Latest employment data Forum

cal2013 · Post by **cal2013** » Thu Apr 16, 2015 5:41 pm

Mack.Hambleton wrote:>baylor

No

Why?

Winston1984 · Post by **Winston1984** » Thu Apr 16, 2015 5:47 pm

cal2013 wrote:
Mack.Hambleton wrote:>baylor

No
Why?

It's apparently hell on earth.

03152016 · Post by **03152016** » Thu Apr 16, 2015 5:48 pm

i like how you edited out the part about how TLS is some big anti-baylor circlejerk
as if we really cared about that toilet
i also like how you edited out the part about how edgy mack is

looks like we have ourselves some real edit ninjas in c/o 2018

TLSModBot · Post by **TLSModBot** » Thu Apr 16, 2015 5:50 pm

Nothing gets by brut. Nothing.

rpupkin · Post by **rpupkin** » Thu Apr 16, 2015 6:01 pm

zacharus85 wrote:Nothing gets by brut. Nothing.

He's like a human wayback machine of TLS posts.

BigZuck · Post by **BigZuck** » Thu Apr 16, 2015 6:46 pm

I've met real life Baylor students and heard their horror stories first hand.

Job numbers seem ok, hopefully it's cheap for people who attend.

cal2013 · Post by **cal2013** » Thu Apr 16, 2015 6:50 pm

Brut wrote:i like how you edited out the part about how TLS is some big anti-baylor circlejerk
as if we really cared about that toilet
i also like how you edited out the part about how edgy mack is

looks like we have ourselves some real edit ninjas in c/o 2018

I'm glad you liked those things.

To be fair, his post was rather edgy.

cal2013 · Post by **cal2013** » Thu Apr 16, 2015 6:54 pm

BigZuck wrote:I've met real life Baylor students and heard their horror stories first hand.

Job numbers seem ok, hopefully it's cheap for people who attend.

Agreed on both counts. I have spoken with several recent grads who echo the "beware, this place is not disneyland" warning, but all of them did recommend attending if it was at a steep discount.

I'm not a Baylor apologist, but it isn't a toilet for those with modest goals.

TheOnePercent · Post by **TheOnePercent** » Thu Apr 16, 2015 10:52 pm

cannibal ox wrote:
zombie mcavoy wrote:Y'all are ruining UT's moment of glory!
And Michigan/GULC's moment of shame.

LULZ Michigan thread attributing low BL/FC #'s "completely [to] self-selection." Checking that off my "Michigan Placement Excuses Bingo Card."

EEguy5 wrote:I'm not sure what the data shows, or why it shows a [Michigan] decline in BL/FC, but I would assume it is completely self selected.

rpupkin · Post by **rpupkin** » Thu Apr 16, 2015 11:11 pm

TheOnePercent wrote:LULZ Michigan thread attributing low BL/FC #'s "completely [to] self-selection." Checking that off my "Michigan Placement Excuses Bingo Card."

I also liked the "all the 1Ls I know have summer jobs/externships" point, as if the same couldn't be said of just about any law school. That one wasn't even on my bingo card.

yomisterd · Post by **yomisterd** » Thu Apr 16, 2015 11:35 pm

guys we must go deeper. we need an analysis of CoA + V10.

JFO1833 · Post by **JFO1833** » Thu Apr 16, 2015 11:45 pm

Wasn't able to fill this out before.

78: Brooklyn - BL+FC-12.8% (-1.2%), FTLTBR-52.4% (-4.1%), FTLTBR (w/o LSF)-52.4% (-4.1%)

Still missing:

Temple
CUNY
John Marshall Atlanta
Belmont

Have these schools missed a deadline?

Saddle Up · Post by **Saddle Up** » Fri Apr 17, 2015 12:05 am

yomisterd wrote:guys we must go deeper. we need an analysis of CoA + V10.

Not so sure if an analysis of CoA is even possible or that it would be meaningful. If the sticker is $40k and the data shows the average student is paying $25k, it still would be irrelevant. For someone with a 3.8/172 is the CoA could be minimal. A 3.3/162 might get you waitlisted for the opportunity of paying sticker.

What could work is a formula based rate card but, as is, negotiating college is the same as dealing with a car salesman.

AT9 · Post by **AT9** » Fri Apr 17, 2015 12:13 am

Saddle Up wrote:
yomisterd wrote:guys we must go deeper. we need an analysis of CoA + V10.
Not so sure if an analysis of CoA is even possible or that it would be meaningful. If the sticker is $40k and the data shows the average student is paying $25k, it still would be irrelevant. For someone with a 3.8/172 is the CoA could be minimal. A 3.3/162 might get you waitlisted for the opportunity of paying sticker.

What could work is a formula based rate card but, as is, negotiating college is the same as dealing with a car salesman.

CoA = Court of Appeals (clerkships)
COA = Cost of Attendance

At least that's what I gathered from his post.

chuckbass · Post by **chuckbass** » Fri Apr 17, 2015 12:14 am

Saddle Up wrote:
yomisterd wrote:guys we must go deeper. we need an analysis of CoA + V10.
Not so sure if an analysis of CoA is even possible or that it would be meaningful. If the sticker is $40k and the data shows the average student is paying $25k, it still would be irrelevant. For someone with a 3.8/172 is the CoA could be minimal. A 3.3/162 might get you waitlisted for the opportunity of paying sticker.

