Oh, let Fletcher have his fun. His paranoid ramblings and news article links provide me with a daily laugh.MarcusAurelius wrote:she was stabbed in her lindenwold apartment, not in camden. read the article, JACKASS.Fletcher Reed wrote:Rutgers-Camden Student Stabbed To Death
http://gleaner.rutgers.edu/2010/11/22/s ... of-murder/
Student-on-student doesn't count? Where do you form your logic? I can't wrap my mind around it. Student-on-student would certainly matter in the context of the conversation regarding the dangers of living on or near RU-Camden. Btw--the attacker in the above article that you challenged me to find was not a student.
Rutgers-Camden to be absorbed by Rowan University? Forum
- mrtoren
- Posts: 733
- Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2010 9:43 pm
Re: Rutgers-Camden to be absorbed by Rowan University?
-
- Posts: 51
- Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2012 11:03 pm
Re: Rutgers-Camden to be absorbed by Rowan University?
@MarcusAurelius, I want you to know that I loled. Post of the day.MarcusAurelius wrote:she was stabbed in her lindenwold apartment, not in camden. read the article, JACKASS.Fletcher Reed wrote:Rutgers-Camden Student Stabbed To Death
http://gleaner.rutgers.edu/2010/11/22/s ... of-murder/
Student-on-student doesn't count? Where do you form your logic? I can't wrap my mind around it. Student-on-student would certainly matter in the context of the conversation regarding the dangers of living on or near RU-Camden. Btw--the attacker in the above article that you challenged me to find was not a student.
Okay guys, Fletcher wants peace. Let's call it and switch topics lol.
As much as I dislike his/her negativity, I can tell he/she is making a slight effort to not draw too much attention.
After all, he or she may be a potential member of RU-C Law CO2015 (and we should look out for each other).
Though, I must truthfully admit that I currently do not like you @Fletcher.
Edit: Post of the month.
Last edited by highlander1 on Tue Apr 03, 2012 3:32 am, edited 1 time in total.
- 20130312
- Posts: 3814
- Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2011 8:53 pm
Re: Rutgers-Camden to be absorbed by Rowan University?
Can't wait til all of you live here next year...
-
- Posts: 81
- Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2012 2:23 pm
-
- Posts: 2890
- Joined: Wed Jul 28, 2010 6:42 pm
Re: Rutgers-Camden to be absorbed by Rowan University?
Honestly, I'd just live in Westmont or Collingswood, maybe Cherry Hill if I were fond of sprawl.InGoodFaith wrote:Can't wait til all of you live here next year...
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 51
- Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2012 11:03 pm
Re: Rutgers-Camden to be absorbed by Rowan University?
Me too! Victor looks like a pretty awesome place to live. It has a bar on the ground floorInGoodFaith wrote:Can't wait til all of you live here next year...

I don't get internet sarcasm -_-
- drmguy
- Posts: 1004
- Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2009 5:43 am
Re: Rutgers-Camden to be absorbed by Rowan University?
A bar is within the same building. You have to walk outside to get there.highlander1 wrote:Me too! Victor looks like a pretty awesome place to live. It has a bar on the ground floorInGoodFaith wrote:Can't wait til all of you live here next year...![]()
I don't get internet sarcasm -_-
- 20130312
- Posts: 3814
- Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2011 8:53 pm
Re: Rutgers-Camden to be absorbed by Rowan University?
All credited places to live. Cherry Hill is probably a bit expensive for the typical lawl student, though.HeavenWood wrote:Honestly, I'd just live in Westmont or Collingswood, maybe Cherry Hill if I were fond of sprawl.InGoodFaith wrote:Can't wait til all of you live here next year...
-
- Posts: 2890
- Joined: Wed Jul 28, 2010 6:42 pm
Re: Rutgers-Camden to be absorbed by Rowan University?
Cherry Hill West is fairly inexpensive as I recall.InGoodFaith wrote:All credited places to live. Cherry Hill is probably a bit expensive for the typical lawl student, though.HeavenWood wrote:Honestly, I'd just live in Westmont or Collingswood, maybe Cherry Hill if I were fond of sprawl.InGoodFaith wrote:Can't wait til all of you live here next year...
-
- Posts: 81
- Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2012 2:23 pm
- mrtoren
- Posts: 733
- Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2010 9:43 pm
Re: Rutgers President
Would you calm down? Jesus. You'll never succeed after law school with such an anal, pessimistic personality.Fletcher Reed wrote:Does anyone know why the Rutgers University president is resigning from his $550,000/year job, taking a year off, and coming back as a history teacher for $200,000 less? Does it have to do with the merger? It's not reassuring that the school's leader is jumping ship during a time like this.
http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2011/0 ... ent_o.html
In other news, the president is against the merger..yet it doesn't matter because he's abandoning the school...
http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2012/0 ... repor.html
The University of Illinois President is doing the same thing. Its not unusual.
