Does prestige really matter after T-6? Forum

Share experiences and seek insight regarding your experience as an underrepresented minority within the legal community.
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting

Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are sharing sensitive information about bar exam prep. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.

Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned."
Locked
El Rey Negro

New
Posts: 11
Joined: Wed Aug 25, 2010 12:38 am

Does prestige really matter after T-6?

Post by El Rey Negro » Fri Aug 27, 2010 11:44 pm

With USNews basically having the legal ranking system by its nuts, prestige now plays a huge factor in the legal community. This tends to make some people subconsciously view Yale grads as more accomplished than Columbia grads, Harvard grads more elite than Stanford grads & NYU grads not even close to their neighbors up the island. I know Im not the only one who's seen those silly "arguments". Does it really matter where you go to school after you reach T-6? If you're dedicated, disciplined & willing to go further than your peers, would it really be that much of a factor on your career if you went to Chicago instead of Harvard?
Last edited by El Rey Negro on Fri Aug 27, 2010 11:47 pm, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
Adjudicator

Silver
Posts: 1108
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2010 4:18 am

Re: Does prestige really matter after T-6?

Post by Adjudicator » Fri Aug 27, 2010 11:45 pm

Identify the region that you want to work in, and find out which schools place well in that region. That's my take, at least.

User avatar
rayiner

Platinum
Posts: 6145
Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2008 11:43 am

Re: Does prestige really matter after T-6?

Post by rayiner » Fri Aug 27, 2010 11:50 pm

Yes. Yale is still more prestigious than Harvard, and Harvard is more prestigious than Columbia/NYU. There is probably a bigger difference in placement between YLS/SLS and CLS than between CLS and say Penn.

User avatar
PDaddy

Gold
Posts: 2063
Joined: Sat Jan 16, 2010 4:40 am

Re: Does prestige really matter after T-6?

Post by PDaddy » Fri Aug 27, 2010 11:51 pm

:roll: Anyone who takes the time to dissect the T6 and pick based solely - or even mostly, for that matter - on how they are ranked deserves the miserable life they are headed for. There's not much difference between Harvard and Chicago, or the schools in-between. And the rest of the so-called top-10 can make the same argument. Harvard has plenty of idiots. Find your best fit! Prestige should matter only after one has worked out the more pragmatic issues: location of the school and where graduates work. For the top-6, that's pretty much everywhere. Yes, the only true "national schools" are Harvard and Yale, but the others do just fine.
Last edited by PDaddy on Fri Aug 27, 2010 11:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.

bk1

Diamond
Posts: 20063
Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2010 7:06 pm

Re: Does prestige really matter after T-6?

Post by bk1 » Fri Aug 27, 2010 11:53 pm

I think employment prospects beg to differ whether there isn't difference between HLS and UChi.

User avatar
PDaddy

Gold
Posts: 2063
Joined: Sat Jan 16, 2010 4:40 am

Re: Does prestige really matter after T-6?

Post by PDaddy » Fri Aug 27, 2010 11:56 pm

bk187 wrote:I think employment prospects beg to differ whether there isn't difference between HLS and UChi.
Something that gets lost is employment after 5 years. I'd love to see that tracked. My guess is that, after that point, grads from the elite schools shake out pretty much the same. The Harvard name won't help you much if you're major a F-up with entitlement issues. Many (not all) Harvard grads tend to be just that.

El Rey Negro

New
Posts: 11
Joined: Wed Aug 25, 2010 12:38 am

Re: Does prestige really matter after T-6?

Post by El Rey Negro » Sat Aug 28, 2010 12:05 am

PDaddy wrote:
bk187 wrote:I think employment prospects beg to differ whether there isn't difference between HLS and UChi.
Something that gets lost is employment after 5 years. I'd love to see that tracked. My guess is that, after that point, grads from the elite schools shake out pretty much the same. The Harvard name won't help you much if you're major a F-up with entitlement issues. Many (not all) Harvard grads tend to be just that.
My sentiments exactly. How long can one live off of the brand of the institution he graduated from? Wont he/she eventually have to "put up" & show that the respect they've garnered is well-deserved? I believe that prestige plays a large factor initially but, I think its becomes more focused on the individual after the first few years. Do you really think the POTUS' career trajectory wouldve went any differently if he graduated from Columbia or Chicago Law instead of Harvard?
Last edited by El Rey Negro on Sat Aug 28, 2010 12:05 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
romothesavior

Diamond
Posts: 14692
Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2009 4:29 pm

Re: Does prestige really matter after T-6?

