Splitter Question Forum

Share experiences and seek insight regarding your experience as an underrepresented minority within the legal community.
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting

Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are sharing sensitive information about bar exam prep. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.

Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned."
User avatar
In Good Faith

New
Posts: 6
Joined: Wed Dec 25, 2013 9:47 pm

Splitter Question

Post by In Good Faith » Wed May 28, 2014 7:05 pm

Hello everyone i have a question regarding school selection. I received a 170 on the LSAT, but my GPA is a 2.3 after Junior year. It is possible to reach a 3.0 by the end of senior year.However realistically i'll end up with a 2.85 or 2.9. I would like to attend USC but i heard that they are sticklers for GPA. Should i just retake and shoot for higher score or forgo an application to USC all together?


Thanks for any input.
Last edited by In Good Faith on Wed May 28, 2014 10:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
ScottRiqui

Gold
Posts: 3633
Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2010 8:09 pm

Re: Splitter Question

Post by ScottRiqui » Wed May 28, 2014 7:22 pm

Definitely don't skip the application - make them tell you "no". Also, with the decline in applicants over the past cycle or two, the admissions game has really turned into a crap shoot, even more so for URM applicants. Even as a non-URM, I got into UT this cycle with a 170/2.6, and up until recently, UT also had the reputation for being very picky when it comes to uGPA.

User avatar
Nova

Platinum
Posts: 9102
Joined: Sun Apr 15, 2012 8:55 pm

Re: Splitter Question

Post by Nova » Wed May 28, 2014 7:54 pm

What kind of urm are you?

I know sub3 167+ urms who have gotten money from usc. Good money from umn/wustl is almost a slam dunk.

Higher score would increase your odds, but I'm guessing only incrementally at this point

User avatar
In Good Faith

New
Posts: 6
Joined: Wed Dec 25, 2013 9:47 pm

Re: Splitter Question

Post by In Good Faith » Wed May 28, 2014 10:42 pm

Thanks for the feedback, I am an AA Male

User avatar
Attax

Gold
Posts: 3589
Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2013 10:59 am

Re: Splitter Question

Post by Attax » Thu May 29, 2014 1:18 pm

Nova wrote:What kind of urm are you?

I know sub3 167+ urms who have gotten money from usc. Good money from umn/wustl is almost a slam dunk.

Higher score would increase your odds, but I'm guessing only incrementally at this point
This, and also what Scott said. The LSAT and making your app otherwise flawless can really make up for that. While USC seemed, at least to me, to care more about GPA this cycle (I'm 2.85, 168) and I got waitlisted, I had great options from UMN, WUSTL, UT and other schools in that general range. But, as a URM, you should be better off than I was and have a bit of a boost from that which would also definitely help.

User avatar
Lacepiece23

Silver
Posts: 1433
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2011 1:10 pm

Re: Splitter Question

Post by Lacepiece23 » Wed Jun 04, 2014 11:55 am

In Good Faith wrote:Thanks for the feedback, I am an AA Male
Dude if you get close to a 3.0 with that LSAT your in at Harvard probably. even below 3.0 I would still blanket the T14.

User avatar
pertristis

Bronze
Posts: 374
Joined: Fri Jul 31, 2009 12:29 pm

Re: Splitter Question

Post by pertristis » Wed Jun 04, 2014 12:14 pm

Lacepiece23 wrote:
In Good Faith wrote:Thanks for the feedback, I am an AA Male
Dude if you get close to a 3.0 with that LSAT your in at Harvard probably. even below 3.0 I would still blanket the T14.
Doubtful.

Image
Image

Do you think you've maxed out your LSAT score? Something around a 175 improves outcomes dramatically.

User avatar
Fiero85

Gold
Posts: 1983
Joined: Sun Jun 30, 2013 3:38 am

Re: Splitter Question

Post by Fiero85 » Wed Jun 04, 2014 1:06 pm

Lacepiece23 wrote:
In Good Faith wrote:Thanks for the feedback, I am an AA Male
Dude if you get close to a 3.0 with that LSAT your in at Harvard probably. even below 3.0 I would still blanket the T14.
Tso wrong...

OP don't waste your time/money applying to HYS, or even CCN realistically.