P.S. - Do your research. McCormick has been planning his retirement for quite some time. Its not connected to the merger.
-
- Posts: 81
- Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2012 2:23 pm
- mrtoren
- Posts: 733
- Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2010 9:43 pm
Re: Rutgers President
Fletcher, there are few people in this world that drive me crazy. You are one of them.Fletcher Reed wrote: I was actually asking whether or not anyone knew why he was leaving and I was pointing out that it's interesting that it's during all the controversy. I was not asking about the liklihood of my success after law school.
Additionally, the Ilinois University president "resigned after months of turmoil, a faculty mutiny and a scandal in the president's office that had left him so sidelined that people began to question not whether he would quit but when."
http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2012 ... d-campuses
The Rutgers president isn't amidst this type of scandal. It seems that he may be leaving because his university is being torn apart and he doesn't want to be in the middle of it. Does anyone have any info. on this?
P.S. He is not retiring. He's leaving for a year (during the merger) and coming back as a teacher (far away from the Camden campus) at the New Brunswick Rutgers campus.
You some how fail to grasp the simplest of concepts.
McCormick's departure (FROM THE POST OF PRESIDENT) is NOT connected to the merger. Its been in the works for a while now (FIRST REPORTED IN MAY 2011). He's been in the position for almost ten years and I'm sure its a stressful, time-consuming job. Money isn't the motivation here. He's on the board of several other organizations and is probably banking more than he can realistically spend. Its opportunity-cost. He's had a good run, he's 64 years old, its time to move on. ACCEPT THAT.
Do I need to break out the sledgehammer Fletcher? Do I?
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Wed Dec 07, 2011 4:59 pm
Re: Rutgers-Camden to be absorbed by Rowan University?
I am a life-long resident of Camden County. I have attended at least 50+ concerts in Camden. Rutgers-Camden is EASILY accessible via exit 5B right near the bridge. You drive through the most secure part of Camden to reach the campus. ALL cities have areas that pose higher risk than other spots. Camden for sure is mostly made up of areas like this but there is absolutely NO reason to enter those areas. There are plenty of places to live within South Jersey that provide easy access to campus and do not require driving through gunfire.kaiser wrote:I can assure you this is not BS. Camden, at least in its bad parts, is one of the most dangerous places in the entire country, and a few years ago was even ranked number 1. Again, as many people mentioned, the school is cloistered off and in what sounds like a safe area, but DO NOT assume that the rest of the city is safe to walk around. Again, I know someone who was shot and someone else who had his car stolen. Neither were at Rutgers Camden (which people say is in a safe area), but it goes to show how unsafe some of the other areas can be. I myself am an NJ lifer. I have been to all the best, and all the worst parts of the state. When people speak about Camden, Trenton, and Newark, they are not joking around with you. You need to keep your head up in these places.ths115 wrote:InGoodFaith wrote:Look, I've lived near Camden my entire life. Camden is terrible. Yes, Rutgers campus is fairly safe. HOWEVER, in order to get on the freakin' campus, you still have to journey through Camden. Even when you're driving in, it's pretty scary. You can easily be mugged or shot or whatever at a red light.
Complete and utter BS.
- MarcusAurelius
- Posts: 155
- Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2012 4:49 pm
Re: Rutgers-Camden to be absorbed by Rowan University?
+1ths115 wrote:I am a life-long resident of Camden County. I have attended at least 50+ concerts in Camden. Rutgers-Camden is EASILY accessible via exit 5B right near the bridge. You drive through the most secure part of Camden to reach the campus. ALL cities have areas that pose higher risk than other spots. Camden for sure is mostly made up of areas like this but there is absolutely NO reason to enter those areas. There are plenty of places to live within South Jersey that provide easy access to campus and do not require driving through gunfire.kaiser wrote:I can assure you this is not BS. Camden, at least in its bad parts, is one of the most dangerous places in the entire country, and a few years ago was even ranked number 1. Again, as many people mentioned, the school is cloistered off and in what sounds like a safe area, but DO NOT assume that the rest of the city is safe to walk around. Again, I know someone who was shot and someone else who had his car stolen. Neither were at Rutgers Camden (which people say is in a safe area), but it goes to show how unsafe some of the other areas can be. I myself am an NJ lifer. I have been to all the best, and all the worst parts of the state. When people speak about Camden, Trenton, and Newark, they are not joking around with you. You need to keep your head up in these places.ths115 wrote:InGoodFaith wrote:Look, I've lived near Camden my entire life. Camden is terrible. Yes, Rutgers campus is fairly safe. HOWEVER, in order to get on the freakin' campus, you still have to journey through Camden. Even when you're driving in, it's pretty scary. You can easily be mugged or shot or whatever at a red light.
Complete and utter BS.
I can vouch for this, as I have lived in Westmont (10 minutes outside of Camden) for the past 20 years of my life
InGoodFaith, WHAT SAY YOU??????????????????????????????????
