FTLTBR (w/o LSF)-68%
122: Hofstra - BL+FC-5%, FTLTBR-57%, FTLTBR (w/o LSF)-56%
122: Washburn - BL+FC-3%, FTLTBR-63%, FTLTBR (w/o LSF)-63%
127: Drexel - BL+FC-8%, FTLTBR-60%, FTLTBR (w/o LSF)-60%
127: Quinnipiac - BL+FC-2%, FTLTBR-42%, FTLTBR (w/o LSF)-42%
135: Loyola New Orleans - BL+FC-5%, FTLTBR-49%, FTLTBR (w/o LSF)-48%
138: Albany - BL+FC-3%, FTLTBR-62%, FTLTBR (w/o LSF)-62%
138: Pace - BL+FC-4%, FTLTBR-56%, FTLTBR (w/o LSF)-54%
RNP: Appalachian - BL+FC-3%, FTLTBR-33%, FTLTBR (w/o LSF)-33%
RNP: Arizona Summit - BL+FC-1%, FTLTBR-39%, FTLTBR (w/o LSF)-37%
RNP: Ave Maria - BL+FC-0%, FTLTBR-35%, FTLTBR (w/o LSF)-35%
RNP: Capital - BL+FC-2%, FTLTBR-34%, FTLTBR (w/o LSF)-34%
RNP: Charlotte - BL+FC-0%, FTLTBR-29%, FTLTBR (w/o LSF)-29%
RNP: Florida Costal - BL+FC-1%, FTLTBR-33%, FTLTBR (w/o LSF)-33%
RNP: Liberty - BL+FC-1%, FTLTBR-42%, FTLTBR (w/o LSF)-41%
RNP: McGeroge - BL+FC-4%, FTLTBR-43%, FTLTBR (w/o LSF)-42%
RNP: Northern Kentucky - BL+FC-6%, FTLTBR-42%, FTLTBR (w/o LSF)-42%
RNP: Puerto Rico - BL+FC-2%, FTLTBR-15%, FTLTBR (w/o LSF)-15%
RNP: Widener-DE - BL+FC-2%, FTLTBR-44%, FTLTBR (w/o LSF)-44%
RNP: Widener-Harrisburg - BL+FC-2%, FTLTBR-52%, FTLTBR (w/o LSF)-52%
RNP: WMU-Cooley - BL+FC-1%, FTLTBR-26%, FTLTBR (w/o LSF)-26%
UNR: LaVerne - BL+FC-0%, FTLTBR-39%, FTLTBR (w/o LSF)-39%
UNR: UMass-Dartmouth - BL+FC-2%, FTLTBR-22%, FTLTBR (w/o LSF)-22%
Last edited by JFO1833 on Thu Apr 09, 2015 12:25 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 450
- Joined: Thu Mar 06, 2014 3:49 pm
Re: Latest employment data
The fuck?JFO1833 wrote:
1: Yale - BL+FC-60%, FTLTBR-68%, FTLTBR (w/o LSF)-65%
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Mack.Hambleton
- Posts: 5414
- Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2014 2:09 am
- rpupkin
- Posts: 5653
- Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 10:32 pm
Re: Latest employment data
Hey at least YLS tied Penn......Penn State, that is! Both at 65% FTLTBRThe Dark Shepard wrote:The fuck?JFO1833 wrote:
1: Yale - BL+FC-60%, FTLTBR-68%, FTLTBR (w/o LSF)-65%
YLS is in decline. It's about to become the Cornell of New Haven but without the baller big law placement.
Clearly more sub-tier reorganization is in order. I am confident that BigZuck is on it.
- Robb
- Posts: 330
- Joined: Fri Feb 14, 2014 10:21 pm
Re: Latest employment data
Isn't it 72.6% LTFTBR? 167/230
Minus school funded should be 69.6%.
Minus school funded should be 69.6%.
-
- Posts: 268
- Joined: Fri Oct 17, 2014 2:06 pm
Re: Latest employment data
Yep, fat fingered a number in my calculations. Fixed it.Robb wrote:Isn't it 72.6% LTFTBR? 167/230
Minus school funded should be 69.6%.
