C/O 2016 median lsat/gpa/class size Forum
- altoid99
- Posts: 249
- Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2012 12:04 am
Re: C/O 2016 median lsat/gpa/class size
Stop posting schools we already have numbers for. Check the spreadsheet first.
-
- Posts: 2502
- Joined: Fri May 10, 2013 11:14 am
Re: C/O 2016 median lsat/gpa/class size
Wait... George Washington is 165? Doood... I thought it was 166, no?
-
- Posts: 1695
- Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2009 2:42 am
Re: C/O 2016 median lsat/gpa/class size
Has this even been released yet?jk148706 wrote:Wait... George Washington is 165? Doood... I thought it was 166, no?
And where did BU come from? Post links peoples.
-
- Posts: 2502
- Joined: Fri May 10, 2013 11:14 am
Re: C/O 2016 median lsat/gpa/class size
+1ohpobrecito wrote:Has this even been released yet?jk148706 wrote:Wait... George Washington is 165? Doood... I thought it was 166, no?
And where did BU come from? Post links peoples.
- KevinP
- Posts: 1322
- Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 8:56 pm
Re: C/O 2016 median lsat/gpa/class size
fyi, here is the rest of uchi's breakdown: http://www.law.uchicago.edu/files/file/ ... 013-14.pdf
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- ManoftheHour
- Posts: 3486
- Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2013 6:03 pm
Re: C/O 2016 median lsat/gpa/class size
+1isuperserial wrote:Seems to be. Makes me feel damn good knowing even if I didn't improve much on my Oct retake, I can still be accepted to some great schools, hopefully with a little scholly money. Just waiting on WashU... their loss will be my gain XDjk148706 wrote:Holy. Is this confirmed ??A-Modest-Proposal wrote:Just got Notre Dame's Class Profile from my school's Law School Fair. It's not pretty.
Median GPA: 3.60
Median LSAT: 163
LSAT Range: 160-165
class size: 163
It's pretty crazy out there. Blood everywhere.
-
- Posts: 11730
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am
Re: C/O 2016 median lsat/gpa/class size
I want MOAR BLOOD!!!
- Robespierre
- Posts: 512
- Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2011 7:02 pm
Re: C/O 2016 median lsat/gpa/class size
As the numbers roll in, I'm more and more impressed with the way GW zigged while everyone else zagged. They grabbed every high-GPA mufu they could find and threw money at them. The result was
(a) a huge GPA boost, and
(b) a huge class, which means more revenue assuming the extra students got anything less than a free ride.
You have to hand it to their Admissions people. They're always running some sort of game and it usually works.
ETA: Of course they took a 2-point LSAT hit, but that headline gets buried since so many others schools took the same or a similar hit.
(a) a huge GPA boost, and
(b) a huge class, which means more revenue assuming the extra students got anything less than a free ride.
You have to hand it to their Admissions people. They're always running some sort of game and it usually works.
ETA: Of course they took a 2-point LSAT hit, but that headline gets buried since so many others schools took the same or a similar hit.
- TheJanitor6203
- Posts: 880
- Joined: Sun Nov 04, 2012 5:12 pm
Re: C/O 2016 median lsat/gpa/class size
Still haven't seen new numbers for GW...Robespierre wrote:As the numbers roll in, I'm more and more impressed with the way GW zigged while everyone else zagged. They grabbed every high-GPA mufu they could find and threw money at them. The result was
(a) a huge GPA boost, and
(b) a huge class, which means more revenue assuming the extra students got anything less than a free ride.
You have to hand it to their Admissions people. They're always running some sort of game and it usually works.
ETA: Of course they took a 2-point LSAT hit, but that headline gets buried since so many others schools took the same or a similar hit.
