URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread Forum

Share experiences and seek insight regarding your experience as an underrepresented minority within the legal community.
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting

Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are sharing sensitive information about bar exam prep. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.

Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned."
User avatar
dietcoke1

Silver
Posts: 1326
Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2016 8:18 pm

Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread

Post by dietcoke1 » Tue Jan 03, 2017 7:24 pm

musiclover123 wrote:Long time lurker on this thread!

MA female, just submitted apps, super excited :D
good luck!

User avatar
brinicolec

Gold
Posts: 4479
Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2016 7:09 pm

Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread

Post by brinicolec » Tue Jan 03, 2017 7:44 pm

dinan15 wrote:Hey guys, checking in!! [MA female, 170, 3.9] Completed my apps December 1st [T14 and UCLA] and have been accepted to UCLA and Duke so far, and interviews with Georgetown and Harvard. Deciding to post to calm the nerves, ahhhh! We're all in this together!
You'll have a great cycle with those numbers. Congrats!

noroomfordoubt

New
Posts: 11
Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2016 10:35 pm

Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread

Post by noroomfordoubt » Wed Jan 04, 2017 12:46 am

Hey y'all! Checking in. Queer black woman planning to do PI work. In at Duke, GULC, and NYU (top choice!!) in 2016, hoping for good news in 2017 re: $$$ and other schools!
Congrats to everybody so far and good luck going forward!

User avatar
Barack O'Drama

Gold
Posts: 3272
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2012 7:21 pm

Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread

Post by Barack O'Drama » Wed Jan 04, 2017 12:48 am

Congrats to everyone who got their scores back! Good luck to all my fellow URMS this cycle :)
Last edited by Barack O'Drama on Fri Jan 26, 2018 7:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Mr_Chukes

Silver
Posts: 1162
Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2016 5:01 pm

Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread

Post by Mr_Chukes » Wed Jan 04, 2017 12:50 am

noroomfordoubt wrote:Hey y'all! Checking in. Queer black woman planning to do PI work. In at Duke, GULC, and NYU (top choice!!) in 2016, hoping for good news in 2017 re: $$$ and other schools!
Congrats to everybody so far and good luck going forward!
Congrats! I'm happy for you. :) I'm still waiting for 15 schools lol. Wish you the best.

User avatar
brinicolec

Gold
Posts: 4479
Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2016 7:09 pm

Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread

Post by brinicolec » Wed Jan 04, 2017 12:58 am

noroomfordoubt wrote:Hey y'all! Checking in. Queer black woman planning to do PI work. In at Duke, GULC, and NYU (top choice!!) in 2016, hoping for good news in 2017 re: $$$ and other schools!
Congrats to everybody so far and good luck going forward!
Awesome cycle for you so far. Congrats!

uhwrestler

Bronze
Posts: 291
Joined: Thu Oct 22, 2015 11:44 pm

Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread

Post by uhwrestler » Wed Jan 04, 2017 11:52 am

does it seem like urm's are down this year especially aa's?

beantheshadow

Bronze
Posts: 223
Joined: Tue May 12, 2015 3:05 pm

Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread

Post by beantheshadow » Wed Jan 04, 2017 12:25 pm

dinan15 wrote:Hey guys, checking in!! [MA female, 170, 3.9] Completed my apps December 1st [T14 and UCLA] and have been accepted to UCLA and Duke so far, and interviews with Georgetown and Harvard. Deciding to post to calm the nerves, ahhhh! We're all in this together!

Great cycle so far! Congrats!

beantheshadow

Bronze
Posts: 223
Joined: Tue May 12, 2015 3:05 pm

Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread

Post by beantheshadow » Wed Jan 04, 2017 12:26 pm

musiclover123 wrote:Long time lurker on this thread!

MA female, just submitted apps, super excited :D

Good luck!

