Hispanics vs african americans URM Forum

Share experiences and seek insight regarding your experience as an underrepresented minority within the legal community.
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting

Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are sharing sensitive information about bar exam prep. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.

Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned."
Locked
mrm2083

Bronze
Posts: 238
Joined: Fri Jul 24, 2009 9:16 pm

Hispanics vs african americans URM

Post by mrm2083 » Mon Feb 01, 2010 2:33 pm

I realize that the only Hispanics who get a boost are Mexicans and Puerto Ricans but aren't Hispanics as a whole underrepresented in top law schools compared to African Americans. For example Harvard has 11.8% African Americans and 7.3% Hispanics while the population of the US consists of 12.4% African Americans and 15% Hispanics if the point of URM is because they are underrepresented then shouldn't Hispanics (whatever the origin), at least at Harvard, get more of a boost than African Americans? *Statistics at other top law schools also seem to hover around these numbers.

scionb4

Silver
Posts: 503
Joined: Mon May 26, 2008 8:57 am

Re: Hispanics vs african americans URM

Post by scionb4 » Mon Feb 01, 2010 2:43 pm

When I saw in the subject, "Hispanics vs. African Americans" I thought this had the potential to be a very discussion.

Flanker1067

Silver
Posts: 658
Joined: Tue Dec 29, 2009 12:47 pm

Re: Hispanics vs african americans URM

Post by Flanker1067 » Mon Feb 01, 2010 2:50 pm

But then you realized this question is stupid.

OP, by grouping all hispanics together you are saying that in essence, all hispanics should get URM because Mexicans and Puerto Ricans are severely under-represented. You can't just substitute one hispanic for another.

User avatar
holydonkey

Silver
Posts: 1181
Joined: Fri Dec 18, 2009 1:40 pm

Re: Hispanics vs african americans URM

Post by holydonkey » Mon Feb 01, 2010 2:51 pm

URM status is not determined by stats at a single school. It's across the board at many different law schools.

User avatar
Rand M.

Silver
Posts: 757
Joined: Fri Aug 07, 2009 8:24 am

Re: Hispanics vs african americans URM

Post by Rand M. » Mon Feb 01, 2010 2:57 pm

--ImageRemoved--

Flanker1067

Silver
Posts: 658
Joined: Tue Dec 29, 2009 12:47 pm

Re: Hispanics vs african americans URM

Post by Flanker1067 » Mon Feb 01, 2010 3:00 pm

That is hilarious. Well -done.

02082010

Gold
Posts: 1645
Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2009 5:10 pm

Re: Hispanics vs african americans URM

Post by 02082010 » Mon Feb 01, 2010 3:02 pm

Ran here.



But it's boring so I'm headed back to the lounge.

User avatar
Billy Blanks

Bronze
Posts: 107
Joined: Fri Oct 16, 2009 3:08 pm

Re: Hispanics vs african americans URM

Post by Billy Blanks » Mon Feb 01, 2010 3:05 pm

mrm2083 wrote:I realize that the only Hispanics who get a boost are Mexicans and Puerto Ricans but aren't Hispanics as a whole underrepresented in top law schools compared to African Americans. For example Harvard has 11.8% African Americans and 7.3% Hispanics while the population of the US consists of 12.4% African Americans and 15% Hispanics if the point of URM is because they are underrepresented then shouldn't Hispanics (whatever the origin), at least at Harvard, get more of a boost than African Americans? *Statistics at other top law schools also seem to hover around these numbers.
It depends on the focus of increased representation. If you simply say, "this is the rate of Hispanics in the population vs the rate of Hispanics in law school," then your assertion would be correct. However, I think law schools are sensitive to the designations made in the US Census since this where all "representation" claims originate. The Census now accounts for Hispanics of different national origin. Therefore, law schools look at Hispanic with a finer level detail than they otherwise would and determine which sub-groups really are underrepresented and which are not. Knowing this information, it would make no sense to give "all Hispanics" the same URM consideration.

mrm2083

Bronze
Posts: 238
Joined: Fri Jul 24, 2009 9:16 pm

Re: Hispanics vs african americans URM

Post by mrm2083 » Mon Feb 01, 2010 3:20 pm

Thread fail.... I admit it :(

Flanker1067

Silver
Posts: 658
Joined: Tue Dec 29, 2009 12:47 pm

Re: Hispanics vs african americans URM

Post by Flanker1067 » Mon Feb 01, 2010 4:29 pm

mrm2083 wrote:Thread fail.... I admit it :(

No big deal. People on TLS are harsh, including me. We have all been on both ends though.

Locked

Return to “Underrepresented Law Students”