-
- Posts: 2502
- Joined: Fri May 10, 2013 11:14 am
Re: C/O 2016 median lsat/gpa/class size
Yeah, where are these #s??TheJanitor6203 wrote:Still haven't seen new numbers for GW...Robespierre wrote:As the numbers roll in, I'm more and more impressed with the way GW zigged while everyone else zagged. They grabbed every high-GPA mufu they could find and threw money at them. The result was
(a) a huge GPA boost, and
(b) a huge class, which means more revenue assuming the extra students got anything less than a free ride.
You have to hand it to their Admissions people. They're always running some sort of game and it usually works.
ETA: Of course they took a 2-point LSAT hit, but that headline gets buried since so many others schools took the same or a similar hit.
- Tiago Splitter
- Posts: 17148
- Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 1:20 am
Re: C/O 2016 median lsat/gpa/class size
It would be pretty extraordinary if these numbers get confirmed. Given that most schools took a 1-3 point LSAT hit while barely holding steady on the other metrics, it's really impressive to only give up 2 LSAT points and still grow class size and get a big GPA jump. But it sounds like we should reserve judgment a little longer because the whole thing may be too good to be true.Robespierre wrote:As the numbers roll in, I'm more and more impressed with the way GW zigged while everyone else zagged. They grabbed every high-GPA mufu they could find and threw money at them. The result was
(a) a huge GPA boost, and
(b) a huge class, which means more revenue assuming the extra students got anything less than a free ride.
You have to hand it to their Admissions people. They're always running some sort of game and it usually works.
ETA: Of course they took a 2-point LSAT hit, but that headline gets buried since so many others schools took the same or a similar hit.
-
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2012 5:46 pm
Re: C/O 2016 median lsat/gpa/class size
This is the only link that I could find: http://blogs.gwhatchet.com/newsroom/201 ... aw-school/Tiago Splitter wrote:It would be pretty extraordinary if these numbers get confirmed. Given that most schools took a 1-3 point LSAT hit while barely holding steady on the other metrics, it's really impressive to only give up 2 LSAT points and still grow class size and get a big GPA jump. But it sounds like we should reserve judgment a little longer because the whole thing sounds too good to be true.Robespierre wrote:As the numbers roll in, I'm more and more impressed with the way GW zigged while everyone else zagged. They grabbed every high-GPA mufu they could find and threw money at them. The result was
(a) a huge GPA boost, and
(b) a huge class, which means more revenue assuming the extra students got anything less than a free ride.
You have to hand it to their Admissions people. They're always running some sort of game and it usually works.
ETA: Of course they took a 2-point LSAT hit, but that headline gets buried since so many others schools took the same or a similar hit.
I'm not sure where that article is getting its data.
- The-Specs
- Posts: 1039
- Joined: Tue Oct 30, 2012 12:55 pm
Re: C/O 2016 median lsat/gpa/class size
If this is all true i don't think this is something to be lauded. Sure GW saw a GPA boost but they enrolled a larger class when there are not jobs to justify that increase. On top of that they blatantly stated that it was about money. Kudos to them for their honesty but maybe they should cut down on costs by getting more of their graduates jobs instead of having to support them in unemployment.Robespierre wrote:As the numbers roll in, I'm more and more impressed with the way GW zigged while everyone else zagged. They grabbed every high-GPA mufu they could find and threw money at them. The result was
(a) a huge GPA boost, and
(b) a huge class, which means more revenue assuming the extra students got anything less than a free ride.
You have to hand it to their Admissions people. They're always running some sort of game and it usually works.
