Post
by PopandLock » Mon Oct 19, 2009 2:44 pm
Hey, I am just going to drop my PS on the thread. I've gotten only a few responses from PMs, so I am posting it publicly in the hopes that some TLS-ers will drop their input on it. Tear it to shreds.
Thus far I've had one TLS person give me extensive input, and I really appreciate this person's insight. Thank you.
That being said, send me your PS as well for review. I will do my best.
“Great Salt Lake Mercury Worries Scientists.”
“Toxic mercury lurking in Great Salt Lake.”
They sound like premises for a bad horror movie, but they are real headlines that appeared in newspapers in 2005. The reason: a study conducted by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) revealing the Great Salt Lake to contain extremely high levels of mercury. My research partner, Levi, and I were hot on the trail, trying to get answers from government officials, scientists, and environmental groups.We began our investigation believing that identifying the source of the lake’s mercury contamination would be easy. We were wrong.
Levi and I were both members of an environmental think tank developed by my university’s Honors College. The think tank’s purpose was to address environmental concerns relevant to the Greater Salt Lake area. This year, the twelve-panel consortium was tasked to focus on the Great Salt Lake itself. Through speaking with a local environmental activist, Levi and I became intrigued by the particular issue of mercury contamination in the lake. We decided to investigate the matter ourselves.
Our first step was to examine available scientific evidence. The USGS report revealed the concentration of mercury in the lake to be as high as twenty-five parts per billion, the highest mercury readings ever recorded in a body of water in the United States. The state responded by issuing an advisory, sparking public concern. Such a concern is not unwarranted, as mercury is a neurotoxin and poses a health risk to humans.
Where did this mercury come from? Though Levi and I had initially suspected local anthropogenic (manmade) sources to be the culprit, we encountered a problem when we discovered that mercury could remain in the atmosphere for long periods of time and travel great distances around the globe. A volcanic eruption in the pacific rim, for instance, could be just as likely a contributor to mercury in the lake as a gold refinery in Elko, Nevada. After conferring with scientists in the field, we realized that identifying the exact sources of the lake’s mercury would be ‘technically unfeasible’ using atmospheric data. Our question remained unanswered, though our suspicions remained.
I summed up our findings in a report submitted to the think tank. The year drew to a close and the group adjourned. I had come to the table expecting to make ground-breaking changes, and had come away from it impeded by a lack of scientific data. On the surface it seemed like the program had proved to be a waste of my time.
In reality, however, the program had turned out to be a very valuable use of my time. Interacting with a wide variety of professionals gave me multiple frames of reference from which to view a real-world problem. It also developed my own professional skills. The many hours I spent interviewing taught me how to ask the right questions. In addition, the experience brought me closer to the Honors College community, where I thrived and formed lasting relationships with fellow students and faculty.
These same skills will carry over to my law school experience. I am looking forward to interacting professionally with experts in pursuit of solving problems. Due to my inquisitive and persevering nature, I believe I have a future in litigation, and plan to participate in one or more litigation clinics during law school. Just as in the mercury investigation, there are many questions to be asked; I will be the one asking them.