Lol...romothesavior wrote:Abe Lincoln was pre-ITE.
HTH

Lol...romothesavior wrote:Abe Lincoln was pre-ITE.
HTH
Romo once again for the lulzromothesavior wrote:Abe Lincoln was pre-ITE.
HTH
rad law wrote:I love it when threads degenerate in to memes. Matlock, this one's for you.
--ImageRemoved--
go to the website and seach "advice matlock"
--LinkRemoved--schmohawk wrote: No, it really isn't. Are there some shady schools out there that are scamming students? I don't know, maybe.
Is this method of waiting for OCI, sending out blind application packets, and just hoping your transcript gets you a job still that prevalent? I find that hard to believe. I feel like more and more of us know - and knew before going to law school - that building a career is about building connections and proving yourself through hard work and opportunities. Also, I feel like a lot of the doom and gloom is based on expectations of massive income or thrilling careers. Not sure why some law students can't just be satisfied with a simple, normal existence. You go into it just wanting to practice law, pay for a decent mortgage and watch your kids' baseball games. There are jobs out there that provide that. They may not be glamorous, or even in the nicest cities, but life isn't always what you want. Sometimes it's what you need.Matthies wrote:Showing the lemmenings OCI and mass mailing are stupid plans for finding a job ... they sedn out 500 mail merged unsolcited letter to firms then get upsent when the equivilant of junkmail does not end up getting them the $160k job they think the deserve.
Want to continue reading?
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
Oh, many of them are SOL, that's for SURE. Like I said earlier, there is a point where the risk becomes greater. At my school, regardless of the economy, it isn't "if you aren't in the top 20%, watch out! You might be making, gasp, 60k at graduation!romothesavior wrote:Scam n.- A fraudulent or deceptive act or operation.schmohawk wrote: I think people who call law school a scam are truly idiots who thought it was a get-rich-quick scheme to begin with. Grow up Peter Pan.
If the use of extremely misleading statistics and (sometimes) straight up lies for the purpose of convincing students to make an unwise 6-figure investment isn't a scam, then I'd like to hear your opinion on what is.
And yes a'nold, it is late... my RC was poor on that one.But I do still think maybe you're overstating it a bit, and I'd imagine many of your classmates are SOL right now.
BTW, if I'm not the first person you tell about your WUSTL transfer decision I will be very upset.
Disagree with your first point and VERY much agree with your second point.smalltown wrote:Is this method of waiting for OCI, sending out blind application packets, and just hoping your transcript gets you a job still that prevalent? I find that hard to believe. I feel like more and more of us know - and knew before going to law school - that building a career is about building connections and proving yourself through hard work and opportunities. Also, I feel like a lot of the doom and gloom is based on expectations of massive income or thrilling careers. Not sure why some law students can't just be satisfied with a simple, normal existence. You go into it just wanting to practice law, pay for a decent mortgage and watch your kids' baseball games. There are jobs out there that provide that. They may not be glamorous, or even in the nicest cities, but life isn't always what you want. Sometimes it's what you need.Matthies wrote:Showing the lemmenings OCI and mass mailing are stupid plans for finding a job ... they sedn out 500 mail merged unsolcited letter to firms then get upsent when the equivilant of junkmail does not end up getting them the $160k job they think the deserve.
This is why I wish Matthies and others would stop promoting networking and Guerrilla Tactics. I'd rather everyone kept the status quo!A'nold wrote: I think many feel like career services will find them a job. This even happens at my t3.
4 realz, haha.romothesavior wrote:This is why I wish Matthies and others would stop promoting networking and Guerrilla Tactics. I'd rather everyone kept the status quo!A'nold wrote: I think many feel like career services will find them a job. This even happens at my t3.
That last thread was pretty interesting, and I'll admit my foot went in my mouth for a few seconds. It was disgusting.romothesavior wrote:--LinkRemoved--schmohawk wrote: No, it really isn't. Are there some shady schools out there that are scamming students? I don't know, maybe.
http://law.hofstra.edu/studentlife/Care ... stics.html
http://law.shu.edu/ProspectiveStudents/ ... -Stats.cfm
--LinkRemoved--
http://www.avemarialaw.edu/index.cfm?ev ... ers.report
Just some examples.
http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 2&t=114338
Seriously, read this thread and the article within it, if you have not already. Then come back here and tell me that there aren't shady schools scamming students. And although I don't know if it is quite as fair to say T1s are scams in the typical sense of the word, they are certainly engaging in deceptive actions as well.