ETA: Of course they took a 2-point LSAT hit, but that headline gets buried since so many others schools took the same or a similar hit.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- t-14orbust
- Posts: 2130
- Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 4:43 pm
Re: C/O 2016 median lsat/gpa/class size
I think this is understood by everyone giving them praise. They're all coming from the perspective of the admissions comittee's goals, which are to increase/maintain revenue while not losing out too much in the rankings. They did a good jerbThe-Specs wrote:If this is all true i don't think this is something to be lauded. Sure GW saw a GPA boost but they enrolled a larger class when there are not jobs to justify that increase. On top of that they blatantly stated that it was about money. Kudos to them for their honesty but maybe they should cut down on costs by getting more of their graduates jobs instead of having to support them in unemployment.Robespierre wrote:As the numbers roll in, I'm more and more impressed with the way GW zigged while everyone else zagged. They grabbed every high-GPA mufu they could find and threw money at them. The result was
(a) a huge GPA boost, and
(b) a huge class, which means more revenue assuming the extra students got anything less than a free ride.
You have to hand it to their Admissions people. They're always running some sort of game and it usually works.
ETA: Of course they took a 2-point LSAT hit, but that headline gets buried since so many others schools took the same or a similar hit.
- jbagelboy
- Posts: 10361
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 7:57 pm
Re: C/O 2016 median lsat/gpa/class size
wait, is this another fake? where is this from?KevinP wrote:fyi, here is the rest of uchi's breakdown: http://www.law.uchicago.edu/files/file/ ... 013-14.pdf
-
- Posts: 1695
- Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2009 2:42 am
Re: C/O 2016 median lsat/gpa/class size
It's on their website.jbagelboy wrote:wait, is this another fake? where is this from?KevinP wrote:fyi, here is the rest of uchi's breakdown: http://www.law.uchicago.edu/files/file/ ... 013-14.pdf
- altoid99
- Posts: 249
- Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2012 12:04 am
Re: C/O 2016 median lsat/gpa/class size
That's actually from their website. http://www.law.uchicago.edu/files/file/ ... 013-14.pdfjbagelboy wrote:wait, is this another fake? where is this from?KevinP wrote:fyi, here is the rest of uchi's breakdown: http://www.law.uchicago.edu/files/file/ ... 013-14.pdf
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- jbagelboy
- Posts: 10361
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 7:57 pm
Re: C/O 2016 median lsat/gpa/class size
snapaltoid99 wrote:That's actually from their website. http://www.law.uchicago.edu/files/file/ ... 013-14.pdfjbagelboy wrote:wait, is this another fake? where is this from?KevinP wrote:fyi, here is the rest of uchi's breakdown: http://www.law.uchicago.edu/files/file/ ... 013-14.pdf
so its 170 for Chicago. Maybe we will see a tie at 4th
-
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Mon Jul 15, 2013 10:25 pm
Re: C/O 2016 median lsat/gpa/class size
Those are averages, not medians. It looks like they took a good number of very high gpa/very low lsat applicants and those LSAT outliers could have dragged down the mean. It's still possible that they maintained a 167 or dropped only to a 166.RebelAmoeba wrote:This is the only link that I could find: http://blogs.gwhatchet.com/newsroom/201 ... aw-school/Tiago Splitter wrote:It would be pretty extraordinary if these numbers get confirmed. Given that most schools took a 1-3 point LSAT hit while barely holding steady on the other metrics, it's really impressive to only give up 2 LSAT points and still grow class size and get a big GPA jump. But it sounds like we should reserve judgment a little longer because the whole thing sounds too good to be true.Robespierre wrote:As the numbers roll in, I'm more and more impressed with the way GW zigged while everyone else zagged. They grabbed every high-GPA mufu they could find and threw money at them. The result was
(a) a huge GPA boost, and
(b) a huge class, which means more revenue assuming the extra students got anything less than a free ride.
You have to hand it to their Admissions people. They're always running some sort of game and it usually works.
ETA: Of course they took a 2-point LSAT hit, but that headline gets buried since so many others schools took the same or a similar hit.
I'm not sure where that article is getting its data.
