Yeah sophie... what the heck!?GAIAtheCHEERLEADER wrote: This is the first time I've ever heard of anyone being "pretty positive" about scoring in the 99%ile...
And why hasn't LSAC released it?
I almost didn't want to say it but your whole story just seems too bizarre to me
URM 2010-2011 Application Cycle Forum
					Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
 
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are sharing sensitive information about bar exam prep. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
 
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned."
	Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are sharing sensitive information about bar exam prep. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned."
- Fresh
 
- Posts: 681
 - Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2010 4:30 pm
 
Re: URM 2010-2011 Application Cycle
- ToriM
 
- Posts: 73
 - Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2010 8:31 pm
 
Re: URM 2010-2011 Application Cycle
.............
			
			
									
									
						- 
				Kaitlyn
 
- Posts: 149
 - Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2010 2:06 pm
 
Re: URM 2010-2011 Application Cycle
.
			
			
													
					Last edited by Kaitlyn on Sat Jan 29, 2011 1:52 pm, edited 1 time in total.
									
			
									
						- timmna
 
- Posts: 524
 - Joined: Sat Jun 19, 2010 11:15 am
 
Re: URM 2010-2011 Application Cycle
Congratulations!!Kaitlyn wrote:Wow, you guys weren't kidding...in at UVA as of 30 minutes ago.vanwinkle wrote:I want to reaffirm what Gaia said, and note that a 160/3.98 is strong everywhere. As an AA female, you have a shot at even HYS with that combination; a GPA that high sends a really strong signal to schools. Also, the top schools are looking to increase diversity, and are more likely to overlook things like averaging scores for someone like you. You could further help your cause by writing an LSAT addendum, but I'm not sure that's even necessary.Kaitlyn wrote:Thanks for responding! I forgot to add that I had a 3.98 GPA and double majored in English and Philosophy. I'm primarily worried about my LSAT scores though that, if averaged, would be below the 160 mark, which seems like the danger zone for URM candidates.
Good luck with your cycle, though I have a feeling you won't need any to do well.
My head is spinning.
- LLB2JD
 
- Posts: 660
 - Joined: Tue Sep 29, 2009 5:32 pm
 
Re: URM 2010-2011 Application Cycle
Yay. CongratsKaitlyn wrote:Wow, you guys weren't kidding...in at UVA as of 30 minutes ago.vanwinkle wrote:I want to reaffirm what Gaia said, and note that a 160/3.98 is strong everywhere. As an AA female, you have a shot at even HYS with that combination; a GPA that high sends a really strong signal to schools. Also, the top schools are looking to increase diversity, and are more likely to overlook things like averaging scores for someone like you. You could further help your cause by writing an LSAT addendum, but I'm not sure that's even necessary.Kaitlyn wrote:Thanks for responding! I forgot to add that I had a 3.98 GPA and double majored in English and Philosophy. I'm primarily worried about my LSAT scores though that, if averaged, would be below the 160 mark, which seems like the danger zone for URM candidates.
Good luck with your cycle, though I have a feeling you won't need any to do well.
My head is spinning.
- EbonyEsq
 
- Posts: 264
 - Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2010 10:06 am
 
Re: URM 2010-2011 Application Cycle
Dear Kaitlyn,
Much congratulations!!!!
Best,
Susanna
  
  
			
			
									
									
						Much congratulations!!!!
Best,
Susanna
- Knock
 
- Posts: 5151
 - Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2009 3:09 pm
 
Re: URM 2010-2011 Application Cycle
Congrats on UVA!Kaitlyn wrote:Wow, you guys weren't kidding...in at UVA as of 30 minutes ago.vanwinkle wrote:I want to reaffirm what Gaia said, and note that a 160/3.98 is strong everywhere. As an AA female, you have a shot at even HYS with that combination; a GPA that high sends a really strong signal to schools. Also, the top schools are looking to increase diversity, and are more likely to overlook things like averaging scores for someone like you. You could further help your cause by writing an LSAT addendum, but I'm not sure that's even necessary.Kaitlyn wrote:Thanks for responding! I forgot to add that I had a 3.98 GPA and double majored in English and Philosophy. I'm primarily worried about my LSAT scores though that, if averaged, would be below the 160 mark, which seems like the danger zone for URM candidates.
Good luck with your cycle, though I have a feeling you won't need any to do well.
My head is spinning.
- vanwinkle
 
- Posts: 8953
 - Joined: Sun Dec 21, 2008 3:02 am
 
Re: URM 2010-2011 Application Cycle
Congrats on your first of what should be many admissions!Kaitlyn wrote:Wow, you guys weren't kidding...in at UVA as of 30 minutes ago.
My head is spinning.
- LLB2JD
 
- Posts: 660
 - Joined: Tue Sep 29, 2009 5:32 pm
 
Re: URM 2010-2011 Application Cycle
EbonyEsq wrote:Dear Kaitlyn,
Much congratulations!!!!
Best,
Susanna![]()
![]()
LOLz
- Knock
 
- Posts: 5151
 - Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2009 3:09 pm
 
Re: URM 2010-2011 Application Cycle
Just curious how other MA cycles are going. Anyone get a JR1 or some acceptances?
			