FTFYA'nold wrote:4 realz, haha.romothesavior wrote:This is why I wish Matthies and others would stop promoting networking and Guerrilla Tactics. I'd rather everyone kept the status quo!A'nold wrote: I think many feel like career services will find them a job. This even happens at my t3.
Oh, btw, fo sho you will be the first peep to hear about my WUSTLrejectionacceptance!
Register now!
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
*Bows to the internet nerd tough guy*romothesavior wrote:Schmohawk, you are lucky I'm in a good mood. Normally I would have taken such a horrific post and torn it to shreds (and radlaw may have helped as well). But I took mercy.
I agree with your last point. Personally, I think a lot of the freaking out is "Waaaaah I'm not gonna make biglaw!" For me personally, give me a 60k salary in my preferred market and I will make the most of it. I don't feel entitled to a huge salary; but I do feel somewhat entitled to a job after spending 100k on a top 20 law school (which is, after all, a professional school), especially if I finish at median or higher.schmohawk wrote:That last thread was pretty interesting, and I'll admit my foot went in my mouth for a few seconds. It was disgusting.romothesavior wrote:--LinkRemoved--schmohawk wrote: No, it really isn't. Are there some shady schools out there that are scamming students? I don't know, maybe.
http://law.hofstra.edu/studentlife/Care ... stics.html
http://law.shu.edu/ProspectiveStudents/ ... -Stats.cfm
--LinkRemoved--
http://www.avemarialaw.edu/index.cfm?ev ... ers.report
Just some examples.
http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 2&t=114338
Seriously, read this thread and the article within it, if you have not already. Then come back here and tell me that there aren't shady schools scamming students. And although I don't know if it is quite as fair to say T1s are scams in the typical sense of the word, they are certainly engaging in deceptive actions as well.
But my main point, which I still stand behind, is that a legal education is just that...an education. I did concede earlier that there might be shady schools out there, but that does not mean law schools in general are corrupt because students are unemployed. Most law schools that didn't pop into existence in the past twenty years generally have a strong foundation and reason for establishment...to train future lawyers. I already knew about Ave Maria, and it's obvious since it's not a non-profit that it's a scam. But still, I just have a problem with the attitude that law students are entitled to employment with W2 salary and benefits. Like someone said earlier, only doctors (and perhaps pharmacists in today's world) have that luxury, but that's only because of demand, aka "market-driven" forces which are entirely out of academia's hands.
thisromothesavior wrote: I agree with your last point. Personally, I think a lot of the freaking out is "Waaaaah I'm not gonna make biglaw!" For me personally, give me a 60k salary in my preferred market and I will make the most of it. I don't feel entitled to a huge salary; but I do feel somewhat entitled to a job after spending 100k on a top 20 law school (which is, after all, a professional school), especially if I finish at median or higher.
+10000romothesavior wrote:I agree with your last point. Personally, I think a lot of the freaking out is "Waaaaah I'm not gonna make biglaw!" For me personally, give me a 60k salary in my preferred market and I will make the most of it. I don't feel entitled to a huge salary; but I do feel somewhat entitled to a job after spending 100k on a top 20 law school (which is, after all, a professional school), especially if I finish at median or higher.schmohawk wrote:That last thread was pretty interesting, and I'll admit my foot went in my mouth for a few seconds. It was disgusting.romothesavior wrote:--LinkRemoved--schmohawk wrote: No, it really isn't. Are there some shady schools out there that are scamming students? I don't know, maybe.
http://law.hofstra.edu/studentlife/Care ... stics.html
http://law.shu.edu/ProspectiveStudents/ ... -Stats.cfm
--LinkRemoved--
http://www.avemarialaw.edu/index.cfm?ev ... ers.report
Just some examples.
http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 2&t=114338
Seriously, read this thread and the article within it, if you have not already. Then come back here and tell me that there aren't shady schools scamming students. And although I don't know if it is quite as fair to say T1s are scams in the typical sense of the word, they are certainly engaging in deceptive actions as well.
But my main point, which I still stand behind, is that a legal education is just that...an education. I did concede earlier that there might be shady schools out there, but that does not mean law schools in general are corrupt because students are unemployed. Most law schools that didn't pop into existence in the past twenty years generally have a strong foundation and reason for establishment...to train future lawyers. I already knew about Ave Maria, and it's obvious since it's not a non-profit that it's a scam. But still, I just have a problem with the attitude that law students are entitled to employment with W2 salary and benefits. Like someone said earlier, only doctors (and perhaps pharmacists in today's world) have that luxury, but that's only because of demand, aka "market-driven" forces which are entirely out of academia's hands.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
JDU and XOXO hate TLS. I wouldn't be surprised if this is a concentrated effort on their part to troll us.gwuorbust wrote:didn't bother to read 5 pages of JDU trolls mixed with reasonable ppl but...
what the fuck is going on? it seems like these JDU'er are coming out of the woodwork to TLS over the last few days.