What could work is a formula based rate card but, as is, negotiating college is the same as dealing with a car salesman.

Just a wild guess, but I think CoA in this context was getting at court of appeals...

Dammit scooped.

Saddle Up · Post by **Saddle Up** » Fri Apr 17, 2015 12:16 am

AT9 wrote:
Saddle Up wrote:
yomisterd wrote:guys we must go deeper. we need an analysis of CoA + V10.
Not so sure if an analysis of CoA is even possible or that it would be meaningful. If the sticker is $40k and the data shows the average student is paying $25k, it still would be irrelevant. For someone with a 3.8/172 is the CoA could be minimal. A 3.3/162 might get you waitlisted for the opportunity of paying sticker.

What could work is a formula based rate card but, as is, negotiating college is the same as dealing with a car salesman.
CoA = Court of Appeals (clerkships)
COA = Cost of Attendance

At least that's what I gathered from his post.

I think you're right about that. As a 1L the court of appeals is not exactly on my radar. Opps

yomisterd · Post by **yomisterd** » Fri Apr 17, 2015 12:23 am

Saddle Up wrote:
AT9 wrote:
Saddle Up wrote:
yomisterd wrote:guys we must go deeper. we need an analysis of CoA + V10.
Not so sure if an analysis of CoA is even possible or that it would be meaningful. If the sticker is $40k and the data shows the average student is paying $25k, it still would be irrelevant. For someone with a 3.8/172 is the CoA could be minimal. A 3.3/162 might get you waitlisted for the opportunity of paying sticker.

What could work is a formula based rate card but, as is, negotiating college is the same as dealing with a car salesman.
CoA = Court of Appeals (clerkships)
COA = Cost of Attendance

At least that's what I gathered from his post.
I think you're right about that. As a 1L the court of appeals is not exactly on my radar. Opps

thx for the helpful post though on COA.

03152016 · Post by **03152016** » Fri Apr 17, 2015 12:24 am

yomisterd wrote:guys we must go deeper. we need an analysis of CoA + V10.

i did the east coast schools, c/o 2013 stats

cls - 22.43%
cornell - 16.58%
nyu - 16.57%
h - 16.26%
y - 14.78%
penn - 11.97%
duke - 11.62%
uva - 9.07%
gulc - 8.68%

03152016 · Post by **03152016** » Fri Apr 17, 2015 12:25 am

to be completely honest
i did not expect that from cornell
i'm totally surprised

Mack.Hambleton · Post by **Mack.Hambleton** » Fri Apr 17, 2015 12:25 am

Brut wrote:
yomisterd wrote:guys we must go deeper. we need an analysis of CoA + V10.
i did the east coast schools, c/o 2013 stats

cls - 22.43%
cornell - 16.58%
nyu - 16.57%
h - 16.26%
y - 14.78%
penn - 11.97%
duke - 11.62%
uva - 9.07%
gulc - 8.68%

howd u do this

03152016 · Post by **03152016** » Fri Apr 17, 2015 12:26 am

although actually now that i think about it
cornell is probably super nyc heavy
so that probably explains part of it
still, impressive

i'm actually going to re-do this using grade selective firms (as opposed to just v10) when i have the chance
probably this weekend

03152016 · Post by **03152016** » Fri Apr 17, 2015 12:26 am

Mack.Hambleton wrote:
Brut wrote:
yomisterd wrote:guys we must go deeper. we need an analysis of CoA + V10.
i did the east coast schools, c/o 2013 stats

cls - 22.43%
cornell - 16.58%
nyu - 16.57%
h - 16.26%
y - 14.78%
penn - 11.97%
duke - 11.62%
uva - 9.07%
gulc - 8.68%
howd u do this

nlj data + lst + vault rankings + a calculator

yomisterd · Post by **yomisterd** » Fri Apr 17, 2015 12:27 am

Mack.Hambleton wrote:
Brut wrote:
yomisterd wrote:guys we must go deeper. we need an analysis of CoA + V10.
i did the east coast schools, c/o 2013 stats

cls - 22.43%
cornell - 16.58%
nyu - 16.57%
h - 16.26%
y - 14.78%
penn - 11.97%
duke - 11.62%
uva - 9.07%
gulc - 8.68%
howd u do this

i'm also skeptical/impressed

03152016 · Post by **03152016** » Fri Apr 17, 2015 12:28 am

no need for skepticism
the data is all public
why would i make up something that can be easily verified

queerqueg · Post by **queerqueg** » Fri Apr 17, 2015 12:29 am

The REAL new tiers (NFL law, the only important metric):

HGR (Whorevard, GW, Rutgers)
YWT (Yalé, Widener, Tulane)
SPBG (Stamford, Penn, Berkeley, GTown)

You heard it here first

Latest employment data Forum

Re: Latest employment data

Re: Latest employment data

Re: Latest employment data

Re: Latest employment data

Re: Latest employment data

Re: Latest employment data

Re: Latest employment data

Re: Latest employment data

Re: Latest employment data

Re: Latest employment data

Re: Latest employment data

Re: Latest employment data

Re: Latest employment data

Re: Latest employment data

Re: Latest employment data

Re: Latest employment data

Re: Latest employment data

Re: Latest employment data

Re: Latest employment data

Re: Latest employment data

Re: Latest employment data

Re: Latest employment data

Re: Latest employment data

Re: Latest employment data

Re: Latest employment data