Congrats! I got Vandy today as well...that acceptance package is no jokeEvMont wrote:Two in one day?! Congrats!mt2165 wrote:Ahhhhhh just got into WUSTL and Vanderbilt today!! Feeling good! Supposed to be hearing back from Duke this week!
URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are sharing sensitive information about bar exam prep. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned."
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are sharing sensitive information about bar exam prep. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned."
- ChuggaChuggaChooChoo
- Posts: 46
- Joined: Wed Jan 29, 2014 2:20 pm
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
-
- Posts: 551
- Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 3:10 am
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
Congrats! Got into Vandy last week and I'm waiting for my interview with WUSTL.mt2165 wrote:Ahhhhhh just got into WUSTL and Vanderbilt today!! Feeling good! Supposed to be hearing back from Duke this week!
How do you know you'll be hearing back from Duke this week?
- mt2165
- Posts: 546
- Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2012 2:58 pm
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
Hint: I think the WUSTL interview is really a last chance for them as an admissions committee to make sure you're not insane and it's basically an unofficial acceptance notification. And I was originally Priority Track but they wanted my fall grades and I forgot to add the addendum for the JD/MA program so they told me they'd get back to me this week.El Principe wrote:Congrats! Got into Vandy last week and I'm waiting for my interview with WUSTL.mt2165 wrote:Ahhhhhh just got into WUSTL and Vanderbilt today!! Feeling good! Supposed to be hearing back from Duke this week!
How do you know you'll be hearing back from Duke this week?
- ThePiedPiper
- Posts: 469
- Joined: Sat Jul 27, 2013 6:50 pm
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
mt2165 wrote:Ahhhhhh just got into WUSTL and Vanderbilt today!! Feeling good! Supposed to be hearing back from Duke this week!

Since you received two acceptances its only right you get two gifs!!! Congrats on the WUSTL Acceptance!!! #GoodDeal

Congrats on the Vandy Acceptance!!! #GoodDeal
- Cocoblues
- Posts: 321
- Joined: Sat Dec 28, 2013 10:18 pm
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
Congrats on the acceptances!!! 

- coolbean2013
- Posts: 275
- Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2012 8:24 pm
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
Cocoblues wrote:Congrats on the acceptances!!!
- BobMoses
- Posts: 56
- Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 10:25 pm
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
coolbean2013 wrote:Cocoblues wrote:Congrats on the acceptances!!!
-
- Posts: 285
- Joined: Tue Aug 20, 2013 8:21 pm
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
Question for those of you who have already submitted your Need Access application:
Have any of you had issues with the non-custodial parent part of it? That is, you were raised by a single parent or otherwise just can't fill out the info for the second parent. Is it possible to submit the app with out that part? And has that held things up for you with schools?
Thanks in advance!
Have any of you had issues with the non-custodial parent part of it? That is, you were raised by a single parent or otherwise just can't fill out the info for the second parent. Is it possible to submit the app with out that part? And has that held things up for you with schools?
Thanks in advance!
-
- Posts: 1171
- Joined: Tue Jul 16, 2013 10:36 am
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
+1 interested in this as wellEvMont wrote:Question for those of you who have already submitted your Need Access application:
Have any of you had issues with the non-custodial parent part of it? That is, you were raised by a single parent or otherwise just can't fill out the info for the second parent. Is it possible to submit the app with out that part? And has that held things up for you with schools?
Thanks in advance!
- DPhoenix
- Posts: 99
- Joined: Wed Dec 04, 2013 8:32 pm
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
+1BobMoses wrote:coolbean2013 wrote:Cocoblues wrote:Congrats on the acceptances!!!
- ChuggaChuggaChooChoo
- Posts: 46
- Joined: Wed Jan 29, 2014 2:20 pm
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
I plan on submitting without this...but it would be nice to know for sureEvMont wrote:Question for those of you who have already submitted your Need Access application:
Have any of you had issues with the non-custodial parent part of it? That is, you were raised by a single parent or otherwise just can't fill out the info for the second parent. Is it possible to submit the app with out that part? And has that held things up for you with schools?
Thanks in advance!