User avatar
PrezRand

Gold
Posts: 1608
Joined: Sat Jun 13, 2015 4:31 pm

Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread

Post by PrezRand » Wed Jan 04, 2017 1:41 pm

uhwrestler wrote:does it seem like urm's are down this year especially aa's?
Seems like that is the case. A couple of us were planning on applying this cycle but chose to apply for the next

User avatar
brinicolec

Gold
Posts: 4479
Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2016 7:09 pm

Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread

Post by brinicolec » Wed Jan 04, 2017 3:29 pm

uhwrestler wrote:does it seem like urm's are down this year especially aa's?
Are you basing that on this thread or have you seen some data?

uhwrestler

Bronze
Posts: 291
Joined: Thu Oct 22, 2015 11:44 pm

Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread

Post by uhwrestler » Wed Jan 04, 2017 3:31 pm

brinicolec wrote:
uhwrestler wrote:does it seem like urm's are down this year especially aa's?
Are you basing that on this thread or have you seen some data?

spiveys data and activity on the urm forum compared to last years cycle

User avatar
brinicolec

Gold
Posts: 4479
Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2016 7:09 pm

Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread

Post by brinicolec » Wed Jan 04, 2017 3:32 pm

uhwrestler wrote:
brinicolec wrote:
uhwrestler wrote:does it seem like urm's are down this year especially aa's?
Are you basing that on this thread or have you seen some data?

spiveys data and activity on the urm forum compared to last years cycle

Haven't seen Spivey's data but I wouldn't be surprised if it were.

uhwrestler

Bronze
Posts: 291
Joined: Thu Oct 22, 2015 11:44 pm

Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread

Post by uhwrestler » Wed Jan 04, 2017 3:36 pm

brinicolec wrote:
uhwrestler wrote:
brinicolec wrote:
uhwrestler wrote:does it seem like urm's are down this year especially aa's?
Are you basing that on this thread or have you seen some data?

spiveys data and activity on the urm forum compared to last years cycle

Haven't seen Spivey's data but I wouldn't be surprised if it were.
the data showed aa applicants were down
and that high lsat scores overall were down
but it had no data on if high urm lsat scores were also down
but i think its safe to assume they are also down

User avatar
hammy393

Bronze
Posts: 390
Joined: Tue Nov 15, 2016 9:51 pm

Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread

Post by hammy393 » Wed Jan 04, 2017 6:42 pm

uhwrestler wrote:
brinicolec wrote:
uhwrestler wrote:
brinicolec wrote:
uhwrestler wrote:does it seem like urm's are down this year especially aa's?
Are you basing that on this thread or have you seen some data?

spiveys data and activity on the urm forum compared to last years cycle

Haven't seen Spivey's data but I wouldn't be surprised if it were.
the data showed aa applicants were down
and that high lsat scores overall were down
but it had no data on if high urm lsat scores were also down
but i think its safe to assume they are also down

Here's the data: http://blog.spiveyconsulting.com/2016-2 ... 12-9-2016/

As of early December, URM applicants are down

AAs down by 10%
Latinos, 2.5%
Puerto Ricans, 2.8%
Native Americans, 9%

User avatar
brinicolec

Gold
Posts: 4479
Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2016 7:09 pm

Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread

Post by brinicolec » Wed Jan 04, 2017 6:48 pm

hammy393 wrote:
uhwrestler wrote:
brinicolec wrote:
uhwrestler wrote:
brinicolec wrote:
uhwrestler wrote:does it seem like urm's are down this year especially aa's?
Are you basing that on this thread or have you seen some data?

spiveys data and activity on the urm forum compared to last years cycle

Haven't seen Spivey's data but I wouldn't be surprised if it were.
the data showed aa applicants were down
and that high lsat scores overall were down
but it had no data on if high urm lsat scores were also down
but i think its safe to assume they are also down

Here's the data: http://blog.spiveyconsulting.com/2016-2 ... 12-9-2016/

As of early December, URM applicants are down

AAs down by 10%
Latinos, 2.5%
Puerto Ricans, 2.8%
Native Americans, 9%
Hate that URMS apps are down because we are seriously underrepresented in the profession but I like that us being down may slightly increase my odds.

Hi-So - ArshavinFan

Bronze
Posts: 197
Joined: Thu Mar 26, 2015 4:51 pm

Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread

Post by Hi-So - ArshavinFan » Wed Jan 04, 2017 7:52 pm

deleted
Last edited by Hi-So - ArshavinFan on Tue Apr 04, 2017 6:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Mr_Chukes

Silver
Posts: 1162
Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2016 5:01 pm

Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread

Post by Mr_Chukes » Thu Jan 05, 2017 2:50 pm

brinicolec wrote:
hammy393 wrote:
uhwrestler wrote:
brinicolec wrote:
uhwrestler wrote:
brinicolec wrote:
uhwrestler wrote:does it seem like urm's are down this year especially aa's?
Are you basing that on this thread or have you seen some data?

