Do Asians, even though they're not URMs, get a boost? Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are sharing sensitive information about bar exam prep. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned."
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are sharing sensitive information about bar exam prep. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned."
-
- Posts: 142
- Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2010 7:00 pm
Do Asians, even though they're not URMs, get a boost?
Paraphrased opinion from an "exploring law careers website": In the coming generation, the American legal profession would benefit from a higher number of diverse and minority lawyers.
With this, do law schools give an admissions boost to Asians, even though they're not considered URM? Secondly, I notice there aren't as many Indian Asians in law schools as there are Oriental Asians (Chinese, Korean, Japanese, Vietnamese, etc). Do law schools, in designing their next entering class, go to an extent to differentiate among an ethnicity class (e.g. Oriental versus non-Oriental Asians, or the various Latino origins like Mexico, Peru, etc.), in order to increased "ethnic diversity"?
With this, do law schools give an admissions boost to Asians, even though they're not considered URM? Secondly, I notice there aren't as many Indian Asians in law schools as there are Oriental Asians (Chinese, Korean, Japanese, Vietnamese, etc). Do law schools, in designing their next entering class, go to an extent to differentiate among an ethnicity class (e.g. Oriental versus non-Oriental Asians, or the various Latino origins like Mexico, Peru, etc.), in order to increased "ethnic diversity"?
- Grizz
- Posts: 10564
- Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 6:31 pm
- DoubleChecks
- Posts: 2328
- Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 4:35 pm
Re: Do Asians, even though they're not URMs, get a boost?
to answer your questions:
1. no
2. i dont think so, though it is possible -- however, even if they did, it would be a near insignificant boost imo
1. no
2. i dont think so, though it is possible -- however, even if they did, it would be a near insignificant boost imo
-
- Posts: 371
- Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2010 11:03 pm
Re: Do Asians, even though they're not URMs, get a boost?
ComatoseClown wrote:Paraphrased opinion from an "exploring law careers website": In the coming generation, the American legal profession would benefit from a higher number of diverse and minority lawyers.
With this, do law schools give an admissions boost to Asians, even though they're not considered URM? Secondly, I notice there aren't as many Indian Asians in law schools as there are Oriental Asians (Chinese, Korean, Japanese, Vietnamese, etc). Do law schools, in designing their next entering class, go to an extent to differentiate among an ethnicity class (e.g. Oriental versus non-Oriental Asians, or the various Latino origins like Mexico, Peru, etc.), in order to increased "ethnic diversity"?
1. No. If anything, it's quite the opposite. There was an interesting article not too long ago about how/why URM's tend to take seats in T14 schools that would otherwise be populated by Asians. Focused heavily on Berkeley and the huge drop-off in AA students they experienced immediately after they were told they couldn't use race/ethnicity as a dispositive factor in admissions.
2. In some cases. There's a strong distinction between Puerto Rican/Mexican and other Hispanics, with the former getting a legit URM boost and the others getting a more negligible boost (if any). Not too sure about the other cases, although I doubt it.
- burger lover
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 5:26 pm
Re: Do Asians, even though they're not URMs, get a boost?
let's face it. other than the possibility of a DS about adding mad karaoke skills to the school, i don't think that anyone considers asians "diverse" anymore.
fair? probably not.
especially because i have mad karaoke skills.
fair? probably not.
especially because i have mad karaoke skills.
-
- Posts: 3727
- Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2010 2:23 pm
Re: Do Asians, even though they're not URMs, get a boost?
When schools say that they are seeking diversity I would take them at their word. If their class statistics show few Asians relative to their representation in the US, then you might get a boost. I think it would be easier in places where it is difficult to attract Asian students to attend, so you would have to convincingly demonstrate that you are interested in the school.
Edit: This probably only applies to schools outside of the top tier. Most likely in areas with a smaller Asian population (i.e. South, maybe Midwest).
Edit: This probably only applies to schools outside of the top tier. Most likely in areas with a smaller Asian population (i.e. South, maybe Midwest).
Last edited by bdubs on Sat Oct 23, 2010 11:59 am, edited 1 time in total.
- rayiner
- Posts: 6145
- Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2008 11:43 am
Re: Do Asians, even though they're not URMs, get a boost?
Indians are overrepresented in law school, just by a lesser amount than east Asians. In the populous states (NY, VA, CA, IL, etc) Indians make up less than 2% of the population. In my section of 62 at NU, 5 people (8%) were Indian/Pakistani/etc.
-
- Posts: 20063
- Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2010 7:06 pm
Re: Do Asians, even though they're not URMs, get a boost?
