URM 2014-2015 Cycle Thread Forum

Share experiences and seek insight regarding your experience as an underrepresented minority within the legal community.
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting

Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are sharing sensitive information about bar exam prep. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.

Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned."

Which of these April ASWs do you plan to attend?

Yale (4/16-4/18)
5
16%
Stanford (4/25-4/27)
5
16%
Harvard (4/18-4/20)
10
32%
Chicago (4/9-4/11)
4
13%
NYU (4/16-4/17
1
3%
Penn (4/13)
1
3%
Michigan (4/9-4/11)
2
6%
Northwestern (4/10-4/11)
2
6%
Cornell (4/17)
1
3%
 
Total votes: 31

User avatar
jw316

Silver
Posts: 525
Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 12:29 pm

Re: URM 2014-2015 Cycle Thread

Post by jw316 » Fri Jan 02, 2015 11:34 am

Hey cc check your PM's when you get a second please. Seeking a lil advice as well :)

User avatar
jemthey17

Silver
Posts: 1056
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2012 11:54 am

Re: URM 2014-2015 Cycle Thread

Post by jemthey17 » Fri Jan 02, 2015 11:56 am

cc78 wrote:
sashafierce wrote:161 up from 153 last December, really disappointed as I was scoring in the mid to high 160s. Not sure if I should apply or sit out another year :(

Edit: that was my third attempt 155-153-161
That really depends on your GPA. If you're above 3.5, you should move forward with your 161. Good things can happen:

Image

Also, since there are other folks out there trying to think about what to do now that they have their December LSAT, I fiddled around with mylsn and found out the lowest GPA and lowest LSAT each t14 school took for AA candidates these past three cycles:

Yale: 3.6; 163
Harvard: 3.45; 160
Stanford: 3.5; 162
Chicago: 3.09; 154
Columbia: 3.14; 158
NYU: 3.14; 160
Penn: 3.35; 155
UVA: 3.36; 155
Berkeley: 3.06; 157
Duke: 3.3; 159
Michigan: 3.2; 158
Northwestern: 3.09; 155
Cornell: 3.1; 154
Georgetown: 3.09; 154

Keep in mind that these scores don't represent individual applicants, they are the respective "floors" for GPA and LSAT separately. So, Harvard's 3.45 GPA actually had a 169 LSAT. And, again this is just AA applicants and is just the LSN sample, which could or could not be representative.
This is fantastic! Thanks!

User avatar
Dream_weaver32

Silver
Posts: 643
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2014 11:38 pm

Re: URM 2014-2015 Cycle Thread

Post by Dream_weaver32 » Fri Jan 02, 2015 12:16 pm

Tr3 wrote:Anyone mind if I add some conditional formatting to the spreadsheet to changed all "Accepted" to green text?

(for me, it's easier to see with color-coding)
Go for it! It is very basic, and any improvements are great. Hopefully we make it very useful, and then future cycles can copy the format.

User avatar
Dream_weaver32

Silver
Posts: 643
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2014 11:38 pm

Re: URM 2014-2015 Cycle Thread

Post by Dream_weaver32 » Fri Jan 02, 2015 12:24 pm

Went ahead and color coded the Spreadsheet. Will check to make sure it continues to be correct and make any changes. If anyone sees any flaws, please feel free to make corrections!

User avatar
Dream_weaver32

Silver
Posts: 643
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2014 11:38 pm

Re: URM 2014-2015 Cycle Thread

Post by Dream_weaver32 » Fri Jan 02, 2015 2:58 pm

Has anyone in this thread had any luck soliciting a waiver from NYU?

LoganCouture

Gold
Posts: 1536
Joined: Tue Feb 11, 2014 9:48 pm

Re: URM 2014-2015 Cycle Thread

Post by LoganCouture » Fri Jan 02, 2015 3:06 pm

Dream_weaver32 wrote:Has anyone in this thread had any luck soliciting a waiver from NYU?
I don't think CCN have responded positively to solicitations (unless you're military or TFA or something) for merit-based waivers.

User avatar
Dream_weaver32

Silver
Posts: 643
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2014 11:38 pm

Re: URM 2014-2015 Cycle Thread

Post by Dream_weaver32 » Fri Jan 02, 2015 3:22 pm

lc39 wrote:
Dream_weaver32 wrote:Has anyone in this thread had any luck soliciting a waiver from NYU?
I don't think CCN have responded positively to solicitations (unless you're military or TFA or something) for merit-based waivers.
I didn't think they had but wanted to make sure. Sent an email anyway.

User avatar
Mrocky2

New
Posts: 92
Joined: Wed Nov 05, 2014 2:32 pm

Re: URM 2014-2015 Cycle Thread

Post by Mrocky2 » Fri Jan 02, 2015 3:23 pm

Dream_weaver32 wrote:Has anyone in this thread had any luck soliciting a waiver from NYU?
I tried and failed after the September LSAT release

User avatar
Tr3

Silver
Posts: 626
Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2014 1:25 am

Re: URM 2014-2015 Cycle Thread

Post by Tr3 » Fri Jan 02, 2015 3:45 pm

Dream_weaver32 wrote:
Tr3 wrote:Anyone mind if I add some conditional formatting to the spreadsheet to changed all "Accepted" to green text?