			
									
									
						- 20121109
 
- Posts: 1611
 - Joined: Mon Apr 27, 2009 8:19 pm
 
Re: URM 2010-2011 Application Cycle
vanwinkle wrote:Congrats on your first of what should be many admissions!Kaitlyn wrote:Wow, you guys weren't kidding...in at UVA as of 30 minutes ago.
My head is spinning.
- Fresh
 
- Posts: 681
 - Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2010 4:30 pm
 
Re: URM 2010-2011 Application Cycle
Congrats!!!
Other good news - I got my JR1 today!
			
			
									
									
						Other good news - I got my JR1 today!
- EbonyEsq
 
- Posts: 264
 - Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2010 10:06 am
 
Re: URM 2010-2011 Application Cycle
Boo-yah!Fresh wrote:Congrats!!!
Other good news - I got my JR1 today!
Yeah, you already know you either heading to Cambridge, New Haven or Palo Alto.
- Knock
 
- Posts: 5151
 - Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2009 3:09 pm
 
Re: URM 2010-2011 Application Cycle
Congrats Fresh!!! That's awesomeFresh wrote:Congrats!!!
Other good news - I got my JR1 today!
- Fresh
 
- Posts: 681
 - Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2010 4:30 pm
 
Re: URM 2010-2011 Application Cycle
Thannnnnnnks all!! I hope we get some more of these soon
			
			
									
									
						- timmna
 
- Posts: 524
 - Joined: Sat Jun 19, 2010 11:15 am
 
Re: URM 2010-2011 Application Cycle
Congrats!! Also, shoot some of that success my way!Fresh wrote:Thannnnnnnks all!! I hope we get some more of these soon
- CryingMonkey
 
- Posts: 148
 - Joined: Tue May 04, 2010 1:22 pm
 
Re: URM 2010-2011 Application Cycle
CryingMonkey wrote:
Berkeley (UR 10/18)
Chicago (complete 10/15)
Columbia
Cornell (complete 11/10)
Duke (UR 10/19)
Georgetown (accepted 11/12)
Harvard (jr1 11/4)
Texas (accepted 11/3)
UVA (accepted 11/9)
Michigan
NYU (being processed 11/7)
Northwestern
Stanford
Yale (still working on 250 i swear I'll submit someday)
- 
				Kaitlyn
 
- Posts: 149
 - Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2010 2:06 pm
 
Re: URM 2010-2011 Application Cycle
Fresh wrote:Congrats!!!
Other good news - I got my JR1 today!
Thanks everyone!! And congratulations, Fresh! I'm sure you're a lock at this point.
- s0ph1e2007
 
- Posts: 1043
 - Joined: Sat Oct 10, 2009 10:37 pm
 
Re: URM 2010-2011 Application Cycle
haha I'm sorry... you think it's bizarre that anyone could expect above a 173 or that a URM does? That's a mildly disappointing comment... Maybe you need to reconsider your expectations. I met a fellow URM the other day who went to Harvard got a 3.8 and then 180d his first LSAT.GAIAtheCHEERLEADER wrote: This is the first time I've ever heard of anyone being "pretty positive" about scoring in the 99%ile...
And why hasn't LSAC released it?
I almost didn't want to say it but your whole story just seems too bizarre to me
Also, I posted my story elsewhere. It's a test center hold because of noise in the center.
- mpasi
 
- Posts: 322
 - Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2008 5:26 pm
 
Re: URM 2010-2011 Application Cycle
It's pretty obvious that she meant the former. And playing the race card won't work with Gaia, she's a URM at Harvard.s0ph1e2007 wrote:haha I'm sorry... you think it's bizarre that anyone could expect above a 173 or that a URM does? That's a mildly disappointing comment... Maybe you need to reconsider your expectations. I met a fellow URM the other day who went to Harvard got a 3.8 and then 180d his first LSAT.GAIAtheCHEERLEADER wrote: This is the first time I've ever heard of anyone being "pretty positive" about scoring in the 99%ile...
And why hasn't LSAC released it?
I almost didn't want to say it but your whole story just seems too bizarre to me
Also, I posted my story elsewhere. It's a test center hold because of noise in the center.
- s0ph1e2007
 
- Posts: 1043
 - Joined: Sat Oct 10, 2009 10:37 pm
 
Re: URM 2010-2011 Application Cycle
dumb convo
			
			
													
					Last edited by s0ph1e2007 on Sun Nov 14, 2010 12:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.
									