You do realize that 3/4 or more almost every law school is white?burger lover wrote:let's face it. other than the possibility of a DS about adding mad karaoke skills to the school, i don't think that anyone considers asians "diverse" anymore.
fair? probably not.
especially because i have mad karaoke skills.
-
- Posts: 3727
- Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2010 2:23 pm
Re: Do Asians, even though they're not URMs, get a boost?
You do realize that a bit more than 3/4 of the US population is white, right?bk187 wrote:You do realize that 3/4 or more almost every law school is white?burger lover wrote:let's face it. other than the possibility of a DS about adding mad karaoke skills to the school, i don't think that anyone considers asians "diverse" anymore.
fair? probably not.
especially because i have mad karaoke skills.
-
- Posts: 6244
- Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2009 6:09 pm
Re: Do Asians, even though they're not URMs, get a boost?
Asians are overrepresented they get a boost down
Last edited by Borhas on Sun Jan 28, 2018 2:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 963
- Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2010 12:23 am
Re: Do Asians, even though they're not URMs, get a boost?
i don't think it works like that. i'm pretty sure that with all non-minorities, it's all #'s.Borhas wrote:Asians are overrepresented they get a boost down
-
- Posts: 20063
- Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2010 7:06 pm
Re: Do Asians, even though they're not URMs, get a boost?
That's false.bdubs wrote:You do realize that a bit more than 3/4 of the US population is white, right?
-
- Posts: 3727
- Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2010 2:23 pm
Re: Do Asians, even though they're not URMs, get a boost?
White is 77.1%, without Hispanics it is 69% both are close enough to 3/4 of the population that it is appropriate to expect at least 75% enrollment at LS to be counted as white.bk187 wrote:That's false.bdubs wrote:You do realize that a bit more than 3/4 of the US population is white, right?
http://censtats.census.gov/data/US/01000.pdf
-
- Posts: 20063
- Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2010 7:06 pm
Re: Do Asians, even though they're not URMs, get a boost?
You do realize there is a difference between saying "around" and saying "a bit more," right?bdubs wrote:White is 77.1%, without Hispanics it is 69% both are close enough to 3/4 of the population that it is appropriate to expect at least 75% enrollment at LS to be counted as white.
http://censtats.census.gov/data/US/01000.pdf
Being an ass aside, all I meant to say to you was that 1/4 of law schools are minorities whereas more than 1/4 (almost 1/3) of the US pop are minorities. What I meant to say to the other poster was that when 2/3, or 3/4 or whatever, of a school is white, it is a pretty retarded statement to not call Asians, or any minority for that matter, diverse.
- MoS
- Posts: 404
- Joined: Fri Oct 16, 2009 10:59 pm
Re: Do Asians, even though they're not URMs, get a boost?
If you find a school that doesn't have an asian population, maybe. But good luck with that.
-
- Posts: 3727
- Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2010 2:23 pm
Re: Do Asians, even though they're not URMs, get a boost?
Last I checked 77.1% is a bit more than 75%, just sayin.bk187 wrote:You do realize there is a difference between saying "around" and saying "a bit more," right?bdubs wrote:White is 77.1%, without Hispanics it is 69% both are close enough to 3/4 of the population that it is appropriate to expect at least 75% enrollment at LS to be counted as white.
http://censtats.census.gov/data/US/01000.pdf
Being an ass aside, all I meant to say to you was that 1/4 of law schools are minorities whereas more than 1/4 (almost 1/3) of the US pop are minorities. What I meant to say to the other poster was that when 2/3, or 3/4 or whatever, of a school is white, it is a pretty retarded statement to not call Asians, or any minority for that matter, diverse.
-
- Posts: 20063
- Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2010 7:06 pm
Re: Do Asians, even though they're not URMs, get a boost?
When I said white I meant to imply only white, but yes I get your point and we are arguing for no reason.bdubs wrote: Last I checked 77.1% is a bit more than 75%, just sayin.

- kalvano
- Posts: 11951
- Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 2:24 am
Re: Do Asians, even though they're not URMs, get a boost?
justadude55 wrote:i don't think it works like that. i'm pretty sure that with all non-minorities, it's all #'s.Borhas wrote:Asians are overrepresented they get a boost down
This made me lulz.