- cotiger
- Posts: 1648
- Joined: Tue Jul 23, 2013 11:49 pm
Re: C/O 2016 median lsat/gpa/class size
I don't know that I trust their school newspaper to make that distinction. I bet they're referring to medians.splitcity wrote:Those are averages, not medians. It looks like they took a good number of very high gpa/very low lsat applicants and those LSAT outliers could have dragged down the mean. It's still possible that they maintained a 167 or dropped only to a 166.RebelAmoeba wrote:This is the only link that I could find: http://blogs.gwhatchet.com/newsroom/201 ... aw-school/Tiago Splitter wrote:It would be pretty extraordinary if these numbers get confirmed. Given that most schools took a 1-3 point LSAT hit while barely holding steady on the other metrics, it's really impressive to only give up 2 LSAT points and still grow class size and get a big GPA jump. But it sounds like we should reserve judgment a little longer because the whole thing sounds too good to be true.Robespierre wrote:As the numbers roll in, I'm more and more impressed with the way GW zigged while everyone else zagged. They grabbed every high-GPA mufu they could find and threw money at them. The result was
(a) a huge GPA boost, and
(b) a huge class, which means more revenue assuming the extra students got anything less than a free ride.
You have to hand it to their Admissions people. They're always running some sort of game and it usually works.
ETA: Of course they took a 2-point LSAT hit, but that headline gets buried since so many others schools took the same or a similar hit.
I'm not sure where that article is getting its data.
- Robespierre
- Posts: 512
- Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2011 7:02 pm
Re: C/O 2016 median lsat/gpa/class size
I was just going by what's on the spreadsheet. So you guys are questioning whether it's true? Good point, I guess. GW's website is silent, and I don't think we can rely on the school paper ...TheJanitor6203 wrote:Still haven't seen new numbers for GW...Robespierre wrote:As the numbers roll in, I'm more and more impressed with the way GW zigged while everyone else zagged. They grabbed every high-GPA mufu they could find and threw money at them. The result was
(a) a huge GPA boost, and
(b) a huge class, which means more revenue assuming the extra students got anything less than a free ride.
You have to hand it to their Admissions people. They're always running some sort of game and it usually works.
ETA: Of course they took a 2-point LSAT hit, but that headline gets buried since so many others schools took the same or a similar hit.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- TheMostDangerousLG
- Posts: 1545
- Joined: Thu Nov 22, 2012 4:25 am
Re: C/O 2016 median lsat/gpa/class size
UChi's 25th LSAT is a 166.
Looks like we know where they fall on the LSAT v. GPA side of things.
It's tough out there for a splitter.

It's tough out there for a splitter.
- longlivetheking
- Posts: 279
- Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2012 2:15 am
Re: C/O 2016 median lsat/gpa/class size
are splitters essentially fucked? every school besides Columbia and NYU is going to be splitter-unfriendly because they can take 169s instead of 170s to maintain their medians.TheMostDangerousLG wrote:UChi's 25th LSAT is a 166.Looks like we know where they fall on the LSAT v. GPA side of things.
It's tough out there for a splitter.
-
- Posts: 334
- Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2012 7:34 pm
Re: C/O 2016 median lsat/gpa/class size
You're not fucked if you can go to CLS or NYU.longlivetheking wrote:are splitters essentially fucked? every school besides Columbia and NYU is going to be splitter-unfriendly because they can take 169s instead of 170s to maintain their medians.TheMostDangerousLG wrote:UChi's 25th LSAT is a 166.Looks like we know where they fall on the LSAT v. GPA side of things.
It's tough out there for a splitter.
- longlivetheking
- Posts: 279
- Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2012 2:15 am
Re: C/O 2016 median lsat/gpa/class size
--ImageRemoved--KingFish wrote:You're not fucked if you can go to CLS or NYU.longlivetheking wrote:are splitters essentially fucked? every school besides Columbia and NYU is going to be splitter-unfriendly because they can take 169s instead of 170s to maintain their medians.TheMostDangerousLG wrote:UChi's 25th LSAT is a 166.Looks like we know where they fall on the LSAT v. GPA side of things.
It's tough out there for a splitter.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login