First Draft Forum
-
- Posts: 432112
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
First Draft
EDIT: Thanks guys, I think I got the feedback I was looking for.
Last edited by Anonymous User on Mon Sep 10, 2012 7:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 1499
- Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2012 4:25 pm
- bobbypin
- Posts: 255
- Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2011 3:50 pm
Re: First Draft
I am not a fan of this topic at all. What information are you trying to impart on the admissions staff? After reading that, I still don't know anything about you.
I think you need a different topic altogether. Sorry.
I think you need a different topic altogether. Sorry.
- kwais
- Posts: 1675
- Joined: Tue May 11, 2010 12:28 pm
Re: First Draft
agree with what others posted. Also, the "dilemma" seems decidedly uncomplicated. The dude couldn't reconcile two systems, one of which was based on his own superstitions, so he decided not to. Big deal. I'm only saying that because your massive breakthrough just comes across as anti-climactic. I think you should start over, dig deeper and leave out the philosophy name-dropping. You are a good writer though. very smooth, nothing awkward besides the content.
-
- Posts: 493
- Joined: Sat May 26, 2012 9:32 am
Re: First Draft
This is pedantic, but I think the word you want is "composed" or "constituted."Anonymous User wrote:Pomponazzi resolved the dilemma, but only by cutting himself off from the Aristotelianism that comprised his life’s work
As for the broader essay--I thought there was too much philosophy and not enough you. I can't think of a way to fix that particular problem, so if I were you, I'd probably scrap it and try to think of something new.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login