Too feisty for a PS?? Forum
- AtticusRising
- Posts: 34
- Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2014 3:13 am
Too feisty for a PS??
I'm a budding public interest lawyer and I wanted to make my passion very explicit, but I'm wondering if it comes off a little too feisty? Then again, what social justice folk aren't
Critiques welcomed! Thanks in advance!
There is a tattoo of a rosary on my left wrist, etched into my skin as a lingering shadow of the relic my grandmother would often cling to for solace. When I was kid, I once found her alone in her room with her eyes closed, squeezing her rosary amidst the dim candlelight that flickered with every prayer she whispered. When I asked her why she was squeezing so tightly, she simply replied, "Because when you hold on tightly to what you believe in, your faith gives you strength."
Over the years, I came to learn that the faith that carried my grandmother through abject poverty in rural Mexico was the same faith my mother used to overcome her own struggles as an immigrant, single mother in the U.S. Humbled by the resilient women that raised me, I developed a great desire to help individuals who have similarly been confronted by great adversities. I naturally gravitated towards a career in working with one of the world's most vulnerable populations: refugee children. The kids I have worked with have been subjected to a litany of horrors such as sexual abuse, armed violence and endless psychological trauma. Yet despite such misfortunes, I quickly learned that these children were not victims, they were survivors.
I remember one particular interview with a young boy who stopped in the middle of recounting how he was brutally tortured by one of the Mexican drug cartels after being kidnapped from his home. He closed his eyes tightly as if trying to find the strength to continue reliving the incident, but when he opened his eyes, he rested his gaze on my tattoo. His eyes lingered for a moment and then a modest grin came across his face as he looked up at me. With a steady gaze and unwavering conviction he said, "My faith gave me the strength to escape." I smiled at him because in that moment I saw the same faith that I saw in my mother, grandmother, and every survivor I have ever met. It is a faith irrespective of religious dogma, but rather, couched in hope; and it allows the individual to overcome unimaginable hardships in the fight for their survival.
Having seen first hand the scars left on the human spirit from having to endure oppressive circumstances, public interest law seemed like a logical career choice for me. I have found legal interventions to be the most empowering protection mechanism for individuals who have been beaten and worn by the world's injustices. To legitimize their grievances through the eyes of the law is to restore their dignity and enable them to regain their self-determination. Yet, it wasn't until I moved to Texas to work with unaccompanied minors during the height of the humanitarian crisis unfolding at the U.S.-Mexico border that my career choice quickly became a passionate one.
Providing aid and protection to unaccompanied children fleeing for their lives is unquestioned in much of Berkeley, within the UN system, and among the international community in Geneva; all of which are places that have influenced my world-view. Thus, falling within the jurisdiction of the Houston Asylum Office—an office with one of the lowest approval rates in the entire country—has proved to be a sobering reality of the high politicization of humanitarian assistance. It is equally sobering, if not enraging when State court judges display a complete lack of compassion and sensitivity towards children who have endured more suffering than most people experience in a lifetime. The perpetual injustices I’ve witnessed within the legal profession have challenged what I thought I knew. I’m no longer the naïve idealist blind to the disparate values that pose objections to humanitarian protection. I’m now a tactical idealist compelled to become a child's advocate: an attorney with the skills to translate unbridled compassion for human suffering into sound reasoning that effectively advocate's for a child’s need for protection in the face of opposition.
It's been years since I've picked up a real rosary, but every time I look down at my tattoo I am reminded of the unyielding perseverance I inherited from the women in my family that is reinforced with every survivor I meet. So like my grandmother, I’m holding on tightly to the justice I believe in so that I have the strength to fight for that justice; and I will fight the way countless survivors have taught me how to fight.
Critiques welcomed! Thanks in advance!
There is a tattoo of a rosary on my left wrist, etched into my skin as a lingering shadow of the relic my grandmother would often cling to for solace. When I was kid, I once found her alone in her room with her eyes closed, squeezing her rosary amidst the dim candlelight that flickered with every prayer she whispered. When I asked her why she was squeezing so tightly, she simply replied, "Because when you hold on tightly to what you believe in, your faith gives you strength."
Over the years, I came to learn that the faith that carried my grandmother through abject poverty in rural Mexico was the same faith my mother used to overcome her own struggles as an immigrant, single mother in the U.S. Humbled by the resilient women that raised me, I developed a great desire to help individuals who have similarly been confronted by great adversities. I naturally gravitated towards a career in working with one of the world's most vulnerable populations: refugee children. The kids I have worked with have been subjected to a litany of horrors such as sexual abuse, armed violence and endless psychological trauma. Yet despite such misfortunes, I quickly learned that these children were not victims, they were survivors.