- burger lover
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 5:26 pm
Re: Do Asians, even though they're not URMs, get a boost?
all numbers aside, there is no question that asians bring diversity to any school~ even the ones at which they are "overrepresented". i think the OP brought up a valid point that is often overlooked, namely that "Asian-Pacific Islanders" is a broad and diverse umbrella that deserves more attention than it usually gets.bdubs wrote:You do realize that a bit more than 3/4 of the US population is white, right?bk187 wrote:You do realize that 3/4 or more almost every law school is white?burger lover wrote:let's face it. other than the possibility of a DS about adding mad karaoke skills to the school, i don't think that anyone considers asians "diverse" anymore.
fair? probably not.
especially because i have mad karaoke skills.
when i said that asians aren't diverse, i was referring strictly to the context of education and admissions.
to be honest, a discussion of URM does leave asian students out in the cold.
i don't agree with that or how it, by implication, diminishes the significance of the immigrant experience, but what can you do? asians just don't get a boost anymore.
- Na_Swatch
- Posts: 467
- Joined: Sun Sep 20, 2009 4:40 pm
Re: Do Asians, even though they're not URMs, get a boost?
Hey I'm just thankful asians don't get the negative effect that is present in UG admissions.
- burger lover
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 5:26 pm
Re: Do Asians, even though they're not URMs, get a boost?
+1Na_Swatch wrote:Hey I'm just thankful asians don't get the negative effect that is present in UG admissions.
- Helmholtz
- Posts: 4128
- Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 1:48 pm
Re: Do Asians, even though they're not URMs, get a boost?
I have heard asians get a boost at howard. Don't know how true that it is.
- dcman06
- Posts: 89
- Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 8:08 pm
Re: Do Asians, even though they're not URMs, get a boost?
Depends on Ancestry. The Asian American groups known for being high achievers, such as Korean, Chinese, and Indians, are likely to get docked points for AA reasons. These three groups alone should account for most Asian Americans in a law school. Other Asian American groups will be given preference, but probably not as much as Blacks (esp. Black men) and Hispanics. Filipinos, Thai, Vietnamese, Pakistanis, Cambodians and Hmong should fare better off with the same stats as a Korean, Chinese, or Indian. Japanese people I'll say are in between both of these groups.
Some law schools will actively want more Asian Americans than others, in particular Southern schools not in T-14 (no Duke, no UVA for example), and schools in the central part of the country.
Some law schools will actively want more Asian Americans than others, in particular Southern schools not in T-14 (no Duke, no UVA for example), and schools in the central part of the country.
- DoubleChecks
- Posts: 2328
- Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 4:35 pm
Re: Do Asians, even though they're not URMs, get a boost?
I havent read anything that points to the fact that Koreans, Chinese, and Indians get DOCKED points at law schools. Undergrad, prob. But I dont know about law schools, or at least I havent seen the data on that. And other Asian groups will be given preference but "probably" not as much as Black men and Hispanics? lol more like definitely.dcman06 wrote:Depends on Ancestry. The Asian American groups known for being high achievers, such as Korean, Chinese, and Indians, are likely to get docked points for AA reasons. These three groups alone should account for most Asian Americans in a law school. Other Asian American groups will be given preference, but probably not as much as Blacks (esp. Black men) and Hispanics. Filipinos, Thai, Vietnamese, Pakistanis, Cambodians and Hmong should fare better off with the same stats as a Korean, Chinese, or Indian. Japanese people I'll say are in between both of these groups.
Some law schools will actively want more Asian Americans than others, in particular Southern schools not in T-14 (no Duke, no UVA for example), and schools in the central part of the country.
And though I don't know the current state of Japanese Americans in US higher education, it's interesting you put them in between the 2 groups as they used to be the highest achieving Asians in America.
- Na_Swatch
- Posts: 467
- Joined: Sun Sep 20, 2009 4:40 pm
Re: Do Asians, even though they're not URMs, get a boost?
There isn't any strong evidence for Asian's being docked points in LS admissions... Also no evidence supporting the fact that Thai, Vietnamese, etc. get higher consideration. On the margins though (i.e. almost exactly the same applicants with just these differences) it might be plausible.dcman06 wrote:Depends on Ancestry. The Asian American groups known for being high achievers, such as Korean, Chinese, and Indians, are likely to get docked points for AA reasons. These three groups alone should account for most Asian Americans in a law school. Other Asian American groups will be given preference, but probably not as much as Blacks (esp. Black men) and Hispanics. Filipinos, Thai, Vietnamese, Pakistanis, Cambodians and Hmong should fare better off with the same stats as a Korean, Chinese, or Indian. Japanese people I'll say are in between both of these groups.
Some law schools will actively want more Asian Americans than others, in particular Southern schools not in T-14 (no Duke, no UVA for example), and schools in the central part of the country.