(for me, it's easier to see with color-coding)
Go for it! It is very basic, and any improvements are great. Hopefully we make it very useful, and then future cycles can copy the format.
Cool thanks I'll check it out! =)

User avatar
Dream_weaver32

Silver
Posts: 643
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2014 11:38 pm

Re: URM 2014-2015 Cycle Thread

Post by Dream_weaver32 » Fri Jan 02, 2015 4:26 pm

Tr3 wrote:
Dream_weaver32 wrote:
Tr3 wrote:Anyone mind if I add some conditional formatting to the spreadsheet to changed all "Accepted" to green text?

(for me, it's easier to see with color-coding)
Go for it! It is very basic, and any improvements are great. Hopefully we make it very useful, and then future cycles can copy the format.
Cool thanks I'll check it out! =)
Let me know what you think of the changes!

User avatar
Mrocky2

New
Posts: 92
Joined: Wed Nov 05, 2014 2:32 pm

Re: URM 2014-2015 Cycle Thread

Post by Mrocky2 » Fri Jan 02, 2015 4:32 pm

Dream_weaver32 wrote:
Tr3 wrote:
Dream_weaver32 wrote:
Tr3 wrote:Anyone mind if I add some conditional formatting to the spreadsheet to changed all "Accepted" to green text?

(for me, it's easier to see with color-coding)
Go for it! It is very basic, and any improvements are great. Hopefully we make it very useful, and then future cycles can copy the format.
Cool thanks I'll check it out! =)
Let me know what you think of the changes!
Looks Sweet!

User avatar
Oskosh

Silver
Posts: 1028
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2014 3:18 pm

Re: URM 2014-2015 Cycle Thread

Post by Oskosh » Fri Jan 02, 2015 4:50 pm

I feel like LSN is too small of a sample to determine much for me...

I plugged in a value of 160-170, URM excluding AA (I'm Mexican). Most of the schools only had about 4 applicants, most of which were waitlisted/rejected. :(

No URM boost for Mexicans?

User avatar
DiniMae

Silver
Posts: 734
Joined: Sat Sep 14, 2013 6:36 pm

Re: URM 2014-2015 Cycle Thread

Post by DiniMae » Fri Jan 02, 2015 4:51 pm

jemthey17 wrote:
cc78 wrote:
That really depends on your GPA. If you're above 3.5, you should move forward with your 161. Good things can happen:

Image

Also, since there are other folks out there trying to think about what to do now that they have their December LSAT, I fiddled around with mylsn and found out the lowest GPA and lowest LSAT each t14 school took for AA candidates these past three cycles:

Yale: 3.6; 163
Harvard: 3.45; 160
Stanford: 3.5; 162
Chicago: 3.09; 154
Columbia: 3.14; 158
NYU: 3.14; 160
Penn: 3.35; 155
UVA: 3.36; 155
Berkeley: 3.06; 157
Duke: 3.3; 159
Michigan: 3.2; 158
Northwestern: 3.09; 155
Cornell: 3.1; 154
Georgetown: 3.09; 154

Keep in mind that these scores don't represent individual applicants, they are the respective "floors" for GPA and LSAT separately. So, Harvard's 3.45 GPA actually had a 169 LSAT. And, again this is just AA applicants and is just the LSN sample, which could or could not be representative.
This is fantastic! Thanks!
+1

User avatar
DiniMae

Silver
Posts: 734
Joined: Sat Sep 14, 2013 6:36 pm

Re: URM 2014-2015 Cycle Thread

Post by DiniMae » Fri Jan 02, 2015 4:53 pm

lc39 wrote:
Dream_weaver32 wrote:Has anyone in this thread had any luck soliciting a waiver from NYU?
I don't think CCN have responded positively to solicitations (unless you're military or TFA or something) for merit-based waivers.
I tried and failed with Columbia. I even mentioned being a veteran and got their standard auto-reply of "NO...But we look forward to reading your application." I know this is the wrong forum, but it'd be really nice if all schools gave the 'ole vet discount. :-)

LoganCouture

Gold
Posts: 1536
Joined: Tue Feb 11, 2014 9:48 pm

Re: URM 2014-2015 Cycle Thread

Post by LoganCouture » Fri Jan 02, 2015 5:00 pm

Oskosh wrote:I feel like LSN is too small of a sample to determine much for me...

I plugged in a value of 160-170, URM excluding AA (I'm Mexican). Most of the schools only had about 4 applicants, most of which were waitlisted/rejected. :(

No URM boost for Mexicans?
I'm MA and I feel like that has given me a bump thus far this cycle. It is hard because I also didn't find much data on LSN.

I think that it would be safe to say MAs get the smallest URM boost.

User avatar
DiniMae

Silver
Posts: 734
Joined: Sat Sep 14, 2013 6:36 pm

Re: URM 2014-2015 Cycle Thread

Post by DiniMae » Fri Jan 02, 2015 5:03 pm

cc78 wrote:And now, some very exciting news...

In at Chicago just now via email!
congrats!

