Fisher v. University of Texas Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are sharing sensitive information about bar exam prep. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned."
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are sharing sensitive information about bar exam prep. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned."
-
- Posts: 180
- Joined: Mon Feb 14, 2011 3:36 pm
Fisher v. University of Texas
SIAP. I did a search around the forums and was surprised that there wasn't a thread about it yet. This case has been gaining traction and is currently awaiting review for cert by the SCOTUS. I am graduating this May and decided to delay my cycle until next fall. As a MA I can't help but wonder if by doing so I may be facing a radically different admissions outlook should the court hear the case and use it as an opportunity to overturn some language in Grutter. With O' Connor off the court I feel like this is a real possibility. Have any other URMs, particularly those applying next fall been following this case? Any insights, predictions, or concerns?
-
- Posts: 180
- Joined: Mon Feb 14, 2011 3:36 pm
Re: Fisher v. University of Texas
So I'm sure many of you heard this case is going to be heard in the fall. The tragic twist is that Kagan had to recuse herself because she already worked on the case before joining the Supreme Court. It's not looking good.
- HETPE3B
- Posts: 126
- Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2011 12:35 pm
-
- Posts: 180
- Joined: Mon Feb 14, 2011 3:36 pm
Re: Fisher v. University of Texas
Sorry. I didn't think to look on the off topic boards. I just wanted to revive my topic now that this case is happening.HETPE3B wrote:http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 0&t=178724
-
- Posts: 88
- Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2012 5:11 pm
Re: Fisher v. University of Texas
Even if they rule against affirmative action in the broadest possible way, won't this still only extend to public universities? Not very hard to imagine private schools picking up URMs to try to compensate IMO.amonthofsundays wrote:Sorry. I didn't think to look on the off topic boards. I just wanted to revive my topic now that this case is happening.HETPE3B wrote:http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 0&t=178724
-
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2011 1:16 pm
Re: Fisher v. University of Texas
There is an article that was published yesterday on The Student Appeal Law Journal website that might be relevant to this discussion: http://thestudentappeal.com/article/bak ... ly-decided