Get that GPA up as close to 3.0 as possible and blanket apply to like #7-20.

USC is definitely possible with 170, sub 3.0 GPA. Retaking could get you higher though if you feel like you got room to improve.

User avatar
Lacepiece23

Silver
Posts: 1433
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2011 1:10 pm

Re: Splitter Question

Post by Lacepiece23 » Thu Jun 05, 2014 11:14 am

Fiero85 wrote:
Lacepiece23 wrote:
In Good Faith wrote:Thanks for the feedback, I am an AA Male
Dude if you get close to a 3.0 with that LSAT your in at Harvard probably. even below 3.0 I would still blanket the T14.
Tso wrong...

OP don't waste your time/money applying to HYS, or even CCN realistically.

Get that GPA up as close to 3.0 as possible and blanket apply to like #7-20.

USC is definitely possible with 170, sub 3.0 GPA. Retaking could get you higher though if you feel like you got room to improve.
Are you serious? Did you read the part where he said he was a black male? I've definitely heard of black males getting into H with a 3.0 170 and definitely CCN with those stats. You must be a 0L.

User avatar
Fiero85

Gold
Posts: 1983
Joined: Sun Jun 30, 2013 3:38 am

Re: Splitter Question

Post by Fiero85 » Thu Jun 05, 2014 11:37 am

Lacepiece23 wrote:
Fiero85 wrote:
Lacepiece23 wrote:
In Good Faith wrote:Thanks for the feedback, I am an AA Male
Dude if you get close to a 3.0 with that LSAT your in at Harvard probably. even below 3.0 I would still blanket the T14.
Tso wrong...

OP don't waste your time/money applying to HYS, or even CCN realistically.

Get that GPA up as close to 3.0 as possible and blanket apply to like #7-20.

USC is definitely possible with 170, sub 3.0 GPA. Retaking could get you higher though if you feel like you got room to improve.
Are you serious? Did you read the part where he said he was a black male? I've definitely heard of black males getting into H with a 3.0 170 and definitely CCN with those stats. You must be a 0L.
First of all, OP said "realistically i'll end up with a 2.85 or 2.9". So even he thinks 3.0 is a stretch.

Besides that, there are no data points supporting HYS or even CCN acceptances online. There's one Columbia waitlist. That's all I can really go by.

I am in fact a 0L, so I apologize for not having as much of an ear to the ground about the stories not posted in the database (seriously). I suppose I shouldn't have been so bold, but mylsn just does not look encouraging at all:

Image

Image

User avatar
August Wilson

Silver
Posts: 548
Joined: Mon Nov 18, 2013 10:59 am

Re: Splitter Question

Post by August Wilson » Thu Jun 05, 2014 11:41 am

Fiero85 wrote:
Lacepiece23 wrote:
Fiero85 wrote: Tso wrong...

OP don't waste your time/money applying to HYS, or even CCN realistically.

Get that GPA up as close to 3.0 as possible and blanket apply to like #7-20.

USC is definitely possible with 170, sub 3.0 GPA. Retaking could get you higher though if you feel like you got room to improve.
Are you serious? Did you read the part where he said he was a black male? I've definitely heard of black males getting into H with a 3.0 170 and definitely CCN with those stats. You must be a 0L.
First of all, OP said "realistically i'll end up with a 2.85 or 2.9". So even he thinks 3.0 is a stretch.

Besides that, there are no data points supporting HYS or even CCN acceptances online. There's one Columbia waitlist. That's all I can really go by.

I am in fact a 0L, so I apologize for not having as much of an ear to the ground about the stories not posted in the database (seriously). I suppose I shouldn't have been so bold, but mylsn just does not look encouraging at all:

Image

Image
you're not wrong.

User avatar
Lacepiece23

Silver
Posts: 1433
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2011 1:10 pm

Re: Splitter Question

Post by Lacepiece23 » Thu Jun 05, 2014 11:47 am

I didn't mean that OP would def get into H I just strongly think that he should apply. And as a black male in law school I can tell you that LSN is not great for us. We are the most underrepresented group and from my understanding LSN takes into account all Underrepresented groups such as black females, and both Mexican males and females. So I wouldn't really judge his chances according to LSN. If I did I would not be at a T14.