I can't imagine this being necessary, but I remember having to write a confirmation for this part of the app when applying for Fin Aid before undergrad
ie saying your mom/dad wasn't in your life or whatever the case may be
- sherealcool
- Posts: 50
- Joined: Sun Jan 12, 2014 12:01 am
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
My father died, so when I filled out need access I put his old job/address and then wrote "DECEASED." In the additional info section, I wrote that he died in such and such a year just for good measure. I was shocked that you couldn't check a box or anything for "deceased." It's a huge loophole in their application process.mandyjay11 wrote:+1 interested in this as wellEvMont wrote:Question for those of you who have already submitted your Need Access application:
Have any of you had issues with the non-custodial parent part of it? That is, you were raised by a single parent or otherwise just can't fill out the info for the second parent. Is it possible to submit the app with out that part? And has that held things up for you with schools?
Thanks in advance!
- AAJD2B
- Posts: 871
- Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2012 12:37 am
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
So we can submit our form without filling out the non-custodial part?? My parents are divorced. Would I have to add the same information under parent form for the non-custodial form?
- sherealcool
- Posts: 50
- Joined: Sun Jan 12, 2014 12:01 am
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
No, they won't let you submit without filling out the non-custodial parent part. See this thing from yale:AAJD2B wrote:So we can submit our form without filling out the non-custodial part?? My parents are divorced. Would I have to add the same information under parent form for the non-custodial form?
"***Please Note: Students whose parents are divorced or separated must submit a Need Access analysis for both natural parents."
http://www.law.yale.edu/admissions/fina ... ssment.htm
- AAJD2B
- Posts: 871
- Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2012 12:37 am
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
Ok thanks. I have yet to complete the parent form, but does it ask for information for each parent (ie parent 1 and 2)?sherealcool wrote:No, they won't let you submit without filling out the non-custodial parent part. See this thing from yale:AAJD2B wrote:So we can submit our form without filling out the non-custodial part?? My parents are divorced. Would I have to add the same information under parent form for the non-custodial form?
"***Please Note: Students whose parents are divorced or separated must submit a Need Access analysis for both natural parents."
http://www.law.yale.edu/admissions/fina ... ssment.htm
Or can I input info for one parent in the parent form and the other parent in the non-custodial form?
- Dr.Zer0
- Posts: 1027
- Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2012 12:11 pm
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
Zero motivation to write my Yale two fidy =/
- AAJD2B
- Posts: 871
- Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2012 12:37 am
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
You can do it!Dr.Zer0 wrote:Zero motivation to write my Yale two fidy =/
- AAJD2B
- Posts: 871
- Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2012 12:37 am
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
So I was speaking to an HBCU grad who then went on to an Ivy law school and she said that as minorities, we should try and get as cheap an undergrad degree as possible and gun for a top law school, preferably with an Ivy brand. She said its a given that URM + Ivy law degree = many many more opportunities.
What do you guys think about this?? Is an Ivy league law degree the way to go no matter the rankings or $$$ provided by non-Ivy law schools?
What do you guys think about this?? Is an Ivy league law degree the way to go no matter the rankings or $$$ provided by non-Ivy law schools?
- nabadgelyo
- Posts: 143
- Joined: Fri Dec 06, 2013 7:58 pm
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
I think it really depends on what kind of law you're going into, from what I've heard. Is your friend in BigLaw? Big Law, like the business world it serves, is incredibly prestige conscious, so I see what she's saying w/r/t Vault50 firms or whatev. I think that if you want to be a public defender or work for a small or medium sized firm (or hang out your own shingle) the answer might be different.AAJD2B wrote:So I was speaking to an HBCU grad who then went on to an Ivy law school and she said that as minorities, we should try and get as cheap an undergrad degree as possible and gun for a top law school, preferably with an Ivy brand. She said its a given that URM + Ivy law degree = many many more opportunities.
What do you guys think about this?? Is an Ivy league law degree the way to go no matter the rankings or $$$ provided by non-Ivy law schools?
- AAJD2B
- Posts: 871
- Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2012 12:37 am
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
nabadgelyo wrote:I think it really depends on what kind of law you're going into, from what I've heard. Is your friend in BigLaw? Big Law, like the business world it serves, is incredibly prestige conscious, so I see what she's saying w/r/t Vault50 firms or whatev. I think that if you want to be a public defender or work for a small or medium sized firm (or hang out your own shingle) the answer might be different.AAJD2B wrote:So I was speaking to an HBCU grad who then went on to an Ivy law school and she said that as minorities, we should try and get as cheap an undergrad degree as possible and gun for a top law school, preferably with an Ivy brand. She said its a given that URM + Ivy law degree = many many more opportunities.