Post by romothesavior » Sat Aug 28, 2010 12:05 am

PDaddy wrote::roll: Anyone who takes the time to dissect the T6 and pick based solely - or even mostly, for that matter - on how they are ranked deserves the miserable life they are headed for. There's not much difference between Harvard and Chicago, or the schools in-between. And the rest of the so-called top-10 can make the same argument. Harvard has plenty of idiots. Find your best fit! Prestige should matter only after one has worked out the more pragmatic issues: location of the school and where graduates work. For the top-6, that's pretty much everywhere. Yes, the only true "national schools" are Harvard and Yale, but the others do just fine.
This is idiotic (as are most things you say on this site). Yale, Harvard, and Stanford stand head and shoulders above everyone else, especially for academia and clerkships. And I would much, much, MUCH rather be in the bottom third at HYS than bottom third anywhere else.

Choosing a school within the subtiers of HYS or between CCN based solely on "fit" makes some sense, because the differences between Chicago/Columbia or Stanford/Harvard has a lot to do with locational preference, class size preferences, etc. But anyone taking NYU over Yale should realize they are choosing a clearly inferior school (and I do not mean any slight to NYU, because it is a fantastic institution). The individual should simply recognize that they are likely closing or limiting certain opportunities by taking NYU over Yale. Such a decision is not always a bad thing overall (maybe they REALLY want NYC and they have a full ride to NYU), but they should still be aware of the sizable gap nonetheless.

User avatar
romothesavior

Diamond
Posts: 14692
Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2009 4:29 pm

Re: Does prestige really matter after T-6?

Post by romothesavior » Sat Aug 28, 2010 12:11 am

El Rey Negro wrote: My sentiments exactly. How long can one live off of the brand of the institution he graduated from? Wont he/she eventually have to "put up" & show that the respect they've garnered is well-deserved? I believe that prestige plays a large factor initially but, I think its becomes more focused on the individual after the first few years. Do you really think POTUS career trajectory wouldve went any differently if he graduated from Columbia or Chicago Law instead of Harvard?
1. Welcome to law. It is a prestige-whoring field.
2. Yes, I definitely think Obama's chances at POTUS would become severely limited if he didn't go to HLS. There are few networks (if any) that are as powerful as Harvard's. And if you want to focus on elite legal positions besides elected politics, take a look at SCOTUS and count the number of non-Harvard/Yale grads. Shouldn't take you too long to count them, because there aren't any. Why is this? Because making it to SCOTUS takes a lot more than simply "putting up" and producing; your school DOES matter.

User avatar
jayn3

Silver
Posts: 664
Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 5:21 pm

Re: Does prestige really matter after T-6?

Post by jayn3 » Sat Aug 28, 2010 12:12 am

i'm impressed that not only is this duplicate posted, but that the URM version got more attention.

El Rey Negro

New
Posts: 11
Joined: Wed Aug 25, 2010 12:38 am

Re: Does prestige really matter after T-6?

Post by El Rey Negro » Sat Aug 28, 2010 12:13 am

romothesavior wrote:
PDaddy wrote::roll: Anyone who takes the time to dissect the T6 and pick based solely - or even mostly, for that matter - on how they are ranked deserves the miserable life they are headed for. There's not much difference between Harvard and Chicago, or the schools in-between. And the rest of the so-called top-10 can make the same argument. Harvard has plenty of idiots. Find your best fit! Prestige should matter only after one has worked out the more pragmatic issues: location of the school and where graduates work. For the top-6, that's pretty much everywhere. Yes, the only true "national schools" are Harvard and Yale, but the others do just fine.
This is idiotic (as are most things you say on this site). Yale, Harvard, and Stanford stand head and shoulders above everyone else, especially for academia and clerkships. And I would much, much, MUCH rather be in the bottom third at HYS than bottom third anywhere else.

Choosing a school within the subtiers of HYS or between CCN based solely on "fit" makes some sense, because the differences between Chicago/Columbia or Stanford/Harvard has a lot to do with locational preference, class size preferences, etc. But anyone taking NYU over Yale should realize they are choosing a clearly inferior school (and I do not mean any slight to NYU, because it is a fantastic institution). The individual should simply recognize that they are likely closing or limiting certain opportunities by taking NYU over Yale. Such a decision is not always a bad thing overall (maybe they REALLY want NYC and they have a full ride to NYU), but they should still be aware of the sizable gap nonetheless.
Maybe I shouldve worded it better. The question I want to ask is, is a person's success more attributed to the institution he attended or his work ethic/individual drive? If the latter is true, would it really matter if you went to Yale or Columbia, considering you would've been a successful from either. If the former is true, is prestige that important that it can change a relatively unimpressive candidate into a whale?

bk1

Diamond
Posts: 20063
Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2010 7:06 pm

Re: Does prestige really matter after T-6?

Post by bk1 » Sat Aug 28, 2010 12:14 am

jayn3 wrote:i'm impressed that not only is this duplicate posted, but that the URM version got more attention.
Blame PDaddy.

User avatar
vanwinkle

Platinum
Posts: 8953
Joined: Sun Dec 21, 2008 3:02 am

Re: Does prestige really matter after T-6?

Post by vanwinkle » Sat Aug 28, 2010 12:17 am

Double post, does not belong in URM forum.

http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 2&t=128088

Locked

Return to “Underrepresented Law Students”