- starry eyed
- Posts: 2046
- Joined: Thu Nov 13, 2014 11:26 am
Re: Latest employment data
"but surely the other 30% are working super interesting jobs such as sports agent or going into politics"
"yea no one from yale even wants those law jobs!"
"yea no one from yale even wants those law jobs!"
-
- Posts: 58
- Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2012 3:52 am
Re: Latest employment data
Not to nitpick but bottom 25% aren't 113k, it's 98.75k. I think you might've looked at the mean, which is 113k.Desert Fox wrote:in house and compliance are big.chimp wrote:also, i feel like going in-house directly out of law school (although still fairly rare) is becoming more of a thing, especially for transactional people who missed the biglaw boat.Mack.Hambleton wrote:at penn its mostly JD/MBA doing consulting or other finance shit. Probably mostly similar in the T14chimp wrote:I always wonder what the "Business & Industry" jobs consist of. It probably varies considerably based on school tier, but it would be interesting to know.
Here is what NU's looks like. 82% of business report their salaries and bottom 25% of those reported are 113k. Not too shabby
http://www.law.northwestern.edu/profess ... index.html
- pamphleteer
- Posts: 167
- Joined: Tue Dec 09, 2014 6:03 pm
Re: Latest employment data
Seriously though, what's the actual explanation for this? Because 30% "self-selecting" into jobs that don't require the use of the degree they just spent three years and $250k on seems like bullshit.starry eyed wrote:"but surely the other 30% are working super interesting jobs such as sports agent or going into politics"
"yea no one from yale even wants those law jobs!"
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- bowser
- Posts: 238
- Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2012 2:54 am
Re: Latest employment data
pamphleteer wrote:Seriously though, what's the actual explanation for this? Because 30% "self-selecting" into jobs that don't require the use of the degree they just spent three years and $250k on seems like bullshit.starry eyed wrote:"but surely the other 30% are working super interesting jobs such as sports agent or going into politics"
"yea no one from yale even wants those law jobs!"
from my interactions with YLS people, even among those summering at biglaw, a good 1/3--1/2 are very ambivalent about it and openly talk about going into other things. Those things include career paths that aren't traditional legal jobs. Yale grads are probs the most confident they'll actually be able to make those things happen, and therefore the most likely to turn down the 160K just sitting there for them.
Weirdly, the year that most Yalies actually became lawyers was 2011, the worst hiring year in history (90% J.D.-required long term)
- Mack.Hambleton
- Posts: 5414
- Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2014 2:09 am
Re: Latest employment data
well lets look at their report:pamphleteer wrote:Seriously though, what's the actual explanation for this? Because 30% "self-selecting" into jobs that don't require the use of the degree they just spent three years and $250k on seems like bullshit.starry eyed wrote:"but surely the other 30% are working super interesting jobs such as sports agent or going into politics"
"yea no one from yale even wants those law jobs!"
Out of a class of 230
20 employed by the school, assuming PI fellowship stuff mostly
15 people in business, probably consulting and stuff
10 doing more education for whatever reason
10 people in the various unemployed categories
and since their class is so small, that makes up the 25% or so of non JD required jobs
- Johann
- Posts: 19704
- Joined: Wed Mar 12, 2014 4:25 pm
Re: Latest employment data
So there's 40% in lawyer jobs in law firms, 31% in clerking, 5% pursuing another graduate degree, 4% in education 7% in industry, 6% in govt, 12% in PI. Seems pretty straight forward. Biglaw sucks. If I could be a prof I would - which looks to be about 9% of their class there or trying to get there. Rest is self explanatory.
