(Applications Advice, Letters of Recommendation . . . )
-
BlueLotus

- Posts: 2416
- Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2012 8:07 pm
Post
by BlueLotus » Mon Oct 06, 2014 2:53 pm
JCougar wrote:JCougar wrote:Well, I think that's it. We have 6 schools with 7-point drops (but two have yet to release this year's medians), and 2 schools with 6-point drops that have yet to release 2014 stats (USF, Summit). I didn't find any other schools with 6-7 point drops that haven't yet released for this year, but I didn't look at every school, either. I mostly just used LST to search the extra scammy states like CA, FL, OH, IN, NY, and MA (these states seem to have the vast majority of scam schools, for whatever reason).
But if someone knows of another, please chime in. Otherwise, we're just waiting on Valpo, Suffolk, USF, and Summit to see if we can get an 8-point drop, or whether we have a 6, 7, or 8-way tie for the Ultra-Toilet Law School Median Drop Competition, 2014.
With Valpo's stats out and a 2-point median rise (to 145...lol), we're waiting on Suffolk's stats to determine who the biggest loser is. So far, we have 5 schools with 7-point drops, with Suffolk's 2014 medians still outstanding:
Brooklyn
American
University of the Pacific
Western New England
Suffolk (2014 medians yet to come)
We also haven't heard from any of the two schools with 6-point drops who haven't yet released their 2014 medians:
Arizona Summit
University of San Francisco
A 2-point drop this year with a Suffolk hold could give us a champion.
Dafuq is "Arizona Summit"? Is that even accredited?
Waiting anxiously for BU. Wonder if they tanked as badly as BC, medians-wise.
-
should-i-do-it

- Posts: 409
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 5:45 pm
Post
by should-i-do-it » Mon Oct 06, 2014 2:55 pm
Someone should also make a list of biggest enrollment drops
-
Rigo

- Posts: 16639
- Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2014 3:19 pm
Post
by Rigo » Mon Oct 06, 2014 2:56 pm
should-i-do-it wrote:Someone should also make a list of biggest enrollment drops
It's called looking all the way to the right on the spreadsheet.
-
JCougar

- Posts: 3216
- Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 8:47 pm
Post
by JCougar » Mon Oct 06, 2014 2:56 pm
BlueLotus wrote:JCougar wrote:JCougar wrote:Well, I think that's it. We have 6 schools with 7-point drops (but two have yet to release this year's medians), and 2 schools with 6-point drops that have yet to release 2014 stats (USF, Summit). I didn't find any other schools with 6-7 point drops that haven't yet released for this year, but I didn't look at every school, either. I mostly just used LST to search the extra scammy states like CA, FL, OH, IN, NY, and MA (these states seem to have the vast majority of scam schools, for whatever reason).
But if someone knows of another, please chime in. Otherwise, we're just waiting on Valpo, Suffolk, USF, and Summit to see if we can get an 8-point drop, or whether we have a 6, 7, or 8-way tie for the Ultra-Toilet Law School Median Drop Competition, 2014.
With Valpo's stats out and a 2-point median rise (to 145...lol), we're waiting on Suffolk's stats to determine who the biggest loser is. So far, we have 5 schools with 7-point drops, with Suffolk's 2014 medians still outstanding:
Brooklyn
American
University of the Pacific
Western New England
Suffolk (2014 medians yet to come)
We also haven't heard from any of the two schools with 6-point drops who haven't yet released their 2014 medians:
Arizona Summit
University of San Francisco
A 2-point drop this year with a Suffolk hold could give us a champion.
Dafuq is "Arizona Summit"? Is that even accredited?
Waiting anxiously for BU. Wonder if they tanked as bad as BC, medians-wise.
Arizona Summit, formerly known as the Phoenix School of Law, is an ABA-approved, for-profit law school that feeds on the aspirational career dreams of gullible college graduates, chews them up, and spits them out financially helpless, destitute, starving, and huddled.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
chuckbass

- Posts: 9956
- Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2011 9:29 pm
Post
by chuckbass » Mon Oct 06, 2014 3:01 pm
Blue, you seem a like you're holding onto law school quite a bit haha
Aren't you a recent grad?
-
BlueLotus

- Posts: 2416
- Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2012 8:07 pm
Post
by BlueLotus » Mon Oct 06, 2014 3:07 pm
scottidsntknow wrote:Blue, you seem a like you're holding onto law school quite a bit haha
Aren't you a recent grad?
Nope! 3LOLer here.

