C/O 2016 median lsat/gpa/class size Forum

[bouleversement]

While you're at it Regulus, do you have anything like this for other schools?

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/pub ... fNXc&gid=1

[lawschool22]

While you're at it Regulus, do you have anything like this for other schools?

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/pub ... fNXc&gid=1

This might be what you're after:

http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 219901#top


Edit: NVM - I just realized you might be looking for the previous cycle's data.

[bouleversement]

While you're at it Regulus, do you have anything like this for other schools?

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/pub ... fNXc&gid=1

This might be what you're after:

http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 219901#top


Edit: NVM - I just realized you might be looking for the previous cycle's data.

I am, but that is really great too and will definitely be useful going forward. Thanks for the contribution!

[bouleversement]

Is it faulty to assume Stanford's 75th also increased a point?

Frequentist statistics would say you cannot assume/conclude that.

Bayesian statistics could make that assumption defensible.

Have you heard why SLS has not yet released its 25th/75ths?

[Power_of_Facing]

Is it faulty to assume Stanford's 75th also increased a point?

Frequentist statistics would say you cannot assume/conclude that.

Bayesian statistics could make that assumption defensible.

Have you heard why SLS has not yet released its 25th/75ths?

Has SLS even officially released its median? I thought the spreadsheet was updated entirely on the basis of the little birdy in Mr. Spivey's ear.

[BigZuck]

It doesn't matter what their median is. Furd's gonna Furd, even if they drop a point it's not going to make it any easier for a mere mortal to get in

[bouleversement]

Is it faulty to assume Stanford's 75th also increased a point?

Frequentist statistics would say you cannot assume/conclude that.

Bayesian statistics could make that assumption defensible.

Have you heard why SLS has not yet released its 25th/75ths?

Has SLS even officially released its median? I thought the spreadsheet was updated entirely on the basis of the little birdy in Mr. Spivey's ear.

You could be right. I just know we can bank on Spivey's birdy.

[Vincent]

Frequentist statistics would say you cannot assume/conclude that.

Bayesian statistics could make that assumption defensible.

Have you heard why SLS has not yet released its 25th/75ths?

Has SLS even officially released its median? I thought the spreadsheet was updated entirely on the basis of the little birdy in Mr. Spivey's ear.

You could be right. I just know we can bank on Spivey's birdy.

How do you know? I, for one, don't think we can trust just any random birdie

To answer your question though, yes, I have...

[thestatusguo]

Have you heard why SLS has not yet released its 25th/75ths?

Has SLS even officially released its median? I thought the spreadsheet was updated entirely on the basis of the little birdy in Mr. Spivey's ear.

You could be right. I just know we can bank on Spivey's birdy.

How do you know? I, for one, don't think we can trust just any random birdie

To answer your question though, yes, I have...

Well I just have a hunch that we can trust Spivey's birdie on this one. And Vincent, as an SLS admit, you should know better than to doubt very credible sources, right?

[Vincent]

Has SLS even officially released its median? I thought the spreadsheet was updated entirely on the basis of the little birdy in Mr. Spivey's ear.

You could be right. I just know we can bank on Spivey's birdy.

How do you know? I, for one, don't think we can trust just any random birdie

To answer your question though, yes, I have...

Well I just have a hunch that we can trust Spivey's birdie on this one. And Vincent, as an SLS admit, you should know better than to doubt very credible sources, right?

Maybe if the credible source had provided a clear and concise set of steps to produce independently verifiable and replicable results that any TLS member could reproduce, the scientist in me would be less skeptical

[jingosaur]

Well I just have a hunch that we can trust Spivey's birdie on this one. And Vincent, as an SLS admit, you should know better than to doubt very credible sources, right?

Maybe if the credible source had provided a clear and concise set of steps to produce independently verifiable and replicable results that any TLS member could reproduce, the scientist in me would be less skeptical [/quote]

Is this the same birdie that told him LSAT scores were coming out on 10/31?

[HYSenberg]

What's up with the spreadsheet?

[jk148706]

What's up with the spreadsheet?

[ms9]

Well I just have a hunch that we can trust Spivey's birdie on this one. And Vincent, as an SLS admit, you should know better than to doubt very credible sources, right?

Maybe if the credible source had provided a clear and concise set of steps to produce independently verifiable and replicable results that any TLS member could reproduce, the scientist in me would be less skeptical

Is this the same birdie that told him LSAT scores were coming out on 10/31?

No, someone from LSAC did not give me this. The Dean of Admission at Stanford told someone "these are our numbers" and that someone called and told me.

I said as clearly as I possibly could on the LSAT date I had no way of verifying if the data I had was accurate. I also have no way to 100% know if this is true, but it seems much more likely.

I try to qualify everything that I do not hear directly from a source that would 100% know. I hope this helps!

Mike

[TheJanitor6203]

So I guess SMU isn't going to release their new medians. Ever.

[haus]

So I guess SMU isn't going to release their new medians. Ever.

Perhaps it will be dug up by future anthropologist.

[TheJanitor6203]

So I guess SMU isn't going to release their new medians. Ever.

Perhaps it will be dug up by future anthropologist.

Probably.

[Happy Gilmore]

If Stanford really did go up in median, why are they waiting so long to publish it?

[BigZuck]

Furd gonna Furd

[cannibal ox]

Alabama is up.

Class of 2016
157 / 164 / 166
-1 / -1 / -1
3.42 / 3.86 / 3.94
+0.11 / +0.03 / 0.00


Class of 2015
158 / 165 / 167
3.31 / 3.83 / 3.94

[BigZuck]

Alabama is up.

Class of 2016
157 / 164 / 166
-1 / -1 / -1
3.42 / 3.86 / 3.94
+0.11 / +0.03 / 0.00


Class of 2015
158 / 165 / 167
3.31 / 3.83 / 3.94

That median GPA is redic. Do all the reverse splitter "Not Gunna!" retakers end up at Alabama?

Also lulz at the difference between the medians and the 25ths

[kay2016]

Alabama is up.

Class of 2016
157 / 164 / 166
-1 / -1 / -1
3.42 / 3.86 / 3.94
+0.11 / +0.03 / 0.00


Class of 2015
158 / 165 / 167
3.31 / 3.83 / 3.94

That median GPA is redic. Do all the reverse splitter "Not Gunna!" retakers end up at Alabama?

Also lulz at the difference between the medians and the 25ths

guilty.

[Louis1127]

Alabama is up.

Class of 2016
157 / 164 / 166
-1 / -1 / -1
3.42 / 3.86 / 3.94
+0.11 / +0.03 / 0.00


Class of 2015
158 / 165 / 167
3.31 / 3.83 / 3.94

That median GPA is redic. Do all the reverse splitter "Not Gunna!" retakers end up at Alabama?

Also lulz at the difference between the medians and the 25ths

Remember DAT program where if you get into the Honors College at Bama and what not you can go to LS at Bama without having to take the LSAT. Maybe not the entire reason, but certainly one reason for dat ridic GPA.

Edit: According to the website, only 5 ppl did that. So it is a very small reason for the ridic GPA. Definitely puzzling.

[dasani13]

I just spent like an hour reading this thread. Thanks for all the great info so far.

[Happy Gilmore]

I just spent like an hour reading this thread. Thanks for all the great info so far.

It's all summarized in a spread sheet. Probably not worth reading all 72 pages.