What do you guys think about this?? Is an Ivy league law degree the way to go no matter the rankings or $$$ provided by non-Ivy law schools?
Yes, she worked as a lit associate at a V5 law firm. I also plan on going the BIGLAW route.
- nabadgelyo
- Posts: 143
- Joined: Fri Dec 06, 2013 7:58 pm
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
Got it. In that case, I wonder why she says ivy? I think NYU is still more prestigious than Cornell, right?AAJD2B wrote:Yes, she worked as a lit associate at a V5 law firm. I also plan on going the BIGLAW route.nabadgelyo wrote:I think it really depends on what kind of law you're going into, from what I've heard. Is your friend in BigLaw? Big Law, like the business world it serves, is incredibly prestige conscious, so I see what she's saying w/r/t Vault50 firms or whatev. I think that if you want to be a public defender or work for a small or medium sized firm (or hang out your own shingle) the answer might be different.AAJD2B wrote:So I was speaking to an HBCU grad who then went on to an Ivy law school and she said that as minorities, we should try and get as cheap an undergrad degree as possible and gun for a top law school, preferably with an Ivy brand. She said its a given that URM + Ivy law degree = many many more opportunities.
What do you guys think about this?? Is an Ivy league law degree the way to go no matter the rankings or $$$ provided by non-Ivy law schools?
-
- Posts: 285
- Joined: Tue Aug 20, 2013 8:21 pm
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
nabadgelyo wrote:Got it. In that case, I wonder why she says ivy? I think NYU is still more prestigious than Cornell, right?AAJD2B wrote:Yes, she worked as a lit associate at a V5 law firm. I also plan on going the BIGLAW route.nabadgelyo wrote:I think it really depends on what kind of law you're going into, from what I've heard. Is your friend in BigLaw? Big Law, like the business world it serves, is incredibly prestige conscious, so I see what she's saying w/r/t Vault50 firms or whatev. I think that if you want to be a public defender or work for a small or medium sized firm (or hang out your own shingle) the answer might be different.AAJD2B wrote:So I was speaking to an HBCU grad who then went on to an Ivy law school and she said that as minorities, we should try and get as cheap an undergrad degree as possible and gun for a top law school, preferably with an Ivy brand. She said its a given that URM + Ivy law degree = many many more opportunities.
What do you guys think about this?? Is an Ivy league law degree the way to go no matter the rankings or $$$ provided by non-Ivy law schools?
I think the Ivy label is more important at the undergrad level, than it is at the post grad level. I also think it's important to remember that most people can't even name all 8 Ivies. Heck, sometimes I'm convinced there are only 7 (Ooops! *shrugs*). So, I wouldn't put too much stock in the label. I'd take NYU law with $$$ over Cornell and it's Ivy label any damn day.
- AAJD2B
- Posts: 871
- Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2012 12:37 am
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
Ev, what if it's a choice between NYU with no money and Cornell with $$$?
Nabadgelyo, true but I still think the Cornell name is more easily recognizable than the NYU name, especially overseas. Cornell's alumni network runs deep...as is the case for any Ivy I would imagine.
Nabadgelyo, true but I still think the Cornell name is more easily recognizable than the NYU name, especially overseas. Cornell's alumni network runs deep...as is the case for any Ivy I would imagine.
- applelover
- Posts: 1921
- Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2013 12:43 pm
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
Same.Dr.Zer0 wrote:Zero motivation to write my Yale two fidy =/
- Mojosodope
- Posts: 941
- Joined: Tue Jun 18, 2013 10:33 am
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
Cornell's alumni network probably does run deep, but Cornell Law's alumni network would be more important to you, for awhile at least.AAJD2B wrote:Ev, what if it's a choice between NYU with no money and Cornell with $$$?
Nabadgelyo, true but I still think the Cornell name is more easily recognizable than the NYU name, especially overseas. Cornell's alumni network runs deep...as is the case for any Ivy I would imagine.
NYU's class size is larger and has been ranked in the top 6 for a long time, which means that in the legal community their name is very well known and their alumni network is actually larger just due to sheer numbers alone.