I remember one particular interview with a young boy who stopped in the middle of recounting how he was brutally tortured by one of the Mexican drug cartels after being kidnapped from his home. He closed his eyes tightly as if trying to find the strength to continue reliving the incident, but when he opened his eyes, he rested his gaze on my tattoo. His eyes lingered for a moment and then a modest grin came across his face as he looked up at me. With a steady gaze and unwavering conviction he said, "My faith gave me the strength to escape." I smiled at him because in that moment I saw the same faith that I saw in my mother, grandmother, and every survivor I have ever met. It is a faith irrespective of religious dogma, but rather, couched in hope; and it allows the individual to overcome unimaginable hardships in the fight for their survival.
Having seen first hand the scars left on the human spirit from having to endure oppressive circumstances, public interest law seemed like a logical career choice for me. I have found legal interventions to be the most empowering protection mechanism for individuals who have been beaten and worn by the world's injustices. To legitimize their grievances through the eyes of the law is to restore their dignity and enable them to regain their self-determination. Yet, it wasn't until I moved to Texas to work with unaccompanied minors during the height of the humanitarian crisis unfolding at the U.S.-Mexico border that my career choice quickly became a passionate one.
Providing aid and protection to unaccompanied children fleeing for their lives is unquestioned in much of Berkeley, within the UN system, and among the international community in Geneva; all of which are places that have influenced my world-view. Thus, falling within the jurisdiction of the Houston Asylum Office—an office with one of the lowest approval rates in the entire country—has proved to be a sobering reality of the high politicization of humanitarian assistance. It is equally sobering, if not enraging when State court judges display a complete lack of compassion and sensitivity towards children who have endured more suffering than most people experience in a lifetime. The perpetual injustices I’ve witnessed within the legal profession have challenged what I thought I knew. I’m no longer the naïve idealist blind to the disparate values that pose objections to humanitarian protection. I’m now a tactical idealist compelled to become a child's advocate: an attorney with the skills to translate unbridled compassion for human suffering into sound reasoning that effectively advocate's for a child’s need for protection in the face of opposition.
It's been years since I've picked up a real rosary, but every time I look down at my tattoo I am reminded of the unyielding perseverance I inherited from the women in my family that is reinforced with every survivor I meet. So like my grandmother, I’m holding on tightly to the justice I believe in so that I have the strength to fight for that justice; and I will fight the way countless survivors have taught me how to fight.
Last edited by AtticusRising on Mon Oct 12, 2015 6:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Trippel
- Posts: 192
- Joined: Mon Dec 30, 2013 2:52 pm
Re: Too feisty for a PS??
I would tone down the second to last paragraph. Particularly the sentence about judges. The last sentence of that paragraph is also too strong.
-
- Posts: 11442
- Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 4:54 pm
Re: Too feisty for a PS??
No, this is not too feisty for a law school PS; just wait until you meet some actual experienced public defenders for a better example of zealousness.
-
- Posts: 11442
- Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 4:54 pm
Re: Too feisty for a PS??
Agree that the fifth paragraph is in need of substantial revision & that the final sentence needs to be redone.
The first sentence of the fifth paragraph should be deleted. The second sentence is a bit naïve as Houston's caseload probably far exceeds the typical caseload in the US. The third sentence is just incorrect. The fourth sentence is unneeded.
CONSIDER: "...and I will fight with all the strength and courage my abilities and faith can muster." (Not as strong as it should be, but at least it coincides with your theme.)
The first sentence of the fifth paragraph should be deleted. The second sentence is a bit naïve as Houston's caseload probably far exceeds the typical caseload in the US. The third sentence is just incorrect. The fourth sentence is unneeded.
CONSIDER: "...and I will fight with all the strength and courage my abilities and faith can muster." (Not as strong as it should be, but at least it coincides with your theme.)
Last edited by CanadianWolf on Mon Oct 12, 2015 3:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 11442
- Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 4:54 pm
Re: Too feisty for a PS??
Additionally, you need to revise some sentences & phrases to express yourself in a more concise manner.
CONSIDER: "..repeated psychological trauma" rater than "endless".
ADD: "only" to "these children were not only victims,"
DELETE: "irrespective of religious dogma, but rather" USE: "It is faith couched in hope; and it allows..."
CHANGE: "by the world's injustices" to "by injustice."
CONSIDER: "..repeated psychological trauma" rater than "endless".
