LSN 2012-2013...It's Back! Forum

[WhiteyCakes]

http://lawschoolnumbers.com/foosbol21

3.1/170

Foosbol I can't open your page...it says that the user doesn't exist or the page isn't visible.

Oops, I think I was hidden. It should be fixed now.

Yep it is working now- you're all set.

[kcam1991]

http://lawschoolnumbers.com/Kcam1991

3.86 172 URM

[WhiteyCakes]

http://lawschoolnumbers.com/Kcam1991

3.86 172 URM

Enjoy HYS....I'll add you in a minute

[maggielizer]

Cool resource, thanks Whitey!

Mine's http://lawschoolnumbers.com/maggielizer

Had the account when I applied last year, but it's now officially a blank slate pending this year's apps (and my October retake!).

[WhiteyCakes]

Cool resource, thanks Whitey!

Mine's http://lawschoolnumbers.com/maggielizer

Had the account when I applied last year, but it's now officially a blank slate pending this year's apps (and my October retake!).

I'm very good.

[WhiteyCakes]

Thanks again to North for contributing the formatting and many of the ideas to this thread. He's the brains, I'm just the muscle.

[msquaredb]

http://lawschoolnumbers.com/msquaredb

3.95, October LSAT

[WhiteyCakes]

http://lawschoolnumbers.com/msquaredb

3.95, October LSAT

Good to go. Let us know how October goes!

[Yardbird]

http://lawschoolnumbers.com/shadowofjazz

I'm curious as to the new features they said would be rolling out.

[WhiteyCakes]

http://lawschoolnumbers.com/shadowofjazz

I'm curious as to the new features they said would be rolling out.

Shadow I'm putting you in the URM category...this is correct, right?

[lovelydarkanddeep]

Here's mine....http://lawschoolnumbers.com/lovelydarkanddeep

[alwayssunnyinfl]

http://lawschoolnumbers.com/an0therdatap0int

171/2.7

[facile princeps]

Checking in (i might retake):

You should. But it looks like you're going to Yale anyway. Congrats, dude! Your cycle will be fun to stalk.

+1

Thanks guys. If only it was that easy .

In a strange twist, I checked out what would happen if the LSAT range were bumped up to 168-170 and this is what happened : http://myLSN.info/82rhnw

Case in point lol. My numbers are just slightly higher, too . We'll see how it goes.

[broadstreet11]

3.78 and a 172 (approximately)! K-JD here.

Here's the link: http://lawschoolnumbers.com/broadstreet11/jd

Can't wait to s̶t̶a̶l̶k̶ follow you all this cycle.

[CyanIdes Of March]

In a strange twist, I checked out what would happen if the LSAT range were bumped up to 168-170 and this is what happened : http://myLSN.info/82rhnw

That... is really odd. Seems like a stim for a resolve the paradox question.

Facile Princeps, maybe don't retake...

The answer to that question would be: The students that scored in the lower range were black/native american while the students who scored in the 168 - 170 range and got rejected were latino.

[outlookingin]

http://lawschoolnumbers.com/outlookingin

3.74~/175

Thanks for doing this!

[bobbyflayed]

http://lawschoolnumbers.com/bobbyflayed

3.62/171

[ctmx]

http://lawschoolnumbers.com/ctmx

3.32/170

pretty short cycle but maybe it'll help someone

[WhiteyCakes]

All should be up to date. Post if you want to be included

[Vincent]

http://lawschoolnumbers.com/bobbyflayed

3.62/171

Wow, we have really close stats.. Good luck this cycle!

[guinness1547]

.

[DaRascal]

.

[lc.]

http://lawschoolnumbers.com/lslc

175, 3.93

Good luck everyone!

[North]

The 1% is really coming out of the woodwork in this beautiful thread.

[guinness1547]

The 1% is really coming out of the woodwork in this beautiful thread.

No kidding.