I'm a senior going into my final semester with a 3.77 GPA. I don't have to take very many classes to graduate, and had every intention to finally take the bare minimum for my last semester in school. But I've seen a few posters on this forum comment about the importance of a 3.8 vs. the 3.7x because of the way medians work at some of the top schools.
How important is this threshold for law school admissions? If I take as few classes as I intend to I have no chance of reaching a 3.8 by graduation. Is this cutoff important enough for me to consider tacking on a couple extra classes to make the 3.8 happen? Any advice is appreciated.
(FWIW: AA Male, HYP, 165 lsat.)
How important is the 3.8 threshold? Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are sharing sensitive information about bar exam prep. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned."
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are sharing sensitive information about bar exam prep. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned."
-
snehpets
- Posts: 1164
- Joined: Thu Nov 10, 2011 1:26 pm
Re: How important is the 3.8 threshold?
It's probably a bigger deal for Harvard, and to some extent Yale and Stanford. Still, there was a 165/3.5 URM in at Harvard last year. Below that I really haven't seen evidence that it matters, although Chicago has raised their GPA median really high. It really depends on where you're trying to apply. In any case, I think the 3.8 is a lot bigger deal for non-URMs. Your numbers seem fine for a URM at 3.77. However, I'm a 0L non-URM, so take that for what it's worth. Personally, if it was the difference between taking 6 hours and 12 hours I would go ahead and do 12, but 12 vs like 18 or something seems like you would just be risking accidentally messing one up and getting a B.mono172000 wrote:I'm a senior going into my final semester with a 3.77 GPA. I don't have to take very many classes to graduate, and had every intention to finally take the bare minimum for my last semester in school. But I've seen a few posters on this forum comment about the importance of a 3.8 vs. the 3.7x because of the way medians work at some of the top schools.
How important is this threshold for law school admissions? If I take as few classes as I intend to I have no chance of reaching a 3.8 by graduation. Is this cutoff important enough for me to consider tacking on a couple extra classes to make the 3.8 happen? Any advice is appreciated.
(FWIW: AA Male, HYP, 165 lsat.)