			
									
						- mpasi
 
- Posts: 322
 - Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2008 5:26 pm
 
Re: URM 2010-2011 Application Cycle
I haven't met any other TLS member quite as nutty as you. Sorry.s0ph1e2007 wrote:This is the URM forum.. I'm aware she is a URM. That doesn't preclude her from underestimating other URMs. I wasn't sure what she meant though, since there are quite a few TLSers on here, who expect higher than 173 on their LSATs. I think it's reasonable... anyways. dumb conversation; I was just a little taken aback by the comment- seemed to imply that I was some sort of troll. Don't want to have to deal with that. I'm just like every other psycho overly obsessed TLSer on here lolmpasi wrote:It's pretty obvious that she meant the former. And playing the race card won't work with Gaia, she's a URM at Harvard.s0ph1e2007 wrote:haha I'm sorry... you think it's bizarre that anyone could expect above a 173 or that a URM does? That's a mildly disappointing comment... Maybe you need to reconsider your expectations. I met a fellow URM the other day who went to Harvard got a 3.8 and then 180d his first LSAT.GAIAtheCHEERLEADER wrote: This is the first time I've ever heard of anyone being "pretty positive" about scoring in the 99%ile...
And why hasn't LSAC released it?
I almost didn't want to say it but your whole story just seems too bizarre to me
Also, I posted my story elsewhere. It's a test center hold because of noise in the center.
- s0ph1e2007
 
- Posts: 1043
 - Joined: Sat Oct 10, 2009 10:37 pm
 
Re: URM 2010-2011 Application Cycle
ha why is that? because I want to do well on my lsat? yea that's crazy...mpasi wrote:
I haven't met any other TLS member quite as nutty as you. Sorry.
... also, any particular reason you're trying to be so rude?
- 20121109
 
- Posts: 1611
 - Joined: Mon Apr 27, 2009 8:19 pm
 
Re: URM 2010-2011 Application Cycle
Underestimating URMs, huh? Yeah.....that's a pretty unsubstantiated comment. I don't think that questioning someone who appears to be weirdly naive as to assume a score in the 99%ile constitutes as an underestimation. There's a difference between expecting/hoping for a score in 99%ile and assuming that you actually have a score in the 99%ile without actually seeing your score. I have absolutely no reason to discourage another fellow URM, and quite honestly, the posters who are most familiar with me know that I would probably be the last person to do such a thing.s0ph1e2007 wrote:This is the URM forum.. I'm aware she is a URM. That doesn't preclude her from underestimating other URMs. I wasn't sure what she meant though, since there are quite a few TLSers on here, who expect higher than 173 on their LSATs. I think it's reasonable... anyways. dumb conversation; I was just a little taken aback by the comment- seemed to imply that I was some sort of troll. Don't want to have to deal with that. I'm just like every other psycho overly obsessed TLSer on here lolmpasi wrote:It's pretty obvious that she meant the former. And playing the race card won't work with Gaia, she's a URM at Harvard.s0ph1e2007 wrote:haha I'm sorry... you think it's bizarre that anyone could expect above a 173 or that a URM does? That's a mildly disappointing comment... Maybe you need to reconsider your expectations. I met a fellow URM the other day who went to Harvard got a 3.8 and then 180d his first LSAT.GAIAtheCHEERLEADER wrote: This is the first time I've ever heard of anyone being "pretty positive" about scoring in the 99%ile...
And why hasn't LSAC released it?
I almost didn't want to say it but your whole story just seems too bizarre to me
Also, I posted my story elsewhere. It's a test center hold because of noise in the center.
But I'm not about to derail this thread. So...if you feel like you have anything more to say to me, please feel free to PM me.
- vanwinkle
 
- Posts: 8953
 - Joined: Sun Dec 21, 2008 3:02 am
 
Re: URM 2010-2011 Application Cycle
I've known GAIA for a while now on this forum and can say confidently that she is not this type of person at all.s0ph1e2007 wrote:This is the URM forum.. I'm aware she is a URM. That doesn't preclude her from underestimating other URMs.
Hopefully people can let this topic die and move it elsewhere, such as PMs or the lounge, and this thread can return to its intended purpose.