- rpupkin
- Posts: 5653
- Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 10:32 pm
Re: Latest employment data
Yeah, that's why I'm somewhat amused by the "OMG PENN/CORNELL!!" thing happening on TLS. Obviously NYC big law beats being unemployed with tons of debt, but most of those folks will be miserable.JohannDeMann wrote:So there's 40% in lawyer jobs in law firms, 31% in clerking, 5% pursuing another graduate degree, 4% in education 7% in industry, 6% in govt, 12% in PI. Seems pretty straight forward. Biglaw sucks. If I could be a prof I would - which looks to be about 9% of their class there or trying to get there. Rest is self explanatory.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- lhanvt13
- Posts: 2378
- Joined: Wed Jun 09, 2010 12:59 am
Re: Latest employment data
well shit, completely missed the boat and just now hopping on. Biglaw seems to be heading upwards. #NYCto190 Confirmed
- cron1834
- Posts: 2299
- Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2014 1:36 am
Re: Latest employment data
Yeah. I also don't understand what people are confused about here. Self selecting out of NYC biglaw may be uncommon at Cornell or Penn, but not everywhere. Especially Yale.JohannDeMann wrote:So there's 40% in lawyer jobs in law firms, 31% in clerking, 5% pursuing another graduate degree, 4% in education 7% in industry, 6% in govt, 12% in PI. Seems pretty straight forward. Biglaw sucks. If I could be a prof I would - which looks to be about 9% of their class there or trying to get there. Rest is self explanatory.
-
- Posts: 11730
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am
Re: Latest employment data
HS
CCNP
DCN
B
V
GM
U(T)
Y
CCNP
DCN
B
V
GM
U(T)
Y
- Dafaq
- Posts: 354
- Joined: Sat Feb 15, 2014 6:19 pm
Re: Latest employment data
Looking forward on comparing UT to GTown.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- starry eyed
- Posts: 2046
- Joined: Thu Nov 13, 2014 11:26 am
Re: Latest employment data
lolMack.Hambleton wrote:well lets look at their report:pamphleteer wrote:Seriously though, what's the actual explanation for this? Because 30% "self-selecting" into jobs that don't require the use of the degree they just spent three years and $250k on seems like bullshit.starry eyed wrote:"but surely the other 30% are working super interesting jobs such as sports agent or going into politics"
"yea no one from yale even wants those law jobs!"
Out of a class of 230
20 employed by the school, assuming PI fellowship stuff mostly
15 people in business, probably consulting and stuff
10 doing more education for whatever reason
10 people in the various unemployed categories
and since their class is so small, that makes up the 25% or so of non JD required jobs
if this was say gtown/uva, you would have said business was starbucks and the school employed were losers
Last edited by starry eyed on Thu Apr 09, 2015 10:08 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 934
- Joined: Tue Jan 14, 2014 11:41 pm
Re: Latest employment data
The Biglaw rates seem to be approaching similar rates as during the mid-2000's. Those were the years when even non-14 schools like USC, BU and GW routinely approached (and crossed) the 40% mark. It's pretty interesting. It was only a couple years ago that Georgetown and Michigan had a hard time placing 40% of their classes into Biglaw jobs.
- Tiago Splitter
- Posts: 17148
- Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 1:20 am
Re: Latest employment data
Yeah there's a bit of a myth out there that things were always peachy until the recession, but class of 2013 put more people into firms of 100+ than the classes of the late 90's and 2003-2004. For better or worse what we're seeing now is consistent with the way things have always been.Moneytrees wrote:The Biglaw rates seem to be approaching similar rates as during the mid-2000's. Those were the years when even non-14 schools like USC, BU and GW routinely approached (and crossed) the 40% mark. It's pretty interesting. It was only a couple years ago that Georgetown and Michigan had a hard time placing 40% of their classes into Biglaw jobs.
- starry eyed
- Posts: 2046
- Joined: Thu Nov 13, 2014 11:26 am
Re: Latest employment data
i thought fordham placed 55% in 2008?Tiago Splitter wrote:Yeah there's a bit of a myth out there that things were always peachy until the recession, but class of 2013 put more people into firms of 100+ than the classes of the late 90's and 2003-2004. For better or worse what we're seeing now is consistent with the way things have always been.Moneytrees wrote:The Biglaw rates seem to be approaching similar rates as during the mid-2000's. Those were the years when even non-14 schools like USC, BU and GW routinely approached (and crossed) the 40% mark. It's pretty interesting. It was only a couple years ago that Georgetown and Michigan had a hard time placing 40% of their classes into Biglaw jobs.
eta: 45% not that big a difference from today
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login