Stanford's GPA Floor for URMs and Being below the 25% of a Law School Forum

Share experiences and seek insight regarding your experience as an underrepresented minority within the legal community.
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting

Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are sharing sensitive information about bar exam prep. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.

Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned."
onlyhere4fun

New
Posts: 69
Joined: Mon Apr 27, 2015 1:33 pm

Stanford's GPA Floor for URMs and Being below the 25% of a Law School

Post by onlyhere4fun » Mon Jun 27, 2016 9:01 pm

Hey guys I was just wondering what you all think the gpa floor is for Stanford law. I'm AA male and I just graduated from my college with a 3.8, but after calculating my lsdas gpa myself, and including the grades from the college i transfered from, my upga is actually brought down to a 3.52 thanks to my bad performance my first year in college. I have a very big upward trend at my graduating institution. My gpa for each respective semester I had in college is 2.7, 3.6, 3.8, 3.6. 3.8, 3.8, 3.9, ad 3.9. I don't know if the trend really matters or not but I'm wondering if I would be shut out of Stanford completely due to my ugpa. I know yale is out of reach with my current gpa, and Harvard is a possibility if I get a high enough LSAT score. But I question whether I could get Stanford. And if it is possible would I have to get like a 99th percentile score on the LSAT to even have a chance at Stanford? I think I can break into the low 170's with a lot of work (and maybe some luck) but I don't know if I can hit a 99th percentile score.

Also I have a more general question, and it is not meant to incite a debate on the merits of affirmative action although it might seem like it might. I tend to think of myself as a 3.8 student because that's what I averaged once I got my act together in school, but does being below the 25th % of a t-14s gpa really put me at a competitive disadvantage? Has anyone had an experience of being below the 25% ugpa, lsat score, or both for whatever school they got into and had a hard time excelling due to the forced curve grading system? I'm asking this because I want to know (assuming the best case scenario and I got acceptances from S down, however unlikely that is lol) would I really be better off just going to a lower t-14 wherein my stats would place me at a better position based on the predictive weight that the lsat gpa combo has on 1l performance?

User avatar
jnwa

Silver
Posts: 1125
Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2015 12:35 am

Re: Stanford's GPA Floor for URMs and Being below the 25% of a Law School

Post by jnwa » Mon Jun 27, 2016 9:09 pm

Stanford is going to be really difficult with a low 3.5. HYS are much more fond of high GPA URM's. Id say stanfords floor is closer to a 3.7. Its worth shooting out an app anyways though. A 167ish should get you in at Harvard. Shoot for as high an lsat score as possible though. If you break 170 you could be looking at t14 full rides. I got one as an AA male with a worse gpa and a 173.

User avatar
soj

Platinum
Posts: 7888
Joined: Sat Jan 16, 2010 11:10 pm

Removed

Post by soj » Mon Jun 27, 2016 10:05 pm

.

Post Reply Post Anonymous Reply  

Return to “Underrepresented Law Students”