Damnit I wish I could be quoted on JDU/XOXO. Some guys around here have all the luck.romothesavior wrote:JDU and XOXO hate TLS. I wouldn't be surprised if this is a concentrated effort on their part to troll us.gwuorbust wrote:didn't bother to read 5 pages of JDU trolls mixed with reasonable ppl but...
what the fuck is going on? it seems like these JDU'er are coming out of the woodwork to TLS over the last few days.
I've actually been quoted on JDU and XOXO... So they do keep tabs on TLS pretty closely.
Your posting history is sub-par.rad law wrote:Damnit I wish I could be quoted on JDU/XOXO. Some guys around here have all the luck.romothesavior wrote:JDU and XOXO hate TLS. I wouldn't be surprised if this is a concentrated effort on their part to troll us.gwuorbust wrote:didn't bother to read 5 pages of JDU trolls mixed with reasonable ppl but...
what the fuck is going on? it seems like these JDU'er are coming out of the woodwork to TLS over the last few days.
I've actually been quoted on JDU and XOXO... So they do keep tabs on TLS pretty closely.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Already a member? Login
I think I can agree with that as it would be hard for anyone to say "I'm comfortable spending 100k on a top 20 law school and not finding a job." Obviously, I too would feel cheated if that happened. But honestly, the law profession is cyclical and completely geared towards the success of its clients. Other professional schools, particularly in the medical profession, are less cyclical. So I guess knowing that going into it takes that whole entitlement factor out of the equation. The countless discussions I've had with attorneys I know from work or through personal friendships has been centered on the changing face of the profession, and how it is more and more being geared towards customer service, aka "client-driven". So, if I'm to expect a job after spending 100k (though I won't be spending half that), I had better hope there are clients out there who need a lawyer, instead of law schools headhunting for me. I don't know, that's just my two cents.romothesavior wrote:I agree with your last point. Personally, I think a lot of the freaking out is "Waaaaah I'm not gonna make biglaw!" For me personally, give me a 60k salary in my preferred market and I will make the most of it. I don't feel entitled to a huge salary; but I do feel somewhat entitled to a job after spending 100k on a top 20 law school (which is, after all, a professional school), especially if I finish at median or higher.schmohawk wrote:That last thread was pretty interesting, and I'll admit my foot went in my mouth for a few seconds. It was disgusting.romothesavior wrote:--LinkRemoved--schmohawk wrote: No, it really isn't. Are there some shady schools out there that are scamming students? I don't know, maybe.
http://law.hofstra.edu/studentlife/Care ... stics.html
http://law.shu.edu/ProspectiveStudents/ ... -Stats.cfm
--LinkRemoved--
http://www.avemarialaw.edu/index.cfm?ev ... ers.report
Just some examples.
http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 2&t=114338
Seriously, read this thread and the article within it, if you have not already. Then come back here and tell me that there aren't shady schools scamming students. And although I don't know if it is quite as fair to say T1s are scams in the typical sense of the word, they are certainly engaging in deceptive actions as well.
But my main point, which I still stand behind, is that a legal education is just that...an education. I did concede earlier that there might be shady schools out there, but that does not mean law schools in general are corrupt because students are unemployed. Most law schools that didn't pop into existence in the past twenty years generally have a strong foundation and reason for establishment...to train future lawyers. I already knew about Ave Maria, and it's obvious since it's not a non-profit that it's a scam. But still, I just have a problem with the attitude that law students are entitled to employment with W2 salary and benefits. Like someone said earlier, only doctors (and perhaps pharmacists in today's world) have that luxury, but that's only because of demand, aka "market-driven" forces which are entirely out of academia's hands.
I'm not biting this one either, Romo. My only contribution:schmohawk wrote:*Bows to the internet nerd tough guy*romothesavior wrote:Schmohawk, you are lucky I'm in a good mood. Normally I would have taken such a horrific post and torn it to shreds (and radlaw may have helped as well). But I took mercy.
May I suggest:gwuorbust wrote:well then I am def going to have to substantially increase my post count if I am going to get quoted on JDU. where is PDaddy when he is needed so I can debate some nonsense for a while...
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login