URM splitters (traditional or non-traditional) at T14 Forum

Share experiences and seek insight regarding your experience as an underrepresented minority within the legal community.
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting

Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are sharing sensitive information about bar exam prep. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.

Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned."
mps200

New
Posts: 40
Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2009 9:16 am

URM splitters (traditional or non-traditional) at T14

Post by mps200 » Sat Dec 12, 2009 1:53 am

Hey all,
First time poster. Amidst finals and applications, I haven't had enough time to post, yet respect the opinions and information of most threads on this forum. I have a quick question for fellow URM's who are in law school now:
Basically, if you were a splitter when applying to law schools, and had either a lower GPA or LSAT score than the median of people accepted at your law school, how have you fared after 1L? What position are you in relative to your class? I was just wondering and felt like procrastinating...It's been a long day.

amg0996

New
Posts: 21
Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 1:39 am

Re: URM splitters (traditional or non-traditional) at T14

Post by amg0996 » Mon Jan 25, 2010 2:59 am

No one likes you... And I'm not in law school but I'll bump and I'm also interested 170/3.26 here :mrgreen:

User avatar
lawrencecis

New
Posts: 48
Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 3:42 am

Re: URM splitters (traditional or non-traditional) at T14

Post by lawrencecis » Mon Feb 01, 2010 6:10 pm

bumpidy bump bump


User avatar
JustE

Silver
Posts: 1330
Joined: Tue Sep 28, 2010 8:49 pm

Re: URM splitters (traditional or non-traditional) at T14

Post by JustE » Thu Oct 20, 2011 2:43 pm

This was helpful... :roll:

Post Reply Post Anonymous Reply  

Return to “Underrepresented Law Students”