--->
After this introduction, I want to demonstrate how this philosophy applies to me by showing the opposite environments in which I deal with on a day to day basis.
By day, I go to school in NYC, perhaps one of the most diverse and expressive cities in the world. By night, I act as a caretaker and live with my 70 year old grandfather who has Alzheimer's.
--->
From there I intend to discuss how all of this connects to why I want to practice law:
Mainly, on the surface of things, people tend to see in a simplistic manner. However, beneath them (relate this back to the fact that my fellow students did not see my "caretaker" side), they are a powerful mixing of opposites which cannot always be easily understood. From this, I want to practice law because it will allow me to explore these different aspects of interpretation and look beyond the simplistic.
----------------------------------
This is obviously a VERY ROUGH AND VAGUE outline of what I intend to do. I know that there is no conclusion and many parts are lacking strong connections etc etc.
I am just looking for some feedback as to whether my thinking is along the right lines, or should I throw these thoughts away and start over?
I feel like if I execute this well, it will include many different aspects that the TLS PS article suggests, however, I could be completely wrong and that's why I am asking.
