Can someone help me with this? Not a PS issue but seemed like the best place for this kind of question:
"I met with your colleague John Doe who spoke very highly of your work"
Commas before and after John Doe??
Quick Grammar question Forum
-
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Sun Dec 12, 2010 4:51 am
Re: Quick Grammar question
yep absolutely.
edit: ps it's called an apposition in case you want to look it up.
edit: ps it's called an apposition in case you want to look it up.
- thecilent
- Posts: 2500
- Joined: Sat Dec 12, 2009 4:55 pm
Re: Quick Grammar question
Commas before and after is your best bet
- verklempt
- Posts: 115
- Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2010 6:59 pm
Re: Quick Grammar question
I would not use commas. In this sentence, I don't see "colleague" and "John Doe" as appositives. Rather, "colleague" serves as a straight modifier of "John Doe" and does not need commas. A few illustrative examples:
I went to talk to Senator Jane Doe about the bill being discussed.
I talked to a senator, Jane Doe, about the bill being discussed.
It's subtle, but it depends on what you are emphasizing. From my perspective, the emphasis is that John Doe is a colleague (no comma) not that you met with a colleague, a person by the name of John Doe (commas).
Bottom line: it's a nitpick of a choice; neither is wrong or ungrammatical.
I went to talk to Senator Jane Doe about the bill being discussed.
I talked to a senator, Jane Doe, about the bill being discussed.
It's subtle, but it depends on what you are emphasizing. From my perspective, the emphasis is that John Doe is a colleague (no comma) not that you met with a colleague, a person by the name of John Doe (commas).
Bottom line: it's a nitpick of a choice; neither is wrong or ungrammatical.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login