URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are sharing sensitive information about bar exam prep. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned."
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are sharing sensitive information about bar exam prep. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned."
- okaygo
- Posts: 805
- Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2013 1:23 pm
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
As lame as it is, I do get legit excited when you all get acceptances! Success (even other peoples) makes me happy!
- JodieLovesChachi
- Posts: 174
- Joined: Mon Dec 30, 2013 11:01 pm
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
Ahhhhhh fxck that. Lol. "I love to see you fail, that feeling there's the shxt. I swear."okaygo wrote:As lame as it is, I do get legit excited when you all get acceptances! Success (even other peoples) makes me happy!
Hahaaa.

- ThePiedPiper
- Posts: 469
- Joined: Sat Jul 27, 2013 6:50 pm
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
+1okaygo wrote:As lame as it is, I do get legit excited when you all get acceptances! Success (even other peoples) makes me happy!
- Futuregohan14
- Posts: 196
- Joined: Mon Sep 02, 2013 10:41 pm
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
wowJodieLovesChachi wrote:Ahhhhhh fxck that. Lol. "I love to see you fail, that feeling there's the shxt. I swear."okaygo wrote:As lame as it is, I do get legit excited when you all get acceptances! Success (even other peoples) makes me happy!
Hahaaa.Just a little lyrical fun of course...
such Canadian
many Degrassi
last name walking
first name never
such biracial
started from bottom
now here
so talent
very music icon
JodieLovesDrizzy
wow
- JodieLovesChachi
- Posts: 174
- Joined: Mon Dec 30, 2013 11:01 pm
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
wowFuturegohan14 wrote:wowJodieLovesChachi wrote:Ahhhhhh fxck that. Lol. "I love to see you fail, that feeling there's the shxt. I swear."okaygo wrote:As lame as it is, I do get legit excited when you all get acceptances! Success (even other peoples) makes me happy!
Hahaaa.Just a little lyrical fun of course...
such Canadian
many Degrassi
last name walking
first name never
such biracial
started from bottom
now here
so talent
very music icon
JodieLovesDrizzy
wow
much keen
such recognize
many thanks
much love
wow
- Pozzy
- Posts: 15
- Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2013 11:21 am
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
do i stand a chance … especially being so late in the admission cycle AND with one of my recommenders not submitting his letter until jan 20th or later?
checking in. AA Female
UG GPA: 3.56
LSAC GPA: 3.48
Dec '13 LSAT: 163 (not thrilled about this)
i feel like back in '08 this may have been good enough for T14 but i think it's harder to get in to good schools now and this won't cut it. (HYS, NYU, Columbia are my interests)
any advice? seems like those of us getting into T14 either have 165+ or 3.5+ or are splitters. i just have a mediocre GPA and a mediocre LSAT.
checking in. AA Female
UG GPA: 3.56
LSAC GPA: 3.48
Dec '13 LSAT: 163 (not thrilled about this)
i feel like back in '08 this may have been good enough for T14 but i think it's harder to get in to good schools now and this won't cut it. (HYS, NYU, Columbia are my interests)
any advice? seems like those of us getting into T14 either have 165+ or 3.5+ or are splitters. i just have a mediocre GPA and a mediocre LSAT.
-
- Posts: 313
- Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 11:04 pm
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
http://mylsn.info/qxtqk3Pozzy wrote:do i stand a chance … especially being so late in the admission cycle AND with one of my recommenders not submitting his letter until jan 20th or later?
checking in. AA Female
UG GPA: 3.56
LSAC GPA: 3.48
Dec '13 LSAT: 163 (not thrilled about this)
i feel like back in '08 this may have been good enough for T14 but i think it's harder to get in to good schools now and this won't cut it. (HYS, NYU, Columbia are my interests)
any advice? seems like those of us getting into T14 either have 165+ or 3.5+ or are splitters. i just have a mediocre GPA and a mediocre LSAT.
