C/O 2013: How Accurate was LSP? Forum

Share experiences and seek insight regarding your experience as an underrepresented minority within the legal community.
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting

Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are sharing sensitive information about bar exam prep. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.

Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned."

Would you recommend other URMS to use LSP?

Yes
1
9%
No
10
91%
 
Total votes: 11

User avatar
billyez

Silver
Posts: 865
Joined: Sun Jun 14, 2009 6:19 pm

C/O 2013: How Accurate was LSP?

Post by billyez » Thu Jul 22, 2010 4:39 pm

In hindsight, I spent far more time than was necessary on the thing. All things considered, it was more of a help figuring out what my LSAC GPA was going to be rather than what my cycle was going to be. This thread isn't to diss the thing, but just a general question about the experience fellow URM applicants had with it. Would you recommend other URM's to use it?

The answer for me would be no and I've told future URM applicants to avoid letting it influence their applications.
Last edited by billyez on Thu Jul 22, 2010 4:46 pm, edited 2 times in total.

sumus romani

Silver
Posts: 564
Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2010 6:04 pm

Re: C/O 2013: How Accurate was LSP?

Post by sumus romani » Thu Jul 22, 2010 4:42 pm

I agree. URMs should use the Median Application Method. Or MAM for short. LSP is too pessimistic for at least some minorities (especially AA males).

User avatar
MartianManhunter

Bronze
Posts: 125
Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2009 10:59 pm

Re: C/O 2013: How Accurate was LSP?

Post by MartianManhunter » Thu Jul 22, 2010 5:15 pm

I think it's a good place to get a ballpark figure for URM's - to get them looking at higher ranked schools than they would otherwise. Then direct them to something like LSN or TLS for better perspective/specific instances.

Edit: Just used it again and checked it against my cycle. Waaay off. But I stand by the fact that it got me thinking about schools that were way above what I originally considered.

User avatar
billyez

Silver
Posts: 865
Joined: Sun Jun 14, 2009 6:19 pm

Re: C/O 2013: How Accurate was LSP?

Post by billyez » Thu Jul 22, 2010 5:28 pm

So, it encouraged you to send applications to schools you wouldn't have considered otherwise? That's the opposite of what happened to me - it would have made me look at schools far below where I could have been accepted.

User avatar
Knock

Platinum
Posts: 5151
Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2009 3:09 pm

Re: C/O 2013: How Accurate was LSP?

Post by Knock » Thu Jul 22, 2010 5:50 pm

sumus romani wrote:I agree. URMs should use the Median Application Method. Or MAM for short. LSP is too pessimistic for at least some minorities (especially AA males).
I saw your post on the MAM and I thought it was very helpful, if i'm recalling it correctly; something about your odds if your numbers are at 25th at median at 75th, one at 25th one at 75th etc. But how does it apply to URM's?

User avatar
billyez

Silver
Posts: 865
Joined: Sun Jun 14, 2009 6:19 pm

Re: C/O 2013: How Accurate was LSP?

Post by billyez » Mon Jul 26, 2010 5:12 pm

bump for more votes and opinions. I think this is a rather important topic. If LSP is was as terribly inaccurate for me as it is for many URM's then they need to know that they shouldn't use it.
Last edited by billyez on Mon Jul 26, 2010 6:42 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
hiromoto45

Silver
Posts: 690
Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2009 2:05 pm

Re: C/O 2013: How Accurate was LSP?

Post by hiromoto45 » Mon Jul 26, 2010 6:06 pm

Combination of LSP, LSN and TLS helped. From T30 schools down very accurate. But T30 and above accuracy plummets substantially . It is better to seek out a physic than use LSP.

Post Reply Post Anonymous Reply  

Return to “Underrepresented Law Students”