And if he does break a 3.0 he would be absolutely crazy not to apply from H down with a 170. Shit most his waivers will probably be free.

User avatar
August Wilson

Silver
Posts: 548
Joined: Mon Nov 18, 2013 10:59 am

Re: Splitter Question

Post by August Wilson » Thu Jun 05, 2014 11:53 am

With a 170 he should apply everywhere from CCN down, but H (which doesn't give fee waivers based on LSAT) just won't be in the cards with a 3.0.

ETA: if he had a 175-180, I'd say apply.

User avatar
Lacepiece23

Silver
Posts: 1433
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2011 1:10 pm

Re: Splitter Question

Post by Lacepiece23 » Thu Jun 05, 2014 12:00 pm

August Wilson wrote:With a 170 he should apply everywhere from CCN down, but H (which doesn't give fee waivers based on LSAT) just won't be in the cards with a 3.0.

ETA: if he had a 175-180, I'd say apply.
Well we went from me being "so wrong" to applying everywhere, but one school I suggested. My OP wasn't clear, but when I said blanket the T14 I meant everywhere but YS because I said he was probably in at H. Shit your probably right about him not getting in, but I still think he should apply. Who wouldn't want to apply if the had a small shot.

User avatar
Fiero85

Gold
Posts: 1983
Joined: Sun Jun 30, 2013 3:38 am

Re: Splitter Question

Post by Fiero85 » Thu Jun 05, 2014 12:01 pm

Lacepiece23 wrote:I didn't mean that OP would def get into H I just strongly think that he should apply. And as a black male in law school I can tell you that LSN is not great for us. We are the most underrepresented group and from my understanding LSN takes into account all Underrepresented groups such as black females, and both Mexican males and females. So I wouldn't really judge his chances according to LSN. If I did I would not be at a T14.

And if he does break a 3.0 he would be absolutely crazy not to apply from H down with a 170. Shit most his waivers will probably be free.
Yeah you're right, it's more of a lack of data than anything. Using "AA only" hardly got any results at all. There's no gender filter either. So really "URM only" isn't completely on point for an AA male.

Since you're a URM actually in the T14 I'll defer to you. Especially since I think you're addressing my post of "don't waste your time" rather than his chances being low, which you admit they are.

OP: Blanket T14 plus UCLA and USC if you're looking for Cali. Especially if you get mad fee waivers, which you likely will from your high LSAT alone. I should have said, "don't get your hopes up" rather than "don't waste your time" with applying to #1-6. Especially if you can earn a 3.0 overall that'd be great for your cycle.

Good luck!

User avatar
Lacepiece23

Silver
Posts: 1433
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2011 1:10 pm

Re: Splitter Question

Post by Lacepiece23 » Thu Jun 05, 2014 12:11 pm

Fiero85 wrote:
Lacepiece23 wrote:I didn't mean that OP would def get into H I just strongly think that he should apply. And as a black male in law school I can tell you that LSN is not great for us. We are the most underrepresented group and from my understanding LSN takes into account all Underrepresented groups such as black females, and both Mexican males and females. So I wouldn't really judge his chances according to LSN. If I did I would not be at a T14.

And if he does break a 3.0 he would be absolutely crazy not to apply from H down with a 170. Shit most his waivers will probably be free.
Yeah you're right, it's more of a lack of data than anything. Using "AA only" hardly got any results at all. There's no gender filter either. So really "URM only" isn't completely on point for an AA male.

Since you're a URM actually in the T14 I'll defer to you. Especially since I think you're addressing my post of "don't waste your time" rather than his chances being low, which you admit they are.

OP: Blanket T14 plus UCLA and USC if you're looking for Cali. Especially if you get mad fee waivers, which you likely will from your high LSAT alone. I should have said, "don't get your hopes up" rather than "don't waste your time" with applying to #1-6. Especially if you can earn a 3.0 overall that'd be great for your cycle.

Good luck!
I still really think OP gets in somewhere 3-6 and probably not Berkley. But alls well that ends well. Good luck OP

Post Reply Post Anonymous Reply  

Return to “Underrepresented Law Students”