User avatar
DiniMae

Silver
Posts: 734
Joined: Sat Sep 14, 2013 6:36 pm

Re: URM 2014-2015 Cycle Thread

Post by DiniMae » Fri Jan 02, 2015 5:07 pm

cc78 wrote:
jw316 wrote:Can anyone point me in the direction of some good URM reverse splitter info (>75th GPA, <25th LSAT)? I did myLSN for my numbers and nothing on there. I also know I should re-take but with this cycle being weird I kind of want to toss my hat in and see what happens
I'm surprised you didn't find mylsn helpful. Without knowing a ton about you, I did a general URM reverse splitter search:

Image

Now, type of URM matters quite a bit. If you're AA:

Image

My reading of this is that you've got a shot to get a good set of acceptances and even with money. So, why not throw the apps out there? Of course, I don't know exactly what you're working with...
I'm a reverse splitter. Is it true that I will likely hear back from schools later in the cycle after they've secured the LSAT median?

Harvette

Bronze
Posts: 271
Joined: Thu May 22, 2014 2:21 pm

Re: URM 2014-2015 Cycle Thread

Post by Harvette » Fri Jan 02, 2015 5:26 pm

LSATneurotic wrote:I did slightly worse, despite perfect scoring LG. If I hadn't gotten into Chicago yesterday I'd probably be more upset. Still disappointing, but it is what it is.
No worries, u will be alright!

Harvette

Bronze
Posts: 271
Joined: Thu May 22, 2014 2:21 pm

Re: URM 2014-2015 Cycle Thread

Post by Harvette » Fri Jan 02, 2015 5:28 pm

MadwomanintheAttic wrote:@Harvette I'm proclaiming 2 January as the day even though officially the release date is 5 Januray. I think LSAC has forced December takers to wait long enough.
U got it right my dear ;-)
I should have you predict my acceptance lol

LoganCouture

Gold
Posts: 1536
Joined: Tue Feb 11, 2014 9:48 pm

Re: URM 2014-2015 Cycle Thread

Post by LoganCouture » Fri Jan 02, 2015 5:29 pm

DiniMae wrote:
cc78 wrote:
jw316 wrote:Can anyone point me in the direction of some good URM reverse splitter info (>75th GPA, <25th LSAT)? I did myLSN for my numbers and nothing on there. I also know I should re-take but with this cycle being weird I kind of want to toss my hat in and see what happens
I'm surprised you didn't find mylsn helpful. Without knowing a ton about you, I did a general URM reverse splitter search:

Image

Now, type of URM matters quite a bit. If you're AA:

Image

My reading of this is that you've got a shot to get a good set of acceptances and even with money. So, why not throw the apps out there? Of course, I don't know exactly what you're working with...
I'm a reverse splitter. Is it true that I will likely hear back from schools later in the cycle after they've secured the LSAT median?
Not necessarily. Schools have been admitting some reverse splitters (UVA comes to mind) early. But patience in general always is helpful. Plenty of cycle left.

Harvette

Bronze
Posts: 271
Joined: Thu May 22, 2014 2:21 pm

Re: URM 2014-2015 Cycle Thread

Post by Harvette » Fri Jan 02, 2015 5:32 pm

How did the lsat go for those who took the December test?
Also do we have updated numbers for test takers?

Harvette

Bronze
Posts: 271
Joined: Thu May 22, 2014 2:21 pm

Re: URM 2014-2015 Cycle Thread

Post by Harvette » Fri Jan 02, 2015 5:42 pm

Harvette wrote:How did the lsat go for those who took the December test?
Also do we have updated numbers for test takers?

There was a link to numbers of recent test takers here that I can't find.

User avatar
gold33

New
Posts: 86
Joined: Thu Nov 27, 2014 4:02 pm

Re: URM 2014-2015 Cycle Thread

Post by gold33 » Fri Jan 02, 2015 7:52 pm

So much good news :)

What has everyone's take on the DS been? I've read a few sources that highly encourage submitting one, but I feel like my PS already touches on any points that I would write about.

MadwomanintheAttic

Bronze
Posts: 251
Joined: Mon May 26, 2014 9:42 pm

Re: URM 2014-2015 Cycle Thread

Post by MadwomanintheAttic » Fri Jan 02, 2015 7:54 pm

Question: does anyone know if law schools see your percentile rank? My score is not impressive, but the percentile jump from first take to most recent is.

User avatar
Tr3

Silver
Posts: 626
Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2014 1:25 am

Re: URM 2014-2015 Cycle Thread

Post by Tr3 » Fri Jan 02, 2015 8:11 pm

gold33 wrote:So much good news :)

What has everyone's take on the DS been? I've read a few sources that highly encourage submitting one, but I feel like my PS already touches on any points that I would write about.
I wrote a DS even though my PS did touch on some diversity points. But my central topic in both statements were different. I would say only write a PS if you think it will add to your file. I took the approach of using the PS to talk more about 'why law school' and the DS to talk about my background/circumstances. FWIW I've been accepted to a few schools, so at least some adcoms liked it.

Post Reply Post Anonymous Reply  

Return to “Underrepresented Law Students”