-
Paul Campos

- Posts: 688
- Joined: Mon Dec 12, 2011 9:44 am
Post
by Paul Campos » Mon Oct 06, 2014 3:13 pm
Hofstra's median LSAT went from 159 in 2011 to 152 this fall, so they go into the seven-point club too.
-
Rigo

- Posts: 16639
- Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2014 3:19 pm
Post
by Rigo » Mon Oct 06, 2014 3:16 pm
Paul Campos wrote:Hofstra's median LSAT went from 159 in 2011 to 152 this fall, so they go into the seven-point club too.
Surprising since TLS still has them at $160k starting salary.
All the salary talk in the articles needs to just be deleted. I've heard it touted IRL way too much.
Want to continue reading?
Register for access!
Did I mention it was FREE ?
Already a member? Login
-
BlueLotus

- Posts: 2416
- Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2012 8:07 pm
Post
by BlueLotus » Mon Oct 06, 2014 3:24 pm
Dirigo wrote:Paul Campos wrote:Hofstra's median LSAT went from 159 in 2011 to 152 this fall, so they go into the seven-point club too.
Surprising since TLS still has them at $160k starting salary.
All the salary talk in the articles needs to just be deleted. I've heard it touted IRL way too much.
Anyone who believes that stat deserves what's coming to them. In this day and age, 5 minutes of internet research will reveal that the $160K starting salary figure is absolute bullsh*t.
-
Rigo

- Posts: 16639
- Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2014 3:19 pm
Post
by Rigo » Mon Oct 06, 2014 3:26 pm
BlueLotus wrote:Dirigo wrote:Paul Campos wrote:Hofstra's median LSAT went from 159 in 2011 to 152 this fall, so they go into the seven-point club too.
Surprising since TLS still has them at $160k starting salary.
All the salary talk in the articles needs to just be deleted. I've heard it touted IRL way too much.
Anyone who believes that stat deserves what's coming to them. In this day and age, 5 minutes of internet research will reveal that the $160K starting salary figure is absolute bullsh*t.
I agree that people should do their due diligence, but TLS shouldn't make it harder or more confusing.
-
chuckbass

- Posts: 9956
- Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2011 9:29 pm
Post
by chuckbass » Mon Oct 06, 2014 3:28 pm
BlueLotus wrote:scottidsntknow wrote:Blue, you seem a like you're holding onto law school quite a bit haha
Aren't you a recent grad?
Nope! 3LOLer here.

Ah ok, fair.
-
JCougar

- Posts: 3216
- Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 8:47 pm
Post
by JCougar » Mon Oct 06, 2014 3:37 pm
Paul Campos wrote:Hofstra's median LSAT went from 159 in 2011 to 152 this fall, so they go into the seven-point club too.
Rats...I missed that. I should have suspected Hofstra being a likely contender.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
JCougar

- Posts: 3216
- Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 8:47 pm
Post
by JCougar » Mon Oct 06, 2014 3:44 pm
My search was far from methodological/systematic, so feel free to add to/correct any information I posted.
-
Rigo

- Posts: 16639
- Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2014 3:19 pm
Post
by Rigo » Mon Oct 06, 2014 3:50 pm
Spivey just said it was 172.

-
Hand

- Posts: 3843
- Joined: Thu May 08, 2014 11:33 am
Post
by Hand » Mon Oct 06, 2014 3:50 pm
Dirigo wrote:
Spivey just said it was 172.


Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
whitespider

- Posts: 592
- Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2014 11:37 am
Post
by whitespider » Mon Oct 06, 2014 4:07 pm
That's all I could find today, ugh.
Guess it's about time to print out some old 509s to compare against the impending new ones re scholly info.
-
BlueLotus

- Posts: 2416
- Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2012 8:07 pm
Post
by BlueLotus » Mon Oct 06, 2014 4:08 pm
Dirigo wrote:BlueLotus wrote:Dirigo wrote:Paul Campos wrote:Hofstra's median LSAT went from 159 in 2011 to 152 this fall, so they go into the seven-point club too.
Surprising since TLS still has them at $160k starting salary.
All the salary talk in the articles needs to just be deleted. I've heard it touted IRL way too much.
Anyone who believes that stat deserves what's coming to them. In this day and age, 5 minutes of internet research will reveal that the $160K starting salary figure is absolute bullsh*t.
I agree that people should do their due diligence, but TLS shouldn't make it harder or more confusing.
TBF, the TLS article on HofsTTTra is pretty skeptical.
The school's claim of a median post-graduate salary of $160,000 is suspect, especially in the currently struggling economy. [...] The school claims a private sector median salary of $160,000; however, this number is based on incomplete and deceiving data. [...] For instance, the median salary of $160,000 claimed for the Class of 2007 is compiled from only 23% of the class. The data set being so small makes this information virtually useless for applicants. Combine this problem with the fact that the economy has taken a nosedive since the Class of 2008 found jobs, and it quickly becomes apparent that students cannot bank on making anywhere near the reported $160,000 median salary for private sector jobs.
-
Winston1984

- Posts: 1789
- Joined: Sun Mar 17, 2013 12:02 pm
Post
by Winston1984 » Mon Oct 06, 2014 4:16 pm
Dirigo wrote:
Spivey just said it was 172.


-
Louis1127

- Posts: 817
- Joined: Thu Jun 27, 2013 9:12 pm
Post
by Louis1127 » Mon Oct 06, 2014 4:40 pm
This doesn't really matter but I think you meant to type +1 for median LSAT instead of -1.
I swear I'm not trolling, you're doing alot of good work

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
-
whitespider

- Posts: 592
- Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2014 11:37 am
Post
by whitespider » Mon Oct 06, 2014 4:42 pm
Louis1127 wrote:
This doesn't really matter but I think you meant to type +1 for median LSAT instead of -1.
I swear I'm not trolling, you're doing alot of good work

Oh shit, yeah... good call.
My bad.
-
TheBananaStand

- Posts: 15
- Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2014 10:31 am
Post
by TheBananaStand » Mon Oct 06, 2014 5:22 pm
Sorry, this is in reference to Stanford increasing their LSAT to 172.
How are schools like Stanford and Columbia increasing their LSAT medians with then number of takers declining? Are these going to be the new benchmarks for them, or is this year somehow atypical?
-
phillywc

- Posts: 3448
- Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2013 12:17 am
Post
by phillywc » Mon Oct 06, 2014 5:23 pm
TheBananaStand wrote:Sorry, this is in reference to Stanford increasing their LSAT to 172.
How are schools like Stanford and Columbia increasing their LSAT medians with then number of takers declining? Are these going to be the new benchmarks for them, or is this year somehow atypical?
SLS just finally focused on the LSAT. If they want to stay at 172, they can, and easily. The only need 90 172+s.
Columbia will have to fight to hold the 172 but I would expect them to for at least this year.
-
Rigo

- Posts: 16639
- Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2014 3:19 pm
Post
by Rigo » Mon Oct 06, 2014 5:25 pm
TheBananaStand wrote:Sorry, this is in reference to Stanford increasing their LSAT to 172.
How are schools like Stanford and Columbia increasing their LSAT medians with then number of takers declining? Are these going to be the new benchmarks for them, or is this year somehow atypical?
Number of high scoring applicants is increasing, so there's no famine at the very top schools.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login