spiveys data and activity on the urm forum compared to last years cycle

Haven't seen Spivey's data but I wouldn't be surprised if it were.
the data showed aa applicants were down
and that high lsat scores overall were down
but it had no data on if high urm lsat scores were also down
but i think its safe to assume they are also down

Here's the data: http://blog.spiveyconsulting.com/2016-2 ... 12-9-2016/

As of early December, URM applicants are down

AAs down by 10%
Latinos, 2.5%
Puerto Ricans, 2.8%
Native Americans, 9%
Hate that URMS apps are down because we are seriously underrepresented in the profession but I like that us being down may slightly increase my odds.
That is what I was going to say. Better odds for us. Lower scores as well increase the chances.

latif

New
Posts: 37
Joined: Tue May 17, 2016 1:44 pm

Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread

Post by latif » Thu Jan 05, 2017 5:25 pm

Anybody getting more fee waivers after Dec LSAT? I got Cornell, Georgetown today and a bunch of randoms today, I previously got Chicago and UVA.
Also a theory: if you have certain schools on your LSAC list, then you won't get fee waivers from them? I deleted Columbia and NYU hoping that they would send out fee waivers as a result, any thoughts on this strategy?

lawschool2017712

Bronze
Posts: 119
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 6:38 pm

Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread

Post by lawschool2017712 » Thu Jan 05, 2017 5:41 pm

x
Last edited by lawschool2017712 on Wed Feb 22, 2017 1:07 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
brinicolec

Gold
Posts: 4479
Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2016 7:09 pm

Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread

Post by brinicolec » Thu Jan 05, 2017 5:54 pm

lawschool2017712 wrote:
latif wrote:Anybody getting more fee waivers after Dec LSAT? I got Cornell, Georgetown today and a bunch of randoms today, I previously got Chicago and UVA.
Also a theory: if you have certain schools on your LSAC list, then you won't get fee waivers from them? I deleted Columbia and NYU hoping that they would send out fee waivers as a result, any thoughts on this strategy?
I don't think it matters. I've had the entire t14 on my LSAC list since June/July and it didn't impact getting unsolicited waivers from t14 minus YHS.
Having schools on the list doesn't matter. Hell, having partially-completed apps doesn't matter. I got unsolicited waivers from most t14s.

Also, I randomly got a UMD waiver today, though I think I also got one before. I didn't retake in December though so I'm not sure why I got it lol

latif

New
Posts: 37
Joined: Tue May 17, 2016 1:44 pm

Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread

Post by latif » Thu Jan 05, 2017 5:57 pm

Having schools on the list doesn't matter. Hell, having partially-completed apps doesn't matter. I got unsolicited waivers from most t14s.

Also, I randomly got a UMD waiver today, though I think I also got one before. I didn't retake in December though so I'm not sure why I got it lol
They are getting desperate?!

Dip

New
Posts: 27
Joined: Tue Oct 13, 2015 10:05 am

Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread

Post by Dip » Thu Jan 05, 2017 10:26 pm

latif wrote:Anybody getting more fee waivers after Dec LSAT? I got Cornell, Georgetown today and a bunch of randoms today, I previously got Chicago and UVA.
Also a theory: if you have certain schools on your LSAC list, then you won't get fee waivers from them? I deleted Columbia and NYU hoping that they would send out fee waivers as a result, any thoughts on this strategy?
I have also gotten some more fee waivers today.

janereacher

Bronze
Posts: 121
Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2016 4:12 am

Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread

Post by janereacher » Fri Jan 06, 2017 1:25 am

latif wrote:Anybody getting more fee waivers after Dec LSAT? I got Cornell, Georgetown today and a bunch of randoms today, I previously got Chicago and UVA.
Also a theory: if you have certain schools on your LSAC list, then you won't get fee waivers from them? I deleted Columbia and NYU hoping that they would send out fee waivers as a result, any thoughts on this strategy?
I got several today as well... Cornell, Georgetown, Emory, BU, UNC, WUSTL, Duke, U Chicago, UVA (silent), and Northwestern (silent). My LSAT was disappointing so I am hoping this is a sign of desperation that will work in my favor.
Last edited by janereacher on Fri Jan 06, 2017 8:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
dietcoke1

Silver
Posts: 1326
Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2016 8:18 pm

Re: URM 2016-2017 Cycle Thread

Post by dietcoke1 » Fri Jan 06, 2017 5:25 pm

if anyone has yet to add their data to the spreadsheet following the Dec LSAT, please add it !

Post Reply Post Anonymous Reply  

Return to “Underrepresented Law Students”