- drmguy
- Posts: 1004
- Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2009 5:43 am
Re: Rutgers-Camden to be absorbed by Rowan University?
I think there are at least two explanations. One, some people are just more sensitive than others. Two, I have noticed that people in the surrounding area literally think Camden is Somalia because of how much people talk it down.
Either way, campus is fine and driving there is fine.
Either way, campus is fine and driving there is fine.
- MarcusAurelius
- Posts: 155
- Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2012 4:49 pm
Re: Rutgers-Camden to be absorbed by Rowan University?
no it wasn'ttfleming09 wrote:I've been to Camden. I have a picture to prove it. This was taken right by the law school.drmguy wrote:I think there are at least two explanations. One, some people are just more sensitive than others. Two, I have noticed that people in the surrounding area literally think Camden is Somalia because of how much people talk it down.
Either way, campus is fine and driving there is fine.

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- 20130312
- Posts: 3814
- Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2011 8:53 pm
Re: Rutgers-Camden to be absorbed by Rowan University?
That's obviously not Camden. There's no greenery and far more abandoned buildings in Camden.tfleming09 wrote:I've been to Camden. I have a picture to prove it. This was taken right by the law school.drmguy wrote:I think there are at least two explanations. One, some people are just more sensitive than others. Two, I have noticed that people in the surrounding area literally think Camden is Somalia because of how much people talk it down.
Either way, campus is fine and driving there is fine.
- MarcusAurelius
- Posts: 155
- Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2012 4:49 pm
Re: Rutgers-Camden to be absorbed by Rowan University?
you are such a tosserInGoodFaith wrote:That's obviously not Camden. There's no greenery and far more abandoned buildings in Camden.tfleming09 wrote:I've been to Camden. I have a picture to prove it. This was taken right by the law school.drmguy wrote:I think there are at least two explanations. One, some people are just more sensitive than others. Two, I have noticed that people in the surrounding area literally think Camden is Somalia because of how much people talk it down.
Either way, campus is fine and driving there is fine.
- 20130312
- Posts: 3814
- Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2011 8:53 pm
Re: Rutgers-Camden to be absorbed by Rowan University?
MarcusAurelius wrote:you are such a tosserInGoodFaith wrote:That's obviously not Camden. There's no greenery and far more abandoned buildings in Camden.

- MellowMantis
- Posts: 94
- Joined: Tue Aug 23, 2011 1:01 pm
Re: Rutgers-Camden to be absorbed by Rowan University?
This thread is a giant win.InGoodFaith wrote:MarcusAurelius wrote:you are such a tosserInGoodFaith wrote:That's obviously not Camden. There's no greenery and far more abandoned buildings in Camden.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- neeko
- Posts: 941
- Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2010 3:41 pm
Re: Rutgers-Camden to be absorbed by Rowan University?
That reply deserves an award.InGoodFaith wrote:That's obviously not Camden. There's no greenery and far more abandoned buildings in Camden.tfleming09 wrote:I've been to Camden. I have a picture to prove it. This was taken right by the law school.drmguy wrote:I think there are at least two explanations. One, some people are just more sensitive than others. Two, I have noticed that people in the surrounding area literally think Camden is Somalia because of how much people talk it down.
Either way, campus is fine and driving there is fine.
- MarcusAurelius
- Posts: 155
- Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2012 4:49 pm
Re: Rutgers-Camden to be absorbed by Rowan University?
no it doesn't. here's a picture of the admissions office at rutgers camden.neeko wrote:That reply deserves an award.InGoodFaith wrote:That's obviously not Camden. There's no greenery and far more abandoned buildings in Camden.tfleming09 wrote:I've been to Camden. I have a picture to prove it. This was taken right by the law school.drmguy wrote:I think there are at least two explanations. One, some people are just more sensitive than others. Two, I have noticed that people in the surrounding area literally think Camden is Somalia because of how much people talk it down.
Either way, campus is fine and driving there is fine.
--ImageRemoved--
- neeko
- Posts: 941
- Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2010 3:41 pm
Re: Rutgers-Camden to be absorbed by Rowan University?
You people need to lighten up. The school is in a shithole city and you can deny it all you want but it's true. No one here is saying the area IMMEDIATELY surrounding the school is bad, yet that's all you people keep arguing.
- 20130312
- Posts: 3814
- Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2011 8:53 pm
Re: Rutgers-Camden to be absorbed by Rowan University?
For real. Stop the white knighting. No one is saying the campus sucks. It's just that the entire city sucks.neeko wrote:You people need to lighten up. The school is in a shithole city and you can deny it all you want but it's true. No one here is saying the area IMMEDIATELY surrounding the school is bad, yet that's all you people keep arguing.
Shockingly accurate.tfleming09 wrote:Sorry man, you're right. I got my Camden trip and my Somalia trip mixed up. Here's Camden:InGoodFaith wrote:
That's obviously not Camden. There's no greenery and far more abandoned buildings in Camden.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login