Your chances for Columbia and NYU are looking good, though I'm not sure how your late-ish application will affect your chances (if it does at all, since I hear it doesn't for URMS)
- Futuregohan14
- Posts: 196
- Joined: Mon Sep 02, 2013 10:41 pm
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
wowPozzy wrote:do i stand a chance … especially being so late in the admission cycle AND with one of my recommenders not submitting his letter until jan 20th or later?
checking in. AA Female
UG GPA: 3.56
LSAC GPA: 3.48
Dec '13 LSAT: 163 (not thrilled about this)
i feel like back in '08 this may have been good enough for T14 but i think it's harder to get in to good schools now and this won't cut it. (HYS, NYU, Columbia are my interests)
any advice? seems like those of us getting into T14 either have 165+ or 3.5+ or are splitters. i just have a mediocre GPA and a mediocre LSAT.
such pessimist
too negative
many great chance
much opportunity
become positivePozzy
wow
Srsly: this talk about "easier in 08" doesn't even add up. The number of LSAT takers has fallen 45% since 2008, and the quality has gone down too (higher scorers have accounted for a disproportionate amount of that decline). The pool of applicants now is not only much smaller than it was 5 years ago, it is weaker too. A 163 puts you in a better position now than you'd have been in 5 years back.
http://thecareerist.typepad.com/thecare ... years.html
Even in 2008, a 163 for an AA was a lock for the T-14, especially when combined with a solid (3.48 is solid) GPA. You're well above the 99th percentile for AA test takers. There are less than 100 (probably 50-70 by my guess) AAs in the entire country with numbers superior to yours, and the T-14 took in 270+ AAs last year. Do the math. There are plenty of AAs in here with LSATs lower than yours and similar GPAs who have T-14 acceptances already.
http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 4&t=195443
Apply as soon as possible to as many T-14s (and a couple good T-20s) as you can and enjoy multiple acceptances.
If the rec comes in too late for this cycle, see if you can hold off until next cycle and apply very early (September) to as many T-14s as possible. You'll get results you'll like.

- Nova
- Posts: 9102
- Joined: Sun Apr 15, 2012 8:55 pm
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
^Nailed it.
Gohan is on fire
Gohan is on fire
- Pozzy
- Posts: 15
- Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2013 11:21 am
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
ironically my name (pozzy) was derived from positive, which i generally am. thanks for being uplifting (and factual) despite my negative nancy pessimistic spewing. my LSAT score was lower than I felt it would be & everything law school related hasn't been flowing as planned. idkkkk i hope I didn't bring anyone down especially since I come here for encouragement.Futuregohan14 wrote:wowPozzy wrote:do i stand a chance … especially being so late in the admission cycle AND with one of my recommenders not submitting his letter until jan 20th or later?
checking in. AA Female
UG GPA: 3.56
LSAC GPA: 3.48
Dec '13 LSAT: 163 (not thrilled about this)
i feel like back in '08 this may have been good enough for T14 but i think it's harder to get in to good schools now and this won't cut it. (HYS, NYU, Columbia are my interests)
any advice? seems like those of us getting into T14 either have 165+ or 3.5+ or are splitters. i just have a mediocre GPA and a mediocre LSAT.
such pessimist
too negative
many great chance
much opportunity
become positivePozzy
wow
Srsly: this talk about "easier in 08" doesn't even add up. The number of LSAT takers has fallen 45% since 2008, and the quality has gone down too (higher scorers have accounted for a disproportionate amount of that decline). The pool of applicants now is not only much smaller than it was 5 years ago, it is weaker too. A 163 puts you in a better position now than you'd have been in 5 years back.
http://thecareerist.typepad.com/thecare ... years.html
Even in 2008, a 163 for an AA was a lock for the T-14, especially when combined with a solid (3.48 is solid) GPA. You're well above the 99th percentile for AA test takers. There are less than 100 (probably 50-70 by my guess) AAs in the entire country with numbers superior to yours, and the T-14 took in 270+ AAs last year. Do the math. There are plenty of AAs in here with LSATs lower than yours and similar GPAs who have T-14 acceptances already.
http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 4&t=195443
Apply as soon as possible to as many T-14s (and a couple good T-20s) as you can and enjoy multiple acceptances.
If the rec comes in too late for this cycle, see if you can hold off until next cycle and apply very early (September) to as many T-14s as possible. You'll get results you'll like.
[img]http://i.imgur.com/hlONajx.gif
Great info. Thanks again. I will proceed based on these stats and put my current stinky Debbie downer demeanor aside.