ADD: "only" to "these children were not only victims,"
DELETE: "irrespective of religious dogma, but rather" USE: "It is faith couched in hope; and it allows..."
CHANGE: "by the world's injustices" to "by injustice."
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 11442
- Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 4:54 pm
Re: Too feisty for a PS??
CONSIDER approaching the issues set forth in your current fifth paragraph as:
Providing aid & protection to unaccompanied children fleeing for their lives is unquestionably a responsibility of those in a position to help. Dealing within the jurisdiction of the Houston Asylum Office--an office with the highest caseload in the country--has enlightened me to the sobering realities of the complexity of such a seemingly simple issue. Overworked state court judges burdened by conflicting forces of politics & compassion lead to what appears to be a cycle of perpetual injustice inflicted upon children who have endured unimaginable suffering. No longer a naïve idealist, I must use the power of the law in order to become an effective, tactical realist equipped to fight for compassionate, yet pragmatic, solutions to this horrific problem.
Providing aid & protection to unaccompanied children fleeing for their lives is unquestionably a responsibility of those in a position to help. Dealing within the jurisdiction of the Houston Asylum Office--an office with the highest caseload in the country--has enlightened me to the sobering realities of the complexity of such a seemingly simple issue. Overworked state court judges burdened by conflicting forces of politics & compassion lead to what appears to be a cycle of perpetual injustice inflicted upon children who have endured unimaginable suffering. No longer a naïve idealist, I must use the power of the law in order to become an effective, tactical realist equipped to fight for compassionate, yet pragmatic, solutions to this horrific problem.
-
- Posts: 11442
- Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 4:54 pm
Re: Too feisty for a PS??
Did you deal with state or federal judges ? Aren't most immigration matters dealt with in federal court ?
- AtticusRising
- Posts: 34
- Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2014 3:13 am
Re: Too feisty for a PS??
Thanks for the feedback CW! I've incorporated some of your stylistic suggestions. As for content, I stand by my case on the Houston asylum office. The denial rates are a PERCENTAGE of their total pool of applicants relative to other asylum offices in the country. Thus, a high case load does not negate the fact that there are disturbing inconsistencies within USCIS. A child chance of obtaining asylum should not be arbitrary determined by the state in which they reside when the are within the jurisdiction of a federal agency. Not to mention how adversarial the asylum officers can get with child clients.CanadianWolf wrote:Did you deal with state or federal judges ? Aren't most immigration matters dealt with in federal court ?
Also, some children are eligible for Special Immigrant Juvenile Status. One can apply for SIJS through USCIS but must first obtain a predicate order in their respective state courts. Enter, my complaints about state court judges. I did not say ALL state court judge lack compassion, but I do want to note that some make their personal biases very evident and will find any excuse to deny a child's predicate order so as to prevent them from obtaining an immigration benefit. Making a child cry during their hearing after reprimanding them for "breaking the law" is not in congruence with simply being "overworked."
-
- Posts: 11442
- Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 4:54 pm
Re: Too feisty for a PS??
You posted this thread asking whether or not your proposed law school PS was "too feisty". Although the topic is not, the presentation might be. Consider who is your audience & what is your purpose in writing this piece. In my opinion, it is more likely to be persuasive if you recognize both sides of the issue. Decide whether you want to preach & scold or reason & persuade.
Last edited by CanadianWolf on Tue Oct 13, 2015 7:12 pm, edited 2 times in total.
- 3pianists
- Posts: 294
- Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2014 12:56 am
Re: Too feisty for a PS??
Third-to-last paragraph, "first hand" -> firsthand.
Less concretely, your last couple of paragraphs lose the sense of being carefully crafted that the first bit has. I like the narrative sections better--can you work a bit more on smoothing your conclusions?
I agree with the comments on the penultimate paragraph, but I love your passion and what you've learned from your experiences. Rock on!
Less concretely, your last couple of paragraphs lose the sense of being carefully crafted that the first bit has. I like the narrative sections better--can you work a bit more on smoothing your conclusions?
I agree with the comments on the penultimate paragraph, but I love your passion and what you've learned from your experiences. Rock on!
-
- Posts: 11442
- Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 4:54 pm
Re: Too feisty for a PS??
"penultimate" = second to last (I had to look it up.)
- AtticusRising
- Posts: 34
- Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2014 3:13 am
Re: Too feisty for a PS??
As did I. New word for the day!CanadianWolf wrote:"penultimate" = second to last (I had to look it up.)
And I see your point now. I definitely want to come off passionate and persuasive without preaching or scolding. I'll work on softening up the latter half of the piece. A million thanks!
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login