-
- Posts: 1171
- Joined: Tue Jul 16, 2013 10:36 am
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
Welcome and what he said! ^^Futuregohan14 wrote:wowPozzy wrote:do i stand a chance … especially being so late in the admission cycle AND with one of my recommenders not submitting his letter until jan 20th or later?
checking in. AA Female
UG GPA: 3.56
LSAC GPA: 3.48
Dec '13 LSAT: 163 (not thrilled about this)
i feel like back in '08 this may have been good enough for T14 but i think it's harder to get in to good schools now and this won't cut it. (HYS, NYU, Columbia are my interests)
any advice? seems like those of us getting into T14 either have 165+ or 3.5+ or are splitters. i just have a mediocre GPA and a mediocre LSAT.
such pessimist
too negative
many great chance
much opportunity
become positivePozzy
wow
Srsly: this talk about "easier in 08" doesn't even add up. The number of LSAT takers has fallen 45% since 2008, and the quality has gone down too (higher scorers have accounted for a disproportionate amount of that decline). The pool of applicants now is not only much smaller than it was 5 years ago, it is weaker too. A 163 puts you in a better position now than you'd have been in 5 years back.
http://thecareerist.typepad.com/thecare ... years.html
Even in 2008, a 163 for an AA was a lock for the T-14, especially when combined with a solid (3.48 is solid) GPA. You're well above the 99th percentile for AA test takers. There are less than 100 (probably 50-70 by my guess) AAs in the entire country with numbers superior to yours, and the T-14 took in 270+ AAs last year. Do the math. There are plenty of AAs in here with LSATs lower than yours and similar GPAs who have T-14 acceptances already.
http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 4&t=195443
Apply as soon as possible to as many T-14s (and a couple good T-20s) as you can and enjoy multiple acceptances.
If the rec comes in too late for this cycle, see if you can hold off until next cycle and apply very early (September) to as many T-14s as possible. You'll get results you'll like.
- ThePiedPiper
- Posts: 469
- Joined: Sat Jul 27, 2013 6:50 pm
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
Remain confident and calm and all will work out. Your stars will align themselves. You just have to put your best foot forward with no regrets and dive right in. Don't let a score or a GPA allow you to second guess yourself. Just put your best foot forward and everything will work itself out on its on like cool butter. Take the risk and see what happens. Good luck on your cycle and welcome to the thread.Pozzy wrote:do i stand a chance … especially being so late in the admission cycle AND with one of my recommenders not submitting his letter until jan 20th or later?
checking in. AA Female
UG GPA: 3.56
LSAC GPA: 3.48
Dec '13 LSAT: 163 (not thrilled about this)
i feel like back in '08 this may have been good enough for T14 but i think it's harder to get in to good schools now and this won't cut it. (HYS, NYU, Columbia are my interests)
any advice? seems like those of us getting into T14 either have 165+ or 3.5+ or are splitters. i just have a mediocre GPA and a mediocre LSAT.
- teampeeta
- Posts: 422
- Joined: Sat Jul 13, 2013 7:36 pm
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
There was an AA female with a 3.54/163 who got Harvard last cycle: http://lawschoolnumbers.com/xpxgymnxpx. I think she did the Peace Corps (so her softs were great), but her numbers clearly didn't keep her out. This woman also got in: http://lawschoolnumbers.com/khaleesiqueen (I know her GPA is higher than yours, but her LSAT is 2 points lower).Pozzy wrote:do i stand a chance … especially being so late in the admission cycle AND with one of my recommenders not submitting his letter until jan 20th or later?
checking in. AA Female
UG GPA: 3.56
LSAC GPA: 3.48
Dec '13 LSAT: 163 (not thrilled about this)
i feel like back in '08 this may have been good enough for T14 but i think it's harder to get in to good schools now and this won't cut it. (HYS, NYU, Columbia are my interests)
any advice? seems like those of us getting into T14 either have 165+ or 3.5+ or are splitters. i just have a mediocre GPA and a mediocre LSAT.
I imagine you'll do okay, especially with the drop in applicants.
- jlk411
- Posts: 193
- Joined: Mon Dec 30, 2013 6:52 pm
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
where on your lsac acct do you find the lsac gpa?Pozzy wrote:do i stand a chance … especially being so late in the admission cycle AND with one of my recommenders not submitting his letter until jan 20th or later?
checking in. AA Female
UG GPA: 3.56
LSAC GPA: 3.48
Dec '13 LSAT: 163 (not thrilled about this)
i feel like back in '08 this may have been good enough for T14 but i think it's harder to get in to good schools now and this won't cut it. (HYS, NYU, Columbia are my interests)
any advice? seems like those of us getting into T14 either have 165+ or 3.5+ or are splitters. i just have a mediocre GPA and a mediocre LSAT.
- KingJamesLBJ
- Posts: 194
- Joined: Fri Nov 08, 2013 11:22 pm
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
jlk411 wrote:where on your lsac acct do you find the lsac gpa?Pozzy wrote:do i stand a chance … especially being so late in the admission cycle AND with one of my recommenders not submitting his letter until jan 20th or later?
checking in. AA Female
UG GPA: 3.56
LSAC GPA: 3.48
Dec '13 LSAT: 163 (not thrilled about this)
i feel like back in '08 this may have been good enough for T14 but i think it's harder to get in to good schools now and this won't cut it. (HYS, NYU, Columbia are my interests)
any advice? seems like those of us getting into T14 either have 165+ or 3.5+ or are splitters. i just have a mediocre GPA and a mediocre LSAT.
Its at the bottom of your academic summary report
- jlk411
- Posts: 193
- Joined: Mon Dec 30, 2013 6:52 pm
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
perfect, thanks! yeah, i ended up calling lsac and asking them.KingJamesLBJ wrote:jlk411 wrote:where on your lsac acct do you find the lsac gpa?Pozzy wrote:do i stand a chance … especially being so late in the admission cycle AND with one of my recommenders not submitting his letter until jan 20th or later?
checking in. AA Female
UG GPA: 3.56
LSAC GPA: 3.48
Dec '13 LSAT: 163 (not thrilled about this)
i feel like back in '08 this may have been good enough for T14 but i think it's harder to get in to good schools now and this won't cut it. (HYS, NYU, Columbia are my interests)
any advice? seems like those of us getting into T14 either have 165+ or 3.5+ or are splitters. i just have a mediocre GPA and a mediocre LSAT.
Its at the bottom of your academic summary report
- Tariffs
- Posts: 95
- Joined: Sat Jun 08, 2013 1:55 pm
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
In at Cornell earlier today!
4 for 4 so far and it's only January, feelin real good right now.

4 for 4 so far and it's only January, feelin real good right now.
- ThePiedPiper
- Posts: 469
- Joined: Sat Jul 27, 2013 6:50 pm
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
Congrats Tariffs on all the acceptance!!! That's a big dealTariffs wrote:In at Cornell earlier today!![]()
4 for 4 so far and it's only January, feelin real good right now.
- BobMoses
- Posts: 56
- Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 10:25 pm
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
CongratsTariffs wrote:In at Cornell earlier today!![]()
4 for 4 so far and it's only January, feelin real good right now.
- JodieLovesChachi
- Posts: 174
- Joined: Mon Dec 30, 2013 11:01 pm
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
Clutch! Where else have you been accepted to?!Tariffs wrote:In at Cornell earlier today!![]()
4 for 4 so far and it's only January, feelin real good right now.
-
- Posts: 288
- Joined: Mon Sep 02, 2013 4:57 pm
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
BobMoses wrote:CongratsTariffs wrote:In at Cornell earlier today!![]()
4 for 4 so far and it's only January, feelin real good right now.
- Tariffs
- Posts: 95
- Joined: Sat Jun 08, 2013 1:55 pm
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
Thanks for the love everyone!
GW, UC Berkeley, and NYUJodieLovesChachi wrote:Clutch! Where else have you been accepted to?!
- JodieLovesChachi
- Posts: 174
- Joined: Mon Dec 30, 2013 11:01 pm
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
Killin' it! Here's to hoping that we all shoot somewhere near that percentage..Tariffs wrote:Thanks for the love everyone!
GW, UC Berkeley, and NYUJodieLovesChachi wrote:Clutch! Where else have you been accepted to?!
Leh go!
- coolbean2013
- Posts: 275
- Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2012 8:24 pm
Re: URM 2013-2014 Cycle Thread
ThePiedPiper wrote:Congrats Tariffs on all the acceptance!!! That's a big dealTariffs wrote:In at Cornell earlier today!![]()
4 for 4 so far and it's only January, feelin real good right now.